NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Tenergy 80-FX

  

  Max thickness, 45g. Mainly used on my backhand side.
  1. A rubber that's perfect for the backhand.
  2. Blocking is super stable!
  3. Easier to get speed out of than spin.

  When you really sink the ball into the sponge, you get that Tenergy-style spin and can hit deep balls too.
  Compared to Tenergy 05FX, the spin is a bit less, but that also makes it less sensitive to the opponent's drives and smashes, so blocking was easier.
  Tenergy 80 and Rozena are still easier to block with, and I think they're great for a grinding style of table tennis.
  On the other hand, when I drive myself, the ball doesn't sink in as much and the power feels a bit weaker.
  I think it depends on which one suits you or which one you prefer.
  Personally I still like the 05 series better because it has a solid grip on the ball and the ball really sinks in.
  Since it's soft, it's easy to bite into the ball on backspin shots too, so speed drives were easy to hit.
  On the other hand, pushes and stops tend to float, so you need a delicate touch.
  Hope this helps.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚で45g。主にバック面で使用。
  1. バックに持ってい来いのラバー。
  2. ブロックがド安定する！
  3. 回転以上にスピードが出しやすいラバー。

  ボールを深くくい込ませるとテナジーらしい回転もかかってボールも深いボールが打てました。
  テナジー05FXと比較すると回転量は落ちるのですが、その分相手のドライブやスマッシュに対しても鈍感でブロックがしやすかったです。
  テナジー80やロゼナはやはりブロックがしやすくて、粘る卓球にもってこいだと思います。
  一方で、自分からドライブをするときにやはりボールが沈みにくくて威力も落ちるように感じますね。
  このあたりは、どちらがあうか、どちらが好みかにもよると思います。
  個人的にはやはり05系の方がボールのグリップ感とボールの沈み込みがしっかりあるので好きですね。
  柔らかいので、下回転打ちもくい込ませやすくて、スピードドライブが打ちやすかったです。
  一方でツッツキやストップは浮きやすいので繊細なタッチが求められると思います。
  ご参考ください。

  2021/04/11

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  104

• 

  REINFORCE AC

  

  88g, flared handle only.
  - The limba top ply grips the ball really well! Gives you a reassuring feel!
  - With a 6.0mm blade thickness, there's plenty of power on hard hits!
  - Great value for money!
  When you hit hard, you get that carbon-like power and distance. Personally I felt a bit of a gap between hitting hard and deep versus just sinking the ball into the rubber sheet, in terms of how far it felt like it should go, but it wasn't as pronounced as with Butterfly's Innerforce Layer ZLC. That's probably because the aramid carbon is softer and easier to handle than ZLC.
  I got it on clearance for around 5,000 yen, which is less than half the price of an Innerforce Layer ALC. It's true the grip only comes in flared and felt a little too thin, but I don't care that much about grip shape so it wasn't a problem. Really happy with this purchase! Definitely worth considering.

  See original review Hide original review

  88g、フレア（のみ）
  ・上板リンバでよくつかむ！安心感のある打球感！
  ・6.0 mmのブレード厚さで、ハードヒット時の威力は十分！
  ・コスパが素晴らしい！
  ハードヒットすると、威力と飛距離はカーボンらしさのあるボールが打てます。個人的にハードに厚くぶつけるように打ったときと、ラバーのシートだけにくい込ませるように打つ時で、イメージの飛距離が違うことに少し違和感を感じましたが、バタフライのインナーフォースレイヤーZLCほどではありませんでした。アラミドカーボンはZLCよりもソフトで扱いやすいためでしょう。
  在庫処分で5000円台で購入でき、インナーフォースレイヤーALCの半額以下だと思います。たしかにグリップはフレアのみで細さに少し違和感は感じましたが、自分はグリップにそこまでこだわらないので問題ありませんでした。非常に良い買い物ができてよかったです！是非ご参考ください。

  2021/08/13

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) DNA PLATINUM XH

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  99

• 

  EVOLUTION MX-D

  

  2.1 mm, 53 g. Shore C hardness meter reading of 42.3° (Tenergy 05 was 47 g, 44.6°).
  1. The ball leaves fast, giving a strong sense of speed! 2. It grips the ball well enough that you don't feel the stated sponge hardness of 51.5°. 3. Despite fine pips on the sheet, the spin performance is high too.
  I think the rubber is designed so that the hard sheet provides spin performance, the well-gripping sponge provides ease of use and ball-holding, and the fine pips on the sheet provide speed performance, each compensating for the others. I don't think any other manufacturer had this kind of design concept before. It combines the best of classic German-made rubbers with the best of what makes Tenergy Tenergy, and I was convinced by the tagline that it's "the best of the MX-P and MX-S." Compared to other rubbers, it's especially strong in speed performance - I'd describe it as sitting in a position like the 64, or an 80 leaning toward the 64, making it easy to do speed drives while also being easy to use for counter-drives.
  I've also reviewed it on my blog, so please check that out too.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1 mm、53 g。硬度計shore cで42.3°（テナ05は47 g、44.6°）。
  1. 球離れ速く疾走感が強い！2. 公表スポンジ硬度51.5°を感じさせない食い込みの良さ。3. シートの粒が細いのに回転性能も高い。
  シートを硬くして回転性能を、食い込みの良いスポンジで扱いやすさと球持ちを、シート粒は細くしてスピード性能を、それぞれ補うラバー設計なのだと思います。このようなコンセプトのラバー設計は他メーカーにはなかったのではないかと思います。古典的ドイツ製ラバーとテナジーらしさの良いところどりができていて、MX-PとMX-Sの良いところどり、というキャッチコピーにも納得しました。他ラバーと比較すると、やはりスピード性能に特徴があり、64や64よりの80的なポジションのラバー、スピードドライブがしやすく、かつカウンタードライブもやりやすい、という理解で良いと思います。
  ブログでもレビューしていますのでご参考ください。

  2021/09/17

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REINFORCE AC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  95

• 

  OMEGA VII China Ying

  

  Max thickness, 60g. Hardness on a Shore C gauge came to 49.3° (for reference, Tenergy 05 was 47g at 44.6°, and Dignics 09C was 50g at 50.8°).
  1. Monstrous spin and wobble that rivals Hurricane! 2. It's a tacky rubber, yet it bounces like crazy! 3. Extremely difficult to handle — you need to account for the weight!
  The top sheet only has a slight tackiness, not a strong tacky feel. It's not that the ball doesn't sink in — I could feel it sinking in when I touched it — but because the sponge is so dense and rubbery, the ball seems to launch back out before you really feel like you've grabbed it. Even though it's supposed to be a tacky tension rubber, the launch is so good it bounces almost like a spin-oriented tension rubber, and you can smash with it just fine too. On top of that, loop drives come out with an insane amount of spin that actually wins you points, which I really liked. It'll definitely take time before you can use it well, but once you can, I think it's a genuinely fun rubber. Hurricane doesn't bounce anywhere near this much, and Dignics 09C doesn't produce this kind of wobble. I've also reviewed it on my blog, so please check that out for reference.

  See original review Hide original review

  Maxで60 g。硬度計shore cで49.3°（テナ05は47 g、44.6°、ディグ09Cは50 gで50.8）。
  1. 化け物じみた回転量と癖！キョウヒョウに迫る！、2. 粘着ラバーなのにめちゃめちゃ弾む！、3. 扱いが極めて難しい！重量対策必須！
  シートは微々粘着程度で、強粘着ではありません。くい込まないわけではなく、触ってみてもくい込みを感じるのですが、それ以上に密度の高いゴムのようなスポンジのためにくい込んだ後、球を持った感覚を感じる前に飛び出している感じでした。粘着テンションラバーのはずなのに、飛び出しがよくスピン系テンションっぽく弾みますし、スマッシュも全然打てると思います。それでいて、ループドライブは得点の取れるエグイ回転量で、非常に気に入りました。確かに扱えるようになるまでに時間がかかりそうですが、扱えればかなり面白いラバーでもあると思います。キョウヒョウはここまで弾まず、ディグ09Cではここまで癖が出ません。ブログでもレビューしてますので、ご参考ください。

  2021/09/23

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Tornado King Power

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  93

• 

  Target Pro XD52.5

  

  Listed as Reinforce AC, but I actually hit with it on an OSP Virtuoso AC blade.
  Cut to 158x150mm and glued on, it weighs 54g. Hardness meter (Tenergy 05 reference): topsheet side 47.9 (44.6), sponge side 43.6 (43.3)
  - Outstanding speed and spin performance!
  - Easy to handle - you'd never guess it's a 52.5!
  - A heavy, high-spin rubber in the Tenergy 80 mold
  Apart from the weight, the feel on contact was Tenergy 80-like, with the ball sinking in and a fast ball trajectory off the blade. But since the spin performance is also high, it draws a solid arc, and the spin amount is outstanding - even a low-level backhand loop drive got the opponent to overshoot. It's easy to sink the ball into, and I think it feels more like a genuine Tenergy than the Dignics does.
  Compared to post-Tenergy tension rubbers like R53 or MX-D, this one holds the ball by sinking it in more. Even so, it's easier to hit fast balls with than DNA Platinum XH, and I felt the overall balance was extremely high. Just like with other rubbers, even if you rate its performance conservatively, it's on par with Tenergy, so it's a good option. It's heavy, so if you take countermeasures (a blade with a smaller head, or gluing it further from the grip), you should be able to bring out the rubber's performance to the fullest!
  Just something to keep in mind.

  See original review Hide original review

  リーンフォースACとしてますが、OSPのヴィルトーソACで打ちました。
  158×150mmに貼って54g。硬度計（テナ05）: シート側 47.9（44.6）、スポンジ側 43.6（43.3）
  ・抜群のスピード性能とスピン性能！
  ・52.5を感じさせない、扱いやすさ！
  ・ヘビーで回転性能の高いテナジー80
  重量以外は打球感はテナ80系ぽいくい込みと球足の速さでした。でも、回転性能も高いので、しっかり弧線を描き、回転量も抜群で技術レベルの低いバックハンドのループドライブでも相手がふかしてくれました。くい込みやすく、ディグニクスよりもテナらしいラバーだと思います。
  ポストテナジー系テンションの、R53やMX-Dと比較すると、くい込んでボールを持ちます。それでいて、DNAプラXHよりもスピードボールが打ちやすくて、トータルバランスは非常に高いと感じました。やはり他のラバー同様に、性能は低く見積もってもテナと同等で、良い選択肢になると思います。重いので、対策（ブレード面積小ラケや、グリップから離して貼る）することで、十二分にラバーの性能を発揮するでしょう！
  参考ください。

  2021/08/13

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REINFORCE AC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  92

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. Next >
11. Last »