Acoustic

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little soft
[Performance] Control and Spin are excellent.
Acoustic

(Click to show big size)

Averages reviews points

  • Evaluation: 8.9 / 10
  • Number of review: 58
    • Speed:6.76
    • Spin:8.69
    • Control:9.22

    The Nittaku Acoustic was made according to the principles used in making string instruments. The materials used for this blade are thicker and softer than those in the Nittaku Violin. This provides the Acoustic with stable characteristics when attacking and blocking. Made in Japan.

    • FL
    • ST

    Specifications

    Price
    15,000 Yen(Include tax 16,500 Yen)
    Producer
    Nittaku
    Product code
    NE-67
    Speed
    Mid
    Touch
    Middle
    Size
    157 × 150mm
    Weight
    85g
    Material
    5 sheets
    Thickness
    5.7mm

    User reviews

    • Nora

      Nora (Experience:6〜10 years) Masterpiece of Nittaku

      Player reviews

      It's a racket that was not used so much at the time of the cell ball, but was addicted changed in Pula was seen using this racket again. First have a sphere, this is amazing. Even I feel feel like stick. It is fun revives than table tennis with good poor pupil by the stringed instrument series specific hitting sound. Such as the sphere of the speed is inferior as compared to carbon racket, but I think that it is by far among all the racket is a sense of stability. I think they'll become to help the future of table tennis of progress if beginner, in seeking a sense of stability, is a racket that can be recommended for those who advanced users.

      See original review

      2016/05/12
      Overall
      10/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      9
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Hardness Soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) Tenergy 64

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) Fastarc S-1

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • (Experience:4〜5 years) If you were to say a 5-ply racket, this would be it

      Player reviews

      I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
      I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
      Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
      The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
      If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
      The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
      Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
      It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
      If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
      Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.

      See original review

      2024/10/06
      Overall
      9/10
      Speed
      5
      Spin
      8
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) RIGAN

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) GTT45

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Gengar

      Gengar (Experience:6〜10 years) Grip is a matter of preference

      Player reviews

      It was an 89.2 model.
      Although it is made of five plywood, it feels like the ball leaves the racket quicker than I expected and flies further.
      However, the power still feels like that of a five-ply wood club.
      I think it is more suitable for people who use special materials and want a more wood-like feel rather than people who want the feel of a five-ply wood club.
      The grip is thin rather than narrow, with a deep jaw and a long distance from the handle to the blade.
      I feel that this is a grip that will divide people's tastes, so if you're interested, I recommend you try holding it at least once.

      See original review

      2024/04/19
      Overall
      8/10
      Speed
      6
      Spin
      8
      Control
      10
      Touch
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) V>20 Double Extra

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) Tenergy 64

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Nostalgic table tennis

      Nostalgic table tennis (Experience:6〜10 years) god racket

      Player reviews

      The best racket among the 5 pieces of wood

      Good feel at impact and good ball retention.
      The momentum is still not enough, so you need to match it with a bouncy rubber such as Tenergy or Dignics.
      Even if you put that aside, it's a racket that has a good feel at impact and you'll want to use it for a long time.
      I was grateful that it came with a one-year warranty, but I didn't use it because the quality was good.


      My personal complaint is that the FL grip is thin.
      Acoustic carbon has a thicker grip, so I'd like to try that someday.

      See original review

      2023/12/07
      Overall
      10/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) TENERGY 05

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Apurisan

      Apurisan (Experience:6〜10 years) Addictive feel at impact

      Player reviews

      I usually use acoustic carbon and purchased this to re-learn the basics of wood.


      What I thought when I hit the ball forefoot was that it felt extremely thick.
      I can see why it's called a masterpiece.

      It felt more bouncy than I expected, so maybe it's more bouncy than a bad inner or fiber? I thought.

      It is very easy to play in the front, and even if you swing it with all your might, it will stay on the table.
      However, I didn't feel like I could hit it with a single hit like with a carbon racket, so it seems better to compete with the amount of rotation and the weight of the ball.

      You'll need a little more power in the middle and rear positions, so I thought it would be better to calmly attack in the front position rather than getting into a fierce battle.

      Also, this time I used hard rubber on both sides as a refresher, but if you are going to use it in actual combat, I recommend using softer rubber. (German hardness around 45-48 degrees)

      It was a racket that could be used by anyone from beginners to advanced players by changing the type of rubber depending on their level.

      See original review

      2023/10/28
      Overall
      10/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) Dignics 09C

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) DIGNICS 05

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • matcha potato

      matcha potato (Experience:4〜5 years) Any user or rubber

      Player reviews

      Simply put, this racket does not choose the user and the rubber. The control performance is very good, and it can be recommended for the first racket, the third racket, and the fourth racket.
      *Performance is evaluated with SWAT as 5.
      As an advantage,
      ・Good control performance and stable technology in general
      ・It has a good ball retention, and it can be entered even if you bite it and rub it or play it.
      - Soft and easy to rotate.
      I think I can give you.
      Disadvantages are
      - Almost no speed
      ・Because it sticks well, it sometimes goes over
      ·expensive
      Is not it.

      However, it is true that it is a racket that can be used by anyone, and I can recommend it to Tsugetaka players. Since the momentum is a little unsatisfactory, please try adjusting with a rubber.

      See original review

      2022/10/27
      Overall
      8/10
      Speed
      4
      Spin
      8
      Control
      9
      Touch
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) V>15 STIFF

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) ILIUS B

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Middle 1 (Experience:2〜3 years) Best!

      Player reviews

      I originally used the butterfly tb5a, so I bought this because I wanted to change the racket. The rubber uses Fastark c1 on the F side and Vega Europe on the B side. After all, the shot feeling and ball holding are the highest peaks. I think some people feel that the speed is not enough, but please cover that with your arms. I said that I used Vega Europe for the B side, but it was too soft, so I'm thinking of using a harder one next time.

      See original review

      2022/10/17
      Overall
      10/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      9
      Control
      10
      Touch
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc C-1

      Recommended rubber (Backhand) Vega Europe

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. 5
    6. Last »
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!