uwhede9865's profile

uwhede9865's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience More than 20 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. LIN Gaoyuan ALC
      Racket

      LIN Gaoyuan ALC

    2. DIGNICS 05
      Rubber (Front)

      DIGNICS 05

    3. TENERGY 05
      Rubber (Back)

      TENERGY 05

      TENERGY 05 has a unique feeling using a combination of Spring Sponge technology, High Tension rub...

User review

  • Evolution MX-S

    User review

    50g at 2.1mm.
    ・ Tsuttsuki is low and easy to fit! As expected, Samsonov's back rubber!
    -The sheet is hard, making it easy to counter and meet!
    ・ The shot feeling is better than Digg, not Tena!
    What surprised me was that the shot feeling was similar to Dignics 05! However, it was a pity that the amount of rotation was not as much as the dig.
    Tsuttsuki's ease of use is excellent, and I feel that it is okay to change it for that purpose. Among the rubbers made in Germany, I thought that it was a rubber like Mr. Tiber, which has many rubbers that are very similar to butterfly rubbers. I felt that it would be easy to make the transition without any discomfort by using it before using Dignix.
    Please refer.

    See original review

    2021/01/01
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Rakza 7

    User review

    Extra thick 49g. Mainly used for back.
    ・ Anyway, it's easy to put the ball in!
    ・ Easy to hit speed drive!
    ・ Good balance in both good and bad ways!
    As a rubber type, I felt that the shot feeling and ball separation were closer to Tena 80 than Tena 05. It was very easy to handle and made few mistakes, so I got the impression that it was very stable. Although it is a little, it is not compatible with the racket, the drive rotation is weaker than I expected, and it was easy for over mistakes of speed drive to occur. I think it suits a more tenacious battle type than attacking.
    Yasaka's rubber is sensuously heavy, and many of them are easy to feel heavy, so I felt that it was more compatible with wood and inner carbon than outer carbon. At least it was a little too strong for the outer ZLC system.
    Please refer!

    See original review

    2021/01/01
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • User review

    49g at Max. Mainly used in the back.
    -It is easy to put out the amount of rotation and power with a relatively weak touch!
    ・ Easy to handle between Tenergy and V & gt; 15.
    -The seat is strong and easy to counter!
    The other party told me that I felt the power of Digg 05. Personally, I felt that the drive was more powerful than the amount of rotation as a gyro type or a knuckle-like ball.
    There is a part where I feel that the shot feeling is similar to V & gt; 15 Extra, and I felt that the amount of rotation could not be obtained and the arch line tended to weaken unless I let it bite in once and then apply rotation. On the other hand, the hardness is the same as V & gt; 15, but I felt that Super Ventus had better bite and was easier to handle. Also, both smash and drive are easy to do, and I think it is a rubber for intermediate and advanced users. If you want to master German rubber, especially V & gt; 15 with a hard sheet, I thought that mastering Super Ventus is easier than Rosena.
    Please refer.

    See original review

    2021/01/01
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Zhang Jike ZLC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • STRADIVARIUS

    User review

    88g in FL.
    I have not checked it separately, but it will probably be a racket with a center of gravity on the grip side as if the grip is clogged.
    The grip was rounded, including the position of the center of gravity, not from the Timo Boll model, but from the Zhang Jike model.
    It was a racket that was very easy to rotate, the backhand felt like holding a ball, and it was extremely easy to handle.
    However, it seems that the thickness or the attached plate is different from Zhang Jike ALC etc., so it is hard to feel the hardness and rigidity, so it may be said that it is an intermediate model.
    While the racket design seems to be compatible with XIOM's rubber, I felt that there might be something that does not match the butterfly rubber.
    As a whole, the cost performance was good and it was a very pleasant racket.
    I think I would have used it if I met earlier, but the high stability and ball holding that made up for the lack of power were very attractive.
    Please refer.

    See original review

    2021/01/09
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

    Recommend rubber(Back) DIGNICS 05

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • OMEGA V TOUR DF

    User review

    51g at max.
    1. Strong grip and high rotation performance! 2. It is easy to meet while producing a strong amount of rotation! 3. No slippery than Vega X!
    As expected, the OMEGA 5 Series is a series that features arch lines and grip, and the strong grip and the amount of rotation made a good impression. However, since it is a little old, even though it has DF, I think that the strength of rotation is a little weak compared to recent high-end rubber and new XIOM rubber. I felt that the Vega X had higher rotation performance, including the ease of rotation. However, since Vega X has a soft sponge and is slippery, it was a reliable rubber although it was a manual overall. Also, although it takes rotation, it is easy to meet, and it does not have such a mad feel, so I think that it fits the back side more than the Omega 7 series. The seat and sponge are hard, and I think that the fore is sufficient for the performance that makes it easy to overwrite with a drive without having to rotate with a counter drive or inquiries.
    Compared to Digg 05, the arch line is low, the sinking of the ball is weak, and the power of the ball seems to be a little weak, but I feel that it is expensive when I think that it can be purchased at the 3000 yen level.
    We also review it on our blog, so please refer to it.

    See original review

    2021/02/07
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Hard

    Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. < Previous
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. Next >
  9. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!