Penmate's profile

Penmate's profile
Gender Male
Age U20
Experience 6〜10 years

User review

  • PATISUMA V

    User review

    Uses thickness on the surface.
    It is a rotating table software, but the sheet is vertical. It is quite hard with the sponge and the ball separates quickly.
    However, I felt that it was easy to suppress short circuits and to adjust the speed because it did not fly too much.
    The seat is easily caught, and although it hardly slips when driving, it can also give a heavy knuckle when meeting, so it is possible to play with a great deal of variation.
    However, if you want to raise your weaknesses, it is better to hit back lightly with an early RBI rather than rubbing firmly because stops and Tsuttsuki are slippery due to the influence of ball separation.

    See original review

    2020/12/17
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Hardness Hard

    Recomend racket PATITAN Ⅱ

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • SYMMETRY HARD VERSION

    User review

    The grain shape is a low trapezoid and the grain arrangement is vertical, making this a hybrid top rubber.
    It has the best of both worlds in terms of performance.
    The original rubber had good control but lacked change and speed, but with the harder rubber you can now produce some pretty brutal knuckles.
    When blocking an opponent's loop, the knuckle becomes strong enough to be pushed, and you can block speed drives and smashes without being bounced off.
    However, when pushing or driving, there is no slippage and you can apply a lot of spin.
    If you make a good hit, you can get a lot of speed, so you have plenty of power to decide.
    It stops well when defending, and it's easy to make changes such as knuckles and side spin, and it has speed when attacking, so there's nothing to complain about.
    It's good for backhand tops because it changes a lot, but it's also stable and fast, so I recommend it for pen tops and forehand tops as well.

    See original review

    2024/06/30
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket BANDA ALLROUND

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • SYMMETRY

    User review

    It is quite soft as a speed chart.
    I felt that the ball was slowly released and it would be used unless it matched with a hard racket.
    When I tried to rub the serve on the surface as well, it was bitter and it was difficult to increase the amount of rotation.
    However, it is surprising that it was quite insensitive to rotation and the smash was very easy.
    Without using a loop drive, you can cut with only smash.
    I loved rubber that is good for ball separation, so it was not good, but I felt it had all-round performance.

    See original review

    2020/04/11
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    7
    Control
    9
    Hardness Soft

    Recomend racket LIBERTA SYNERGY CHN

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • mantra pro M

    User review

    Extra thick material is used on the back of the Liberta Glorious Japanese style.
    It feels harder than the hardness because it uses speed-based tension, not rotation-based tension, so the ball leaves the ball quickly.
    The bounce is excellent, and it feels like it's a little too bouncy.
    When I used to use Mantra S, the rubber was soft, so even if I hit it sloppily, the quality of the ball entering the ball was not high, but the technique of hitting it thickly and the control of the block were excellent, so it was useful for players who mainly play meat. The speed and hardness of the ball's release are a hindrance.
    The trajectory is linear, and the amount of rotation and control of the drive is not high.
    What I felt was fatal was the weakness of the downward rotation.
    I think people who are used to rotating tension will lose a lot of weight.
    The ball releases quickly, but the sheet is not strong and will slip if you hit it thinly.
    In terms of performance, the emphasis is on speed, but due to the quick ball release and moderate hardness, the ball is not stable and the quality of the ball is not good enough for use in the foreground, so I honestly felt that it was not suitable for modern table tennis.

    See original review

    2023/11/07
    Overall
    5/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    6
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket LIBERTA GLORIOUS J-PEN

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Q QUALITY

    User review

    Special thickness is used on the back side of Pachitan 2
    The impression that the momentum does not change so much. It doesn't fly on its own, and if you swing it firmly, you can get a reasonable speed.
    Because the sheet is flexible, it is easy to bite into.
    The characteristic is the amount of rotation. It clearly stands out from the conventional 5,600 yen rubber.
    It's easy to get an arc line, and if you hit the ball with a downward rotation, you can get a high-quality ball, and invite blocks and counter mistakes.
    That's why meat is a little difficult.
    It is not a type of rubber that goes in when you shake it, but it is a rubber that will give you a good ball if you shake it well, so it is recommended for intermediate and above players who drive and hit counters.

    See original review

    2023/05/07
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    10
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket PATITAN Ⅱ

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!