Q QUALITY

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little soft
[Performance] Control and Spin to have excellent
Q QUALITY

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 9.11 / 10
  • 28 reviews
    • Speed:7.96
    • Spin:8.96
    • Control:9.36

    Reviews of Q QUALITY. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 4)

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    5,900 Yen(Include tax 6,490 Yen)
    Producer
    Mizuno
    Product code
    83JRT299

    Players use Q QUALITY

    Reviews by user

    • see_saw

      see_saw (Experience:6〜10 years) High control performance

      Reviews by user

      The sheet has a soft and oily surface, the sponge has a Chinese rubbery, glutinous odor, and it is made in Japan.
      At first I thought that it was a rubber with individuality, but the upward rotation that the ball flies according to my image and the downward rotation that gives the impression that a ball that is tolerant and difficult to enter will enter, and the overall high control performance. feel.
      I think that detailed technology such as tabletops is easy to suppress for rubber that is popular nowadays, but rubber is not a category that can suppress it arbitrarily.
      It does not have surprising rotation and speed, and it is not a rubber that makes the game difficult because its characteristics are too strong. While the number of German-made rubbers exceeding 50 degrees is increasing, it is recommended for those who do not know whether they can master it by seeking only the features and the maximum value.
      A rubber that makes it easy to assemble the game within your own skill.

      See original review

      2022/02/03
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use INFINITY VPS V

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Do it with a pen table Cospa is the strongest, isn't it?

      Reviews by user

      First of all, if you think that most table tennis shops will give you a little discount
      I think you can buy it for just under 5,000 yen, so cospa is good!
      The comparison targets are Rosena from Tamas and Rakuza from Yasaka.
      Higher performance and easier to use than either of these!
      The sponge hardness is stated as 46 °, but the sheet is soft.
      I don't think it's hard! The speed is moderate, but when it goes down, the ball gets a little
      I felt like I was falling, so I think it's suitable for people who play in the front team!
      If you bite into it, the ball will be heavier and more stable.
      The rotation is average!

      See original review

      2022/01/01
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      8
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use SPECIAL DYNAM 10.5 SQUARE TYPE

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Toshihisa (Experience:6〜10 years) Honor student for Mae Nakajin: Evaluation is broken depending on how you hit

      Reviews by user

      Since the sponge of the sheet is also soft, it has a good ball holding and is easy to hit.
      In summary, I think it's a high-performance rubber for intermediate players who play in the front middle team by spinning from themselves, which is not addictive in a good way.
      I'm using it for the inner racket now, but if you want to hit it down, I think that you can stick it on the outer racket.

      Of course, the maximum speed and spin are inferior to rubber such as Dignix and MX-D, but it is easy to meet and block, it is easy to bring out the performance of rubber, and it is possible to shoot high quality and stable hits in rapid succession. I think it is perfect for those who want to step up from intermediate to advanced.
      Personally, I felt that the maximum value was higher than Rosena. I will try using both foreback for a while.

      Finally, I talked with an acquaintance about the usability of this rubber, and my opinion was divided into two, so I will describe it below.
      A good rubber for those who like to spin or drive alone. (myself)
      This rubber is not good for people who like to rotate automatically like Tenergy, or to hit straight and speedy. (acquaintance)
      It's like that.
      I think it's a rubber that sells well enough to compete with Rosena from now on.

      See original review

      2021/12/31
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      9
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Ah-sama (Experience:11〜20 years) High-performance front rubber

      Reviews by user

      It's a good idea, so I hit it in combination with the new Artius combo.
      Although the arc line is a little low, the grip is high, and once you get used to it, it is fun to hit various balls in the front team.
      If you hit from behind, a racket that bounces a little more may be better.

      The fore and back are not bad, and I feel that it is a rubber that is very suitable for the high-speed table tennis of today.
      Especially, I feel that the front-end drive that pierces is unique to this rubber.

      See original review

      2021/12/27
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      8
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use ALTIUS COMBO

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Shio

      Shio (Experience:6〜10 years) It's easy to process on the table, but it's hard to get the power?

      Reviews by user

      I used Q5 for the back for about a year. I wanted to use a little soft rubber in the cold season, so I bought a Q quality special thickness and used it for 5 hours for 2 days.

      It will be evaluated in the back.
      While firmly grasping the upward rotation, a high quality ball came out in both speed and rotation.
      When the downward rotation was thin and a little thick, the sheet was thin and it was apt to be twitched. On the other hand, the speed is not as high as I expected. Therefore, it is better to make it feel like you are driving while hitting it fairly thickly.
      Also, regarding meat, it is not so difficult to do, but I think it is better to carry it out with the rubber to be grasped in mind. At first, it floated quite a bit, but I soon got used to it.

      As a whole, Q5 has become a little soft rubber, and I think it is a good rubber that can be used by intermediate and above with the essence of Q5.
      * This is just a personal opinion.

      See original review

      2021/12/25
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • NIKAIDOU

      NIKAIDOU (Experience:6〜10 years) High-performance high-end model, high cost performance

      Reviews by user

      It is harder and more manual than Tenergy, but it gives the impression that a sharp ball comes out when hit hard.
      The shot feeling is similar to that of MX-D, but I think the best feature is that it is light at around 47g after the extra-thick cut.
      Although the arc line of the hit ball is low, it does not fall, and a ball with sharp rotation and speed can be hit, and there is a sense of stability.
      It is recommended to use it for the fore when combined with the outer, but I think that impact is necessary because I feel the hardness with the back.
      It had a good reputation as a front to middle rubber, but if you choose a racket to combine, you can get enough power even in the apse, so I feel that it is a rubber that matches various layers.

      Also, I think that inner + QQ is likely to become popular in the future as much as an iron plate.
      Above all, I think that the point of reasonable price and light weight is an intermediate level trend, so it will be a rubber that will be seen more in the future.

      See original review

      2021/12/24
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use ALTIUS OUTER

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Biceps that keeps the crying child silent (Experience:4〜5 years) If you do it in front

      Reviews by user

      I used it in the back.
      Overall, the front is enough, but when it goes down to the back, I choose the way to hit. It may be tough if you are not a power hitter.

      The shot feeling is good. It resonates and feels good.
      I feel like I'm biting into it.
      I think the control depends on my arm, but I think it's more than normal.

      The speed is below normal. Since it flies in a straight line, it enters sharply when hit in front, but when it goes down to the middle team, it seems that there is no choice but to rub it and hit it with power. In the case of Inner Force ALC.

      Rotation is completely arm. I couldn't pull it out because I didn't have an arm, but when I loop-driven it in the fore, I was caught and could easily create a rotation. If you are good at backing, I think you can push it by rotating.

      There is an opinion that Tsuttsuki is difficult, but it is better to cut it sharply.

      As for the impression, if you do it in front, if you go down the inner, it's like an outer and one-chan.

      See original review

      2021/12/18
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      6
      Spin
      7
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. < Previous
    2. 1
    3. 2
    4. 3
    5. 4
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!