NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  TENERGY 05 HARD

  

  Too hard for people who usually use Tenergy 05
  It's true that with a normal 05, there are occasional losses, but that's only during practice, and it's rare that I make a full swing like that in a match. The power of one shot of the drive is certainly high, but the detailed technique is more difficult than that. Also, the weight is heavier than the normal 05, so this is tough for Tenergy, which sells lightness. It seems that Togami is using it, but it is a rubber used by players of that level, not a rubber used by ordinary people.
  Rotation force is higher than normal 05
  The speed is fast, the smash is about the same
  But I would choose the normal 05 in the details.

  See original review Hide original review

  普段テナジー０５を使っている人間からすると硬すぎる
  確かに通常の０５だとたまにロスすることもあるけど、それは練習の中での話で、試合でそんなフルスイングすることはほとんどないです。ドライブの一発の威力は確かに高いが、それ以上に細かい技術が難しい。また重量も通常の０５より重いので、軽さが売りのテナジーでこれは厳しい。戸上選手が使っているらしいが、そのレベルの選手が使うラバーであってわれわれ一般人が使うラバーではない。
  回転力は通常の０５より上
  スピードはドライブは早い　スマッシュは同じくらい
  でも細かいところで通常の０５を僕なら選びます。

  2022/12/12

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Acoustic Carbon

  

  If you buy it in anticipation of acoustic, it will fail.
  There is no goodness of having that acoustic ball

  However, it is quite excellent as a carbon racket
  It feels easier to rotate than other outer rackets

  It goes well with table software and I think it matches well with Mima Ito style players.
  If it is a haste play of the front team, it is a fairly high racket

  See original review Hide original review

  アコースティックを期待して買うと失敗します
  あのアコースティックの球持ちのよさは一切ありません

  しかしカーボンラケットとしてはかなり優秀
  回転もほかのアウターラケットよりは掛けやすく感じます

  表ソフトとの相性もよく伊藤美誠スタイルの選手にはかなりマッチすると思います。
  前陣の速攻プレーならかなり上位ラケットです

  2020/12/25

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	5
  Control	6
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Fastarc G-1

  Recommend rubber（Back） Moristo SP

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  I feel that the arch line is higher than Tenergy 05
  I think that the rotation performance does not change.

  The sheet feels pretty stiff.
  Lower rotation hit is higher performance than Tenergy 05
  Will go up without permission

  Tenergy is more stable in rally competition
  I wonder if the flight distance is higher with Tenergy 05

  I feel that the life is quite long
  I think it will last for two months.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー０５と比べると弧線が高い気がします
  回転性能はかわらないと思います。

  シートはかなり硬く感じます。
  下回転打ちはテナジー０５よりも高性能
  勝手に上がってくれます

  ラリー戦はテナジーのほうが安定
  飛距離はテナジー０５のほうが上かな

  寿命は相当長く感じます
  ２ヶ月は持つんじゃないかなと思います。

  2020/12/24

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket SK7 Classic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  HURRICANE KING

  

  It's a racket that Wang Liqin used in the past
  It is used by Chinese players and goes great with adhesive rubber.
  That hard leopard is mild and easy to use.

  However, it is an almighty racket that goes well with the tension system.
  Morizono-kun used it with tension on both sides.

  I think the feature of this racket is the blade surface.
  It is one size larger than the regular size of other manufacturers.
  This stabilizes technologies such as blocks.

  The flight is quite a jump for 5 plywood.
  It's not too much to handle, so I think it's the best racket for people who can't use the carbon racket because it flies too much.
  It is a racket that is suitable for people who compete by rotation and course taking, not by the type that competes by speed
  The disadvantage is that the larger the surface, the heavier the weight tends to be.
  Also, the grip is a little different from the Japanese flare, so it may be a place where you have different tastes.

  See original review Hide original review

  王励勤が昔使っていたラケットですね
  中国選手が使っていただけあって粘着ラバーとの相性は抜群です
  あの硬かったキョウヒョウがマイルドで使いやすくなります。

  ただテンション系との相性も良くてオールマイティーなラケットです
  森園君なんかは両面にテンションで使ってましたしね。

  このラケットの特徴はブレード面にあると思います。
  他のメーカーのレギュラーサイズより一回り大きいです。
  これによってブロックなどの技術が安定します。

  飛びは５枚合板としてはかなりのぶっ飛びです。
  ただ扱いきれないほどではないので、カーボンラケットが飛びすぎて使えない人には最適なラケットなんじゃないかと思います。
  スピードで勝負するタイプではなく回転やコース取りで勝負する人に向いているラケットです
  欠点としては、面が大きい分重量も重くなりがちになります。
  またグリップが日本のフレアと多少ことなるので好みが分かれるところかもしれません。

  2020/12/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	6
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） Fastarc C-1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  RAKZA Z EXTRA HARD

  

  First heavy
  10 grams or more heavier than ordinary rubber

  Is the adhesive strength only slightly adhesive?
  I also used a regular Z but probably the seats are the same

  Flying is wonderful
  It will fly to the extent that it does not seem to be sticky.
  However, there are not many habit balls that have good adhesiveness.
  If anything, it is a trajectory close to the tension system.

  I'm also a pretty hard hitter for the general public, but it's still too hard to handle
  It seems that there is a YouTuber who puts this on both sides and turns it around, but I can not believe it.
  It's too great to put this on the back

  The recommended layer is the fore side of a fairly hard hitter even for advanced players
  Or maybe the racket is too light and worried.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず重いです
  普通のラバーより１０グラム以上重くなります

  粘着力は微粘着くらいでしょうか
  通常のZも使いましたがおそらくシートは同じでしょう

  飛びは素晴らしい
  粘着とは思えない位飛んでいきます。
  ただ粘着の良さであるクセ球はあまり出ないです
  どっちかと言ったらテンション系に近い弾道です。

  僕も一般層としては、かなりのハードヒッターですが、それでも扱いきれない位硬い
  これを両面に貼ってぶん回してるYouTuberがいるらしいですが信じられないですね。
  バックにこれを貼るとはすごすぎる

  オススメの層は上級者でもかなりのハードヒッターのフォア面
  またはラケットが軽すぎて悩んでいる方ぐらいでしょうかね。

  2020/12/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	4
  Hardness	Hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. Next >