NO.1 table tennis review site

I use the NUZN48 2.1 on my forehand. I switched to the NUZN50 MAX because it was too heavy and flew too far.

First of all, when I drive, whether I hit it open or over it, it spins and stays on the table even when I swing hard. The slight stickiness stabilizes defensive play, such as blocks and pushes. Because it's neither too far nor too loose, I can pull back and swing hard to pull the ball, or aim for a counter from the front court. Personally, I found this rubber to be able to hit refreshing shots like the R-series from a C-series Lazanta ball control. As long as I don't swing too high, the ball will land in a nice arc, and if I swing forward, I can hit it sharply.

Of course, the NUZN50 delivers better maximum ball speed, but for those who find it stressful to play while worrying about overshooting, the NUZN48 allows me to swing freely and play the way I want.

I recommend this rubber for those who want a slightly sticky feel but are worried about using a harder rubber.

See original review Hide original review

I used it on a 5-ply wood forehand (2.1) and it felt softer than other 48-degree rubbers. That said, it's easier to control the ball and apply spin, with underspin shots flying quite high. It also tends to be prone to hitting the ball high against opponents' topspin, so adjustments were necessary. Serves, pushes, and stops are easy to perform on the table, and the ball doesn't fly too far, so it's stable, but drives and smashes tend to be countered if you don't make a solid impact, so caution is required. Overall, it's a well-balanced and stable rubber, and I think it's ideal as a backhand rubber for advanced players. For forehand players, it's best to use it with an inner racket that provides a certain amount of distance.

See original review Hide original review

Last time, I shared my impressions with a thick backhand club, so this time I'll share my impressions with an extra-thick forehand club.
I used the NUZN50 for a year before switching, so my impressions were mixed.
Also, I happened to hit a heavy club, which was 2g heavier than the NUZN50 thick club (the video said that the NUZN48 extra-thick club is lighter than the NUZN50 thick club).
As for the details, first of all, light hits didn't fly as far.
Maybe because the seat seems to be different from the 50 and the sponge is soft, the ball didn't go anywhere unless I put it in properly.
On the other hand, I felt it was a little easier to block and hit shots on the table.
As for drives, both above and below the club, the spin, power, and speed were all lackluster.
In this respect, the 50 club was better.
Conclusion
This is limited to the forehand club.
For power, the NUZN50.
For ease of use, the Lazanter C48.
For speed and stability, the Lazanter R48.
I think that's it.

See original review Hide original review