Rath's profile

Rath's profile
Gender Male
Age U40
Experience 11〜20 years

User review

  • mantra pro M

    User review

    Anyway, the shot feeling and sound when meeting is pleasant.
    I felt that the feeling of the seat was similar to the Fastark system. It is insensitive and easy to control, and it can be rotated firmly.
    The sheet is stronger than Rosena, and I didn't feel it fell off even when I applied it thinly.
    Compared to MUJI's Mantra, I think it's a little more focused on drive than meat, but I think the overall balance is better.
    The absolute value of rotation is inferior to the latest spin type tension rubber, so if you try to compete with your opponent's strong rotation with rotation, there are some aspects that are difficult, but it has a well-balanced performance that matches most beginners and intermediate players. Masu.
    It is especially recommended for those who have a scoring pattern of smashing the fifth ball from the third ball drive. The price is reasonable, so I would like you to try it once.

    See original review

    2023/08/28
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket LIBRA

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • CLASSIC 5 CNF

    User review

    A racket equipped with the latest special material, CNF (cellulose nanofiber).

    Before using this racket, I used mace with allylate carbon, but the speed is not inferior.
    The shot feeling is soft without the hardness like carbon, but it is a new sensation racket that does not feel like wood.
    The shot feel is close to that of 7 plywood, but compared to clipper wood, this one feels faster and faster.
    The biggest advantage is that the sweet spot is very wide. If you swing firmly, a good ball will come out stably no matter where you hit the racket.
    It is very easy to rotate, probably because cypress is used for the core and surface material.
    It can be said that a racket with this performance is exceptional for around 10,000 yen.

    One of the points to note is that it is relatively heavy. I weighed 90g, but I asked the manufacturer to search for 89g or less, but I couldn't find it.
    And the biggest difficulty is probably the instability of inventory. It seems that it is more difficult to secure domestic cypress lumber than before, and once it is sold out, it is unknown when the next arrival will be.
    If you are interested in this racket, you may want to reserve it when you find it in stock.

    See original review

    2021/08/01
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) Q QUALITY

    Recommend rubber(Back) Fastarc C-1

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • LIBRA

    User review

    As an inner, it has an initial speed and a flight distance. Since the trajectory is also straight, it is recommended to combine it with a rubber that is easy to draw arcs.
    Although it bounces when attacking, it is very stable on the defensive side, such as blocks and platforms, thanks to the large blade size.
    As the name Libra (Libra) suggests, it is a racket with a high level of balance between attack and defense.
    However, the blade size is quite large at 159 x 152, so if you don't think about the rubber to stretch, the weight of the racket will easily exceed 190g.
    Therefore, we recommend using rubber made in Japan, which is lighter than rubber made in Germany. In particular, the Glaser was good to bite into the back, good to play, good to protect, and it was a great match.
    If you are worried about the weight, you can get enough speed with a racket, so you can make the rubber thicker.

    See original review

    2023/08/28
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Touch
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) Q QUALITY

    Recommend rubber(Back) GLAYZER

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • OVTCHAROV Innerforce ALC

    User review

    It is a racket that has both inner thickness and ball power.
    Until now, I used to avoid rackets made of ALC material because the ball was released quickly, but this racket has a sense of firmly grasping the ball.
    Also, I think that the blade size is a little large, which also affects the feel at impact.

    Although it is a racket with a fairly high overall power, the point to note is that the center of gravity is quite dependent on the tip.
    It became difficult to switch between both hands, and there was a feeling that the backhand block was delayed especially.
    However, when I was conscious of using the head of the racket, the power of the ball increased dramatically, so I think this has both advantages and disadvantages.

    When using this racket, it is recommended to use a light rubber considering the large blade size and the heavy weight. I think that it is a racket that requires considerable power if it is made of double-sided German rubber.

    See original review

    2022/09/12
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    7
    Touch
    9
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) ROZENA

    Recommend rubber(Back) ROZENA

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!