Q3
| Everyone's rating |
[Hardness] Little hard [Performance] Speed and Spin to have excellent |
(Click to zoom the photo)
Averages reviews points
- Speed:8.51
- Spin:8.51
- Control:7.53
-
Reviews of Q3. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 3)
- Pimples in
Players use Q3
Reviews by user
-
-
Cool Max （Experience：１１〜２０ years） For intermediate advanced level
-
2018/09/05
I applied tenazi 05 and Q3 to the inner force layer ZLC-CS and tried hitting both the back and the back.
To the hardness of 47 degrees, the shot feeling was felt soft. It is superior in controllability from its softness, and it can be sent to the course aimed at. Still, the drive let alone fits into the other's coat while keeping quiet power.
This rubber is well balanced at a high level in general technology. Rotation performance, controllability, power also has the ability to respond adequately to middle-level players.
If you only dare to give weak points, there is a shortage of speed to the upper level of the fore.
The image used on the back side of the advanced player comes to the forefront of the intermediate level person.
It is cheaper than regular price 6,300 yen and tenacies, and even middle and advanced level users can expect that the performance of this rubber is most suitable for the player.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ZLC
-
-
-
I am excited. （Experience：２〜３ years） There is no rotation number!
-
2018/07/31
I borrowed a senior and tried using it, but the rotation is messed up.
I felt easy to put out serve and Tsutsuki of the down rotation system in particular.
However, if you do not apply force when driving from the adhesive rubber, the ball falls. I missed a mess.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use Forutiusu FT
-
-
-
Up Down Service （Experience：６〜１０ years） Mat
-
2018/07/26
Because I did not review it if I looked closely. My friends are using it. I also used it once ... The performance may be high, but I could not manage it by myself in those days. The type that my play style ends before meeting, Q3 is the power of the drive by all means power of the drive absolutely ... Although blocks and counters are easy to do, there was a part lacking in the power of a blow a little ... performance itself It is a rubber that I would like to buy because it is expensive.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
-
-
-
Brain muscle drive man （Experience：２〜３ years） It is the best rubber
-
2018/06/21
It is thick to the fore. It was the best rubber in my previous rubber. First of all the speed is wrong. Even if it swings fully in the front team, it normally fits on the table. The platform is also good. Speed comes out, stops lightly bounce about 4, and flicks almost does not make mistakes. Rotation is also sufficient. Just backlax 9 in thickness and 220 g with grip tape, side tape, 2 power tapes so it is not recommended for those who can not swing and performance seems to be horny and there are many people who are hard to use. Is it still expensive?
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use Forutiusu FT
-
-
-
Tools Stray （Experience：１１〜２０ years） hard
-
2018/06/18
It is a hard rubber. How to use is tension rubber, but the shot feeling is Chinese rubber. When used in the image of GFT series, it was completely different rubber.
Because it is hard, downward rotation is easy to cut. Buchi broke down. Because hardness does not cut in small parts on the table, stops also stop.
Drive also takes a turn. MAX tends to be shallower compared to tenazie 05, compared with tenazi, but because it is easy to aim in the deep, it was easy to shift the timing of the block.
I thought that it was a rubber that can be attached to it by myself both in rotation and in flight distance.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Racket recommended use HURRICANE KING
-
-
-
Ultra crunch （Experience：More than ２０ years） Although it was said that it was rubber made in Japan ...
-
2018/06/07
Used for back (2.0 mm)
I tried purchasing racquet which is made by Mizuno and Oshima players are said to be a rubber that faces back. In this year's All Japan, Oshima players put tenazi back and did not use Q3.
First I will bounce. Even with light strikes, it's too much to bounce. The hitting feeling is close to tenazi and it is not too hard, but it is somewhat harder impression, but the seat catch is a good feeling with speed.
With your own sense of fulfilling your own power, a pretty good ace ball comes out. The difference from tenazy is automatic Q3 where good balls do not come out unless you have to strike yourself properly against tenacious that is rotating. The power is given to counters and blocks using the goodness of momentum.
I used 2.0mm, but if I used 1.8mm it might have been a different kind of impression.
It was my impression that momentum was too good for me to use. Compatibility with the 5th issue board or the thin carbon racket with a thin plate may be good as it is a momentary rubber. I think that it is a rubber that can draw out the potential of a rubber that produces power by adjusting the balance with the racket.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use Forutiusu FT
-
-
-
Saturnus （Experience：２〜３ years）
-
2018/04/08
Hi guys, I tried this rubber 2.1mm Red for curiosity in my blade Garaydia ALC and I've been surprised how is good this rubber. It's wonderful in countertopspin and pushes, very good undercut in serves, medium/high throw on slow topspins and medium in fast topspins, high speed too. The sponge hardness is 47° but the feel is harder than R47 or Bluestorm Z1. Faster than Tenergy 05, very good job made by Mizuno Japan!!!
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Racket recommended use Garaydia ALC
-
Rubber
Producer
Type
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.
