NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  Since its release, it can be said that it is the strongest rubber that many players support from lovers to pros without having anything beyond this rubber until now.
  The merit of choosing the user, such as the drive taken by the auto, the drawing which peculiarly draws the arc line and fits on the table, the sharp cutting serve, etc, is immeasurable.
  If it gives a disadvantage, it receives a strong influence of rotation, so the receiver will not be able to receive a stable reception unless you can understand the amount of rotation of the opponent, the kind of ball and appropriate surface can not be obtained.
  It is recommended for people with strong competition orientation, those who want to win.

  See original review Hide original review

  発売以来、今現在までこのラバーを越える物が無く愛好家からプロまで多くのプレイヤーが支持する最強ラバーだと言えます。
  オートでかかるドライブ、独特の弧線を描き出して台上に収まる打球、シャープに切れるサーブなど、使い手を選ぶもののメリットは計り知れません。
  強いてデメリットをあげるならば、回転の影響を強く受けるためレシーブは、相手の回転量、球種が理解できた上で適切な面が出せないと安定したレシーブが出来ないでしょう。
  競技志向が強い方、勝ちたい方にオススメします。

  2017/07/23

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Timo Boll ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  18

• 

  NEO HURRICANE 3

  

  It was completely different from the sticky rubber I used 20 years ago except for smell.
  Although the stickiness of the seat is mild, it is easy to handle with the momentum there.
  All play playing a turn stabilizes at all high standards.
  The weight is very heavy, and the defensive technique such as the block is also characterized by peeking in the severe aspect.
  I recommend it to those who will be playing style that places importance on rotation.

  See original review Hide original review

  20年前に使っていた粘着ラバーとは、匂い以外全く別物でした。
  シートのベタつきはマイルドですが、そこそこの弾みがあり扱いやすいです。
  回転をかけるプレーすべて高い水準で安定します。
  重量がとても重いのと、ブロックなどの守備的な技術はシビアな面を覗かせるのも特徴です。
  回転重視のプレイスタイルをされる方にオススメします。

  2017/07/10

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket INTENSITY NCT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  18

• 

  FACTIVE

  

  After shifting to tension rubber, it stuck on the fore side for a long time.
  It was seen in the performance which compiled Fastik C1 of the same milder.
  You can play consistently with just good balance for all technologies.
  It is also a point that the weight is light, cost performance is quite excellent including price and lifespan.
  Personally, the momentum when I went down to the backwards, the break of the serve was somewhat unsatisfactory, but for the purpose to get used to the tension type rubber, I did not mind.
  I thought that it is ant to paste hardly on the back side.

  See original review Hide original review

  テンションラバーへ移行後、長らくフォア面に貼っていました。
  同メーカーのファスタークC1をマイルドにまとめた性能に見受けられました。
  全ての技術に対して丁度良いバランスで安定したプレーが出来ます。
  重量が軽いのもポイントで、値段や寿命を含めて、コストパフォーマンスはかなり優れています。
  個人的には後陣に下がった時の弾み、サーブの切れは若干物足りなかったですが、テンション系ラバーに慣れる目的においては、気になりませんでした。
  硬度的にバック面に貼るのもアリだと思いました。

  2017/07/26

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Deneb

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  17

• 

  RUTIS C

  

  Although it is the best racket for backside striking, operation with reversal is also OK.
  The weight is very light, and the plate thickness is also thin, because there is enough momentum with built-in carbon, play playing with table software is recommended.
  As I personally I am worried about the weight of the rubber on the back so that the composition of the board and how to bend is similar to Stiga's racket (intensity and rosewood type).
  The only biggest difficulty is the smallness and smallness of the grip.
  Taste is a place to separate, but if you do not mind, please try using it once.
  It is a racket that has been evaluated more.

  See original review Hide original review

  裏面打法に最適なラケットですが、反転での運用もOKです。
  重量が非常に軽く、板厚も薄いわりに、カーボン内蔵で弾みも充分有るため表ソフトで弾くプレーがオススメです。
  私個人としては板の構成や、しなり方がスティガのラケットに似ている(インテンシティーやローズウッド系)為、裏裏でラバーの重量を気にせず振っています。
  唯一にして最大の難点が、グリップの細さと小さい点です。
  好みが別れる所ですが、気にされない方は一度使ってみてください。
  もっと評価されていいラケットです。

  2017/08/19

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	5
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Fastarc G-1

  Recommend rubber（Back） Vega Asia

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  15

• 

  Vega Asia

  

  The biggest point is the peculiar metallic sound that fires when you hit the ball.
  Although it is a performance, it has hardness of hardness, high grip power and it is possible to operate either the front face or the back face.
  There is no habit of responsiveness for both Saab and Receive, but the drive is an impression that draws a somewhat higher arc that loops naturally.
  Personally, I recommend to the back side of those who are transferred from single-sided pen to shake or pen both sides. (Because single-sided pen is hard rubber and back also corresponds)

  See original review Hide original review

  最大のポイントは、打球した際に放つ独特の金属音が気持ちいいのです。
  性能ですが、硬めの硬度、高いグリップ力がありフォア面、バック面どちらの運用も可能です。
  サーブ、レシーブ共に応答性の癖はありませんが、ドライブは自然にループ気味のやや高い弧線を描く印象です。
  個人的には、片面ペンからシェークorペン両面などに移行される方のバック面にオススメします。(片面ペンは硬いラバーでバックも対応する為)

  2017/12/12

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket RUTIS C

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  11

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2