|Experience||More than ２０ years|
I remembered a nostalgic feeling
I remember the ball of the time when I used glue on JUIC Scramble 21
It takes a lot of rotation and has a good ball so it's easy to control.
I personally thought I wanted a little more momentum.
It was a little softer and I thought it might not come with rubber, but the ball went up firmly
I think that it is a rubber for the back side
Overall9/10 Speed9 Spin8 Control9 Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket QUARTET AFC
Comparison with Tenergy 64
Larry: The impression was a little stronger than Tenergy, but I didn't feel the difference
Drive: The speed was more impressive than the amount of rotation. The amount of rotation was larger than Tenergy and the speed drive drove down and the opponent seemed difficult to take
Saab: I think the rotation will take place and you can aim for Service Ace. Long / short adjustment is a little difficult and requires practice and technique
Block: I will wrap and play the ball firmly, so I think that it will become possible if you match even the impact firmly
Counter: The counter felt a little difficult. As mentioned above, the counter wraps around the ball, and it is difficult to take a counter unless the amount of rotation is carefully determined.
General comment: Speed is more important than the amount of rotation, so the fore speed drive is good, but I think it is a rubber that can demonstrate its ability to block on the back side, and well.
Overall9/10 Speed10 Spin9 Control8 Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket HURRICANE LONG 5
It is an impression of a racket that is comparatively easy to strike, and also has a momentum but also a firm control.
Although there are many opinions that the momentum is unsatisfactory in the backwards for the former team, I think that there is a prejudice of the use of Niwa player.
Although it felt slightly weak momentarily when trying to fly only on the seat, the flight distance also comes out firmly according to the speed of the swing.
Is it a question of how to feel that I felt that momentum was insufficient?
It is a racket flying as strikingly as it hits, so I think that ease of use will also change depending on the user, but it was an impression that relatively high cost performance is a racket.
Overall9/10 Speed9 Spin7 Control8 Touch7 Hardness Little soft
It is currently in use racket.
The elongation of the ball when banging is phenomenal.
I think that there is no part that I thought was especially bad and it was finished in a well-balanced manner.
As for the rainbow series of Kyubishi series, since there are many similar products, it is necessary to be careful, but I think that it is performance problematic if it is a genuine product.
What I used was Kyoto Leopard N 301.
Overall10/10 Speed10 Spin9 Control8 Touch9 Hardness Little hard
I used various rubbers, but it was elastic and spinning out.
I think that control is also reasonable because it is good to have balls for momentum.
The sponge is soft compared to the sponge of the leopard leopard but it is stiff, so the first intermediate person and the lady 's players may feel difficult to use.
Performance is better than tenazi depending on usage as a rubber for advanced users.
Now I am using JP01, but I felt it was okay to change it.
Overall10/10 Speed10 Spin10 Control8 Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket HURRICANE LONG
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.