土掘りマン's profile

土掘りマン's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 11〜20 years

User review

  • Kenta Matsudaira ALC

    User review

    It is especially recommended for men and women with small hands.
    Personally, I think that it is a racket that is more suitable for those who hold the grip deeper than those who hold the grip shallowly.
    Since the grip is small (thin?), Power control at impact and racket head control with fingers are very easy to do.
    The difficulty is that you are overpowered when you are nervous or when you hit the drive repeatedly, but your grip control has improved.
    If you are mainly in the front team and want to deal with meetings in the middle team, why not give it a try.

    See original review

    2021/02/09
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    10
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) TRIPLE Double Extra

    Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 80

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Anders LIND Hexa Carbon

    User review

    This racket doesn't fly as well as you'd expect, even though it contains a material. When I hit it lightly, I thought it was a cutting racket. However, if I take advantage of the ball's hold and apply spin, it flies well. I feel like it tends to produce a fairly straight shot.

    Even though it doesn't bounce, the sweet spot is wide, making it extremely stable for blocks, counters, and table shots.

    It's not impossible to hit with a hitter, but it's more stable with a spin-based shot.

    The ST grip is round and a little thicker than the Viscaria ST grip.

    It's a strange racket that feels like it's made of both five and seven plywood, and has a unique texture. It might be just right for those who are trying a material racket after a plywood racket. I also think it's perfect for those who find that inner carbon rackets fly too much but don't like plywood.

    See original review

    2025/08/11
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    9
    Control
    10
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) RAKZA Z EXTRA HARD

    Recommend rubber(Back) HYBRID K3FX

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • MASAMUNE

    User review

    I've been using it for about half a year.
    It has a decent bounce for a wooden attack racket, and quite a bounce for a cut racket.
    The ball holding and hitting feel are unique and peculiar to cypress, so I think people's preferences will differ. Personally, the one that feels the most similar to it was the new Defense II. Until I got used to it, I kept over-missing. Counters were especially difficult. Also, because the surface is round, I think it is difficult to handle if you swing it with all your might.
    You can cut just by being conscious of holding the ball. Straight and deep cuts come out naturally.
    It is very easy to attack with a two-handed drive, just like Hideta.
    I recommend other rackets except for cut players who focus on attack.

    See original review

    2025/07/20
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    10
    Control
    8
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) RAKZA Z EXTRA HARD

    Recommend rubber(Back) HYBRID K3FX

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • HYBRID K2 PRO

    User review

    It is completely different from K3. It is more sticky than K3 and does not bounce. It is similar in that the sheet is soft and does not feel hard. If you are changing from a tension rubber, I think K3 is better. If you are using a sticky rubber, it is worth trying once.
    The hitting feeling seems similar to Nittaku NEO3, but the sheet is more stiff. Among the recently released ones, it is somewhat similar to Jikihai C55, and the ball will be better if you let the sponge bite into it rather than catching it thinly with the sheet. However, it can be applied with the sheet more than C55.
    In general, it is a rubber with a soft sheet and a hard sponge, which is popular, and makes it easy to use strong adhesion.

    See original review

    2024/12/07
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket C-Hack

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Cybershape Clipper

    User review

    I bought it because I was attracted by the shape.
    As is characteristic of the Cyber Shape, the sweet spot is wider than the standard Clipper Wood. The center of gravity is not as far away as the WRB type, but it is slightly closer to the tip. Therefore, it is easier to swing than the standard. I have the impression that it is easier to do table-top shots such as chiquitas and flicks.
    According to the catalog value, it is 5g lighter than the standard, but the downside is that the total weight becomes heavy when rubber is applied because the surface is wide.
    Overall, it is a classic 7-ply wood, so I think it is a good new option.

    See original review

    2024/06/02
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    7
    Control
    10
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) Fastarc G-1

    Recommend rubber(Back) SUPER VENTUS

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6

Top Players

Country

Style