NO.1 table tennis review site

User reviews

• 

  Soogie （Experience：More than ２０ years） Plywood composition changed compared to Nawari Tomokazu Inner Force ALC

  

  With SZLC, the plate thickness is increased by 0.1mm even though it is increased by 0.2mm & amp; the center material is seen only in paulownia wood in the picture and I was worried that I went to the store and noticed the changes Was.
  Compared with Tomokazu Harimoto Inner Force ALC

  Center material
  Ause → Paulownia
  Upper plate thickness
  0.05mm thicker (up and down 0.1mm)

  SZLC is 0.1mm thicker than other materials

  Therefore, it was 0.2mm thicker than Tomokazu Harimoto Inner Force ALC.

  Since the upper plate is thick and the central material is paulownia, the shot feel is not too hard and the ball can be held.
  The shot feel is soft compared to the Kyo Leopard Dragon 5 with a thin top plate.
  Average weight of store inventory is 83g-85g

  If you are looking for a lighter one, you should purchase early. Because later the weight is often heavy.

  See original review Hide original review

  SZLCなら板厚は0.1mm増加なのに何故0.2mmに増えている&写真で中心材が桐材にしか見えず気になってお店に足を運んでみると、変更点が見えてきました。
  張本智和インナーフォースALCと比べ

  中心材
  アユース→桐材
  上板の厚み
  0.05mm厚くなっている(上下合わせて0.1mm)

  SZLCは他の素材より0.1mm厚い

  そのため、張本智和インナーフォースALCより0.2mm厚いのでした。

  上板が厚く中心材が桐材なので打球感が硬くなりすぎず、球持ちを確保できます。
  球を持つのにインナーフォースZLCと比べ、力を入れるととても弾みがよく、台上等はインナー系同様弾みが抑えられていてストップや切るツッツキがとてもしやすいですね。
  ブロックも同様に抑えたり弾いたりがしやすく、えぐい威力のドライブもコントロールして運びやすかったですね。
  サーブはインナーフォースZLCよりも強い回転量を加えるのがやりやすく、アウターZLCでやっていた時同様強烈なドライブ音を響かせて短いサーブが出るのに、少し振れば速いロングサーブになるのでとても楽になりました。
  偏らないとても高バランスなラケットです。

  2020/03/26

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) DIGNICS 80

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Tenergy 80-FX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  28

• 

  First time having sex （Experience：６〜１０ years）

  

  I tried it for the first time, but it flew too much and was difficult to control. But I was looking forward to it, so I was excited when I tried it for the first time. I think it's very good.

  See original review Hide original review

  初めてやってみたんだけど飛びすぎて制御が難しかったですでも楽しみだったので初めてやった時は興奮しましたとても良いと思います

  2025/01/26

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	6
  Control	5
  Touch	10
  Hardness	hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) DIGNICS 05

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Feint Long II

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  table tennis fool （Experience：６〜１０ years）

  

  At first, it took me a while to get used to a lot of over mistakes. I am a type that attacks with Nakajin, but it bounces, so it is very easy to use and I love it.

  See original review Hide original review

  最初のうちはオーバーミスが多く慣れるまで時間がかかりました。自分は中陣で攻めるタイプですが跳ねてくれるのでとても使いやすく愛用してます。

  2023/05/07

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	little hard

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) DIGNICS 05

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) Tenergy 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Manpuku （Experience：４〜５ years） It is best if you hit it with less force.

  

  If you are in a relaxed state such as practicing fore hitting, I think that it is the best racket that has good ball holding and control, and also has good momentum.
  However, in situations such as games where it is easy to get power in your hands, the momentum is too good and over mistakes will occur frequently.
  In fact, I was impressed that the racket was leveled and the ball was rubbed when doing the fore drive.

  See original review Hide original review

  練習のフォア打ちなどリラックスできる状態ならば、球持ちも良くコントロールもでき、かつ弾みも良い最高のラケットだと思います。
  ただ試合のように、手に力が入りやすい場面では弾みが良すぎてオーバーミスを多発するでしょう。
  実際、フォアドライブをするときにラケットを水平にして玉を擦っていたことが印象に残っています。

  2021/06/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	6
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) ROZENA

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) ROZENA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Makotin （Experience：More than ２０ years） The best ever

  

  I used to use Jun Mizutani SZLC before, so I bought it as an inner.
  I was worried that I might jump too much, but it was a racket that was extremely easy to handle.
  The table and blocks fit neatly on the table, but when attacking, a very fast hit ball like SZLC
  I can hit it.
  It's difficult to use because it's expensive, but it's worth more than the price.

  See original review Hide original review

  以前水谷隼SZLCを使ったことがあり、今回インナーということで購入。
  飛びすぎるのではないかと心配していましたが、もの凄く扱いやすいラケットでした。
  台上やブロックはきちんと台に収まりますが、攻める時にはSZLCらしくとても速い打球が
  打てます。
  値段が高いので試しに使うには難しいですが、値段以上の価値ありです。

  2020/09/01

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) Dignics 09C

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) DIGNICS 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  So far, so best （Experience：４〜５ years）

  

  The best racket ever had.

  Fast, but controlled.

  See original review Hide original review

  The best racket ever had.

  Fast, but controlled.

  2020/07/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommended rubber (Forehand) Tenergy 64

  Recommended rubber (Backhand) TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Professional （Experience：More than ２０ years）

  

  Purchased two Chinese styles for both ZLC. Armstrong back software SR42 Morning ultra-thin was pasted on both sides and compared with two hits. It was a jump, but both had the same repulsive force. Unexpectedly, ZLC had a harder and dry feel at impact. I also used Jun Mizutani, Zhang Jie, Timo Boll's ZLC, Super ZLC (Jun Mizutani, Zhang Jie), but Super ZLC flew.
  Tomokazu Harimoto Inner Force SUPER ZLC has better control. And it also has conventional spin performance.

  See original review Hide original review

  ZLCともに、中国式2本購入。アームストロング裏ソフト　SR４２　朝極薄を両面に貼り、２本打ち比べて見ました。飛びですがどちらも同じの反発力でした。意外にZLCの方が硬く乾いた打球感でした。　水谷準、張継科、ティモボル、の　ZLC、ズーパーZLC（水谷準、張継科）も使いましたが、それらはスーパーZLCの方が飛びました。
  張本智和インナーフォース SUPER ZLCはコントロールがアップされています。そして、従来のスピン性能も備わっています。

  2020/04/24

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >

Related racket

• 
  FAN ZHESDONG ZLCSUPER ZLC
• 
  FAN ZHESDONG CNF
• 
  REVOLDIA CNF
• 
  Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC