NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Triangular Edge God Beast Mirror （Experience：２〜３ years） I agree with the quartet!

  

  I used 1.8 for the back. I changed from Morist. At first it was combined with the inner force, but it feels like it does not fly from Morist. Therefore it was very easy for knuckles to come out and I felt it was easy to do blocks. However, I felt that the attack did not reach Morist. However, when combined with the VICTAS Quartet SFC, the offensive and defensive balance is well balanced and the driving is easy and satisfying.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックに1.8を使いました。モリストから変えました。最初インナーフォースレイヤーALCと合わせましたがモリストより飛ばない感じがしました。それ故にナックルが非常に出やすく、ブロックもやりやすく感じました。ただ攻撃はモリストに及ばないかなと感じました。しかしVICTASのカルテットSFCと合わせると攻守のバランスがよく取れていて、ドライブもやりやすく満足できました。

  2019/06/29

  All	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use QUARTET SFC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Bunny apple （Experience：１１〜２０ years） It may be unexpected ...

  

  It is a transition from 102. 101 quit in one practice session. Block 103 is very easy to do. Knuckle comes out naturally. I have no image that slides so much. When asked if it was 101 or 102, I felt that the quality was 101, but I said that Victus was 102. Certainly I can play it, it takes it if I cut it, and I can feel it closer to 102. At the moment I hit it, I felt that I was nervous, and I thought "I'm sorry ...", but I will use it for a while, because I have one more ball than usual. Certainly, between 101 and 102, it is a good cop, if it is bad, it is a rubber without such a characteristic ...

  See original review Hide original review

  102からの移行です。101は1回の練習で辞めました。103はブロックがとてもやりやすいです。ナチュラルにナックルが出ます。私はそんなに滑るイメージはないです。101寄りか102寄りかと聞かれると、球質が101寄りな気がしましたが、ヴィクタスの方は102寄りだと言いました。確かに弾けるし、切ればかかるし、102寄りと感じる事もできます。打った瞬間、むにゅむにゅしてる気がして「こりゃないな…」と思いましたが、何故かいつもより1球多く入るのでしばらく使ってみます。確かに101と102の間、いいとこ取り、悪く言えばそんなに特徴のないラバー…かもです

  2019/06/24

  All	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use FIRE FALL VC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  Bob @ S （Experience：１１〜２０ years） From 101.

  

  Since I am doing tension type table software of long eyes, I purchased it by seeing the evaluation of the net since it was released. I felt that the impression of incorporating 1.8 for about a month was intermediate between 101 and 102 in the concept of the manufacturer, but it is close to 101 due to the eyes. It is slightly harder than 101, but when you bite in blowing you can exit the opponent with no touch. At the time of a block or a rally, it will be naturally knuckle and the ball which the person dislikes will go. 2.0 makes it a bit heavier. If you can do how to spin with table software you can also rotate. It is not suitable for table beginners or beginners, but it is suitable for those who want to attack with knuckles. As an aside, I use players from the Japan league.

  See original review Hide original review

  縦目のテンション系表ソフトを使用しているので、発売されてからネットの評価を見て購入しました。1.8を1ヶ月位使い込んでの感想は、メーカーのコンセプトでは101と102の中間とありましたが、縦目のせいか101に近いと感じました。101よりも少し硬いのですが、強打時で食い込んだ時には相手をノータッチで抜けます。ブロックやラリー時には自然とナックルになり相手が嫌がるボールが行ってくれます。2.0だと少し重くなります。表ソフトでの回転のかけ方を出来る人なら回転もかけられます。表初心者や初級者には向いていませんが、ナックルを使って攻めたい表ソフト中級者以上の方に向いています。余談ですが、日本リーグに出ているコーチも使っています。

  2019/03/01

  All	8/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  Drosui （Experience：４〜５ years） difficult. .

  

  I changed from an inertial xs to this rubber, but I thought that it was changed too much. There are also different types at all, but it can not spin as well as spinning, but it certainly will be a great knuckle when entering.
  I thought that receiving was also difficult and I felt it would not fit me and changed it less than a week ago.
  It is a bit difficult.

  See original review Hide original review

  インパーシャルxsからこのラバーに変えましたが、さすがに変えすぎたなと思いました。全然タイプが違うのもあるのですが、回転はかけれずツッツキも出来ず、確かに入ったらすごいナックルになるのですが。
  レシーブも難しく自分には合わないと思い1週間も経たずに変えてしまいました。
  少し難しいですね。

  2019/02/23

  All	5/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	4
  Control	4
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  hi-lite （Experience：１１〜２０ years） This is difficult ,,,

  

  Compared with the former table software such as spectrum, it slides considerably.
  It is difficult to beat when you drop the hit point.
  Knuckle is easy to take out with linear trajectory, the difference with the back comes out considerably.
  If you strike sharply with an early striking point, your opponent drops often, and if you get used to it it becomes quite a weapon.
  It is not as much as 101, but is it like a double-edged sword?

  See original review Hide original review

  スペクトルなどの往年の表ソフトと比べると、かなり滑りますね。
  打点を落としてしまった時に打つのが難しい、、、。
  直線的な弾道でナックルが出しやすく、裏との差はかなり出ます。
  早い打点で鋭く打ち込むと相手はよく落としてくれ、扱い慣れればかなり武器になりますね。
  101ほどではありませんが、諸刃の剣、といった感じでしょうか。

  2019/01/26

  All	8/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	3
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use EBENHOLZ NCT V

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Tatto （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Table-like rubber

  

  It is a review with a middle pen and a taxime.
  ○ Ball separation is good, angle striking is easy, knuckle is easy to put out.
  The difference in rotation with the back software of the back side was an impression that it was easy to invite the opponent's mistake.

  ● Rotation is difficult to apply, slightly sliding?
  I had a fairly linear image.

  I feel that the table is not affected much by the opponent's rotation.
  It might be good for those who want to be more scary than stability emphasis.

  See original review Hide original review

  中ペン、タクシームでのレビューです。
  ○球離れが良い、角度打ちがしやすい、ナックルが出しやすい。
  裏面の裏ソフトとの回転差は相手のミスを誘いやすい印象でした。

  ●回転はかかりにくい、若干滑る？
  かなり直線的なイメージを持ちました。

  相手の回転の影響はあまり受けない、表らしい表の気がします。
  安定性重視よりスカッとしたい人にはいいかもしれません。

  2018/12/22

  All	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	6
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Table tennis Anything I love （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Is it a stable version of VO & gt; 101?

  

  Previously I used 101 of the same series in the back, but I will not enter! I tried it with that.
   Knuckle, although not around 101, got out so much, and the extent to which the opponent dropped the block and push came out. Also, from the viewpoint of all the table rubbers, I think that knuckle is the way out.
   Although it is easy to put in, I think that it is easier to enter any ball, compared to 101. However, in this case, since it is comparison with 101 to the last, there are many other rubbers that are more stable than this in other companies.
   Although it is a shot feeling, I feel that I'm hitting with rubber alone. 101, Spectrum Blue etc, which I tried once, had a feeling of reaching the racket when digging into it, I used it and used it, but this rubber feels uncomfortable because the feeling is that the digging is stopped at the rubber felt. For that reason, I can not recommend it because I can not get enough energy from the technique of playing and striking.
   It is a comprehensive impression that "Rubber focusing on knuckle with a sense of stability to some extent". I want to put out a lot of knuckle but I do not want to make mistakes! I think that it is also ant to try, if you say.

  See original review Hide original review

  前はバックに同シリーズの101を使っていたのですが、入らない！ということで試してみました。
  ナックルは、101程ではないにしろ、そこそこ出て、ブロックやプッシュは、相手が落とす程度は出ました。又、全ての表ラバーから見れば、ナックルは出る方だと思います。
  入れやすさですが、101と比べると、どのようなボールにおいても入りやすくなっていると思います。ただ、これにおいてはあくまで101との比較なので、他にも他社でこれよりも安定のラバーは沢山あります。
  打球感ですが、ラバーだけで打っている感じがします。101や、かつて試していたスペクトルブルー等は、食い込むとラケットに到達する感触があり、それが好きで使っていましたが、このラバーは、食い込みがラバーで止まっている感じがするため、違和感を感じました。そのため、弾いて打つ、という技術は、しっかりエネルギーを出せない、ということでオススメはできないです。
  「ある程度安定感のあるナックル重視ラバー」というのが総合的な感想です。ナックルをたくさん出したいけどミスをしたくない！という方は試してみるのもアリでは、、、と思います。

  2018/09/01

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Waldner Senso Carbon

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  12

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  VJC>07 STICKY EXTRA
• 
  VJ>07 STIFF
• 
  VO＞101
• 
  VO＞102