NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  Since it came out, nothing has surpassed this rubber, and it's supported by everyone from hobby players to pros — you could call it the strongest rubber out there.
  Drives that spin almost automatically, shots that trace a unique arc and land right on the table, serves that bite sharply — it does pick its user, but the benefits are immeasurable.
  If I had to name a downside, it's that receives are heavily affected by spin, so unless you can read your opponent's spin and ball type and present the right racket angle, you won't get a stable receive.
  I'd recommend it to competitive players and anyone who wants to win.

  See original review Hide original review

  発売以来、今現在までこのラバーを越える物が無く愛好家からプロまで多くのプレイヤーが支持する最強ラバーだと言えます。
  オートでかかるドライブ、独特の弧線を描き出して台上に収まる打球、シャープに切れるサーブなど、使い手を選ぶもののメリットは計り知れません。
  強いてデメリットをあげるならば、回転の影響を強く受けるためレシーブは、相手の回転量、球種が理解できた上で適切な面が出せないと安定したレシーブが出来ないでしょう。
  競技志向が強い方、勝ちたい方にオススメします。

  2017/07/23

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Timo Boll ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  18

• 

  NEO HURRICANE 3

  

  Compared to the tacky rubber I used 20 years ago, this is a completely different beast, aside from the smell.
  The tackiness of the sheet is mild, but it has decent bounce and is easy to handle.
  Every spin-based shot stays consistent at a high level.
  It's characterized by being quite heavy, and defensive techniques like blocking can be a bit unforgiving.
  I'd recommend it to players with a spin-focused playing style.

  See original review Hide original review

  20年前に使っていた粘着ラバーとは、匂い以外全く別物でした。
  シートのベタつきはマイルドですが、そこそこの弾みがあり扱いやすいです。
  回転をかけるプレーすべて高い水準で安定します。
  重量がとても重いのと、ブロックなどの守備的な技術はシビアな面を覗かせるのも特徴です。
  回転重視のプレイスタイルをされる方にオススメします。

  2017/07/10

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket INTENSITY NCT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  18

• 

  FACTIVE

  

  After switching to tension rubbers, I had this on my forehand for a long time.
  It seems to be a milder, more well-rounded version of the same maker's Fastarc C1.
  You can play a stable game with just the right balance across every technique.
  The light weight is also a plus, and considering the price and lifespan, the value for money is quite excellent.
  Personally, I found the bounce when playing away from the table, and the sharpness on serves, a bit lacking, but for the purpose of getting used to tension rubbers, it didn't bother me.
  Given the hardness, I also thought it would work fine on the backhand.

  See original review Hide original review

  テンションラバーへ移行後、長らくフォア面に貼っていました。
  同メーカーのファスタークC1をマイルドにまとめた性能に見受けられました。
  全ての技術に対して丁度良いバランスで安定したプレーが出来ます。
  重量が軽いのもポイントで、値段や寿命を含めて、コストパフォーマンスはかなり優れています。
  個人的には後陣に下がった時の弾み、サーブの切れは若干物足りなかったですが、テンション系ラバーに慣れる目的においては、気になりませんでした。
  硬度的にバック面に貼るのもアリだと思いました。

  2017/07/26

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Deneb

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  17

• 

  RUTIS C

  

  This blade is ideal for backhand-oriented play, but it also works fine used in reverse.
  It's very light, and even though the blade is thin, it has carbon built in and plenty of bounce, so I'd recommend it for a hitting style with short pips on the forehand.
  Personally, I feel the blade's construction and the way it flexes are similar to STIGA blades (like the Intensity or the Rosewood series), so I use inverted rubber on both sides without worrying much about rubber weight.
  The one and only real drawback is that the grip is thin and small.
  It's a matter of preference, but if that doesn't bother you, give it a try.
  This is a blade that deserves more recognition.

  See original review Hide original review

  裏面打法に最適なラケットですが、反転での運用もOKです。
  重量が非常に軽く、板厚も薄いわりに、カーボン内蔵で弾みも充分有るため表ソフトで弾くプレーがオススメです。
  私個人としては板の構成や、しなり方がスティガのラケットに似ている(インテンシティーやローズウッド系)為、裏裏でラバーの重量を気にせず振っています。
  唯一にして最大の難点が、グリップの細さと小さい点です。
  好みが別れる所ですが、気にされない方は一度使ってみてください。
  もっと評価されていいラケットです。

  2017/08/19

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	5
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Fastarc G-1

  Recommend rubber(Back) Vega Asia

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  15

• 

  Vega Asia

  

  The biggest point is the distinctive metallic sound it makes on contact, which feels great.
  As for performance, it's on the harder side with high grip, and works on either the forehand or backhand side.
  Both serves and receives have no odd quirks in response, but the topspin drive naturally draws a slightly high arc with a bit of a loop feel.
  Personally, I'd recommend this for the backhand side of players moving from single-sided penhold to shakehand or double-sided penhold. (Single-sided penhold players use a hard rubber to cover the backhand too.)

  See original review Hide original review

  最大のポイントは、打球した際に放つ独特の金属音が気持ちいいのです。
  性能ですが、硬めの硬度、高いグリップ力がありフォア面、バック面どちらの運用も可能です。
  サーブ、レシーブ共に応答性の癖はありませんが、ドライブは自然にループ気味のやや高い弧線を描く印象です。
  個人的には、片面ペンからシェークorペン両面などに移行される方のバック面にオススメします。(片面ペンは硬いラバーでバックも対応する為)

  2017/12/12

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket RUTIS C

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2