Acoustic Carbon Inner
| Everyone's rating |
[Hardness] Little hard [Performance] Control and Spin are excellent. |
(Click to show big size)
Averages reviews points
- Speed: 7.46
- Spin: 8.04
- Control: 8.13
-
Made with "String Instrument Technology" Carbon version of the famous Nittaku Acoustic. Made in Japan.
- FL
- ST
Specifications
- Producer
- Nittaku
- Product code
- NC-0402,NC-0403
- Speed
- Mid-Fast
- Touch
- hard
- Size
- 157 × 150mm
- Weight
- 90g ±
- Material
- Five plywood + FE 2 sheets of ca
- Thickness
- 5.5mm
Players use Acoustic Carbon Inner
- Excellent ease of play for front-court drives and flat hits
- Unique striking sensation with a strong ball-grabbing feel
- Thin grip provides comfort and high operability
- Excellent spin performance and easy control
- Lacking power in backcourt play with somewhat subdued ball speed
User reviews
-
-
Teacher of transformation weapons Professor Robot Cong
-
2017/05/27
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness little hard
Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc P-1
Recommended rubber (Backhand) TENERGY 05
-
-
-
SHIN (Experience: ４〜５ years) A well-balanced blade
-
2017/01/20
I used this as a custom reverse-penhold-to-shakehand conversion with the blade and handle shape modeled on a Violin R-H.
Since it's an inner construction, the carbon character doesn't come through too strongly, and the feel isn't rock hard either.
Even a light tap produces a fast-feeling ball, but it's not a crazy-fast, flying-off-the-blade type either — for the short game and other fine techniques, it holds still like a wood blade.
That said, since it's still carbon at its core, spin is a bit reduced compared to a 5-ply wood blade, and it feels slightly harder to put spin on the ball than with wood.Personally, I think this suits attacking players who play close to the table with flat hits and drives better than players who stay back.
It pairs fine with spin-oriented tension inverted rubber, and works well with short pips too.It's a well-balanced blade, so I'd recommend it even to people trying their first non-wood blade.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness little hard
Recommended rubber (Forehand) MASTER SPIN SPECIAL
Recommended rubber (Backhand) JOOLA RHYZM
-
-
-
-
2017/01/18
I'm a fan of Miu-chan, so I wanted to go with the outer version, but when I borrowed one to try it felt way too stiff and I gave up on it.
I thought maybe it was because it was the P-1, but I got a bit scared and went with the inner instead.
But I think that was the right call.
Maybe because it's thin overall, the ball holds on the blade longer than I expected, blocks have good control, and serves were easy to hit too.
That said, as everyone says, it might lack a bit of power in topspin rallies when you back off from the table, but at my level that's not an issue at all.
It weighed exactly 90g as listed in the catalog, and with a G-1 (max thickness) + Spectrum Blue (thick) + 10mm grip tape, it came to 174g total.
I'd personally prefer the balance a bit more toward the handle, but it's fine as is.
The FL handle felt a touch thin for me — I wear a size 23cm golf glove.
Overall, no complaints — a solid A+!Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness little hard
Recommended rubber (Forehand) ROZENA
Recommended rubber (Backhand) Moristo SP
-
-
-
White circle (Experience: ６〜１０ years) Easy to put spin on
-
2016/09/07
I switched from the Fly Att Carbon Pro because I was drawn to the inner carbon construction.
At first the feel was quite unfamiliar until I got used to it. It has that hard, carbon-typical feel, but bounces less than I expected, which surprised me at first — though that might just be because I was previously using a blade with a lot of bounce. Basically, though, I found the arc is high and it puts a lot of spin on the ball. The handle is thin too, so it's easy on the wrist and easy to switch grips with.
The downsides are the weight and the balance point.
It felt a bit heavier in hand than the actual listed weight.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness hard
Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc G-1
Recommended rubber (Backhand) Fastarc P-1
-
-
-
Ayano Totally satisfied!
-
2016/07/11
I was torn between the Acoustic Carbon and the Acoustic Carbon Inner, and ended up buying the Acoustic Carbon Inner on a friend's recommendation. Using it, the control was great and the bounce was just right — really good!
One downside is that it's a bit heavy, which made full swings a little harder
But if you're torn between the Acoustic Carbon and the Acoustic Carbon Inner, I'd recommend the Acoustic Carbon Inner!Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness little hard
Recommended rubber (Forehand) TENERGY 05
Recommended rubber (Backhand) Tenergy 25
-
-
-
Poti (Experience: More than ２０ years)
-
2016/02/11
If you keep using this blade, you'll definitely become a strong player. I was amazed by how the ball felt when receiving it — that stretch and weight.
But once I got used to this blade, other blades started to feel unsatisfying.
I wish I'd met it back in junior high.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch
Recommended rubber (Forehand) NITTAKU HURRICANE 3
Recommended rubber (Backhand) Super Anti
-
-
-
Hirokun sama director (Experience: ６〜１０ years)
-
2015/09/27
It generates a lot of spin and the feel is really good.
The flight is a bit less than the Ai Fukuhara ZLF.
It's not suited for players who rally from mid-distance or play from away from the table,
but it's great for players who drive close to the table.
It also matches perfectly with Tenergy and Fastarc.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch
Recommended rubber (Forehand) Fastarc G-1
Recommended rubber (Backhand) Omega IV Euro
-
Related racket
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.