NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Cybershape Clipper

  

  I bought this because I was drawn to the shape.
  True to the Cyber Shape design, the sweet spot is wider than on the normal Clipper Wood. The balance point is also a bit more toward the tip, though not as much as a WRB-type blade. Because of that, it's easier to swing through than the normal version. It gives the impression that chiquitas, flicks, and other short-game techniques over the table are easier to pull off.
  On paper it's 5g lighter than the normal version, but because the blade surface is wider, the total weight ends up heavier once you put rubber on. That's the downside.
  Overall it's a solid, orthodox 7-ply blade, so I think it's a good option to have as another choice.

  See original review Hide original review

  形に惹かれ買ってみました。
  サイバーシェイプの特徴通り、スウィートスポットがノーマルクリッパーウッドより広いです。重心位置もWRBタイプほどではありませんが、やや先端よりです。そのため、ノーマルより振り抜きやすいです。チキータやフリックなど台上がやりやすい印象です。
  カタログ値ではノーマルより5g軽いですが、面が広いためラバーを貼ると総重量が重くなるのが難点です。
  総じて王道の７枚合板なので、新たな選択肢としてありだと思います。

  2024/06/02

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	10
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) Fastarc G-1

  Recommend rubber(Back) SUPER VENTUS

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  RAKZA XX

  

  I use thick on my backhand. I've tried pretty much the whole Rakza lineup, but ever since XX came out I can't go back to anything else. Among rubbers in the same hardness range, it feels soft and easy to sink the ball into. The sheet is strong too, so it's an all-around rubber for pushes, blocks, drives, and chops. Pushes especially cut really well. If you're already using something from the Rakza series, you should be able to use this without any issues.
  That said, maybe because the sheet is so strong, it feels like the lifespan is a bit shorter compared to other rubbers in the Rakza series.

  See original review Hide original review

  厚をバックに使っています。ラクザはひと通り試しましたが、XXが出てから他には戻せません。同硬度帯のラバーの中では、柔らかく食い込みやすく感じます。シートも強いので、ツッツキ、ブロック、ドライブ、カットと万能ラバーです。特にツッツキがよく切れます。ラクザシリーズを使っている方は問題なく使えるかと思います。
  ただ、シートが強いせいか、他のラクザシリーズに比べて、やや寿命が短いように感じます。

  2026/05/31

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket MASAMUNE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Vega Pro hybrid

  

  Put this on my backhand. Up until now, I'd been using Hybrid K3 (2.0) ever since it came out. I felt like my backhand counters were too delicate, so I was looking for something a bit softer that I could still use at max thickness.
  I think this rubber is easy to use for anyone who's been using a slightly-tacky rubber around German 50 degrees. I'm satisfied with both the spin and the speed. I plan to keep using it for a while.
  That said, even though it feels on the harder side, it's rated 47.5 degrees, so people who can handle tacky or genuinely hard rubbers might find it lacking.
  It might be a good first rubber for someone switching over from tension rubbers, but personally I feel its performance is a bit middle-of-the-road, so I'd recommend other rubbers instead.

  See original review Hide original review

  　バックに貼りました。これまでは、発売以来ハイブリッドK3(2.0)を使用していました。バックカウンターをデリケートに感じていたので、もう少し柔らかくかつMAXで使えるラバーを探していました。
  　このラバーは、これまでドイツ硬度50度前後の微粘着ラバーを使っていた方には使いやすいラバーだと思います。回転もスピードも満足です。しばらく使おうと思います。
  　しかし、硬めに感じるとはいっても47.5度なので、粘着や硬いラバーを使いこなせる方には物足りなく感じると思います。
  　テンションラバーから移行したい方が１枚目に使ってみるのはいいかもしれませんが、個人的には性能がやや中途半端かと思いますので、他のラバーをオススメします。

  2024/04/14

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket C-Hack

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  PREHNITE

  

  I bought this from a friend who wasn't using it anymore.
  It's an 85g FL. I used it as a backup racket for about a month (roughly 6 hours of play).
  Thanks to the CNF, the feel is consistent across the whole blade. It's a bit hard for a 5-ply, but quite soft for an outer blade. It also grips the ball well and has a more moderate bounce than a typical 5-ply. It bounces less than the Cybershape Wood Revoldia CNF. My impression is it's about the same as, or maybe slightly less bouncy than, an Innerforce ALC. For a blade with special material in it, it resonates in the hand more than you'd expect.
  It seems like it would pair well with hard tension rubbers or unorthodox (pips/anti) rubbers. With tacky rubber the arc gets too pronounced, so I'd say it works best up to a firmer, lightly tacky rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  使わなくなった友人から購入しました。
  85gのFLです。1ヶ月(約6時間ほど)サブラケットとして使用しました。
  CNFのおかげでブレード全体で打感が一律です。５枚合板としてはやや硬く、アウターラケットとしてはかなり柔らかい打感です。また、球の掴みがよく、５枚合板より適度に弾みます。サイバーシェイプウッド・レボルディアcnfより弾みません。インナーフォースalcと同じくらいかやや弾まないくらいの印象です。特殊素材入りの割には手に響く方かなと思います。
  硬いテンションラバーや異質との相性が良さそうです。粘着ラバーだと弧線がですぎますので、硬めの微粘着までが合いそうです。

  2024/11/17

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) JEKYLL＆HYDE C55.0

  Recommend rubber(Back) DO Knuckle (Short pimples)

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  JEKYLL＆HYDE C55.0

  

  I like Calderano and I normally use slightly tacky rubbers, so I decided to try this.
  The sponge is hard and the sheet is soft. It's heavy. Personally the feel reminds me of Hybrid K3, with even more of a sense of really gripping the ball. It doesn't bounce as much as K3. That said, you need to sink the ball right into the sponge to get a good shot. Without a solid impact, or if you just brush the sheet, the ball tends to come out flat and easy to punish. In other words, a strong impact is essential. For most people this will probably end up being a forehand-only option.
  Highly recommended for players who like mid-distance topspin rallies, all-forehand power players, and choppers. Chopping is easy and bites well.
  I think you get more out of this rubber's potential on a harder blade than on a softer one.
  It might not be a great fit if you're switching over from a tension rubber.
  If you normally use tacky or hard, slightly-tacky rubbers, it's worth trying.

  See original review Hide original review

  カルデラノが好きなのと、普段から微粘着ラバーを使っているので使ってみました。
  スポンジは硬く、シートが柔らかいラバーです。重いです。個人的にはハイブリッドK3と打感は似ていて、より球をグッと掴む印象です。K3より弾みません。ただ、スポンジまで食い込ませないといい球はでません。インパクトがなかったり、シートで擦るとやや棒球気味になります。つまり、強いインパクト必須です。多くの人はフォアのみの選択肢になると思われます。
  中陣で引き合う方やオールフォアでガツガツ打つ方、カットマンにはすごくオススメです。カットはやりやすく切れます。
  柔らかいラケットに貼るより硬いラケットに貼る方がラバーのポテンシャルが引き出せると思います。
  テンションラバーからの移行にはあまり向いていないかもしれません。
  普段から粘着や硬い微粘着を使っている方は試す価値があります。

  2024/11/17

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket PREHNITE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. Next >