NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  INFINITY VPS V

  

  Mine weighs about 80g.
  I've tried it with both tacky-tension and high-tension rubber, and it feels good either way.
  Even with a heavy rubber on it, the blade itself is light so you don't fall behind on your swing timing. Wood blades also pair well with tacky rubber in general — you can produce nasty, hard-to-read shots — and with high-tension rubber like Tenergy, the good ball-holding feel sends out well-spun shots too. It's got decent bounce, and you could say it flies well for a wood blade.
  For short-game techniques and blocking it stays under control nicely and is easy to control, but shots tend to land a bit shallow when you're pushed back from the table, and I guess it can't be helped that it doesn't fly as much as a 7-ply or special-material blade.
  Still, it's easy to handle for players of any level — a really solid blade! I'd say it's probably one of the top picks among the lighter 5-ply blades.

  See original review Hide original review

  約80gの個体です。
  粘着テンションとハイテンションをそれぞれ貼って使いましたが、どちらでも良さを感じるラケットです。
  重いラバーを貼っても本体が軽いのでそこまで振り遅れず、木材ラケットと粘着系の相性の良さもあり、嫌らしい球を打てることや、テナジーのようなハイテンションラバーにも球持ちの良さでスピンの効いた打球が飛んでいきます。弾みもあり木材にしては飛ぶラケットと言えるでしょう。
  台上やブロックなどの技術ではしっかりと収まり、コントロールもしやすいラケットではありますが、下がった時の打球は浅く決まるところがあり、7枚合板や特殊素材に比べると飛ばないのは仕方ないところかと。
  ただ、どんなレベルの選手にも扱いやすく、優秀なラケットです！軽め5枚合板の中では一番手クラスかな？

  2024/03/31

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) RAKZA Z EXTRA HARD

  Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  I put this on before to compare it with Rakza 7.
  Both are rubbers that generate spin, so I was curious, but I got the impression that Tenergy was easier to use.
  I was impressed that just a slight brush produces a powerful, spinny drive. If you want a bit more speed than this, go with 80; if you want speed over spin, then 05 would be the choice.
  The sponge is a bit on the hard side, so if you're used to a softer spin rubber, I feel like it'll take a little time to get used to handling this one.

  See original review Hide original review

  以前ラクザ7と比べる為貼っていました。
  どちらもスピンの掛かるラバーですので気になっていたのですがテナジーの方が使いやすい印象を持ちました。
  少し引っ掛けただけで強力なスピンドライブが打てるので感動しました。これに少しスピードを求めるなら80、スピンよりもスピード重視なら05と言ったところですね。
  スポンジが少し硬めですので柔らかめのスピンラバーを使用している方は扱いに慣れるのに少し時間がかかる気がします。

  2017/02/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket INNERFORCE LAYER ZLF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  V＞15 Extra

  

  I'm currently using this on the forehand of a Quartet AFC. I've also used it on a Zhang Jike ALC, but it's easier to use on the Quartet.
  The sponge is on the hard side, so it feels a bit heavy. I'd recommend it to anyone who likes heavier rubbers. Smash power is high. You get more spin by swinging with momentum rather than trying to sink the ball into the sponge.
  If you're using it on the forehand and your game is mainly drive-based, I think you'd be better off with a different rubber. It doesn't really feel like a drive-oriented rubber. (This is just my personal opinion, so if you're using V>15 Extra as a drive-heavy player and feel differently, trust your own experience.)

  See original review Hide original review

  現在カルテットAFCのフォア面に貼っています。他に張継科ALCでも使いましたがカルテットの方が使いやすいです。
  スポンジが硬めなので少し重い気がします。重めのラバーが好きな方にはオススメ出来るラバーですね。スマッシュの威力は高いです。食い込ませて打つよりかは勢いをつけて打つ方が回転が掛かります。
  フォア面に使用する場合、ドライブを主として戦う方は別のラバーを貼った方が良いかと。あまりドライブ向きなラバーでは無い感じがします。(あくまで個人の意見ですので現在V＞15 Extraを使用中の方でドライブ主戦の方、違うと思えばそれで正しいと思い続けてください。)

  2017/02/05

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket QUARTET AFC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5