NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Spectol Blue

  

  I don't think I can review it, but ...
  The spectrum of 30 years ago was impressed by the straight trajectory and the initial velocity was fast, but the recent back rubber is faster than this.
  The front rubber can rotate only about half of the back rubber.
  There is a feeling that it falls a little from the back rubber if it is a basic hit, and if you do not hit it with a meat, it will be a net.
  Where is it good? I wonder if I want to make both sides behind the scenes? This is a rubber that is difficult to remove for some reason.
  Why use spectrum? If you ask yourself, will you feel stable and secure?
  The weak point of the spectrum is that it is difficult to produce a rotating sphere (serve, drive, etc.).
  However, on the other hand, you can play with little influence from the spinning ball that the opponent put out, and if you feel that the ball has floated a little, the back rubber will be a chance ball.
  Later, it is good that the rubber has a long life.
  The popular back tension rubber is high and has a short life span.
  In the past, it was a rubber that was synonymous with the front team haste, but recently it is also used by Cutman, so isn't it a well-balanced and easy-to-use rubber? I will end the review.

  See original review Hide original review

  上手くない私がレビューするのも、どうかと思いますが・・・
  30年前のスペクトルは、直線的弾道で初速が速く感動しましたが、最近の裏ラバーだと、これより速いです。
  表ラバーは、裏ラバーの半分くらいしか回転をかけれません。
  基本打ちだと裏ラバーより少し落ちる感覚があり、ミートさせて打たないとネットになります。
  えー何処がいいの？両面裏裏にしようかな？と考えてしまうのですが、何故か外しにくいラバーです。
  何故スペクトル使うの？と自分に問いてみると、安定する、安心感があるでしょうか？
  スペクトルの弱点は、回転のある球（サーブ、ドライブ等）を出し難い事くらいです。
  しかしその反面、相手が出した回転のある球に影響される事が少なくプレーでき、少し球が浮いたと感じれば裏ラバーではツッツキするような球でもチャンスボールになります。
  後、ラバーの寿命が長い事が良い事です。
  人気の裏テンションラバーは高くて寿命も短いので片面表にすると、お財布にも優しいです。
  昔は、前陣速攻の代名詞みたいなラバーでしたが、最近ではカットマンにも使われているので、バランスがよく使いやすいラバーなのではないか？でレビューを終わらせて頂きます。

  2019/10/27

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	6
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  Spectol

  

  Spectrum Blue-> Spectrum Red-> 388C-1-> Spectrum and I'm back to the spectrum I used in middle school.
  I personally like the shot feeling of a thin sponge and it is easy to handle.
  It doesn't feel like it bites into it like tension rubber, it's easy to rub on the surface, it doesn't feel like it flies, and it's easy to hit it lightly.
  It also takes some rotation, but I think the biggest advantage is that it looks like the trajectory of the ball is not applied.
  Since it is a front-end haste type, the attack power to punch out will be reduced if it is a non-tension rubber, but it is easy to handle and it is easy to put on and you can have confidence on the table, so this is better for making notches that lead to attacks I think.
  I think that non-tension rubber is easier to use for people on the back table who are not good at back driving because it is easy to hit the back of the crying place on the back table with a long and fast downward rotation and drop it on the opponent's net. ..

  See original review Hide original review

  スペクトルブルー→スペクトルレッド→388C-1→スペクトルと中学時代に使っていたスペクトルへ戻ってきました。
  個人的にスポンジ薄の打球感が好きで扱いやすいです。
  テンションラバーみたいに勝手に食い込む感じがなく、表面で擦りやすい、勝手に飛ぶ感じがなく軽くちょん当てしやすいです。
  また回転もそこそこかかるけど、一番の利点はかかってない球の弾道がかかっている様に見える事だと思います。
  前陣速攻タイプなので、非テンションラバーだと打ち抜く攻撃力ダウンになりますが、扱いやすさで乗せ打ちがやりやすく台上で自信が持てるので、攻撃に繋げる切欠作りには、こちらの方が上と思います。
  バック表の泣き所のバックへ長くて速い下回転を、ちょんと当てて相手のネット際に落としやすいので、バックドライブが苦手なバック表の人には非テンションのラバーの方が使いやすいと思います。

  2021/01/10

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Acoustic Carbon

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Fastarc G-1

  

  Since it is a return group for the first time in 30 years, it is possible to compare only Mark Samurai and Takines with existing rubber.
  The first tension rubber and ball became plastic, and the feeling of hitting was unpleasant and uncomfortable, but as you get used to it, it is a great catch, a great amount of rotation, a speed that can fly even with a light force, 30 I was a little shocked that it changed so much over the years.
  It is said that the stop rotation is entered even at the stop, and the drive rotation is entered even at the fore basic strike.
  Drive from a position away from great rotation is a great rubber that draws an arc.

  See original review Hide original review

  30年ぶり復帰組なので、今あるラバーだとマークⅤやタキネスくらいしか比較できません。
  初のテンションラバーと球がプラスティックになった事もあり、打球感がグニャグニャして気持ち悪かったですが、慣れてくると引っ掛かりの凄さ、回転量の凄さ、軽い力でも飛ばせる速度、30年でこんなにも変わったのかと少しショックを受けました。
  ストップでも下回転入ってたり、フォアの基本打ちでもドライブ回転入ってるなど言われるくらいです。
  回転が凄いから離れた位置からのドライブが、弧線を描いて入ってくれる凄いラバーです。

  2019/11/03

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  SO-TEN

  

  At first, I got the impression that it was carefully made from the feel of the edge of the board. The flight is about the same as Inner ALC>Soten>>Inner ALC-S. If you hit it with a hit, it will fly a little more than the swat? If you hit it with a scratch, the racket will fly and you will end up overshooting. Although the blade is a little large, you can feel the weight of the rubber, so it is better to pay attention to the weight of the rubber you use. The board is flexible, so I feel like it can be used even if I hit it hard with soft rubber. When using Rigan spin at my swing speed in the blue sky, the ball doesn't penetrate the rubber enough and is difficult to control. I think it would have been better to use Ligun instead of Ligun Spin due to its weight and bite. Instead, I feel like it's spinning more than ever before. On the other hand, it seems that even hard rubber that could not be used can be used because the ball can be held securely due to the flexibility of the board. The grip is thick for a Nittaku, and it seems to be suitable for people who want to hold it firmly when swinging, but it doesn't seem to be suitable for people who want to change their grip depending on their technique. I just need to remove the grip. Isn't this a racket that is preferred by people who compete with the amount of rotation of the drive? Personally, I often use the drive for connecting and want to hit it, so the acoustic carbon racket was easier to use.

  See original review Hide original review

  最初に板端面の触り心地から丁寧に作られてる印象を受けました。飛びが、インナーALC＞蒼天＞＞インナーALC-Sくらい。当て打ちだとスワットよりちょっと飛ぶくらい？擦り打ちだと飛ぶラケットでオーバーばかりです。ブレードが若干大きいですが、結構ラバーの重量感を感じますので使用するラバーの重量に気を配った方が良いです。板がしなるので柔らかいラバーで強打しても使えそうな気がします。蒼天で私のスイングスピードでライガンスピンだとラバーへの球の食い込みが少し足りずコントロールし難いです。重さと食い込み感からライガンスピンではなくライガンにすれば良かったと思ってます。その代わり今まで以上に回転かけてる感は強いです。逆に使えなかった硬いラバーでも板のしなりで球持ちを確保できるので使えそうです。グリップがニッタクにしては太目で、しっかり握って振りたい人には合いそうですが、技術毎に持ち替えたい人には合わなそうです。グリップは削ればいいだけですけどね。ドライブの回転量で勝負する人には好まれるラケットではないでしょうか。個人的にドライブは繋ぎで使う事が多く叩き打ちをしたいのでアコースティックカーボンの方が使いやすいラケットでした。

  2024/03/17

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） RIGAN SPIN

  Recommend rubber（Back） RIGAN SPIN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  V>11 EXTRA

  

  At the recommendation of a friend, I bought it because it was a rubber that suits me.
  When I hit it, I felt that the seat surface was less caught, but I could lift the lower rotation normally.
  It is straight like a rubber with a hard trajectory as a whole, without being easy to float due to the stickiness that is common with soft rubber.
  I feel that the seat is less likely to get caught, so I feel like I can hit it without worrying too much about the influence of the opponent's rotation.
  I feel that I haven't been able to serve well because of the seat being caught, but it seems that it is spinning as it is.
  If you practice multi-ball with soft rubber, there will be marks that cannot be removed from the rubber, but this rubber may have a long life because there are no marks left.
  Personally, it's a little stiff and I'd like to use it after improving a little, but it's quite easy to use.
  The rubber feels soft, but the sponge is hard, so if you don't swing it with a proper swing, you will get the impression that a good ball will not come out, so you will get tired.
  I didn't specialize in anything, and I felt that all the technologies were easy to do.
  Isn't it suitable for people who specialize in rubbing sheets and prefer parabolic trajectory? I think.
  I feel that the seat is less caught, so I lowered the rotation by one.

  See original review Hide original review

  友人からのお勧めで、私に合うラバーとの事で購入しました。
  打った感じでは、シート表面の引っ掛かりが少なく感じるのだけど、普通に下回転を持ち上げられる。
  柔らかいラバーにありがちなツッツキで浮きやすい事もなく、全体的に弾道が硬いラバーみたいな直線的です。
  シートの引っ掛かりが少なく感じるので相手の回転の影響をあまり気にせず叩ける気がします。
  シートの引っ掛かりで、サーブも自分では上手くかけれてない気がしますが、それなりに回転かかってるようです。
  柔らかいラバーで多球練習をするとラバーに取れない跡が残るのですが、このラバーは跡が残らなかったので寿命が長いかもしれません。
  個人的には少し硬めでもう少し上達してから使いたいなと思うラバーですが、かなり使いやすいです。
  柔らかめに感じるラバーですが、スポンジは硬いのでそれなりのスイングで振らないと良い球は出ない印象ですので疲れます。
  何かに特化してるわけでもなく全ての技術がやり易く感じました。
  シートの擦り打ち特化で放物線弾道を好む人には合わないんじゃないかな？と思います。
  シートの引っ掛かり感が少なく感じるので回転を1つ下げさせて頂きました。

  2021/02/21

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket FLYATT Carbon PRO

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >