NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  ALPS (Experience: ２〜３ years) A rubber for counter-hitting

  

  Comparing it to G1
  Smash ○ — power and speed are decent, about on par with G1?
  Drive ○ — thanks to the sponge, spin is easy to put on, but it loses to G1
  Counter ◎ — as mentioned in the promo video, it's easy to handle. Probably the easiest of any rubber for this
  Block △ — the ball flies upward. I'm the type who likes to keep the ball down, so unless you adjust the angle depending on the situation, it's quite difficult
  Short game ○ — pushes float up a bit, but flicks and chiquita are stable. Power isn't all that strong, so if you prioritize power, go with G1
  Serve ○ — pretty ordinary spin-type serves. G1 gets noticeably more spin on it

  This time I bought Rozena to get a feel for backhand drives, but I feel like the forehand is actually easier to use it on. The reason being
  pushes and blocks tend to float, so I felt it's not suited for the backhand, which you use a lot for connecting shots

  Overall — if you're buying it to strengthen your counters, I'd be tempted to say just buy G1 instead, but the performance isn't bad, so I'd recommend it to anyone who likes a softer rubber

  See original review Hide original review

  ｇ１と比較します
  スマッシュ○　威力、スピードはそこそこ出るｇ１と同じくらい？
  ドライブ○　スポンジのおかげで回転はかけやすいですがｇ１には負けます
  カウンター◎　PVでも言われているように扱いやすい。たぶんどのラバーよりもやりやすい
  ブロック△　上に飛びます。自分は抑えるタイプなのですが状況に応じて角度を変えないと相当難しいです
  台上処理○　ツッツキは多少浮きますがフリックとチキータは安定しています。威力はさほどないので威力重視ならｇ１です
  サービス○　まあごく普通のスピン系の回転ですね。断然ｇ１の方がかかります

  今回僕はバックドライブの感覚を掴むためにロゼナを買いましたがフォアのほうが使いやすい気がします。理由としては、
  ツッツキやブロックが浮くので繋げることの多いバックには向いていないと思ったからです

  総評　カウンター強化のために買うのならｇ１を買いましょうと言いたくなりますが、性能は悪くないのでやわらかいラバーが好きな人にはお勧めです

  2017/07/08

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use SK Carbon

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  Gigi (Experience: More than ２０ years) Totally different from Tenergy

  

  There are rumors it's Tenergy-like,
  but it doesn't have quite that much grip on the ball.
  That said, it's very stable and well-balanced across every technique.

  I'd recommend it for both forehand and backhand, from beginner up to intermediate level.

  It feels like a well-balanced Rounder with a significant power boost.

  The quality is good too — a rubber I can recommend.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジーぽいとの噂はありますが、
  そこまでの引っかかりはありません。
  しかし、全ての技術において、非常にバランスよく安定します。

  初級者〜中級者くらいまではフォア、バック共にオススメです。

  バランス型のラウンデルをかなりパワーアップした感じですね。

  品質も良く、オススメできるラバーです。

  2017/07/01

  All	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Sho-go (Experience: １１〜２０ years) It's a good rubber.

  

  These are my impressions from mainly using it on my backhand.
  Personally I think it's a really good rubber. The feel on contact is similar enough that I'd almost mistake it for Tenergy.
  It feels like you get a better ball by really sinking it into the sponge, so in terms of category it feels similar to 64 and 80.
  That said, the closest match in feel was actually 05FX.
  It's less that spin "bites" and more that it's easy to put spin on. In terms of absolute spin amount, Tenergy is still ahead.
  On the other hand, it's also somewhat insensitive to the opponent's spin, so meeting the ball is easy too, which makes it feel like a well-balanced rubber.
  My overall impression, if I had to put it into words, is that it's like an upgraded Rounder.
  Compared to high-end rubbers like Tenergy or Omega, you might honestly feel the spin is a bit lacking, but I think it's an excellent, well-balanced rubber.
  Something I noticed after hitting with it a lot: chiquita is really easy to do. Or rather, up-the-table techniques in general felt easy.
  It's also relatively light, so it doesn't discriminate by player type, and I think it's a rubber you could recommend for the backhand on a shakehand racket too.

  See original review Hide original review

  バック面で主に使用した感想です。
  個人的にはとてもいいラバーだと感じます。打球感はテナジーそのもの？と思うくらい似てます。
  球を食い込ませた方がいいボールが出る感じがするため、64と80に系統的には似ている気がします。
  しかし打球感は05FXが一番近いイメージでした。
  回転は掛かるというより掛け易いラバーに感じます。回転の絶対量はやはりテナジーのが上です。
  その代わり相手の回転にもある程度鈍感でミートもし易いためバランスのいいラバーに感じます。
  私が一番感じた感想としてはラウンデルの上位的なラバーというのが一番シックリきました。
  テナジーやオメガなどハイエンドラバーと比べると回転量は正直物足りなさを感じるかもしれませんが、バランスがいい優秀なラバーだと思います。
  打ち込んでみて感じた事ですが、チキータが非常にやり易いです。と言うよりアップ系の技術が全般的にやり易く感じました。
  重量も比較的軽いので使う層を選ばないのも魅力であり、シェークのバックにもオススメできるラバーだと思います。

  2017/06/30

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

• 

  ,!

  

  I use it on my backhand. My impression is it suits a sinking-the-ball style of hitting more than a brushing style, and it performs well close to the table and at mid-distance. Short game techniques like chiquita were easy to pull off.

  See original review Hide original review

  バック面で使用してますが、擦る打法より食い込ます打ち方に向いているような印象で前陣や中陣に力を発揮します。台上技術などチキータはやりやすかった

  2017/06/30

  All	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Tenary (Experience: ２〜３ years) Low arc

  

  Used it on the forehand.
  This rubber releases the ball quickly, so spin is a bit hard to generate, but the arc is low, letting you drive in fast balls.
  Hitting against backspin is tricky, but drives from mid-distance had plenty of power and went in well.
  I'd recommend it for players who prioritize speed but still want a bit of spin.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア面で使用しました
  このラバーは球離れがはやいため回転をかけにくいですが弧線が低いためスピードあるボールを打ち込めます。
  下回転うちが難しいですが中陣からのドライブは威力不足でもなくいいボールがいっていました。
  スピード重視だけど回転が少し欲しい人におすすめですね

  2017/06/29

  All	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use EBENHOLZ NCT V

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Lakeside Takuto (Experience: ６〜１０ years)

  

  It's really easy to put spin on and easy to use overall.
  Even with a bouncy blade, I was still able to get solid spin on the ball.
  Control is good too.
  I think it's easy to use on the forehand for intermediate-level players.
  I'm planning to make this my main rubber going forward.

  See original review Hide original review

  とても回転をかけやすくて使い易いです
  弾みのあるラケットでもしっかり回転をかけることができました
  コントロールも良いです
  中級者くらいのフォアに使い易いと思います
  これからメインで使おうと思います

  2017/06/25

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Mizutani Jun Super ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Hiroaki (Experience: ６〜１０ years) A rubber for the backhand side

  

  I borrowed it from a friend and tried it out, but it felt a bit lacking compared to what I expected. On the forehand, the ball's trajectory was somewhat flat and the amount of spin felt pretty average. But the speed is quite good. So in terms of spin, if you're just going to put it on your forehand, I think there are better rubbers out there.
  That said, when I tried it on my backhand instead, it was really good.
  A lot of different techniques became easier and more stable.
  And the price of 5000 yen is reasonably cheap too, which is great!
  I plan to keep using this rubber on my backhand from now on.

  See original review Hide original review

  友達から借りて使ってみたのですが、思ったより物足りない気がしました。フォアでは球の軌道がやや直線的で回転量も普通だなーって思いました。でもスピードは結構出ます。なので回転量という点ではフォア面に貼るくらいならもっといい他のラバーにした方がいいと思います。
  でも、今度バック面で使用したらとても良かったです。
  色んな技術がやりやすくて安定しました。
  しかも5000円という値段もそこそこ安いのでありがたいです！
  これからはこのラバーをバック面で使い続けたいと思います。

  2017/06/25

  All	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 48
4. 49
5. 50
6. 51
7. 52
8. 53
9. 54
10. 55
11. 56
12. Next >
13. Last »

Related rubber

• 
  impartial XB
• 
  ZYRE-03
• 
  DIGNICS 05
• 
  TENERGY 05 HARD