Pora's profile
Experience | 6〜10 years |
---|
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
- If you want to develop a consistent offensive game, but are unsure which blade to use, you can...
-
- Rubber (Front)
- • Rozena employs the rose-dyed Spring Sponge technology as its name suggests• The newly developed...
-
- Rubber (Back)
- • Rozena employs the rose-dyed Spring Sponge technology as its name suggests• The newly developed...
-
User review
-
-
If you think it is hard and use it, you will be betrayed. Even if the sponge is hard, the sheet is quite soft, so it is good to bite into it, but the sheet is weak, so it is easy to fall off and may not be suitable for hard hitters. Performance is not bad, so rotation and grip are above average. There is no problem with downward rotation. Above all, it is a light rubber, so it is good for those who want to reduce the weight, the back of the pen, etc.
Rosena may be good for performance, and Roundel may be good for lighter weight.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket KORBEL
-
-
With the same blades as Viscaria, Zhang Jike ALC, and Timo Boll ALC, the grip is a flat and thin grip that is particular about Kenta.
As for the performance, you can see by looking at the evaluation of the same blade (Viscaria etc.), but the important thing in this racket is the grip.
I like the thin and flat Korbel, so the Kenta grip feels good at first, but after using it for about an hour, my hands hurt. As is often the case with thin grips, it is too thin and puts extra force on your hands, which makes you very tired. Even myself with small hands hurt, so I think it's for women and kids with small hands. In fact, Kenta uses Zhang Jike ALC instead of his own model, so is it difficult to use?
We recommend that you hold the grip before buying.
The blade performance has a good shot feeling and the ball is released quickly, but there is still a feeling of having it, and its exquisiteness is a wonderful racket.
I think that this blade is the destination to end up with a racket without mistakes.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
-
-
1, The impression that it is more bouncy than a general introductory racket, a racket for beginners, and a little more bouncy than Kolbel.
2, The trajectory is a little straight. Rubber that draws an arc is recommended (I wonder if Rosena is good)
3, There seems to be individual differences in weight. My weight was about 87g.
4, Made in Japan and has a good texture. (There is no sense of luxury)
5, The shot feeling is not good. Vibration is weak and there is a feeling of moth. Not suitable for those who like the feeling of hitting wood.
6, The grip is a little thin. It is closer to SK7 than Kolbel and SK Carbon. Is it close to Timo Boll Flair?From beginners to intermediates overall. For beginners, a racket that can be used for a long time if you step up to Slaver, Roundel, and then Rosena. The technical part has high performance, so ◎.
However, the shot feeling of wood is weak, so it is not good for me personally. It's lighter than Kolbel, so beginners may want to use mace or this.
It seems that it is not a racket that intermediate and above will bother to buy. for your information.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber(Front) ROZENA
-
-
I used it on the fore side, but I think this is really good. If it's a similar rubber, I think it's a Victas V07 made in Japan, but I think there are people who don't fit because of its unique grip. The arc line is high and the speed and the amount of rotation are reasonable. Since the grip is high, it is easy to lift the downward rotation. I think it is a rubber that can be used by those who want to take it to the rally after lifting it by themselves.
Anyway, this quality and low price. It is a good rubber that you want to try M and S as well.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
-
-
Since Fastark p1 was pasted on the face-to-face, compare it with p1.
Rygan is easier to use, the rotation does not change much, and above all, it has higher controllability, so it is better than p1. Since the arch line is also higher than p1, there were few net mistakes.
The Lygan Spin is a new rubber, so it is cheap and has high performance, while the Fastark is old and the performance is normal and expensive.
The normal ligan was also good, so the spin is also good. However, the weight is 44ℊ, which is a little heavier than the normal ligan.
The compatibility with the racket seems to be wide and it seems to be compatible with the hard racket.Speed: Fastark P1> Lygan
Rotation: Fastark P1 = Lygan
Grip: Fastark P1> Lygan
Control: Fastark P1Arch line height: Fastark P1 Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.