NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  SK7 Classic - CS

  

  Mostly Umiyoshi Yoshida.
  The only difference is the grip.
  I feel that it is lighter than the previous model SK7, but the plywood composition is the same.
  The speed seems to be seven pieces and it comes out considerably.
  It's a seven-piece European type that plays well.
  The racket is too heavy to use behind and behind. It is training to use this behind the scenes.
  If you want to use it, I think you should put up table software. I think it's better to stick the light rubber as much as possible or stick it only on the surface.

  If you recommend
  A player who has a medium pen like Yoshida but only sticks to the surface
  Back side with light and thin rubber on the back side
  Don't lose to the opponent's power with table software
  I think that it is suitable for players such as

  See original review Hide original review

  ほとんど吉田海偉です。
  グリップが違うくらいです。
  前モデルのSK７より軽くなってる気はしますが、合板構成は一緒です。
  スピードは七枚らしくかなりでます。
  弾きのいいヨーロッパタイプの七枚です。
  裏裏で使うにはラケットが重すぎる。これを裏裏で使うのは修行です。
  使うなら表ソフトなどを張るといいと思います。できるだけ軽いラバーを貼るか表面だけ貼るのがベターかなと思います。

  オススメするなら
  吉田選手のような中ペンだけど表面しか貼らない選手
  裏面には軽くて薄いラバーを貼っての裏裏
  表ソフトで相手の威力に負けないようにする
  などの選手に向いていると思います。

  2022/12/12

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） V＞01

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  V>11 EXTRA

  

  Obviously lighter than 15
  However, it will be much lighter to hit the ball, so be careful.

  I feel that rotating technology such as serve is not so different.
  However, I feel that attack technology such as drive is a little unsatisfactory.
  However, I think that the weight of the ball does not matter much unless it is at the level of going to the national tournament, so it may be a good match for the intermediate level.
  I feel that other rubber is good for the back side as much as sticking this on both sides.

  See original review Hide original review

  １５と比べると明らかに軽いです
  ただし打球もかなり軽くなりますので注意が必要でしょう

  サーブ等の回転系技術はさほどかわりがないように感じます
  ただドライブ等の攻撃系技術は少し物足りなさを感じます
  でも全国大会にでるレベルでもない限り球の重さはあまり関係ないと思うので中級者レベルにはかなりマッチするのではないでしょうか
  両面にこれを貼るくらいならバック面はほかのラバーで良い気がしますね

  2020/12/31

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Ma Long Five

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  KOJI MATSUSHITA

  

  It's a great racket
  The balance between cut and attack is truly Koji Matsushita

  but
  I feel unsatisfactory when compared with the Matsushita professional model that Butterfly put out.
  This racket is easier to attack, but I do not feel that all the cut balls are in it

  See original review Hide original review

  素晴らしいラケットです
  カットと攻撃のバランスはさすが松下浩二

  ですが
  バタフライが出していた松下プロモデルと比較したときに物足りなさを感じます。
  攻撃のやりやすさはこのラケットの方が上ですが、あのカットしたボールが全てはいるような感覚はありません

  2020/12/25

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） VS＞402 DOUBLE EXTRA

  Recommend rubber（Back） Carl P-3 software

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Seputia C

  

  The compatibility with the table software is very good.
  The blade is easy to play and is so easy to handle that you can't think of it as 7 plywood.
  The difficulty is that it is a little heavy. I own 85 grams, so I think it's difficult to use back software on both sides.
  However, the back software will be applied firmly no matter what you put on it, so if you make the rubber on the back lighter, you can use it somehow ...

  I think the grip is thinner than the average and the tastes are different.
  The surface is average and easy to turn back.
  It is recommended for players who play short and shake the opponent rather than fighting on a drive.

  If I remember correctly, I think it used to be sold for 5,800 yen.
  It was a standard item of table software that was easy to recommend to beginners at the old price ...

  See original review Hide original review

  表ソフトとの相性は非常に良いです。
  弾きやすいブレードで７枚合板とは思えない位扱いやすい。
  難点として少々重めです。僕の所有しているのは８５グラムあるので両面に裏ソフトは難しいかなと思います。
  ただ裏ソフトもどんなものを貼ってもしっかりとかかってくれるので裏面のラバーを軽めのものにすれば、なんとか使えるかな・・・

  グリップは平均よりも薄めで好みが分かれるのかなと思います。
  面は平均的で切り返しのしやすい感じです。
  ドライブで戦うよりもショートで相手を揺さぶるプレーをする選手にお勧めです。

  僕の記憶が正しければ、昔は５８００円で売られていた気がします。
  昔の値段なら初級者にも勧めやすい表ソフトの定番アイテムだったのですが・・・

  2020/12/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Touch	5
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） Spectol

  Recommend rubber（Back） Mark V

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Hina Hayata H2

  

  The feel at impact is similar to that of a hard wood racket*7 plywood.
  Feeling good at this point
  The ball will be hit much higher.
  The downward rotation is very easy to do.
  It is also a racket that is very easy to control because it does not have the ball separation speed that is unique to carbon rackets.
  There was a feeling that the tabletop was flying a little, but it was within an acceptable range.
  The grip of the racket is a slightly thinner version of the Kyouhyoryu 5, which I feel will appeal to everyone.
  Compare with similar rackets (Kyohyouryu 5 and Inner Force Layer ALC)
  Feel at impact
  Hard Leopard Dragon>Inner Force>H2
  speed
  Fast Kyouhyoryu > H2 > Inner Force
  ball holder
  Holds Inner Force>H2>Leopard Dragon
  Flying distance
  Flying Leopard Dragon>H2>Inner Force
  Is it like this?
  I thought it was worth a try for those who couldn't handle Kyohyoryu etc.
  The overall review is that it is a fairly complete racket.
  I wish the price was a little lower...

  See original review Hide original review

  打球感は硬めの木材ラケット※７枚合板に近いような打感です。
  この時点で好感触
  打球はかなり上がってくれます。
  下回転うちは非常にやりやすいです。
  またカーボンラケット特有の球離れの速さもないので非常にコントロールしやすいラケットです。
  多少、台上は飛ぶ感じがありますが許容範囲内でした。
  ラケットのグリップはキョウヒョウ龍５をもう少し細くした形状で万人に受けるような気がします。
  似たようなラケットと比較します（キョウヒョウ龍５とインナーフォースレイヤーALC）
  打球感
  硬い　キョウヒョウ龍＞インナーフォース＞H2
  スピード
  速い　キョウヒョウ龍＞H2＞インナーフォース
  球持ち
  持つ　インナーフォース＞H２＞キョウヒョウ龍
  飛距離
  飛ぶ　キョウヒョウ龍＞H2＞インナーフォース
  このような感じでしょうか
  キョウヒョウ龍などが扱えなかった人は試してみる価値はあると思いました。
  総評はかなり完成度の高いラケットです
  もう少し値段が安ければいいのに・・・

  2023/10/01

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） Rakza 7 Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. Next >