Pin-chan's profile

Pin-chan's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience More than 20 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. HURRICANE LONG 5
      Racket

      HURRICANE LONG 5

      Hurricane Long 5 adopts 7-ply aryl-carbon fiberboard with Pith-Film tech, offering great power an...
    2. Dignics 09C
      Rubber (Front)

      Dignics 09C

    3. DIGNICS 80
      Rubber (Back)

      DIGNICS 80

      It is not yet released as of January 2018, but since it is already used by Mizutani and Hamamoto,...

User review

  • NANO SPINⅡ CHARISMA

    User review

    I remembered a nostalgic feeling
    I remember the ball of the time when I used glue on JUIC Scramble 21
    It takes a lot of rotation and has a good ball so it's easy to control.
    I personally thought I wanted a little more momentum.
    It was a little softer and I thought it might not come with rubber, but the ball went up firmly
    I think that it is a rubber for the back side

    See original review

    2019/11/28
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket QUARTET AFC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • DIGNICS 64

    User review

    Comparison with Tenergy 64
    Larry: The impression was a little stronger than Tenergy, but I didn't feel the difference
    Drive: The speed was more impressive than the amount of rotation. The amount of rotation was larger than Tenergy and the speed drive drove down and the opponent seemed difficult to take
    Saab: I think the rotation will take place and you can aim for Service Ace. Long / short adjustment is a little difficult and requires practice and technique
    Block: I will wrap and play the ball firmly, so I think that it will become possible if you match even the impact firmly
    Counter: The counter felt a little difficult. As mentioned above, the counter wraps around the ball, and it is difficult to take a counter unless the amount of rotation is carefully determined.
    General comment: Speed is more important than the amount of rotation, so the fore speed drive is good, but I think it is a rubber that can demonstrate its ability to block on the back side, and well.

    See original review

    2019/09/26
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    9
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket HURRICANE LONG 5

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Dignics 09C

    User review

    Currently used in the fore
    I was very surprised that, unlike the adhesive tension I used so far, I could get enough speed even from the apse.
    Since the block does not fly, it is impressive that the ball that you should rotate yourself rather than using the power of the opponent goes
    Anyway, I think that it is a rubber that responds to the luxury trouble of wanting to take the initiative by rotation but also wanting power.

    See original review

    2021/02/07
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    10
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket HURRICANE LONG 5

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • HURRICANE LONG 5

    User review

    It is currently in use racket.
    The elongation of the ball when banging is phenomenal.
    I think that there is no part that I thought was especially bad and it was finished in a well-balanced manner.
    As for the rainbow series of Kyubishi series, since there are many similar products, it is necessary to be careful, but I think that it is performance problematic if it is a genuine product.
    What I used was Kyoto Leopard N 301.

    See original review

    2018/05/16
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    9
    Control
    8
    Touch
    9
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) Bluefire JP 01 Turbo

    Recommend rubber(Back) Fastarc G-1

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • QUARTET AFC

    User review

    It is an impression of a racket that is comparatively easy to strike, and also has a momentum but also a firm control.
    Although there are many opinions that the momentum is unsatisfactory in the backwards for the former team, I think that there is a prejudice of the use of Niwa player.
    Although it felt slightly weak momentarily when trying to fly only on the seat, the flight distance also comes out firmly according to the speed of the swing.
    Is it a question of how to feel that I felt that momentum was insufficient?
    It is a racket flying as strikingly as it hits, so I think that ease of use will also change depending on the user, but it was an impression that relatively high cost performance is a racket.

    See original review

    2018/02/14
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) V>15 Extra

    Recommend rubber(Back) TARGET PRO GT-H47

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!