Dai-chan junior high school teacher's profile
Gender | Male |
---|---|
Age | U20 |
Experience | 11〜20 years |
User review
-
-
To be honest, there is no reason to use this racket
First of all, the shot feeling is fluffy.
According to the catalog, it was written that the shot feeling of Marieki increased the momentum.
It's true that the shot feeling is similar, but with 7 plywood, this shot feeling feels strange.
Since the average weight is 95 grams, I think that I will not touch it unless I am confident in the considerable power.I own an 89 gram individual
The momentum is a little more bouncy than Clipper Wood, THE 7 plywood
However, I felt that the flight distance was longer than the other 7 plywood.
Inquiries seem to be strong.The biggest attraction of this racket is that the ball goes up
I think that net mistakes are unlikely if it is an upward rotation.I also tried Rakuza Z, but it goes up considerably, so it supports even the upward rotation of the weak point of adhesion.
I think that the recommended group is intermediate to advanced (people who are confident in power).
Depending on the rubber and the individual, it will easily exceed 200 grams.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7
Recommend rubber(Back) Fastarc S-1
-
-
The feel at impact is similar to that of a hard wood racket*7 plywood.
Feeling good at this point
The ball will be hit much higher.
The downward rotation is very easy to do.
It is also a racket that is very easy to control because it does not have the ball separation speed that is unique to carbon rackets.
There was a feeling that the tabletop was flying a little, but it was within an acceptable range.
The grip of the racket is a slightly thinner version of the Kyouhyoryu 5, which I feel will appeal to everyone.
Compare with similar rackets (Kyohyouryu 5 and Inner Force Layer ALC)
Feel at impact
Hard Leopard Dragon>Inner Force>H2
speed
Fast Kyouhyoryu > H2 > Inner Force
ball holder
Holds Inner Force>H2>Leopard Dragon
Flying distance
Flying Leopard Dragon>H2>Inner Force
Is it like this?
I thought it was worth a try for those who couldn't handle Kyohyoryu etc.
The overall review is that it is a fairly complete racket.
I wish the price was a little lower...Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber(Front) DIGNICS 05
Recommend rubber(Back) Rakza 7 Soft
-
-
Mostly Umiyoshi Yoshida.
The only difference is the grip.
I feel that it is lighter than the previous model SK7, but the plywood composition is the same.
The speed seems to be seven pieces and it comes out considerably.
It's a seven-piece European type that plays well.
The racket is too heavy to use behind and behind. It is training to use this behind the scenes.
If you want to use it, I think you should put up table software. I think it's better to stick the light rubber as much as possible or stick it only on the surface.If you recommend
A player who has a medium pen like Yoshida but only sticks to the surface
Back side with light and thin rubber on the back side
Don't lose to the opponent's power with table software
I think that it is suitable for players such asOverall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber(Front) V>01
-
-
It's a considerable jump
It ’s a level that I doubt if it ’s really 5 plywood.It is a considerable jump from the fore hit
The drive goes up a lot
I'm scared when I'm not a very strong personThe back surface is also stable as the arch line rises, but the impression that it is not suitable for recent back technology
Because the surface is large, it will be quite heavy
The block will be stable by that amountThe recommended level is for advanced users who are particular about equipment or who want it for collection, and we do not recommend normal use.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber(Front) Fastarc G-1
Recommend rubber(Back) Rakza 7 Soft
-
-
Mainly used on the back side
I will write a comparison with Rigan Spin Rakuza 7.
① Weight
Lighter than Ligan Spin and Rakuza
Recommended for those who want to reduce the weight of the racket by pasting it on the back side.
There are individual differences, but mine has changed by about 5 grams.
②Rotation performance
I get the impression that Ligan Spin is more expensive.
*There may be a problem with the way you hit it, but if you hit it with a bit of force, it doesn't take much rotation.
③Speed performance
I get the impression that it is softer and faster than Ligan Spin.
④Archive
pretty linear
There may be many situations where the ball is shallow and you get hit by a counter...
⑤Control
Soft and easy to use
It is difficult to adjust the depth because the ball tends to become shallow.
⑥Overview
I think it is a fairly easy-to-use type of rubber.
This rubber is recommended for those who are worried about the back of the pen or the weight of the shake.
It may be difficult to use it in the foreground as it doesn't have much rotational performance, but I think it's a good rubber that can be used well for beginners and beginners.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket VIOLIN
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.