NO.1 table tennis review site

I used it in the pen table
First of all, the shot feeling is very good. The pleasant feeling when hitting a smash becomes a habit.
The momentum was suppressed, and the stability and fit of the attack were good.
Since the ball is released quickly, I think that it is a racket that is perfect for the front-end haste attacking at a fast pitch.
I don't think it can be recommended for drivemen.

See original review Hide original review

I have been indebted to more than 50 rackets for 30 years in the pen table.
Among them, Aqua Blade was excellent.
The board is moderately hard, it is insensitive to rotation, and it is easy to invalidate the opponent's rotation. Therefore, it is easy to flick on the table, and the score in receiving has increased.
Also, the initial velocity immediately after hitting the ball is fast, but the ball does not stretch. This is a big weapon for your opponent. There are few over mistakes.
If you just hit the ball, the ball will be shallow, so in order to get deep into the opponent's court, you need to swing hard and fast by yourself without relying on the racket. Conversely, it is a racket that you can operate with your own power. This is one of the attractions.
The hitting sound depends on the rubber, but it sounds high with a bang, and it feels very fast and pleasant.
The blade is made of 7 plywoods of wood, and is of equal thickness. It is a very beautiful cypress wood.
It is a masterpiece that I would like you to use on the pen surface.

See original review Hide original review

It is a synonymous racket for the pen table.
I moved from the carbon racket to this racket, so I thought that at first it would not bounce at all.
↑ It is an impression at the time of purchase.

As mentioned above, the momentum is slightly higher than normal (normal 5 plywood).
As much as you do not play, the play of the bass and the block stabilizes.
Because the plate of the racket is hard, it plays very well and so it is precisely on the pen table of the front haste haste
I think that it is a matching racket.
Rubber does not play too much racket, so if you assume a meeting with Nakazaki tension type rubber.
I think that any type of table software will fit if it is a type that sticks to the table and handles it with the former team.

Because the drawback is not momentum, it is difficult to punch out with a single shot from the back.
Even if it goes down I think that it will be a premise to maintain the middle team and fight in front.
Because the initial speed is fast, I want to compete in a place close to the table.

See original review Hide original review