NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  FORTIUS FT ver.D

  

  It is definitely No. 1 in Mizuno's racket
  7 sheets plus 2 special materials, but the shot feeling is the same as the normal 7 sheets

  Isn't it ideal for those who want a little more distance with 7 plywood?

  See original review Hide original review

  ミズノが出しているラケットでは間違いなくNo.１
  ７枚プラス特殊素材２枚ですが普通の７枚と変わらないくらいの打球感

  7枚合板でもう少し飛距離がほしいと思っている人には最適なのではないでしょうか

  2020/12/29

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Fastarc G-1

  Recommend rubber（Back） Fastarc C-1

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Acoustic Carbon

  

  If you buy it in anticipation of acoustic, it will fail.
  There is no goodness of having that acoustic ball

  However, it is quite excellent as a carbon racket
  It feels easier to rotate than other outer rackets

  It goes well with table software and I think it matches well with Mima Ito style players.
  If it is a haste play of the front team, it is a fairly high racket

  See original review Hide original review

  アコースティックを期待して買うと失敗します
  あのアコースティックの球持ちのよさは一切ありません

  しかしカーボンラケットとしてはかなり優秀
  回転もほかのアウターラケットよりは掛けやすく感じます

  表ソフトとの相性もよく伊藤美誠スタイルの選手にはかなりマッチすると思います。
  前陣の速攻プレーならかなり上位ラケットです

  2020/12/25

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	5
  Control	6
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） Fastarc G-1

  Recommend rubber（Back） Moristo SP

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  I feel that the arch line is higher than Tenergy 05
  I think that the rotation performance does not change.

  The sheet feels pretty stiff.
  Lower rotation hit is higher performance than Tenergy 05
  Will go up without permission

  Tenergy is more stable in rally competition
  I wonder if the flight distance is higher with Tenergy 05

  I feel that the life is quite long
  I think it will last for two months.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー０５と比べると弧線が高い気がします
  回転性能はかわらないと思います。

  シートはかなり硬く感じます。
  下回転打ちはテナジー０５よりも高性能
  勝手に上がってくれます

  ラリー戦はテナジーのほうが安定
  飛距離はテナジー０５のほうが上かな

  寿命は相当長く感じます
  ２ヶ月は持つんじゃないかなと思います。

  2020/12/24

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket SK7 Classic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  RAKZA Z EXTRA HARD

  

  First heavy
  10 grams or more heavier than ordinary rubber

  Is the adhesive strength only slightly adhesive?
  I also used a regular Z but probably the seats are the same

  Flying is wonderful
  It will fly to the extent that it does not seem to be sticky.
  However, there are not many habit balls that have good adhesiveness.
  If anything, it is a trajectory close to the tension system.

  I'm also a pretty hard hitter for the general public, but it's still too hard to handle
  It seems that there is a YouTuber who puts this on both sides and turns it around, but I can not believe it.
  It's too great to put this on the back

  The recommended layer is the fore side of a fairly hard hitter even for advanced players
  Or maybe the racket is too light and worried.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず重いです
  普通のラバーより１０グラム以上重くなります

  粘着力は微粘着くらいでしょうか
  通常のZも使いましたがおそらくシートは同じでしょう

  飛びは素晴らしい
  粘着とは思えない位飛んでいきます。
  ただ粘着の良さであるクセ球はあまり出ないです
  どっちかと言ったらテンション系に近い弾道です。

  僕も一般層としては、かなりのハードヒッターですが、それでも扱いきれない位硬い
  これを両面に貼ってぶん回してるYouTuberがいるらしいですが信じられないですね。
  バックにこれを貼るとはすごすぎる

  オススメの層は上級者でもかなりのハードヒッターのフォア面
  またはラケットが軽すぎて悩んでいる方ぐらいでしょうかね。

  2020/12/09

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	4
  Hardness	Hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  Zieger PK50

  

  Is the adhesive strength under the inside?
  Regarding the momentum, the impression is reasonable, the flight distance is not so much.
  With drive technology, a decent ball comes out when rubbing. When I tried to bite it, the seat was so stiff that I couldn't do it with my arm.
  Tsuttsuki is easy to do, and you can hit the ball sharply. I think this is a weapon because it is a ball that is not found in recent tension rubber.
  The smash type flies moderately, so it is much easier to do than sticky leopards. Also, since a habit ball will come in, I think that this can also be extremely effective for junior and senior high school students.
  As for the block, I feel that it is easy to do and stable because it does not bounce.
  I think the recommended level is from beginner to intermediate level.
  Also, it may be more interesting to stick it on the back than to use it on the foreground. I think that it is a good rubber that is quite easy to use for those who make games mainly on Tsuttsuki and blocks.

  See original review Hide original review

  粘着力は中の下でしょうか。
  弾みに関してはまずまずの印象、飛距離はあまりでないです。
  ドライブ系技術は擦り打ちはそこそこのボールが出ます。食い込ませようとするとシートが堅いので僕の腕では無理でした。
  ツッツキはやりやすく、するどい打球がいきます。最近のテンション系ラバーにはない球なのでこれは武器になるなと思います。
  スマッシュ系はほどよく飛んでくれるのでキョウヒョウなどの粘着よりはるかにやりやすい。またクセ球がいってくれるのでこれも中高生相手なら絶大な効果を発揮できると思います。
  ブロックについては弾まない分やりやすく安定している気がします。
  オススメのレベルとしては初級者から中級者くらいまでかなと思います。
  またフォアに使うよりもバックに貼る方が面白いかもしれません。ツッツキやブロックを中心にゲームメイクする方にはかなり使いやすくて良いラバーだと思います。

  2020/12/09

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	4
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket FIRE FALL FC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. Next >
9. Last »