NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  V>11 EXTRA

  

  Compared to the 15, it's noticeably lighter.
  That said, your shots also get noticeably 'lighter' in feel, so you need to be a bit careful about that.

  Spin-based techniques like serves feel like they don't change much.
  But attacking techniques like drives feel a little lacking.
  Still, unless you're at a level where you're competing in national tournaments, I don't think the weight of the ball matters that much, so I'd say this is a pretty good match for intermediate-level players.
  If you're going to put this on both sides, I feel like you might as well use a different rubber for the backhand.

  See original review Hide original review

  １５と比べると明らかに軽いです
  ただし打球もかなり軽くなりますので注意が必要でしょう

  サーブ等の回転系技術はさほどかわりがないように感じます
  ただドライブ等の攻撃系技術は少し物足りなさを感じます
  でも全国大会にでるレベルでもない限り球の重さはあまり関係ないと思うので中級者レベルにはかなりマッチするのではないでしょうか
  両面にこれを貼るくらいならバック面はほかのラバーで良い気がしますね

  2020/12/31

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Ma Long Five

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  LATIKA

  

  This is an all-around blade usable from complete beginners up through intermediate players
  People say the Kasumi Basic is Nittaku's version of the Korbel, but the blade size was different.
  This blade, though, is a true Nittaku version of the Korbel - it's the Kasumi Basic with a bigger blade size
  Being close to the Korbel, it pairs well with both long pips and short pips, so it doesn't pick a rubber

  The ball sits really well and it's easy to handle
  If you play a forehand-focused style of table tennis, I think this can satisfy quite a lot of people

  See original review Hide original review

  卓球を始めたての初心者から中級者くらいまで使える万能ラケットです
  佳純ベーシックがニッタク版コルベルと言われていますがブレードサイズが違いました。
  しかしこのラケットは佳純ベーシックのブレードサイズを大きくした正真正銘のニッタク版コルベルなのです
  コルベルに近いだけあって粒高・表ともに相性がよくラバーを選ばないラケットです

  かなり球持ちがよくて扱いやすい
  フォア重視の卓球ならかなりの人を満足させることができると思います

  2020/12/29

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) Fastarc C-1

  Recommend rubber(Back) Fastarc S-1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  MA LIN EXTRA SPECIAL

  

  Honestly, I don't see a reason to use this blade.
  First off, the feel on contact is kind of dull and hollow.
  According to the catalog, it's supposed to have the Ma Lin Extra's feel with a bounce boost.
  The feel is indeed similar, but having that feel on a 7-ply just seems off.
  The average weight is 95g, so unless you're pretty confident in your power, I don't think you'd want to pick this up.

  The one I own weighs 89g.
  As for bounce, it's maybe just a bit more than a Clipper Wood - basically THE definition of a 7-ply.
  That said, I did feel the distance was better than other 7-plies.
  It seems like it'd be strong for topspin rallies too.

  The biggest appeal of this blade is that the ball rises well -
  against backspin, I don't think you'd ever really net the ball.

  I also tried it with Rakza Z, and since the ball rises quite a bit, it makes up for tacky rubber's weak point against backspin returns.
  As for who I'd recommend it to, I'd say intermediate to advanced players (people confident in their power).
  Depending on the rubber and the individual blade, it can easily go over 200 grams.

  See original review Hide original review

  正直このラケットを使う理由がない
  まず打球感がぽこぽこです。
  カタログによるとマリエキの打球感で弾みをアップと書いてありました。
  たしかに打球感は似ていますが、７枚合板でこの打球感は違和感があります。
  平均重量が９５グラムなので相当パワーに自信がないと触れないと思います。

  僕の所有しているのは８９グラムの個体です
  弾みはクリッパーウッドより少し弾むかなくらいでTHE７枚合板
  ただ飛距離はほかの７枚合板よりもあると感じました。
  引き合いなどは強そうです。

  このラケットの最大の魅力は球が上がること
  対上回転ならネットミスはまずないと思います。

  ラクザZも試しましたが、かなり上がってくれるので粘着の弱点の対上回転でもサポートしてくれます。
  オススメの層としては中級者から上級者（パワーに自信がある人）のかたかなと思います。
  ラバーや個体によっては２００グラムを平気で超えてきます。

  2020/12/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	5
  Touch	3
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7

  Recommend rubber(Back) Fastarc S-1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  RIGAN

  

  Used mainly on the backhand
  I'll write this comparing it to Rigan Spin and Rakza 7.
  ① Weight
  Lighter than Rigan Spin or Rakza
  I'd recommend it to people who want to keep the racket's weight down on the backhand side
  There's individual variation, but for me it changed by about 5 grams
  ② Spin performance
  My impression is that Rigan Spin generates more spin
  *This may partly be a matter of technique, but when you sink the ball deep into the rubber and drive through, it doesn't get all that much spin
  ③ Speed performance
  Since it's softer than Rigan Spin, it feels faster
  ④ Arc
  Fairly flat/direct
  The ball tends to land shallow, so you might get countered a lot・・・
  ⑤ Control
  Soft and easy to use
  The ball tends to land shallow, so it's hard to adjust the depth
  ⑥ Overall
  I think this is a rubber that's quite easy to use overall.
  I'd recommend it to people who are worried about the weight on the backhand side of a penhold, or on a shakehand blade.
  It might be tough to use on the forehand since the spin performance isn't that great, but I think it's a good rubber that beginners and lower-level players can make plenty good use of.

  See original review Hide original review

  主にバック面で使用
  ライガンスピン　ラクザ７と比べて書きます。
  ①重量
  ライガンスピンやラクザと比べると軽い
  バック面に貼ってラケットの重量を抑えたい人にはおすすめできる
  個体差もあるが私は５グラムほど変わった
  ②回転性能
  ライガンスピンのほうが、かかる印象
  ※打ち方の問題もあるかもしれないが食い込ませて打つ場合はあまり回転はかからない
  ③スピード性能
  ライガンスピンより柔らかい分早い印象を受ける
  ④弧線
  なかなか直線的
  球が浅くなり、カウンターを食らう場面が多いかも・・・
  ⑤コントロール
  柔らかくて使いやすい
  球が浅くなりやすいので深さの調整はしにくい
  ⑥総評
  かなり使いやすい部類のラバーだと思います。
  ペンの裏面やシェークの重量に悩んでいる方にはおすすめできるラバーです。
  フォアで使うと回転性能があまりないので厳しいかもしれませんが、初心者・初級者レベルなら十分に活躍できるいいラバーだと思います。

  2023/11/01

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket VIOLIN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Hina Hayata H2

  

  The feel is close to a hard wooden blade — like a 7-ply blade.
  Good first impression right away.
  The ball really lifts up nicely.
  It's very easy to attack backspin balls with it.
  It also doesn't have that fast ball-off-blade feel typical of carbon blades, so it's a very easy blade to control.
  The short game feels a bit springy, but it was within an acceptable range.
  The grip shape is like a slightly slimmer version of the Hurricane Long 5, and I think it would suit pretty much everyone.
  Comparing it to a similar blade (Hurricane Long 5 vs. Innerforce Layer ALC):
  Feel
  Harder: Hurricane Long 5 > Innerforce > H2
  Speed
  Faster: Hurricane Long 5 > H2 > Innerforce
  Ball-holding
  Holds more: Innerforce > H2 > Hurricane Long 5
  Distance
  Flies further: Hurricane Long 5 > H2 > Innerforce
  That's roughly how I'd rank them.
  If you couldn't handle a Hurricane Long 5 type blade, I think it's worth trying this one.
  Overall, it's a really well-finished blade.
  I just wish it were a bit cheaper...

  See original review Hide original review

  打球感は硬めの木材ラケット※７枚合板に近いような打感です。
  この時点で好感触
  打球はかなり上がってくれます。
  下回転うちは非常にやりやすいです。
  またカーボンラケット特有の球離れの速さもないので非常にコントロールしやすいラケットです。
  多少、台上は飛ぶ感じがありますが許容範囲内でした。
  ラケットのグリップはキョウヒョウ龍５をもう少し細くした形状で万人に受けるような気がします。
  似たようなラケットと比較します（キョウヒョウ龍５とインナーフォースレイヤーALC）
  打球感
  硬い　キョウヒョウ龍＞インナーフォース＞H2
  スピード
  速い　キョウヒョウ龍＞H2＞インナーフォース
  球持ち
  持つ　インナーフォース＞H２＞キョウヒョウ龍
  飛距離
  飛ぶ　キョウヒョウ龍＞H2＞インナーフォース
  このような感じでしょうか
  キョウヒョウ龍などが扱えなかった人は試してみる価値はあると思いました。
  総評はかなり完成度の高いラケットです
  もう少し値段が安ければいいのに・・・

  2023/10/01

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05

  Recommend rubber(Back) Rakza 7 Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. Next >