NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  KOJI MATSUSHITA DEFENSIVE

  

  With Tenergy 05 and V>15 Extra on it... it's a decent match, I'd say.
  Attack: Even on hard shots, it's easy to control, but if you don't consciously grip the ball firmly and drive through, the shot lacks power and comes out slow.
  Forehand chop (against a hard shot): It doesn't tend to go long, and it's easy to control. That said, it might not cut the ball much.
  Forehand chop (against a weak shot): If you consciously try to add cut, you have to be careful with control, and it's actually harder to cut than when returning a hard shot.

  With Hurricane Pro 3 Turbo Orange on it... I think it's a good match if you're purely chopping.
  Attack: Maybe my skill isn't there yet, but it clearly lacks speed and doesn't suit attacking at all.
  Forehand chop (against a hard shot): The rebound is well contained, so it's easy to control, and maybe because of the rubber, it cuts reasonably well too.
  Forehand chop (against a weak shot): It feels like the ball doesn't fly much, so you have to be careful with control, but it cuts just as well as when returning a hard shot.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー05、V＞15 Extraを貼った場合・・・まあまあ合うと思う。
  攻撃：強打してもコントロールはしやすいが、自分でしっかりと掴まえて打つように意識しないと力が乗らずスピードが遅い。
  フォアカット（強い打球への対応）：オーバーしやすいという感じでもなくコントロールはしやすい。ただ、あまり切れないかも。
  フォアカット（弱い打球への対応）：意識して切ろうとするとコントロールに気を遣うが、強い打球への返球以上に切りにくい。

  キョウヒョウPro3 ターボオレンジを貼った場合・・・カットに徹するなら合うと思う。
  攻撃：技術が未熟かもしれないけど、明らかにスピードが出ないし全然合わないと思う。
  フォアカット（強い打球への対応）：反発については抑えも効いてコントロールもしやすいし、ラバーのせいかそこそこ切りやすい。
  フォアカット（弱い打球への対応）：飛ばないイメージが強くてコントロールに気を遣うが、強打に対する返球と同様に切りやすい。

  2019/08/25

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) Carl P-1R OX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  Carl P-4 OX

  

  I'd been using Curl P-1 the whole time, and on a whim decided to put Curl P-4 extra-thin on my Wa no Kiwami -Ao- and keep using that, but with the P-4 I was bothered by how pushes came out as straight, spinless balls. So I got a used OX version of the P-4 and an extra-thin P-4 from my club and tried putting them on a Bionsero to test-hit.
  First, regarding pushes, which I was most interested in, unfortunately both the OX and the extra-thin were the same — it's hard to produce variation, so I can only conclude that this is just how the rubber behaves (or maybe my technique isn't good enough).
  As for how well chops bite, I often hear that a rubber without sponge cuts better, but honestly I felt no difference. For pushes, the extra-thin version was clearly more stable, and more importantly, I felt the range of spin variation was wider than with the OX. Thinking about it, it makes sense — since the OX has no sponge, both chops and pushes end up with a similar range of variation, and I felt that would be tough in an actual match since opponents would get used to it.
  And as I wrote about the P-4 in soft form, just as I expected, the combination of the soft Bionsero and the P-4 didn't produce any speed at all, and I struggled especially with slow backhand shots catching in the net a lot. I think a harder blade would be better if you're going to use this.
  In conclusion, I'm going to keep using the extra-thin P-4.

  See original review Hide original review

  カールP-1をずっと使ってて、思い立ってカールP-4特薄を和の極-碧-に貼って使い続けることにしたんだけど、P-4はプッシュの棒玉が気になった。そこでクラブで中古のP-4のOXとP-4の特薄をもらってきてビオンセロに貼って試打してみた。
  まず一番興味があったプッシュに関しては、残念ながらOXも特薄もやっぱり同じで変化は出しずらく、これはもうそういう特性だと思うしかない（技術が足りないかも）。
  カットの切れに関してはスポンジない方が切れるとよく聞くけど、正直変わらないと思った。ツッツキは断然特薄の方が安定するし、何より切れの幅がOXよりも大きいと思った。考えれば当たり前だけど、OXはスポンジがないのでカットもツッツキも変化幅が同じ感じになるし、これでは試合では慣れられて厳しいと思った。
  そしてP-4ソフトで書いたけど、思った通り柔らかいビオンセロとP-4の組み合わせでは全然飛んでいかず、特にバックの緩い打球に対してはネットによく引っかかって苦労した。貼るなら硬いラケットの方が良いと思った。
  結論としてP-4特薄を使い続けようと思う。

  2019/09/08

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  HURRICANE PRO Ⅲ TURBO BLUE

  

  Comparing it to Pro3 Turbo Orange, I don't think there's much difference in feel for chops, pushes, or serves against weak shots.
  For chops or attacking against strong shots, though, it felt like the ball carries more than with Orange and control was harder. It might be my own lack of power, but the spin on my drives just wouldn't increase, so after a few days of trying it I went back to Pro3 Turbo Orange.

  See original review Hide original review

  Pro3ターボオレンジとの比較では、弱い打球に対するカットやツッツキ、サーブの打球感はほとんど変わらないのではないかと思う。
  強い打球に対するカットや攻撃については、オレンジよりも飛んでいくイメージでコントロールが難しいと感じた。自分のパワー不足かもしれないけど、ドライブの回転量があがらないので数日間試してPro３ターボオレンジに戻してしまった。

  2019/08/27

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Recomend racket WANOKIWAMI MIDORI DEF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Q5

  

  I haven't used Q3 or Q4, but from a chopper's perspective, Q5 feels like it sits in the middle between Tenergy 05 and Hurricane Pro3 Turbo Orange (kind of in-between, if that makes sense).
  Chopping stability against strong or weak shots and loop drives feels about the same as Tenergy 05, but it falls well short of Hurricane in terms of sharpness. For attacking, the trajectory feels higher than with Tenergy or Hurricane, and I think Hurricane and Tenergy are better in terms of spin and speed.
  That said, for someone past the beginner stage, I think it's good overall because the control gives you a real sense of security.

  See original review Hide original review

  Ｑ３もＱ４も使用したことはないけど、Ｑ５をカットマンの視点でテナジー05やキョウヒョウPro3 ターボオレンジと比較すると、中間に位置する（中途半端？）なイメージ。
  強い打球あるいは弱い打球、ループドライブに対するカットの安定感はテナジー０５と同じくらいの印象だけど、キレの部分でキョウヒョウには遠く及ばないと思う。攻撃に関しては弧線がテナジーやキョウヒョウよりも高めの印象で、回転量やスピードの面ではキョウヒョウやテナジーの方が優れていると思う。
  ただ、初心者を脱したレベルで使う場合には全般的にコントロールに安心感があって良いのではないかと思う。

  2019/08/27

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket KOJI MATSUSHITA DEFENSIVE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2