O3's profile

O3's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 4〜5 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Acoustic
      Racket

      Acoustic

      The Nittaku Acoustic was made according to the principles used in making string instruments. The ...
    2. ROZENA
      Rubber (Front)

      ROZENA

      • Rozena employs the rose-dyed Spring Sponge technology as its name suggests• The newly developed...
    3. Vega Europe
      Rubber (Back)

      Vega Europe

      Soft type of carbon sponge is great spin and control upgrade that aims to balance the European st...

User review

  • Acoustic

    User review

    I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
    I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
    Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
    The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
    If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
    The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
    Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
    It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
    If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
    Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.

    See original review

    2024/10/06
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    5
    Spin
    8
    Control
    10
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) RIGAN

    Recommend rubber(Back) GTT45

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • ROZENA

    User review

    The sheet itself looks soft, but perhaps because of the strong tension, the hitting feel was harder than I expected.

    This rubber has a clear bite. The feeling of grabbing the ball and bouncing it back like a trampoline is impressive the first time you experience it.
    It is particularly compatible with bouncing techniques. Both hitting and blocking are stable.
    If I had to say one bad point, it would be that the rotation is not very strong even if you rub the sheet, so you need to bite into it and apply it.

    Personally, I recommend using it on the back where the ball is more likely to bounce.

    See original review

    2025/03/26
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    6
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Acoustic

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • BYPE

    User review

    Both the sheet and sponge are hard for a 45° club, and the sheet is quite insensitive.

    The first thing I noticed when I hit it was that it popped out quite quickly.

    Because of this, it's hard to spin it. It pops out before it bites into the sheet.

    On the other hand, it seems good for hitting the ball, but it doesn't have much speed.

    The only good thing about it is that the sheet is insensitive, making it easy to receive.

    The manufacturer says that it's recommended as a second club, but I honestly don't recommend it.

    See original review

    2025/03/26
    Overall
    6/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    4
    Control
    6
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Acoustic

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • RIGAN

    User review

    Both the sheet and sponge are soft and insensitive.

    I think it's good for cultivating the feeling of hitting with forehand and backhand. Even if you hit it from below, it will lift up.

    Because the sheet is insensitive, you don't need to adjust the angle to receive it.

    On the other hand, the upper limit of rotation and speed is low and the trajectory is linear.

    If you start to feel that you can hit it stably with this rubber, but it often returns, or you can't hit it through, it's time to move on to the next rubber.
    In conclusion, if you are going to use it, the first one seems appropriate.

    See original review

    2025/03/26
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    5
    Spin
    5
    Control
    9
    Hardness Soft

    Recomend racket Acoustic

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • CLIPPER WOOD

    User review

    I used the 88g FL. It was a relatively light item, with many weighing over 90g.

    Its features are its unique high hitting sound and the feel it gives in your hand.
    Although it is a high-pitched sound, it is not a metallic sound like carbon, but a pleasant one like hitting wood.
    In terms of performance, it is slightly more bouncy than the 7-ply wood, but I think the balance of flexibility and rotation is good.

    The FL grip is unique in that it is thinner and gets thicker towards the grip end. Please note that if you grip it deeply, it will feel quite thin and thin.
    I have heard that the ST is also quite thicker than the FL, so I recommend that you try gripping it in the store to check the weight.

    See original review

    2025/02/24
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7 Soft

    Recommend rubber(Back) Vega Europe

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!