Wonta's profile

Wonta's profile
Gender Male
Age U40
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Acoustic Carbon
      Racket

      Acoustic Carbon

      Made with "String Instrument Technology" Carbon version of the famous Nittaku Acoustic. Made in J...
    2. RIGAN
      Rubber (Front)

      RIGAN

    3. Moristo SP
      Rubber (Back)

      Moristo SP

      Now the high-tension performance qualities of the smooth Moristo rubbers are available in short p...

User review

  • Vega Asia

    User review

    I borrowed my nephew's and hit it, but it was very easy to use.
    It is easy to use and has a good shot feeling that makes it easy to do all techniques.
    Not too hard, not too soft, bites well and flies moderately.
    The shot feeling is so good that I thought it was a wooden racket, but it was made of fiber or ultra-thin carbon. It makes a good sound with a bang.
    Rotation was a bit old so I can't give an accurate rating.
    However, the selling price is a little high (although the list price is the same).
    The difference is about 300 to 500 yen, but if there is a rubber with the same performance, I will buy it.

    See original review

    2022/10/09
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    8
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Swat

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Swat

    User review

    Since I started playing table tennis for the first time in 30 years, I really wanted something similar to the carbon racket called Oberon, which I used in the past, but I chose it because it was the most popular and wide range from beginner to advanced. I wanted to try using a tension rubber, and I looked sweetly that a wooden racket would be fine, but I bounced more than I thought. In the basic hitting, it is soft with the hitting sound of pom-pom, but when I hit the drive, I felt a hard sound with a good sound. However, for smash and playing systems, I want a faster initial speed. I was surprised at the price of the rubber, but the racket was surprised at this price. G1 is a little too bouncy with the personal impression of the racket and rubber. Is the blade a little smaller than the old racket? I felt that. It may be that your hand has just grown, but ... I learned 7 plywood on the front rubber on the iron plate and the net, but personally I felt that SWAT did not fit a little. There is nothing that can not be used, but it may be a little unsatisfactory for those who want a performance-oriented one point with all 70 points racket and no pointed part.

    See original review

    2019/11/18
    Overall
    6/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    6
    Control
    6
    Touch
    6
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) V>11 EXTRA

    Recommend rubber(Back) RIGAN

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • SO-TEN

    User review

    At first, I got the impression that it was carefully made from the feel of the edge of the board. The flight is about the same as Inner ALC>Soten>>Inner ALC-S. If you hit it with a hit, it will fly a little more than the swat? If you hit it with a scratch, the racket will fly and you will end up overshooting. Although the blade is a little large, you can feel the weight of the rubber, so it is better to pay attention to the weight of the rubber you use. The board is flexible, so I feel like it can be used even if I hit it hard with soft rubber. When using Rigan spin at my swing speed in the blue sky, the ball doesn't penetrate the rubber enough and is difficult to control. I think it would have been better to use Ligun instead of Ligun Spin due to its weight and bite. Instead, I feel like it's spinning more than ever before. On the other hand, it seems that even hard rubber that could not be used can be used because the ball can be held securely due to the flexibility of the board. The grip is thick for a Nittaku, and it seems to be suitable for people who want to hold it firmly when swinging, but it doesn't seem to be suitable for people who want to change their grip depending on their technique. I just need to remove the grip. Isn't this a racket that is preferred by people who compete with the amount of rotation of the drive? Personally, I often use the drive for connecting and want to hit it, so the acoustic carbon racket was easier to use.

    See original review

    2024/03/17
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    10
    Control
    7
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) RIGAN SPIN

    Recommend rubber(Back) RIGAN SPIN

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • RIGAN

    User review

    We bought without expectation very much, but became easy to use very much and became favorite.
    It is inferior in rotation, speed, and catch compared to the G1, but it is easy to use with high controllability to surpass it.
    However, it may be unsatisfactory to shoot in the middle team.
    I was at a loss with Vega Europe, but it is not an accurate comparison because it is a different racket, but is the rotation and speed unsatisfactory even in the front line? I felt that, so if it was Ligan, the front line would not complain, so this was good.

    See original review

    2019/12/16
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    8
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket FLYATT Carbon PRO

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. < Previous
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!