NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  ROZENA

  

  The sheet itself looks soft, but perhaps because of the strong tension, the hitting feel was harder than I expected.

  This rubber has a clear bite. The feeling of grabbing the ball and bouncing it back like a trampoline is impressive the first time you experience it.
  It is particularly compatible with bouncing techniques. Both hitting and blocking are stable.
  If I had to say one bad point, it would be that the rotation is not very strong even if you rub the sheet, so you need to bite into it and apply it.

  Personally, I recommend using it on the back where the ball is more likely to bounce.

  See original review Hide original review

  シート自体は軟そうに見えますが、強めにテンションを掛けているためか打球感は思ったより硬く感じました。

  明確に食い込みを感じられるラバーです。掴んでトランポリンのように跳ね返す感覚は初めて体感すると感動します。
  特に弾く系の技術とは好相性です。ミート打ち・ブロックともに安定します。
  しいて悪い点を言えば回転がシートで擦ってもあまり掛からないので、噛ませて掛ける必要がある点位です。

  個人的には弾きが多くなりやすいバックでの採用をお勧めします。

  2025/03/26

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	6
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  BYPE

  

  Both the sheet and sponge are hard for a 45° club, and the sheet is quite insensitive.

  The first thing I noticed when I hit it was that it popped out quite quickly.

  Because of this, it's hard to spin it. It pops out before it bites into the sheet.

  On the other hand, it seems good for hitting the ball, but it doesn't have much speed.

  The only good thing about it is that the sheet is insensitive, making it easy to receive.

  The manufacturer says that it's recommended as a second club, but I honestly don't recommend it.

  See original review Hide original review

  シート・スポンジ共に45°帯にしては硬めで、シートも結構鈍いです。

  打ってまず感じたのは飛び出しがかなり早い点でした。
  その為、回転が掛けにくいです。シートに噛む前に飛び出します。
  逆にミート打ちには良さそうに感じますが、あんまりスピードも出ません。
  良い点はシートが鈍感なのでレシーブがやりやすい点位と思われます。

  2025/03/26

  Overall	5/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	4
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  GTT45

  

  This is the rubber I would recommend for both sides as a first rubber.
  Not only does it have a moderate bounce, but the sensitivity and softness of the sheet are wonderful.
  The softness of the sheet helps you to apply spin on your own during pushes and drives, while the sensitivity helps you to adjust the angle to match your opponent's spin during receives.
  For better or worse, this is a rubber you can't afford to skimp on.
  To be honest, I'd like them to sell the 1.8 and 2.0 versions, even if it means a big price increase.

  See original review Hide original review

  1枚目ラバーとして両面に最推しのラバーです。
  適度な弾みは勿論、シートの敏感さと柔らかさが素晴らしいです。
  ツッツキ、ドライブで回転を自分から掛ける感覚はシートの柔らかさが、レシーブで相手の回転に対して角度を合わせる事には敏感さがそれぞれ感覚を養ってくれます。
  良くも悪くも手を抜けないラバーですね。

  正直、大幅値上げでもいいから1.8や2.0を売って欲しいですね。

  2025/02/11

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	7
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Acoustic

  

  I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
  I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
  Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
  The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
  If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
  The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
  Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
  It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
  If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
  Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.

  See original review Hide original review

  社会人になってから卓球再開した時にこれを購入しました。
  値段を除けば5枚合板の中で一番いいと思います。
  弦楽器製法のおかげか芯を外してもある程度しっかり球が行きます。
  しなりも球持ちもよく、柔らかい打球感が手によく響きます。

  不満点があるとすればグリップ形状です。
  エラが出っ張ていて深く持つと手に食い込みますので削りも必要です。
  更にFLはあまりグリップエンドに広がる形状ではなく薄く細いSTに近いです。
  その分持ち替え等はやりやすいので好みが分かれると思います。
  機会があればG-REVISIONも試してみたいです。

  最後に平均重量は88gとやや重めですが、軽量個体も多いので専門店等で確認してから購入することをお勧めします。

  2024/10/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） RIGAN

  Recommend rubber（Back） GTT45

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  RIGAN

  

  Both the sheet and sponge are soft and insensitive.

  I think it's good for cultivating the feeling of hitting with forehand and backhand. Even if you hit it from below, it will lift up.

  Because the sheet is insensitive, you don't need to adjust the angle to receive it.

  On the other hand, the upper limit of rotation and speed is low and the trajectory is linear.

  If you start to feel that you can hit it stably with this rubber, but it often returns, or you can't hit it through, it's time to move on to the next rubber.
  In conclusion, if you are going to use it, the first one seems appropriate.

  See original review Hide original review

  シート・スポンジ共に柔らかく鈍感なのが特徴です。

  フォア・バックで入れ感を養うのにはいいと思います。適当に下から当てても持ち上がります。
  シートが鈍いのでレシーブもしっかりと角度を合わせなくても入ります。
  反面、回転・スピードの上限は低く弾道も直線的になります。
  このラバーで強打が安定してきたけどよく返される、打ち抜けないと感じ始めたら次のラバーへの移行タイミングです。
  結論、使うなら最初の1枚目あたりが妥当と思われます。

  2025/03/26

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	5
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. 1
2. 2
3. Next >