NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Fastarc G-1

  

  Since it is a return group for the first time in 30 years, it is possible to compare only Mark Samurai and Takines with existing rubber.
  The first tension rubber and ball became plastic, and the feeling of hitting was unpleasant and uncomfortable, but as you get used to it, it is a great catch, a great amount of rotation, a speed that can fly even with a light force, 30 I was a little shocked that it changed so much over the years.
  It is said that the stop rotation is entered even at the stop, and the drive rotation is entered even at the fore basic strike.
  Drive from a position away from great rotation is a great rubber that draws an arc.

  See original review Hide original review

  30年ぶり復帰組なので、今あるラバーだとマークⅤやタキネスくらいしか比較できません。
  初のテンションラバーと球がプラスティックになった事もあり、打球感がグニャグニャして気持ち悪かったですが、慣れてくると引っ掛かりの凄さ、回転量の凄さ、軽い力でも飛ばせる速度、30年でこんなにも変わったのかと少しショックを受けました。
  ストップでも下回転入ってたり、フォアの基本打ちでもドライブ回転入ってるなど言われるくらいです。
  回転が凄いから離れた位置からのドライブが、弧線を描いて入ってくれる凄いラバーです。

  2019/11/03

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Spectol Blue

  

  I don't think I can review it, but ...
  The spectrum of 30 years ago was impressed by the straight trajectory and the initial velocity was fast, but the recent back rubber is faster than this.
  The front rubber can rotate only about half of the back rubber.
  There is a feeling that it falls a little from the back rubber if it is a basic hit, and if you do not hit it with a meat, it will be a net.
  Where is it good? I wonder if I want to make both sides behind the scenes? This is a rubber that is difficult to remove for some reason.
  Why use spectrum? If you ask yourself, will you feel stable and secure?
  The weak point of the spectrum is that it is difficult to produce a rotating sphere (serve, drive, etc.).
  However, on the other hand, you can play with little influence from the spinning ball that the opponent put out, and if you feel that the ball has floated a little, the back rubber will be a chance ball.
  Later, it is good that the rubber has a long life.
  The popular back tension rubber is high and has a short life span.
  In the past, it was a rubber that was synonymous with the front team haste, but recently it is also used by Cutman, so isn't it a well-balanced and easy-to-use rubber? I will end the review.

  See original review Hide original review

  上手くない私がレビューするのも、どうかと思いますが・・・
  30年前のスペクトルは、直線的弾道で初速が速く感動しましたが、最近の裏ラバーだと、これより速いです。
  表ラバーは、裏ラバーの半分くらいしか回転をかけれません。
  基本打ちだと裏ラバーより少し落ちる感覚があり、ミートさせて打たないとネットになります。
  えー何処がいいの？両面裏裏にしようかな？と考えてしまうのですが、何故か外しにくいラバーです。
  何故スペクトル使うの？と自分に問いてみると、安定する、安心感があるでしょうか？
  スペクトルの弱点は、回転のある球（サーブ、ドライブ等）を出し難い事くらいです。
  しかしその反面、相手が出した回転のある球に影響される事が少なくプレーでき、少し球が浮いたと感じれば裏ラバーではツッツキするような球でもチャンスボールになります。
  後、ラバーの寿命が長い事が良い事です。
  人気の裏テンションラバーは高くて寿命も短いので片面表にすると、お財布にも優しいです。
  昔は、前陣速攻の代名詞みたいなラバーでしたが、最近ではカットマンにも使われているので、バランスがよく使いやすいラバーなのではないか？でレビューを終わらせて頂きます。

  2019/10/27

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	6
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  V>11 EXTRA

  

  At the recommendation of a friend, I bought it because it was a rubber that suits me.
  When I hit it, I felt that the seat surface was less caught, but I could lift the lower rotation normally.
  It is straight like a rubber with a hard trajectory as a whole, without being easy to float due to the stickiness that is common with soft rubber.
  I feel that the seat is less likely to get caught, so I feel like I can hit it without worrying too much about the influence of the opponent's rotation.
  I feel that I haven't been able to serve well because of the seat being caught, but it seems that it is spinning as it is.
  If you practice multi-ball with soft rubber, there will be marks that cannot be removed from the rubber, but this rubber may have a long life because there are no marks left.
  Personally, it's a little stiff and I'd like to use it after improving a little, but it's quite easy to use.
  The rubber feels soft, but the sponge is hard, so if you don't swing it with a proper swing, you will get the impression that a good ball will not come out, so you will get tired.
  I didn't specialize in anything, and I felt that all the technologies were easy to do.
  Isn't it suitable for people who specialize in rubbing sheets and prefer parabolic trajectory? I think.
  I feel that the seat is less caught, so I lowered the rotation by one.

  See original review Hide original review

  友人からのお勧めで、私に合うラバーとの事で購入しました。
  打った感じでは、シート表面の引っ掛かりが少なく感じるのだけど、普通に下回転を持ち上げられる。
  柔らかいラバーにありがちなツッツキで浮きやすい事もなく、全体的に弾道が硬いラバーみたいな直線的です。
  シートの引っ掛かりが少なく感じるので相手の回転の影響をあまり気にせず叩ける気がします。
  シートの引っ掛かりで、サーブも自分では上手くかけれてない気がしますが、それなりに回転かかってるようです。
  柔らかいラバーで多球練習をするとラバーに取れない跡が残るのですが、このラバーは跡が残らなかったので寿命が長いかもしれません。
  個人的には少し硬めでもう少し上達してから使いたいなと思うラバーですが、かなり使いやすいです。
  柔らかめに感じるラバーですが、スポンジは硬いのでそれなりのスイングで振らないと良い球は出ない印象ですので疲れます。
  何かに特化してるわけでもなく全ての技術がやり易く感じました。
  シートの擦り打ち特化で放物線弾道を好む人には合わないんじゃないかな？と思います。
  シートの引っ掛かり感が少なく感じるので回転を1つ下げさせて頂きました。

  2021/02/21

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket FLYATT Carbon PRO

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Spectol

  

  Spectrum Blue-> Spectrum Red-> 388C-1-> Spectrum and I'm back to the spectrum I used in middle school.
  I personally like the shot feeling of a thin sponge and it is easy to handle.
  It doesn't feel like it bites into it like tension rubber, it's easy to rub on the surface, it doesn't feel like it flies, and it's easy to hit it lightly.
  It also takes some rotation, but I think the biggest advantage is that it looks like the trajectory of the ball is not applied.
  Since it is a front-end haste type, the attack power to punch out will be reduced if it is a non-tension rubber, but it is easy to handle and it is easy to put on and you can have confidence on the table, so this is better for making notches that lead to attacks I think.
  I think that non-tension rubber is easier to use for people on the back table who are not good at back driving because it is easy to hit the back of the crying place on the back table with a long and fast downward rotation and drop it on the opponent's net. ..

  See original review Hide original review

  スペクトルブルー→スペクトルレッド→388C-1→スペクトルと中学時代に使っていたスペクトルへ戻ってきました。
  個人的にスポンジ薄の打球感が好きで扱いやすいです。
  テンションラバーみたいに勝手に食い込む感じがなく、表面で擦りやすい、勝手に飛ぶ感じがなく軽くちょん当てしやすいです。
  また回転もそこそこかかるけど、一番の利点はかかってない球の弾道がかかっている様に見える事だと思います。
  前陣速攻タイプなので、非テンションラバーだと打ち抜く攻撃力ダウンになりますが、扱いやすさで乗せ打ちがやりやすく台上で自信が持てるので、攻撃に繋げる切欠作りには、こちらの方が上と思います。
  バック表の泣き所のバックへ長くて速い下回転を、ちょんと当てて相手のネット際に落としやすいので、バックドライブが苦手なバック表の人には非テンションのラバーの方が使いやすいと思います。

  2021/01/10

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Acoustic Carbon

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Spectol Red

  

  I changed the spectrum from blue to red, but I don't understand the difference.
  Did you change from the person who hit you together? It seems that the rotation has increased a little, but there is no difference in the feeling that you are hitting yourself.
  I think that the red color of the rubber has become a beautiful red because it is a red sponge.

  See original review Hide original review

  スペクトル青から赤に換えたけど、違いがよくわかりません。
  一緒に打ってる人から裏に換えた？と言われたので回転が少し増えったっぽいですが、自分で打ってる感じに違いがありません。
  赤いスポンジなのでラバーの赤色が奇麗な赤になったなぁと思うくらいです。

  少し使ったら結構違う。
  青はドライブみたいな擦る打ち方すると「ズリッ」と滑る感じがあったが、
  赤は、裏ラバー程ではないが、少し引っ掛かりを感じる。

  ミート打ちやナックル多様なら青の方が良さそう
  表っぽい癖玉が減るが、表で回転が欲しい人には赤の方が良さそう。

  2019/12/16

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket FLYATT Carbon PRO

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >