NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Tenergy 05 FX

  

  Extra thick 42.5g (without adhesive)

  I used it on the back side.

  There are many detailed reviews, so I will only write what I felt in particular,
  ・ It does not bounce much more than 05
  ・Even if Chiquita is not good at it, she will enter anyway
  ・Block fits

  If you want light and stable, I don't think you'll have any complaints with this.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚 42.5g (接着剤無し)

  バック面で使いました。

  詳しいレビューがたくさんあるので特に感じたことだけ書きますが、
  ・05よりだいぶ弾まない
  ・チキータが下手でもとりあえず入ってくれる
  ・ブロックが収まる

  軽くてド安定を求めるならコレで何も不満は無いと思います。

  2023/07/04

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket KOKI NIWA WOOD

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  TREIBER FI OFF

  

  It was 91g in FL.

  My first innerwear, and fiber
  I usually use 7 pieces of wood, so
  This may not be an accurate evaluation.

  The blade has a wide gill and feels heavier than its weight at the center of gravity at the tip.

  The impression of a light hit is that the ball leaves the ball quickly and pops out. It looks like outerwear.

  However, if you hit it hard, it will hold the ball quite a bit.
  It's not my first time wearing innerwear, so it's not a big deal, but I held it longer than I imagined, and it felt like the rebound of the material sent it flying in the direction of the swing.

  I had the impression that if you touch a weather ball, it's a stick ball, and if you hit it with force, it holds up too much, so I felt that you need the ability to grab it and send it flying.

  However, when I was able to grasp it, I was very satisfied with both the amount of rotation and the speed.
  I've seen reviews that it's a flying innerwear.
  I think it's probably a good racket. lol

  If I could update from old-fashioned table tennis
  I would like to try it again.

  See original review Hide original review

  FLで91gでした。

  自身初めてのインナー、しかもファイバー
  普段は木材7枚を使っていますので、
  正確な評価では無いかもしれません。

  ブレードはエラが広く、先端重心で重量以上に重く感じます。

  軽打の印象は球離れが早く、ポンと飛び出します。アウターのようです。

  しかし強打するとかなり球を持ちます。
  そもそもインナーが初めてなのでアテになりませんが、イメージよりずっと持って、素材の反発でそのままスイング方向に飛んでいく感じでした。

  日和って触ると棒球、力んで当てると持ちすぎるという印象で、掴んで飛ばす能力が必要だと感じました。

  ただし、掴めた時は回転量、速さ共に大満足
  飛ぶインナーという評価を見たこともあり、
  おそらく良いラケットなんだろうなと思います。笑

  自分が昔ながらの卓球からアップデート出来たら
  また試したいですね。

  2023/12/06

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） RASANTER R48

  Recommend rubber（Back） HEXER POWERGRIP

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  HEXER GRIP SFX

  

  I used 2.1mm on the back.

  Momentum is not strong even at 2.1.
  The amount of rotation is the same as the hardness, and it is not a rubber that pushes with a ball.

  But it has great grip! The lower rotation hit will go up.
  Blocks and backmeat are particularly good. The block fits anyway, and the meat can be punched through with a slight downward rotation.

  It is good to combine it with a racket containing materials that are easy to play in the front team. I held too much if it was 5 plywood.

  Although it is soft for adult men, it can be recommended as a foreback for those who are weak and women who are not confident in their strength.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックで2.1mmを使用しました。

  弾みは2.1でも強くないです。
  回転量も硬度の通りという感じで、球威で押すラバーでは無いです。

  ただ、グリップ力が高いです！下回転打ちがめちゃくちゃ上がります。
  特に良いのはブロックとバックミートですね。ブロックはとにかく収まり、ミートは多少の下回転なら打ち抜けます。

  前陣主体で弾きやすい素材入りラケットと組み合わせると良いです。5枚合板だと持ちすぎました。

  成人男性には柔らかいですが、脱力出来る方、力に自信がない女性はフォアバックどちらにもオススメできます。

  2023/08/22

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket MIG NON

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  WANOKIWAMI AO OFF

  

  It was 84g in ST.

  My image of 5 plywood was like Corbel's pocon pocon, but it's just right because it's soft and doesn't resonate with my hands.

  You can also fly distance! It flies only for the strength of the impact.
  You can feel the grip enough! However, it is not specialized for rotation.
  The grip is flat and can be a little slippery.
  Because the blade is large, it becomes the center of gravity at the tip, making it very easy to swing through!

  Mr. Hamakawa of Andro said that the characteristics of the rubber can be utilized when combined with R45, but since I don't have the technology, it was too soft and fell off...

  It is a 5-ply plywood that is generally powerful! recommendation!

  See original review Hide original review

  STで84gでした。

  自分の5枚合板のイメージはコルベルのポコンポコンという感じでしたが、柔らかいのにそこまで手に響かず丁度良いです。

  飛距離も出ますね！インパクトの強弱の分だけ飛びます。
  掴みも十分に感じられます！ただ、回転特化では無いです。
  グリップは平たく、ちょっと滑るかもしれません。
  ブレードが大きいので先端重心になり、非常に振り抜きやすいです！

  アンドロの濱川さんはR45と合わせるとラバーの特徴が生かせると仰ってましたが、自分は技術が無いため柔らかすぎて落ちました…

  総じて威力が出る5枚合板です！オススメ！

  2023/08/18

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） RASANTER R48

  Recommend rubber（Back） RASANTER R48

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  STRADIVARIUS

  

  It was 85g in FL

  It's a bouncing system. It bounces quite a bit.
  However, the shot feeling is a little softer, and there is also a feeling of grasping the ball like other people.

  It seems that a rubber with a little stiffness is more suitable than a squishy rubber.

  I think it works great for this low price.

  See original review Hide original review

  FLで89gでした

  ぶっ飛び系ですね。かなり弾みます。
  ただ、打球感は若干柔らかめで、他の方と同じく球を掴む感覚もあります。

  ぐにゃぐにゃのラバーより、多少コシがあるラバーの方が合いそうです。
  ドイツ硬度42.5°より48°の方が扱いやすかったです。

  この低価格で素晴らしい性能だと思います。

  2023/06/25

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 64

  Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 05 FX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >