goma's profile

goma's profile
Gender Male
Age U20
Experience 4〜5 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Ovtcharov Senso V1
      Racket

      Ovtcharov Senso V1

      Blade Technology "Made in Sweden"The idea originated in Sweden and has found favour with world st...
    2. GOLDEN TANGO
      Rubber (Front)

      GOLDEN TANGO

      The new JOOLA Golden Tango is „Made in Germany“, combining the advantages of a tacky upper rubbe...
    3. Tenergy 64
      Rubber (Back)

      Tenergy 64

      TENERGY 64 is the fastest attacking rubber of the TENERGY family; the No. 64 being the developmen...

User review

  • TeruRyu

    User review

    It is light rubber for sponge hardness. Just because it is not as good as Vega European caution is necessary. Neither Xianglong nor this rubber is so suitable for scuffing, it is better to hit a ball with the highest possible hitting point. Rotation is less than spin tension, speed is a little slow, but control is good accordingly and over mistakes etc are reduced less. I used it for the second year for table tennis, but I think that it was suitable for remembering various ways of doing it. Just be honest We do not have power, so we recommend it for practice.

    See original review

    2018/01/02
    Overall
    6/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Swat

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • MANTRA H

    User review

    Spin tension is close to speed system. You can hit a good ball that let you dig into it rather than rub it. Spherical separation is early and arcuate is linear. It is very similar to V15 extra, but slightly arched line is higher than V15. I think that the low and fast of the counter and the drive were pretty good, so it is for advanced users who have power and steady meetings.

    See original review

    2018/01/02
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Waldner Senso Carbon

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • User review

    This racket is pretty light. Although it was a change from swat, it was too light and I was surprised. Since it was 5 plywood boards, it fell as far as it got down, the flight distance did not come up to that extent, but the initial speed when playing with the front club was quite fast because the surface material was hard. Although compatibility with adhesion is not yet well understood honestly, I think whether compatibility is good in the sense that it is easy to get a habit ball because the weight of the sphere when it is played and the weight of the sphere when hung is quite different. It is recommended for people who play early in the front team because they are light and good control is good.

    See original review

    2017/12/30
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    7
    Control
    10
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) GOLDEN TANGO

    Recommend rubber(Back) Vega Japan

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • GOLDEN TANGO

    User review

    I change from Xianglong and are using it for the current front face. Compared with Xiangrong, the arc of the speed drive is quite high and there is a sense of stability. Xiangrong was not rotated without swing speed, and there were many times I made a net mistake when lifting downward rotation with an unreasonable position, but with this rubber it rarely fell. Although the sponge is pretty sponge, it is easy to handle because the seat is soft or it can be rotated firmly even with a light hit. Thanks to the hard sponge and adhesive sheet, stop stops messing up, but in comparison the distance and speed when striking a drive is high even in adhesive tension, there is also a sticky sinking trajectory and determination power is It is quite expensive. The amount of rotation is also about the same as that of the Kyoto leopard system, which is far more than the conventional adhesive tension. As a difficult technology to play, the block is difficult because it is very sensitive to the influence of rotation, and the platform has stopped too much and a net mistake of the stop occurred frequently, but when it got used to practicing neither, it became no problem. I feel familiar with the adhesion so far because it is slightly different feeling, but since it is a rubber with considerably high performance I want you to use it by all means for sticky users.

    See original review

    2017/12/12
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    10
    Control
    6
    Hardness Hard

    Recomend racket Swat

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • BLOODWOOD

    User review

    The top plate is a racket that is stiff and it fits sticking considerably. There is also the influence of the rubber that is affixed, but not enough speed to punch out, instead you can hit a ball with a considerable amount of rotation. Because the upper plate is hard and carbon-filled, it is recommended for those who can fully shake because the connecting ball becomes a ball.

    See original review

    2017/12/25
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    6
    Touch
    6
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) NEO HURRICANE 3

    Recommend rubber(Back) Fastarc C-1

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. Next >

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!