NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  DIGNICS 80

  

  It is a transfer from Tenergy 05. I changed it for hardness and power. I also tried using Dignix 05 and Dignix 09C, but if I shake it firmly, I can hit a ball with more than 80 rotations, but I gave up because of the difficulty of the connecting ball.
  On the other hand, this 80 has a slightly straight trajectory, but it feels like a dignics with outstanding stability. Although the automatic feeling like Tenergy 05 is reduced, the power and the amount of rotation are more than Tenergy. The connecting ball is also softer than other dignics, so it's easy to do. I think it's easy to use either fore or back. The disadvantages are that the tabletop jumps too much and the loop is a little difficult, but once you get used to it, there is no problem at all. And I'm glad that the short life, which is the biggest drawback of Tenergy, has been improved.

  See original review Hide original review

  硬さと威力を求めてテナジー05から変更しました。ディグニクス05や09Cも使ってみて、ディグ80以上の重いボールが打てたのですが、つなぎのボールの難しさから断念しました。それに対してこの80は弾道は少し直線的なものの打球感はテナジー05に近く安定感があります。オートマ感は減ったものの、しっかり振れれば威力も回転量もテナジー05以上です。つなぎのボールも他のディグニクスに比べて柔らかいためやりやすく、フォアでもバックでも使えます。打点を落として下から上にスイングするよりも、頂点や早い打点で前にスイングした時にこのラバーの素晴らしさが実感できます。下回転も強くぶつけてあげれば回転に負けることなく簡単に撃ち抜けます。欠点をあげるとすると、台上が少し飛びすぎてしまうのと、下回転のループが難しいのと、ストレートへのドライブがオーバー気味になってしまうの3点くらいですが、慣れれば全然問題ありません。テナジー05と比べたら全体的に難しい部分もありますが、寿命もテナジーよりも長く、他のディグニクスが上級者向けなのに対して80は中級者レベルでも使いやすく、安定感と威力の両立をしたいプレイヤーにとてもオススメ出来るラバーです。

  2021/08/22

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  32

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  The impression when I hit it for the first time was that it was a rubber with a sense of stability, although it was a top-class speed and rotation, and the arc was high, and it went up, so it was hard as it was. However, due to the height of the arc, over-mistakes increased, and since the seat is sensitive to rotation, I felt that there was a problem with receiving just to put it in, so I gave up.
  However, that was just a matter of extra thickness. I changed the sponge to a thicker one and tried again. The weight has become lighter, and it has become a versatile rubber due to the lack of defects.

  Until now, I had a preconceived notion that the rubber for the fore would be a particularly thick one, but I was surprised that changing it to a thicker one would make it so easy to use.
  If you are an advanced user, you will be able to bring out all the performance with extra thickness, but for an intermediate person like me, the thickness is enough, and I think that even if it is thick, you can fully demonstrate the goodness of this rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  初めて打った時の感想はスピード、回転共にトップクラスで弧線が高く、上に上がるのでそれなりに硬いが、安定感のあるラバーというイメージだった。しかし、その弧線の高さ故にオーバーミスが増えてしまった事と、シートが回転に敏感であるため、入れるだけのレシーブに課題を感じ断念した。
  しかし、それはあくまで特厚の話で、スポンジを厚に変えて、再挑戦したところ、丁度よく台に収まるようになり、レシーブもラケットで打っている感覚がより強くなった為、しやすくなり、重さも軽くなり、欠点がなくなったことにより万能ラバーになった。

  今まではフォアのラバーは特厚一択という先入観があったが、厚に変えることでこんなにも使いやすくなるのかと自分自身も驚きの結果になった。
  上級者の方なら特厚で性能の全てを引き出せるのだろうが、自分みたいな中級者は厚で充分であり、厚でもこのラバーの良さを十分に発揮できると思います。

  2023/03/01

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  30

• 

  NEO HURRICANE 3

  

  Needless to say, the monster rubber that won the world (though the sponge is different).
  I longed for it myself, but gave up. I will review it based on that.
  First of all, there is an image that adhesive rubber will rotate, but correctly, it is a rubber that can be messed up by someone who can handle it. Not everybody can make a tremendous spin immediately. Also, even if the drive rotates and changes, it will be just a stick ball if you do not use it firmly after mastering the adhesive hitting, which is to open the surface and rub it while biting it.
  The bench and counter are hard, so it's very easy to do.
  It is the reason why I gave up, but if I hit it with every single ball, I can hit a ball that exceeds tenacity, but a rally type like myself requires repeated hits, This is because I determined that I had insufficient physical strength and muscular strength. And, there is a drawback that all the balls hit hard and miserable like middle processing become stick balls. It also has the drawback of being sensitive to moisture.
  From the above, I think that it is the best rubber that can only be used by people who can use it, but it is a difficult rubber that can not be comfortable because it does not rotate with auto like Tenergy.

  See original review Hide original review

  言わずもがな、世界を制したモンスターラバー(スポンジは違いますが)。
  自分も憧れて挑戦しましたが、断念しました。それをふまえてレビューします。
  まず、粘着ラバーは回転がかかるイメージがありますが、正しくは、扱える人が使えばめちゃくちゃ回転がかけられるラバーです。誰でもすぐにものすごい回転をかけられるわけではありません。そして、ドライブのエグい回転や変化も、面を開いて食い込ませながら擦るという、粘着打ちをしっかりマスターしてから使わないとただの棒玉になってしまいます。
  台上やカウンターは硬いだけあってとてもやりやすいです。
  自分が断念した理由ですが、一球一球全力で打てば、確かにテナジーを超えるようなボールが打てるのですが、自分のようなラリー型には連打が必要であり、連打するための体力や筋力が足りてないと判断したからです。そして、ミドル処理など、苦し紛れに打った球がことごとく棒玉になってしまうという欠点があります。また、湿気に弱いという欠点もあります。
  以上のことから、使える人が使えば唯一無二の最高のラバーであると思いますが、テナジーのようにオートでは回転がかかってくれないので、決して楽が出来ない難しいラバーです。

  2020/04/29

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  29

• 

  Cybershape CARBON

  

  No matter where I went, it was sold out and I finally got it, so I will review it. In a word, I am thinking of making it a main racket in the future with a wonderful racket.
  With this racket, you can easily hit a powerful ball that feels good even if you drop the RBI or lose your posture as the sweet spot is wide. Thanks to that, you can demonstrate tremendous strength in rally battles.
  Also, bench technology and receive are extremely easy to do. I feel that it is several times easier to do than usual, such as chiquita, flick, and sink. It's an illusion that you're getting better, but it's the power of the racket lol
  The disadvantages are that the probability of hitting the kado has increased a little, it is difficult until you get used to how to cut the serve, and although it is an inner, it is a little difficult to control with considerable momentum. I think these are the drawbacks that can be covered by practice at all.
  Last but not least, I think it will be your best companion, as evidenced by the world's second-largest track record.

  See original review Hide original review

  どこへ行っても売り切れでようやく手に入れることが出来ましたのでレビューします。一言でいうと素晴らしいラケットで今後メインラケットにしていこうと思っています。
  このラケットはスイートスポットが広いという触れ込み通りに打点を落としても体勢を崩されても気持ちよい強力な打球が簡単に打てます。そのおかげでラリー戦ではものすごい強さを発揮できます。
  それから、台上技術やレシーブがものすごくやり易いです。チキータやフリックや流しなど、普段の数倍やり易く感じます。上手くなったと錯覚してしまうほどですが、ラケットの力です笑
  欠点は若干カドに当たる確率が増えたのと、サーブの切り方が慣れるまでは難しいことと、インナーですがかなりの弾みでコントロールが少し難しいことくらいですね。これらは練習で全然カバーできる欠点であると思います。
  最後になりますが、世界2位の実績が証明してくれるように皆様にとっての最高の相棒になってくれると思います。

  2021/12/08

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） Q QUALITY

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  26

• 

  NUZN 50

  

  I finally found the best rubber.
  I was currently using Dignics 09C and was almost satisfied, but I felt its hardness at the crucial moment, and that was the only thing that worried me.
  I spent my days wondering if Dignics FX would come out. By the way, the quality of the ball deteriorated with the Glazer, so it was no good.
  I also tried New Zone 55, but it was too hard.
  So, when I tried 50 this time, it was softer than Dignics 09C, and it was exactly the hardness I was looking for.
  The rubber's performance was overwhelmingly faster than Dignics 09C in terms of speed, and the spin performance was also different from other speed rubbers. It's about the same as Dignics 09C. The arc is lower than Dignics 09C and has an aggressive trajectory.
  And it has a slight stickiness, so it fits well on the table. The serve is also cut.
  What I particularly liked about it was that it was extremely easy to hit with underspin. If you hit it hard, it will hold anything.
  I think I'll continue to use it if it lasts a long time. It's quite expensive, but it's the best companion with performance that matches the price.

  See original review Hide original review

  やっと最高のラバーに出会えました。
  現在ディグニクス09Cを使いほぼ満足していたのですが、勝負どころで硬さを感じてしまい、そこだけが唯一の不安要素でした。
  ディグニクスのFX出ないかなーなんて思いながら日々を過ごしていました。ちなみにグレイザーでは球の質が落ちてしまい、ダメでした。
  ニューゾーンの55も使ってみたのですが、硬くてダメでした。
  それで、今回50を試したところ、硬さはディグニクス09Cよりも柔らかく、まさに求めていた硬度でした。
  ラバーの性能はスピードは圧倒的にディグニクス09Cよりも速く、回転性能も他のスピード系ラバーとは一線を画すくらいかかりました。ディグニクス09Cと同等くらいです。弧線はディグニクス09Cよりも低めで攻撃的な弾道です。
  そして、ほのかに粘着があるので、台上の収まりも良いです。サーブも切れます。
  特に良いなと思ったところが下回転打ちがめちゃくちゃやりやすいです。しっかりぶち当てればなんでも入ってくれます。
  あとは寿命が長ければ今後も使い続けると思います。値段はかなり強気ですが、それに見合う性能の最高の相棒です。

  2025/04/30

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  15

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. Next >