NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Fastarc C-1

  

  Unlike the cloudy sheet, a somewhat shiny sheet, the shape of the grain can be seen firmly. It is the impression that there is the advantage of entering the opponent court even if you hit the ball appropriately to defense against attacks to a certain extent. If the surface is moistly moisture petopeto, keep it sticky sheet somewhat sticky will shift (lol) For me who used to love Mark V at the same time it was a dish that felt nostalgia and rubber evolution at the same time.

  See original review Hide original review

  曇り系のシートとはちがい、やや光沢のある、粒の形状がしっかり見えるシート。攻撃に守備に、ある程度適当に打球してても相手コートに入ってしまう強みがあるという印象です。表面はしっとりペトペト、粘着シートで保管すればやや粘着も移ります(笑)マークVをかつて愛用していた私にとっては懐かしさとラバーの進化を同時に感じた一品でした。

  2017/07/02

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Arsnova

  

  Other reviewers have also written, but the impression is that it is a racket suitable for table software and half grain. The shot feeling is hard, and the ball is released quite early. Since it is not a type that gives a long flight distance, it seems unsuitable for those who want to inquire about back software.
  If it is a shake hand, it will be a battle type such as choridra & amp; meet on the fore side of the back soft, and meet & knuckle on the front soft and half grain on the back side.
  If it is a medium pen, I think that the front side software haste and the back side is light and suitable.
  There is one characteristic or habit. That is, the racket is a little thick, and it has to be. Therefore, grain height rubber is tricky to absorb the ball power. Bend the rubber grains and let the power escape & amp; It feels like holding the opponent's ball with the core. It would be better to put a side balancer around.
  This racket is also suitable for backhandmen who play shorts.
  The first one has a slightly sharp performance, so I think it is a good choice when considering speed & gt; rotation table tennis.

  See original review Hide original review

  他のレビュワーさんも書かれていますが、表ソフト、半粒に向いているラケットだという印象です。打球感は硬く、球離れはかなり早目です。飛距離は出るタイプではないので、裏ソフトの引き合いをしたい方には不向きと思われます。
  シェークハンドなら、裏ソフトのフォア面でチョリドラ&ミートをやり、バック面には表ソフト・半粒でミート&ナックル、といった戦型でしょう。
  中ペンなら、表ソフト前陣速攻&裏面には軽さもあり向いていると思います。
  1つ、特徴と言うかクセがあります。それは、ラケットがやや厚い事、そしてしならない事です。ゆえに、粒高ラバーは球威を吸収させるのにコツがいります。ラバーの粒を曲げながら威力を逃がす&相手のボールを中芯で抑える感じです。サイドバランサーを周囲に貼るとより良いでしょう。
  ショートで弾くバックハンドマンにも向いているでしょうね、このラケットは。
  はじめの一本には少し尖った性能ですので、スピード>回転 の卓球を考えた時の良い選択肢になる一本だと思います。

  2021/11/16

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） GORIKI KAISOKU

  Recommend rubber（Back） Carl P-1R OX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  HOUO CHINESE STYLE PENHOLDER

  

  I have used both grips in China FL and Chinese style, but it is small enough to think that you can choose it as you like. Perfect fit for ladies and children? Kana Cut back with a small blades and strikingly gleeful are very easy to do. When used at grain height, it was necessary to adjust the angle of the block by bouncing too much. There is no reverberation feeling. Although it is a minor maker, it is not a strange color. Truly a long seller.

  See original review Hide original review

  グリップは中国FLと中国式とどちらも使ったことがありますが、好みで選べばよいと思うほど小さめです。レディースやお子さんにピッタリフィット？かなと。小振りなブレードで切り返しや小気味よい連打はとてもやり易いです。粒高で使用したときは、弾みすぎてブロックの角度を調整してやる必要ありました。響きはない打球感です。マイナーメーカーとはいえ、奇をてらった色物ではありません。さすがのロングセラー。

  2017/06/27

  Overall	5/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	5
  Control	6
  Touch	5
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  TeruRyu

  

  There is quite a degree of adhesion. It is best to keep it with adhesive protective sheet of TSP. It is a person who bounces on sticky rubber. It is not a table tennis that blows off the opponent's block with a demon drive, but it is a rubber that faces towards the rally-oriented body, such as cutting or not cutting, stopping and stretching. The quality is also high, it is excellent in COSPA, it is adhesive rubber which buys and does not damage.

  See original review Hide original review

  粘着度合いは結構あります。TSPの粘着保護シートで保管するのがベストでしょう。粘着ラバーでは弾む方です。鬼ドライブで相手のブロックを吹っ飛ばす卓球ではなく、切ったり切らなかったり、止めたり伸ばしたりというラリー主体の方に向くラバーかなと。品質も高く、コスパに優れた、買って損はない粘着ラバーです。

  2017/06/27

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	8
  Control	5
  Hardness	Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Grass D.tecS

  

  From previous reputation, high reversal performance of rotation · momentum is strong, it is necessary to get used to, it is a review post on using with pen grain from prejudice. ① It surely comes out to the drive of the other party. Sensation of wrapping in rubber and reversing returning without adding anything. However, if there is technology to cut by myself, I thought that it could be reversed enough to produce even other rubbers. ② The momentum is strong, and it goes down with a cut block and arrives at the partner court with plenty of margin, even if it gets down, it is not worried about too much momentum on the table, and if it is a person who can adjust the timing of the block it is strangely enough to fit in the partner coat.
  ③ However, I frequently use forehand on the grain height side, but since I felt it was not fatally stable, this rubber entered the store.

  See original review Hide original review

  前評判から、回転の反転性能高い・弾みは強く慣れが必要、との先入観からペン粒にて使用した上でのレビュー投稿です。①相手のドライブに対してブチ切れブロックは確かに出ます。何も手を加えなくてもラバーで包み込んで反転返球する感覚。ただ、自分で切る技術があるなら、他のラバーでも十分生み出せる反転かと思いました。②弾みは強く、下がってもカットブロックで相手コートに余裕で届きます、台上での弾みすぎは気にならず、ブロックのタイミングが合わせられる人なら不思議なくらい相手コートに収まるものです。
  ③ただ、私は粒高面でのフォアハンドを多用するのですが、それが致命的に安定しない気がしたので、このラバーはお蔵入りです。

  2017/07/02

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	3
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket SWEDEN CLASSIC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. Next >