FORTIUS FT RE

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Medium hardness
[Performance] Control and Speed are excellent.
FORTIUS FT RE

(Click to show big size)

Averages reviews points

  • Evaluation: 8 / 10
  • Number of review: 5
    • Speed: 7.6
    • Spin: 7.4
    • Control: 8.6

    Reviews of FORTIUS FT RE. Players who use Racket evaluate various points such as hardness, momentum, weight, item by item to worry, and feel at impact thoroughly.

    • FL
    • ST

    Specifications

    Price
    8,000 Yen(Include tax 8,800 Yen)
    Producer
    Mizuno
    Product code
    83GTT11055
    Size
    157×149mm
    Weight
    89g ±
    Material
    Wood, 7 ply wood
    Thickness
    6.1mm
    Customer Reviews SummaryAI Summary
    The Fortius FT RE receives mixed evaluations, with improved ease of use and ball retention praised, but reduced power and elasticity criticized. The lightweight design enhances swing speed, but players prioritizing backhand attacks or power strokes find it insufficient.
    ■ Frequently Mentioned Points
    • Improved swing speed due to weight reduction
    • Better ball control and retention characteristics
    • Reduced power from backcourt attacks
    • Stable and reliable backhand drive performance
    • Better suited for intermediate players than advanced players
    ■ Representative Voices
    ▲ PositiveThe balance of weight and elasticity creates satisfying shot feel with solid contact. Backhand drive flight is stable and ideal, making it perfect for 7-ply players seeking improved ball retention.
    ▽ CriticalShot feel lacks firmness and power is insufficient. Limited flight distance makes backcourt attacks difficult, resulting in balls that opponents can easily block.

    User reviews

    • Grasshopper

      Grasshopper (Experience: 6〜10 years) Verified Purchase

      Player reviews

      The unit I got weighed 90g. With Q5 max-thickness rubber on both sides, it came to 187g.
      Personally the weight wasn't an issue for me.
      The feel was pretty good!

      That said, I felt like the power dropped off a bit when attacking from away from the table.

      See original review

      2021/10/28
      Overall
      8/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      8
      Control
      9
      Touch
      10
      Hardness little hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) Q5

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) Q5

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Shinji (Experience: More than 20 years) Good for those who brush the ball.

      Player reviews

      Ordered the lightest one at 86g. The grip was easy to hold, not too thick or too thin, though it does feel a little cheap. With max-thickness rubber on both sides, it came to 183g. In the short game it doesn't bounce too much and everything lands fine. When you hit hard, it grabs the ball well and gets real power out. I think it's great for drive players. Since I play close to the table and focus on hitting hard, I personally wanted a bit more hardness and snap. Overall, though, I think it's a good blade.

      See original review

      2021/05/09
      Overall
      8/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Touch
      8
      Hardness little hard

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) Rakza 7

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) ROZENA

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Kanako (Experience: 4〜5 years) For beginners

      Player reviews

      Feel: doesn't feel like you're hitting the sweet spot, kind of mushy and dull

      Power: basically none. A 7-ply all-wood blade? What is this
      You can only hit weak, light shots

      Control: it doesn't fly, so the ball stays on the table

      Weight: it does have a handle-heavy balance, that much is true, you don't feel much weight overall

      Spin: doesn't grab much spin, makes for a ball that's easy for the opponent to hit

      Topspin drive: easy to do, but it turns into a low-spin, low-power ball that gets blocked easily

      Comparison with the Acoustic
      As expected given the price difference, the Acoustic wins. Even as a 5-ply, the Acoustic flies and has way more power
      The Fortius struggles for power even mid-distance, let alone away from the table. Maybe it's for beginners or older women players?
      I really don't see it as suited for intermediate or advanced players.

      It was a waste putting Fastarc G1 rubber on this
      I had Tackifire Drive on the backhand, so the backhand side is a lost cause anyway, Tackifire Drive is terrible

      I see good reviews of the Fortius out there, but are those from the manufacturer or something??

      Bottom line: I never want to hit with this again

      See original review

      2025/11/22
      Overall
      7/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      5
      Control
      7
      Touch
      5
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc G-1

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) Tackifire Drive

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • tool swamp

      tool swamp (Experience: 11〜20 years) Easy-to-handle 7-ply

      Player reviews

      In a word, this is a more manageable version of the Fortius FT.
      Compared to the original Fortius FT, bounce and power are toned down a bit, but the downsides of the original - the weight and the tip-heavy balance - have been improved, so it swings through easily and you won't lose swing speed.
      In exchange for being easier to handle, it's lost a bit of its edge in power on hard shots and in topspin rallies.
      If you can already swing the Fortius FT around without any problem, I can't really recommend this one.
      But if you think the Fortius FT is a great blade except that the weight is a dealbreaker for you, this is definitely one to pick up.

      See original review

      2022/09/25
      Overall
      9/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      7
      Control
      10
      Touch
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) RASANTER R45

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) RASANTER R45

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      year (Experience: 11〜20 years) 7-ply that feels like 5-ply

      Player reviews

      This is my impression of a 93g unit.
      Right from forehand and backhand hitting, there's a sense that the ball pops upward.
      It feels somewhere between an SK7 and a Korbel.

      For topspin drives against backspin, maybe because I have a habit of making thick contact, my usual stroke didn't quite click - it felt like the ball really travels when you swing in a way that digs into the sponge rather than down to the wood.

      Also, the balance point is a bit toward the tip. The ball travels better and you get that metallic sound when you make contact toward the tip rather than the center of the blade.

      Personally, what I liked was that my backhand drive was noticeably more stable than with the SK7 - that was actually the main reason I bought this blade in the first place.

      As for the weight, it is genuinely heavy, but the grip has been shaved down so you can hold it deeper, which also helps you swing through more easily.
      Being an "re" version probably also helps with that ease of swinging through.

      Personally, I feel more weight from a straight-grip SK7 with spin-oriented tension rubber on both sides.

      I'd say the target user is someone using a heavy, snappy 7-ply blade who wants a bit more ball-holding feel, but finds a snappy 5-ply blade a little lacking.

      My honest impressions:
      - Because of the weight, the solid, core-y feel on contact is very satisfying
      - The trajectory of the backhand drive is stable and ideal

      See original review

      2021/10/11
      Overall
      8/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      8
      Control
      8
      Touch
      9
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) VEGA X

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) VEGA X

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style