NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Mizuno Chidori (Experience: ６〜１０ years)

  

  The purple sponge looks really cool.
  It's not just about looking cool though — it delivers proper spin and speed, and drives are consistent.

  See original review Hide original review

  スポンジが紫でかっこいいですね
  かっこいいだけじゃなくちゃんと回転もスピードも出るし、ドライブが安定する。

  2017/11/04

  All	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use SP-55 S

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Takuto-san (Experience: ４〜５ years)

  

  The ball comes off quickly.
  The feel on impact is on the slightly hard side.
  Drives carry a lot of spin.
  The amount of spin on drives varies.
  Blocking is easy too.
  Works whether you play back or up close.
  Speed is fast.
  The sponge looks cool.
  Value for money is bad. Arc is high.

  See original review Hide original review

  球離れは良い。
  打球感も少し硬めくらい。
  ドライブの回転量は多い。
  ドライブの回転量が変化する。
  ブロックもしやすい。
  下がっても前でも使える。
  スピードは速い。
  スポンジカッコいい。
  コスパ悪い。弧線高い。

  2017/10/31

  All	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Iwacchi (Experience: ２〜３ years) Power, spin, speed — all amazing

  

  I use max thickness on my forehand. Hitting drives, my impression is that it delivers both spin and speed at the same time. It's a rubber that really lives up to Mizuno's concept. The topsheet grips the ball strongly, so even on a rushed shot the arc comes up on its own and the ball goes in. Even hitting a fast drive, the speed is incredible, and with the spin on top of that, opponents' blocks tend to fly long. Loop drives come out with an amazingly high arc. It's easy to use from any distance from the table.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚をフォアに使ってます｡ドライブを打つと回転とスピードが両立されてるという印象です。ミズノのコンセプト通りのラバーです。シートの引っ掛かりが強く、無理をしてでも勝手に弧線が上がるので入るという感じです。速くドライブを打ってもものすごいスピードなんですが、スピンもあって相手はブロックがオーバーしてしまう。ループはスゴイ高い弧線です。どの距離からでもやりやすいです。

  2017/10/31

  All	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  pom (Experience: １１〜２０ years) Easy to control when spinning

  

  I use this on my forehand.
  To put it broadly, it feels a bit like a tacky rubber —
  the feel on impact is hard, and I think it suits players who like generating their own spin rather than relying on the ball's incoming spin.

  Lifting backspin and countering with spin of your own are both easy,
  and it's easy to control using spin.

  Personally, flat hitting is really hard with this one.
  It's difficult to hit flat.

  It's not suited for people who like the feel of sinking the ball deep into the sponge, but
  since the ball actually flies, I found it easier to handle than tacky rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア面で使用しています。
  大きく例えると、粘着ラバーのような感じで、
  打球感は硬く、自分でかけていく方に合うと思います。

  下の持ち上げや、かけ返すカウンターはやりやすく、
  回転を利用したコントロールがしやすいです。

  ミートが個人的にはとてもやりずらいですね。
  フラットに打つのが難しい。

  食い込ませて打つ感覚が好きな方には向いていませんが、
  飛んでいく分、粘着より扱いやすく感じました。

  2017/10/24

  All	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use FORTIUS FT ver.D

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Sughi (Experience: More than ２０ years) Quality varies, be careful!

  

  There's a lot of variation in rubber hardness, especially in the topsheet.
  Because of that, one sheet I had felt like a springy Chinese rubber, almost like a super-thin bounce-type. The other one had a softness close to 47.5 degrees, more like a German-style spin tension rubber.
  The first one barely let the ball sink into the sponge, to the point I thought it must be aimed at Chinese-rubber users.
  The second one felt very easy to put spin on and easy to control.
  That said, from mid-to-far from the table, I couldn't deny it lacked power compared to Tenergy 05, even sinking the ball into the sponge.
  It felt purely suited to close-to-the-table play.
  If quality improves and it becomes more consistent, it might turn into something great.
  When buying, you need to be careful and pick through store stock to check whether the topsheet is soft, otherwise it's a bit risky.

  I'm hoping for good things from the Q4, which is said to be the later 64-style version.

  See original review Hide original review

  ラバー硬度、特にトップシートの硬度が非常にバラツキがあります。
  その為、一枚は弾むようになった中国ラバー極薄のボンバード。もう一枚はドイツ系スピンテンションの47.5度に近い柔らかさでした。
  前者は中国ラバー使用者向けかと思う程食い込ませられませんでした。
  後者は非常に回転がかけやすく、コントロールがしやすい印象です。
  ただ、中後陣はスポンジに食い込ませるほどテナジー05よりも威力不足が否めなかったです。
  完全に前陣向けに感じました。
  恐らく品質改善し安定してくれば、化けるかもしれません。
  購入の際はシートが柔らかいか店頭在庫から選別しないと危険ですので要注意です。

  私は後発の64系と言われているQ4に期待したいと思います。

  2017/10/18

  All	5/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	7
  Control	2
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  Yukki (Experience: ６〜１０ years) Comparison with GFT48

  

  I switched my forehand from GFT48 (MAX) to Q3 (2.1mm), so here's a review comparing the two.

  [Impression of Q3]
  The sponge has small, dense bubbles and is hard. The topsheet is on the softer side of firm for something used by top players.
  It feels like GFT48 with both the sponge and topsheet made harder.
  The feel on impact doesn't feel as hard as you'd expect (given how hard the sponge is), probably because the topsheet is on the softer side.
  [Speed]
  Both drives and flat hits are just a bit faster than GFT48.
  Should be plenty for playing close to mid-distance from the table.
  [Spin]
  If you graze it thin, it grips a ton. If you hit it thick, you can produce drives with fast initial speed.
  For serves, the spin comes out even from a motion that doesn't look like it's spinning much, so my opponents said they had trouble reading it.
  If you really cut it, I think it can spin hard.
  [Flat hitting]
  It's heavily affected by the opponent's spin, making flat hits tricky. (When I tried to hit a ball with a bit of topspin on it flat, it flew upward off the table.)
  I think it's better suited to overpowering the opponent's spin with a drive instead.

  [Overall impression]
  My impression is that the Q3 is a step up from the GFT48, and it's a good rubber that solved my issues with lack of spin.
  I plan to keep using it for a while.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォアGFT４８（MAX）⇒Q3（2.1ｍｍ）に張り替えたので、その比較をまじえてレビュー。

  【Q3の印象】
  スポンジは、気泡が小さく硬い。シートは、トップ選手使用にしては硬めの中の軟らかめ。
  GFT４８をスポンジ・シート共に硬くした感じ。
  打球感は、シートが柔らかめの為か思ったほど硬く感じない（スポンジが硬い割には）。　
  【スピード】
  ドライブ・ミート打ち共に、GFT４８よりちょっと速いくらい。
  前陣～中陣で打つには、十分かな。
  【回転】
  薄く擦るとすごく掛かる。厚く当てると初速が速いドライブが打てる。
  サーブは、切れてないようなフォームから切れてるサーブが出るので、相手は取りにくいと言ってました。
  切れば、ぶち切れると思う。
  【ミート打ち】
  相手の回転の影響をもろに受け、ミート打ちはやりにくかった。（上回転の少し掛かったボールを打とうとすると、上に飛んでいってしまった）
  ドライブで、相手の回転を上書きしていく方が、向いていると思う。

  【感想】
  Q3は、GFT48の上位ラバーと言う印象で、回転不足の悩みを解消してくれた良いラバーだと感じた。
  しばらく使ってみたいと思います。

  2017/10/09

  All	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  happy (Experience: １１〜２０ years) More similar to the 05 than expected

  

  I bought the red max thickness.
  The way the ball comes off felt very similar to Tenergy 05 (thick), but apart from that it felt like a downgraded 05.
  I got the impression the topsheet is soft while the sponge is hard.
  Weight including the package ranged from 93.0 to 94.5, and I picked the 94.0 one.
  Also, up close to the table it felt quite similar to 05, but once I stepped back to play from farther away, I kept getting flat, dead balls.
  I'd recommend either using it close to the table, or on the backhand, like Oshima mentioned.

  See original review Hide original review

  赤の特厚を購入
  飛び出し方がテナジー05（厚）にそっくりでしたがそれ以外は劣化番05でした
  トップシードが柔らかくスポンジが硬いような印象を受けました
  重さはパッケージ込みで94.5~93.0の物があり94.0を選んだ
  あと前陣ではかなり05に似ていたと思うが後陣に下がると棒球ばかりになってしまった
  前陣で扱うか大島選手が言っていたようにバックに使うことをオススメします

  2017/10/05

  All	8/10
  Speed	4
  Spin	8
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use CARBONADO 190

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
7. 7
8. 8
9. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  Q5
• 
  Q4
• 
  GF PRO
• 
  Q power