uwhede9865's profile

uwhede9865's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience More than 20 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. LIN Gaoyuan ALC
      Racket

      LIN Gaoyuan ALC

    2. DIGNICS 05
      Rubber (Front)

      DIGNICS 05

    3. TENERGY 05
      Rubber (Back)

      TENERGY 05

      TENERGY 05 has a unique feeling using a combination of Spring Sponge technology, High Tension rub...

User review

  • TARGET PRO GT-H47

    User review

    47g at Max.
    ・ The shot feeling is very good, and you can hit the ball as you imagined!
    ・ Stops and Tsuttsuki stop well, and it's easy to hit meat!
    -Overwrite counter drive for hitting the top is easy to hit!
    Even if I hit it hard, I didn't feel that the rubber hit the racket strongly, and I felt that it was a very strong rubber.
    I imagine that this would be as good as the drive of the top players.
    Although the arch line was low, it was a rubber with a very stable feeling.
    However, compared to GT-X51, the amount of rotation and speed became unsatisfactory.
    As with the GT-X51, I understand why it is compared to Tena.
    The grain compared to Tena 05 is probably close to 80, and it is a rubber that balances rotation and speed.
    Please refer.

    See original review

    2020/12/24
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    7
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • LIN Gaoyuan ALC

    User review

    91 g in FL.
    As you can see from the headline, I think it is a racket that is almost the same as Zhang Jike ALC but has a different design.
    The center of gravity is on the grip side, and the grip shape is also a round FL, so I felt only the weight difference from Zhang Jike ALC.
    Therefore, the feature is
    1. Stronger arch line than outer ZLC! 2. The shot feeling and operability are similar to ZLC. Hold it firmly because it is soft! 3. Especially the backhand is good and you can feel the ball holding!
    And the comparison of other rackets is the same.
    It is easy to power drive the lower rotation of about half long, and compared to ZLC, it has a ball holding and the blade thickness is thick, so you can get a long distance, you can get power and it takes rotation and you can feel like 7 plywood. It is a racket that holds the ball firmly compared to Timothy and feels the good center of gravity of the grip.
    Compared to Stradivarius, there are few strange over mistakes, and I feel the difference due to the difference in composition (Aramid carbon with Ayous, ALC and Lin Gaoyuan ALC of Limba). I think Lin Gaoyuan ALC is preferred by more advanced players.
    The disadvantage is still the royal road, so is it difficult to differentiate from other players?
    We also review it on our blog, so please refer to it.

    See original review

    2021/03/07
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

    Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 19

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • 5Q VIP

    User review

    2.1 mm used, 50 g.
    ・ It is not just a soft rubber, but a high-quality ball that can be used by top players.
    ・ Easy to adjust! High quality drive is easy even in the upper rotation rally!
    -Although it is a soft rubber, the momentum is weak, so you will not make a mistake even if you take the plunge.
    I was surprised to see a high quality ball that can be used even in the foreground.
    Also, it has a very good ball holding, which can be felt even in Tsuttsuki, flick, riding from the middle team and fish, and as the headline says, "Is this what it means to grab and release the ball !?" It was a hit feeling.
    It was a little affected by rotation and it was difficult to drive blocks and counter drives, but it was easy to handle because I could draw the arch line I wanted and screw it into the table from anywhere.
    It is a rubber that compensates for the poor feel of hitting, not surprisingly high performance.
    It's a little expensive, but it was a good rubber that can be recommended for beginners and intermediates.
    At least I think it's definitely easier to handle and softer than Quantum X Pro.
    It is recommended to purchase for a new feeling by using discounts.

    See original review

    2021/01/22
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    8
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • RHYZER PRO45

    User review

    48g at Max.
    -Very soft, just soft tension rubber!
    ・ Meet counters are very easy to do! What does it mean to enter like this!
    -The block is also soft and easy to put in if you hit it!
    It's a fairly soft tension rubber, but the seat is hard, so the counter meat was very nice.
    Rather than driving, I felt that I could enter fairly stably just by making a certain angle and hitting it with a bang.
    I think that the opponent does not like to attack at the counter rather than attacking with rotation.
    It's easy to handle, but I personally prefer hard rubber. When I used it, the softness of the sponge made it slippery. I felt that it took some getting used to.
    Among the soft tension rubbers that are popular in Europe, I think they have high performance.
    For curtain hitting and serving, I felt that I could get the same rotation as Tena by firmly biting it.
    Please refer.

    See original review

    2021/01/01
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • DNA PLATINUM XH

    User review

    53g hardness tester (Tena 05): Sheet side 45.4 (44.6), Sponge side 44.6 (43.3)
    -Easy to handle and high rotation performance that does not make you feel 52.5 °!
    -The grain of the sheet is thick, and it has a stronger grip than R53!
    -Good compatibility with wood and inner carbon!
    The seat bites well, and I felt that it was a rubber like Tena 05 or Tena 19 except for the weight. The counter is a little difficult because it looks like Tena.
    Even with a backhand loop drive with high rotation performance and low technical level, the other party flirted. Compared to R53 and MX-D, which have post-tenergy tension, R53 and MX-D have a finer grain that separates the ball quickly, while DNA Plastic XH has a thicker sheet and a stronger grip. .. The flashiness was modest, and the trajectory of the drive was a little mature in terms of the growth from the opponent's court. Even if the performance is underestimated, it is the same as Tena, and above all, the goodness of fitting on the table is a good impression, and I think that it will be a good option. It is a little heavy for its thin features, so if you take measures (small blade area and stick it away from the grip), you will be able to fully demonstrate the performance of rubber!
    Please refer.

    See original review

    2021/07/30
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket REINFORCE AC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. < Previous
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. Next >
  10. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!