NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  It had been stuck for Compared with the previous Rakuza 7.
  Both because it is rubber-consuming spin I was in the mood, but I have a easy-to-use impression towards the Tenaji.
  I was impressed because the powerful spin drive strike just hooked a little. 80 If this to seek a little speed, I was saying that 05 if speed more important than spin.
  If you sponge is using a spin rubber softer because it is a little harder it will feel that take a little time to get used to handling.

  See original review Hide original review

  以前ラクザ7と比べる為貼っていました。
  どちらもスピンの掛かるラバーですので気になっていたのですがテナジーの方が使いやすい印象を持ちました。
  少し引っ掛けただけで強力なスピンドライブが打てるので感動しました。これに少しスピードを求めるなら80、スピンよりもスピード重視なら05と言ったところですね。
  スポンジが少し硬めですので柔らかめのスピンラバーを使用している方は扱いに慣れるのに少し時間がかかる気がします。

  2017/02/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket INNERFORCE LAYER ZLF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  V＞15 Extra

  

  We stuck to the fore face of the current quartet AFC. Although I used the other to even Zhang Ji Department of ALC it is easier to use in the quartet.
  Since the sponge is harder to feel a little heavy. It is a rubber that can be recommended for those heavier rubber likes. The power of Smash is high. Or from hitting so bite is better to hit with the momentum it takes rotation.
  If you want to use in the foreground plane, those who fight mainly the drive of whether it is better to have put a different rubber. I feel not a little drive-facing of rubber. (To the end towards the drive main battle in the way in using the current V> 15 Extra because it is a personal opinion, please continue to think and so correct if you differ.)

  See original review Hide original review

  現在カルテットAFCのフォア面に貼っています。他に張継科ALCでも使いましたがカルテットの方が使いやすいです。
  スポンジが硬めなので少し重い気がします。重めのラバーが好きな方にはオススメ出来るラバーですね。スマッシュの威力は高いです。食い込ませて打つよりかは勢いをつけて打つ方が回転が掛かります。
  フォア面に使用する場合、ドライブを主として戦う方は別のラバーを貼った方が良いかと。あまりドライブ向きなラバーでは無い感じがします。(あくまで個人の意見ですので現在V＞15 Extraを使用中の方でドライブ主戦の方、違うと思えばそれで正しいと思い続けてください。)

  2017/02/05

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket QUARTET AFC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  INFINITY VPS V

  

  It is an individual of about 80g.
  I used both adhesive tension and high tension, and both are good rackets.
  Even if you put heavy rubber on it, the main body is light, so you won't be too slow, and the adhesive system is compatible with the wood racket, so you can hit unpleasant balls, and it holds the ball well even with high tension rubber like Tenergy. The ball will fly with a lot of spin. It has momentum and can be said to be a flying racket for wood.
  Although it is a racket that fits securely on the table and blocks and is easy to control, when it goes down, the ball is hit shallowly, and compared to 7-ply plywood or special materials, it can't be helped that it doesn't fly as much.
  However, it is an excellent racket that is easy to handle for players of any level! Is it the first class among the light 5-ply plywood?

  See original review Hide original review

  約80gの個体です。
  粘着テンションとハイテンションをそれぞれ貼って使いましたが、どちらでも良さを感じるラケットです。
  重いラバーを貼っても本体が軽いのでそこまで振り遅れず、木材ラケットと粘着系の相性の良さもあり、嫌らしい球を打てることや、テナジーのようなハイテンションラバーにも球持ちの良さでスピンの効いた打球が飛んでいきます。弾みもあり木材にしては飛ぶラケットと言えるでしょう。
  台上やブロックなどの技術ではしっかりと収まり、コントロールもしやすいラケットではありますが、下がった時の打球は浅く決まるところがあり、7枚合板や特殊素材に比べると飛ばないのは仕方ないところかと。
  ただ、どんなレベルの選手にも扱いやすく、優秀なラケットです！軽め5枚合板の中では一番手クラスかな？

  2024/03/31

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） RAKZA Z EXTRA HARD

  Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5