NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  MASAMUNE

  

  I've been using it for about half a year.
  It has a decent bounce for a wooden attack racket, and quite a bounce for a cut racket.
  The ball holding and hitting feel are unique and peculiar to cypress, so I think people's preferences will differ. Personally, the one that feels the most similar to it was the new Defense II. Until I got used to it, I kept over-missing. Counters were especially difficult. Also, because the surface is round, I think it is difficult to handle if you swing it with all your might.
  You can cut just by being conscious of holding the ball. Straight and deep cuts come out naturally.
  It is very easy to attack with a two-handed drive, just like Hideta.
  I recommend other rackets except for cut players who focus on attack.

  See original review Hide original review

  半年ほど使っています。
  木材攻撃ラケットとしてはそこそこの弾み、カットラケットとしてはかなりの弾みです。
  球持ちと打球感が檜特有で独特なので、好みが分かれると思います。個人的に最も打球感が似ているのは新品のディフェンスⅡでした。慣れるまでは、オーバーミスばかりでした。特にカウンターが難しかったです。また、面が丸い分、思いきり振り抜く打ち方では扱いが難しいと思います。
  カットは球を持つ意識だけで入ります。直線的かつ深いカットが自然と出ます。
  攻撃は英田選手よろしく両ハンドドライブが非常にやりやすいです。
  攻撃中心のカットマン以外は他のラケットをおすすめします。

  2025/07/20

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber（Front） RAKZA Z EXTRA HARD

  Recommend rubber（Back） HYBRID K3FX

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  PREHNITE

  

  I bought it from a friend who no longer uses it.
  It is an 85g FL. I used it as a sub racket for a month (about 6 hours).
  Thanks to the CNF, the feel is uniform across the entire blade. It is a little hard for a 5-ply wood racket, but quite soft for an outer racket. It also grips the ball well and bounces more moderately than a 5-ply wood racket. It bounces less than the Cyber Shape Wood Revoldia CNF. It seems to be about the same as the Inner Force ALC, or slightly less bouncy. I think it resonates with your hands despite the special material.
  It seems to go well with hard tension rubbers and other materials. Sticky rubbers create too much of an arch, so a hard, slightly sticky rubber would be good.

  See original review Hide original review

  使わなくなった友人から購入しました。
  85gのFLです。1ヶ月(約6時間ほど)サブラケットとして使用しました。
  CNFのおかげでブレード全体で打感が一律です。５枚合板としてはやや硬く、アウターラケットとしてはかなり柔らかい打感です。また、球の掴みがよく、５枚合板より適度に弾みます。サイバーシェイプウッド・レボルディアcnfより弾みません。インナーフォースalcと同じくらいかやや弾まないくらいの印象です。特殊素材入りの割には手に響く方かなと思います。
  硬いテンションラバーや異質との相性が良さそうです。粘着ラバーだと弧線がですぎますので、硬めの微粘着までが合いそうです。

  2024/11/17

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE C55.0

  Recommend rubber（Back） DO Knuckle (Short pimples)

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  JEKYLL＆HYDE C55.0

  

  I like Calderano and I usually use a slightly sticky rubber, so I tried it.
  This rubber has a hard sponge and a soft sheet. It's heavy. Personally, I think the feel is similar to the Hybrid K3, and it feels like it grips the ball more. It doesn't bounce as much as the K3. However, you won't get a good ball unless you get the sponge to bite into it. If there's no impact or if you rub it with the sheet, it will feel a bit like a baseball. In other words, a strong impact is essential. I think that for many people, it will be an option only for the forehand.
  I highly recommend it for those who are in the middle of the court, those who hit hard with all forehands, and cut players. It's easy to cut and cut.
  I think that the potential of the rubber can be brought out by sticking it to a hard racket rather than a soft racket.
  It may not be very suitable for transitioning from tension rubber.
  If you usually use sticky or hard slightly sticky rubbers, it's worth trying.

  See original review Hide original review

  カルデラノが好きなのと、普段から微粘着ラバーを使っているので使ってみました。
  スポンジは硬く、シートが柔らかいラバーです。重いです。個人的にはハイブリッドK3と打感は似ていて、より球をグッと掴む印象です。K3より弾みません。ただ、スポンジまで食い込ませないといい球はでません。インパクトがなかったり、シートで擦るとやや棒球気味になります。つまり、強いインパクト必須です。多くの人はフォアのみの選択肢になると思われます。
  中陣で引き合う方やオールフォアでガツガツ打つ方、カットマンにはすごくオススメです。カットはやりやすく切れます。
  柔らかいラケットに貼るより硬いラケットに貼る方がラバーのポテンシャルが引き出せると思います。
  テンションラバーからの移行にはあまり向いていないかもしれません。
  普段から粘着や硬い微粘着を使っている方は試す価値があります。

  2024/11/17

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket PREHNITE

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  RASANTER C53

  

  I am a cutman with an attack racket.
  It's a rubber that holds the ball very well, and the forecut/counter is excellent. It feels softer than 53 degrees. I think it's exactly as described as a tension rubber rather than a slightly sticky rubber. It can also cut Tsutsuki sufficiently.
  Recommended for tension rubber users who want more rotation, and slightly adhesive rubber users who want more momentum.

  See original review Hide original review

  攻撃用ラケットでカットマンをしています。
  大変球持ちの良いラバーで、フォアカット・カウンターが抜群にいいです。53度より柔らかく感じます。微粘着ラバーよりのテンションラバーというふれこみの通りだと思います。ツッツキも十分切れます。
  テンションラバーユーザーでより回転を求める方、微粘着ラバーユーザーでより弾みを求める方、にオススメです。

  2024/02/06

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket MA LONG CARBON 3

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5