NO.1 table tennis review site

I've been playing table tennis for about 4 years, have won a tournament, and am a back-back cut player. I wanted the spin and stability of the back side, so I went from back grain to back front to back-back, and finally came to this rubber. Everything matches my ideal, and I'm very satisfied.
Thickness = thin, forehand = VS401, medium thickness

*Backside transition
Fei Long II → Spe S1 → Spipi D1 → Taki D → Mori DF → this

◆Speed
As per the catalog, the bounce is quite weak (same as Taki D, from my experience). Therefore, cuts are well controlled and blocks are easy (Mori DF bounces too much △). Assuming that attacks are compensated for by power, the stability as a cut player is ◎

◆Spin
The adhesion is quite strong (> Mori DF), and serves, pushes, and cuts are all amazing. The weak bounce improves performance and also suppresses the feeling of slipping, so strength control is ◎

◆Control
The elasticity and friction are well balanced, making it easy to use in general. Back drives and flicks are also stable and secure, with a comfortable grip.

◆Overall Review
Its strengths are its weak bounce and high rotation, making it a pretty good rubber despite its low price. Recommended for intermediate cut players on the back side and beginners who want to learn rotation. It's also great that you can choose a thin version. On the other hand, it may not be suitable for advanced players, for use on the forehand side, or for those who cannot make up for their shortcomings with power.

See original review Hide original review

From a cutman perspective
I think that it is too bouncy than intermediate, so hard racket,
We recommend that you increase the thickness.
But it takes good rotation,
The control is good and stable.
Please try it once. ︎

See original review Hide original review