Q QUALITY
Everyone's rating |
[Hardness] Little soft [Performance] Control and Spin to have excellent |
Averages reviews points
- Speed:7.94
- Spin:8.76
- Control:9.15
-
Reviews of Q QUALITY. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 4)
- Pimples in
Specifications
- Producer
- Mizuno
- Product code
- 83JRT299
Players use Q QUALITY
Reviews by user
-
-
Salt (Experience:4〜5 years) Great for back
-
Ideal for the back surface. The feeling of automatic transmission is terrible.
good point
・ It is easy to rotate and even if you hit the meat, it will take you.
・ Tsuttsuki can be dropped
・ You can rub or hit
-Various ball holding is very good and various techniques are easy.
・ If you hit it strongly, you can use it without problems even in the apse
・ Cospa is quite good for performanceRegrettable point
・ If you eat it unexpectedly, it will go up.
・ The block is easy to float (a little mountainous)The first thing I thought was "getting in without permission"
There was such a part in Tenergy, but this one is stronger. Also, it is a strength to enter even with a forcible way of hitting. (A little suitable, such as a forcible back drive that swings around or a distressed reverse Chiquita)It is a rubber with extremely high overall power that is easy to use.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
Table tennis fun Lazanter god (Experience:2〜3 years) Enter anyway
-
It ’s a transition from Rosena.
The impression is QQ if you place importance on the amount of rotation and fit of the drive, and Rosena if you place importance on the speed and distance of the drive. Both had the same ball holding and were very good and easy to control. There was no big difference in other technologies, but overall, QQ was a little higher quality, and there was a little manual feeling. (Both compared to Rosena)All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use Acoustic
-
-
-
Soy sauce in the mouth (Experience:2〜3 years) surprise
-
This is the first time for Mizuno's rubber, and it takes a proper rotation. And above all, it's light. I thought it was the strongest rubber in COSPA that could be used by a wide range of generations.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC
-
-
-
Ah (Experience:11〜20 years) Good or bad ...
-
It is pasted on the back.
First of all, a good point. It is a soft, habit-free, round rubber. There seems to be no technology that the front team cannot do. I feel that it is a rubber that is easy to choose even for junior and senior high school students because it just claims the goodness of cospa.
The next point was not so good. It's too round. There was no omission, and the other party told me that it was easier to return than before because it was easier to do. Furthermore, even though I put it on the outer, the flight distance did not come out, and when I hit from the middle team to the apse, net mistakes occurred frequently.
In conclusion, if it is a junior high and high school student who is supposed to be a target and a front-end type backhand, I think that it is also pricey.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC
-
-
-
Rotating human (Experience:2〜3 years) Focus on control
-
I tried to hit it because it was Mizuno's new rubber. When I first hit the drive, I got the impression that the speed was a little modest. However, it takes a lot of rotation. It's easy to control.
I thought it was a rubber for the back in my personal hands.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use ALNADE INNER
-
-
-
see_saw (Experience:6〜10 years) High control performance
-
The sheet has a soft and oily surface, the sponge has a Chinese rubbery, glutinous odor, and it is made in Japan.
At first I thought that it was a rubber with individuality, but the upward rotation that the ball flies according to my image and the downward rotation that gives the impression that a ball that is tolerant and difficult to enter will enter, and the overall high control performance. feel.
I think that detailed technology such as tabletops is easy to suppress for rubber that is popular nowadays, but rubber is not a category that can suppress it arbitrarily.
It does not have surprising rotation and speed, and it is not a rubber that makes the game difficult because its characteristics are too strong. While the number of German-made rubbers exceeding 50 degrees is increasing, it is recommended for those who do not know whether they can master it by seeking only the features and the maximum value.
A rubber that makes it easy to assemble the game within your own skill.All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use INFINITY VPS V
-
-
-
Do it with a pen table Cospa is the strongest, isn't it?
-
First of all, if you think that most table tennis shops will give you a little discount
I think you can buy it for just under 5,000 yen, so cospa is good!
The comparison targets are Rosena from Tamas and Rakuza from Yasaka.
Higher performance and easier to use than either of these!
The sponge hardness is stated as 46 °, but the sheet is soft.
I don't think it's hard! The speed is moderate, but when it goes down, the ball gets a little
I felt like I was falling, so I think it's suitable for people who play in the front team!
If you bite into it, the ball will be heavier and more stable.
The rotation is average!All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use SPECIAL DYNAM 10.5 SQUARE TYPE
-
Related rubber
Rubber
Producer
Type
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.