uwhede9865's profile

uwhede9865's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience More than 20 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. LIN Gaoyuan ALC
      Racket

      LIN Gaoyuan ALC

    2. DIGNICS 05
      Rubber (Front)

      DIGNICS 05

    3. TENERGY 05
      Rubber (Back)

      TENERGY 05

      TENERGY 05 has a unique feeling using a combination of Spring Sponge technology, High Tension rub...

User review

  • Tenergy 80-FX

    User review

    Extra thick 45g. Mainly used on the back side.
    1. Rubber to bring to the back.
    2. The block is stable!
    3. Rubber that is easy to speed up more than rotation.

    When the ball was deeply inserted, it took a tenacious rotation and the ball was hit with a deep ball.
    Compared to Tenergy 05FX, the amount of rotation is lower, but it was insensitive to the opponent's drive and smash and it was easier to block.
    I think Tenergy 80 and Rosena are easy to block and are perfect for sticky table tennis.
    On the other hand, when I drive from myself, I feel that the ball does not sink easily and its power drops.
    I think this depends on which one you have and which one you like.
    Personally, I like the 05 series because it has a better grip and sinking of the ball.
    Because it is soft, it was easy to hit the lower rotation, and it was easy to hit the speed drive.
    On the other hand, Tsuttsuki and Stop are easy to float, so I think that a delicate touch is required.
    Please refer.

    See original review

    2021/04/11
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Hardness Soft

    Recomend racket Zhang Jike ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • REINFORCE AC

    User review

    88g, flare (only)
    ・ Grip well with the upper plate limba! A feeling of hitting with a sense of security!
    -With a blade thickness of 6.0 mm, the power at the time of a hard hit is sufficient!
    ・ Cospa is wonderful!
    If you hit hard, you can hit a ball with carbon-like power and flight distance. Personally, I felt a little strange that the flight distance of the image was different when I hit it hard and hit it hard and when I hit it so that only the rubber sheet was hard to insert, but as much as the butterfly inner force layer ZLC It wasn't. This is probably because aramid carbon is softer and easier to handle than ZLC.
    You can buy it at the 5000 yen level by disposing of it in stock, and I think it is less than half the price of Inner Force Layer ALC. Certainly, the grip was only flare and I felt a little uncomfortable with the thinness, but I was not so particular about the grip, so there was no problem. I'm glad I made a very good purchase! Please refer to it.

    See original review

    2021/08/13
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

    Recommend rubber(Back) DNA PLATINUM XH

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • EVOLUTION MX-D

    User review

    2.1 mm, 53 g. 42.3 ° on hardness tester shore c (47 g for tena 05, 44.6 °).
    1. The ball is released quickly and the feeling of running is strong! 2. Published sponge Good bite that does not make you feel the hardness of 51.5 °. 3. Although the grain of the sheet is thin, the rotation performance is also high.
    I think that the rubber design compensates for the rotation performance by making the sheet hard, the ease of handling and ball holding with a sponge that bites well, and the speed performance by making the sheet grain thin. I think that other manufacturers did not have a rubber design with such a concept. I was convinced by the catch phrase that the classic German rubber and the good points of tenergy were made, and the good points of MX-P and MX-S. Compared to other rubbers, it is also characterized by speed performance, and I think it is good to understand that rubber with 80 positions than 64 or 64, speed drive is easy, and counter drive is also easy.
    Please refer to the review on the blog.

    See original review

    2021/09/17
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket REINFORCE AC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • OMEGA VII China Ying

    User review

    60 g at Max. Hardness tester shore c at 49.3 ° (Tena 05 at 47 g, 44.6 °, Dig 09C at 50 g, 50.8).
    1. A monster-like amount of rotation and habits! Approaching the leopard! , 2. Even though it is an adhesive rubber, it bounces tremendously! , 3. Extremely difficult to handle! Weight measures are essential!
    The sheet is only slightly adhesive, not strongly adhesive. It's not that it doesn't bite in, and I feel it bite in when I touch it, but it feels like it's popping out before I feel the feeling of holding a ball after biting in because of the denser rubber-like sponge. .. Although it should be an adhesive tension rubber, it pops out well and bounces like a spin tension, and I think that you can hit smash at all. Still, I really like the loop drive because it has a scoring amount of Egui rotation. It will take some time before you can handle it, but if you can handle it, it will be a very interesting rubber. The leopard doesn't bounce so much, and the dig 09C doesn't have that much habit. I also review it on my blog, so please refer to it.

    See original review

    2021/09/23
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    10
    Control
    7
    Hardness Hard

    Recomend racket Tornado King Power

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Target Pro XD52.5

    User review

    I'm using Lean Force AC, but I hit it with OSP's Virtoso AC.
    54g pasted on 158 x 150mm. Hardness tester (Tena 05): Sheet side 47.9 (44.6), Sponge side 43.6 (43.3)
    -Outstanding speed performance and spin performance!
    ・ Easy to handle without feeling 52.5!
    ・ Tenergy 80, which is heavy and has high rotation performance
    Except for the weight, the shot feeling was the speed of the Tena 80 series and the ball foot. However, because it has high rotation performance, it draws an arch line firmly, the amount of rotation is outstanding, and the opponent even fluffed with a backhand loop drive with a low technical level. It's easy to bite in, and I think it's a rubber that is more like Tena than Dignix.
    Compared to the post-tenergy tension R53 and MX-D, it bites in and holds the ball. Even so, I felt that the speed ball was easier to hit than the DNA plastic XH, and the total balance was very high. As with other rubbers, the performance is the same as Tena even if it is underestimated, so I think it will be a good option. Since it is heavy, you can fully demonstrate the performance of rubber by taking measures (small blade area and sticking away from the grip)!
    Please refer.

    See original review

    2021/08/13
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket REINFORCE AC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. < Previous
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. 6
  8. 7
  9. 8
  10. Next >

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!