NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  SO-TEN

  

  My first impression, just from the feel of the edge of the blade, was that it's carefully made. In terms of how much it flies: Inner ALC > Souten >> Inner ALC-S, roughly. Hitting flat, it flies maybe a bit more than the Swat? Brushing the ball, it's a blade that flies and I kept overshooting. The blade is a bit on the large side, and I felt the weight of the rubber quite a bit, so you should pay attention to the weight of whatever rubber you use. Since the blade flexes, I feel like it could handle hard smashes even with a soft rubber. At my swing speed, with Raigan Spin on the Souten, the ball didn't sink into the rubber quite enough and was hard to control. Given the weight and sink feel, I think I should have gone with regular Raigan instead of Raigan Spin. That said, it feels like I'm generating more spin than ever before. On the other hand, even hard rubbers that didn't work for me before seem usable now, since the flex of the blade secures the ball-holding feel. The grip is a bit thick for a Nittaku blade — it should suit people who like to grip firmly and swing, but probably won't suit people who like to switch their grip for different techniques. Though you can always just sand the grip down. This seems like a blade that would appeal to players who rely on the amount of spin they put on their drives. Personally, I use drives mostly as connecting shots and prefer to go for flatter, harder hits, so the Acoustic Carbon was easier for me to use.

  See original review Hide original review

  最初に板端面の触り心地から丁寧に作られてる印象を受けました。飛びが、インナーALC＞蒼天＞＞インナーALC-Sくらい。当て打ちだとスワットよりちょっと飛ぶくらい？擦り打ちだと飛ぶラケットでオーバーばかりです。ブレードが若干大きいですが、結構ラバーの重量感を感じますので使用するラバーの重量に気を配った方が良いです。板がしなるので柔らかいラバーで強打しても使えそうな気がします。蒼天で私のスイングスピードでライガンスピンだとラバーへの球の食い込みが少し足りずコントロールし難いです。重さと食い込み感からライガンスピンではなくライガンにすれば良かったと思ってます。その代わり今まで以上に回転かけてる感は強いです。逆に使えなかった硬いラバーでも板のしなりで球持ちを確保できるので使えそうです。グリップがニッタクにしては太目で、しっかり握って振りたい人には合いそうですが、技術毎に持ち替えたい人には合わなそうです。グリップは削ればいいだけですけどね。ドライブの回転量で勝負する人には好まれるラケットではないでしょうか。個人的にドライブは繋ぎで使う事が多く叩き打ちをしたいのでアコースティックカーボンの方が使いやすいラケットでした。

  2024/03/17

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) RIGAN SPIN

  Recommend rubber(Back) RIGAN SPIN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  Moristo SP

  

  This feels like the softest short pips I've used so far.
  Maybe closest in feel to Spectol Red — the current S2 or S3?
  When you really brush it hard you get quite a bit of spin, but the ball tends to come out a bit floaty (that floatiness when brushing is the same for any short pips).
  I've been cutting back on flat hitting lately, so I can't really speak to how good it is for that.
  The sheet feels moist and grips the ball well, and the sponge is soft too, so it doesn't have that dropping-off-the-blade feeling you get with a lot of vertical-pips rubbers.
  The Spectol line has a drier-feeling sheet rubber that's a bit harder and feels a little slippery.
  Because the sheet grips the ball, flat hits feel like they won't go in, so I've cut back on flat hitting.
  Knuckle balls don't come out that easily, but when they do show up occasionally, they're nasty.
  It's a vertical-pips rubber that's easy to drive with.
  Since it's soft, the feel on contact is really pleasant.

  The balance between spin, stopping the ball, and smashing is good and it's easy to use, but the downside is the price is a bit on the high side, maybe?
  Short pips are hard to put into words.

  See original review Hide original review

  今まで使った表の中で一番柔らかく感じます。
  スペクトルレッドに使用感近いかな？今のS2かS3？
  ガツッと擦った時は結構回転掛かりますが、浮き気味の球になりやすいです。（擦って浮き気味はどの表も同じです）
  最近弾き打ちを減らしているので弾きの良さはわかりません。
  シートがしっとりした感じで噛みやすく、スポンジも柔らかいので縦目の表のような打っていて落ちる感覚が少ないです。
  スペクトル系は、もっと乾燥した感じのシートゴム質で少し硬めで若干滑る感じがあります。
  シートが噛む感じがあるので弾くと入らないイメージがあり、弾き打ちが減りました。
  ナックルは出やすくありませんが、時々出るのが嫌らしいです。
  ドライブがしやすい縦目表です。
  柔らかいので打球感が気持ちいいです。

  回転、止める、叩くのバランスが良くて使いやすいですが、ネックなのは価格が若干高い事かな？
  表を語るのは難しいです。

  2022/09/25

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic Carbon

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  RIGAN SPIN

  

  Tested with the same racket and the same opponent, comparing Rigan (thick), V-11 (thick), and Rigan Spin (thick).
  My opponent's rating for spin: V-11 > Rigan Spin ≥ Rigan
  My own rating for spin: Rigan Spin > V-11 = Rigan
  Speed: V-11 >> Rigan > Rigan Spin
  Control: Rigan Spin = Rigan >> V-11
  Feel: Rigan ≥ V-11 > Rigan Spin
  It feels like I'm putting a lot of spin on, but surprisingly it's not actually that much. I don't think there's much difference in performance from Rigan. Pushes are easier than with Rigan, but drives from a slightly lower position are harder, so it kind of evens out. Rigan Spin doesn't fly much, so it's more consistent than Rigan, but it has no real quirks, which makes it easier for opponents to attack (Rigan has a bit of a quirk to it). The topsheet is firm so counters are good, but since it doesn't fly much, it's a bit lackluster there. If you play close to the table, go with Rigan Spin for consistency. If you play mid-distance, or want to attack even close to the table, I think Rigan is better. It felt similar to using medium-thick Rigan, so if you go with Rigan Spin, it might be worth buying a thicker sponge than what you normally use.

  See original review Hide original review

  同じラケット、同じ相手で評価、ラバーは、ライガン（厚）V-11（厚）ライガンスピン（厚）で比べる
  相手の評価では、回転：V-11＞ライガンスピン≧ライガン
  自分の評価では、回転：ライガンスピン＞V-11＝ライガン
  速度：V-11＞＞ライガン＞ライガンスピン
  コントロール：ライガンスピン＝ライガン＞＞V-11
  打球感：ライガン≧V-11＞ライガンスピン
  自分では回転かけた感が大きいが、意外とかかっていない。ライガンと性能差はほとんどないと思う。ライガンと比べツッツキがやり易いが少し下がった位置でのドライブがやり難いので相殺かな。ライガンスピンは飛ばないのでライガンより安定するが癖がないので相手は打ちやすい（ライガンは若干癖がある）。シートが強いのでカウンターは良いが飛ばないので微妙。前陣ならライガンスピン安定重視。中陣ならライガン前陣でも攻めたい人にはライガンの方がいいと思う。ライガンの中厚使ってる感覚に近いと思ったのでライガンスピン使うならいつも使ってるスポンジより厚いのを買った方がいいかも知れない。

  2022/10/09

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic Carbon

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Tackiness Chop

  

  Back in junior high, over 30 years ago now, I used the thin version on my backhand.
  I only found out recently that it's a tacky rubber.
  Since I used rubber cleaner on it every day, mine never really had much tackiness left.

  In my first and second year of junior high, matches tended to come down to who could out-spin who, so this rubber came in handy a lot.
  Even against serves I couldn't read, if I just pushed the ball back hard, I could return it without getting attacked too badly.

  But from around the second half of second year, the short game started shifting toward power - drives and flicks even over the table.
  I switched to short pips since I wanted to take the initiative first, but I still remember how good this rubber was for serves and pushes, and it's a rubber I'd like to try again someday.

  If you're a player who's just starting in your first year of junior high, I think this is a great first rubber to recommend.
  I don't know of anything better than this rubber when it comes to putting spin on the ball and making pushes easy.

  See original review Hide original review

  もう30数年前の中学時代、バック側で薄を使用してました。
  粘着ラバーだというのは最近知りました。
  ラバークリーナー毎日使ってたので粘着力は自分のには無かったです。

  中学1～2年の頃は、回転勝負になりがちなので、このラバーは重宝しました。
  わからないサーブでも、とりあえず思いっきり突っついておけば、そうそう打たれる事もなく返球できたからです。

  でも、中学2年の後半くらいから台上でもドライブやフリックなどパワー勝負に変わってきます。
  先に勝負を仕掛けたいので表ラバーに変更しましたが、サーブや突っつきなんかは、このラバーの良さを今でも覚えており、もう一度使ってみたいなと思うラバーです。

  中学1年から始めたプレイヤーなら最初にこのラバーはおすすめできると思います。
  回転のかけ方や突っつきのし易さを、このラバー以上の物を私は知らないからです。

  2020/02/29

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	3
  Spin	8
  Control	7
  Hardness	Soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  FLYATT Carbon PRO

  

  My rating of this kept changing, but once I tried putting Ligan Spin on it, it turned into a blade that's easy to use.
  It's not a blade that generates much spin on its own, but it's easy to use because it's not affected much by the opponent's spin.
  With hard rubber it flies too much and is hard to control, and with soft rubber it sinks in too much on hard hits so you can't lift backspin balls, but with Ligan Spin it seems to work out okay somehow.
  That said, with a beginner's level of skill there's only so much you can do with this blade, so depending on the opponent I worry it might leave you completely helpless.
  On the other hand, since you basically just have to swing without overthinking tactics, the indecision goes away, and it has a strength where you can push through with speed and power.
  If you try to play it safe defensively, it's hard to vary the spin on your returns with inverted rubber, and since the surface is hard, unconventional rubbers probably produce a big variation.
  The feel is satisfying, and when you're in good form it's a fantastic blade, so I think it's recommendable for people who can keep attacking aggressively.
  The price is also appealing for a kevlar carbon blade.
  As always, I'd say this one is really for close-to-the-table fast attack.

  See original review Hide original review

  評価が何回も変わるのですが、ライガンスピンを試しに貼ってみたら使いやすいラケットに変貌しました。
  回転はあまり出せないラケットですが相手の回転の影響を受け難く使いやすいです。
  硬いラバーだと飛び過ぎて使い難く柔らかいラバーだと強打時に食い込み過ぎて下回転の球を持ち上げられない現象がありましたがライガンスピンだとなんとか使えそうです。
  でも初心者の技術でこのラケットだとできる事が限られてくるので対戦相手次第では手も足も出ない事が起こりそうで少し不安があります。
  ですが、あまり戦術的に考える事無く振るしかないと迷いが消えるのでスピードとパワーで押しきれる強みみたいな物があります。
  守りや堅実に行こうとすると裏ラバーでは返球に回転の変化をつけづらい、板表面が硬いので異質ラバーの変化が大きそう。
  打球感が気持ち良く調子が良い時には素晴らしいラケットですので強気で攻め続けられる人にはお勧めできると思います。
  ケプラーカーボンでこの価格も魅力ですね。
  これは毎回同じですが前陣速攻用ではないでしょうか。

  2019/12/16

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) RIGAN SPIN

  Recommend rubber(Back) RIGAN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. Next >