Q5 [Discontinued]

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little hard
[Performance] Spin and Control to have excellent
Q5

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 9.04 / 10
  • 53 reviews
    • Speed:8.74
    • Spin:9.11
    • Control:8.75

    Reviews of Q5. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 4)

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    6,800 Yen(Include tax 7,480 Yen)
    Producer
    Mizuno
    Product code
    83JRT895

    Reviews by user

    • visitor

      Opposition to retirement from Matsuken (Experience:2〜3 years) I think it ’s different

      Reviews by user

      I thought Q5 would have different preferences. If anything, it is close to G1, and if you hook it on the seat, it will rotate well. If you're using a butterfly Misanya TDR, I think it's too much. Either way, it's a very good rubber, so it's worth using it.

      See original review

      2019/11/30
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      10
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Kenta Matsudaira ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Middle school students (Experience:2〜3 years) Too great

      Reviews by user

      1.9 on the fore.
      You can enter even after a full swing
      It is a great rubber that can be beaten with meat.
      The rubber feels firm when touched, but it feels soft when depressed.
      I think that it is a good rubber without too much habit. *
      However, it may be difficult for beginners to use.
      I think it's a rubber that you can do anything if you can master it!

      See original review

      2019/11/30
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      8
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use QUARTET VFC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Table tennis coach (Experience:11〜20 years) What is so good!

      Reviews by user

      I realize that it is a wonderful rubber. The balance, such as biting, friction, drive inquiry, and ease of meeting, is easier to use than ever before. Rubber seems to have been a problem whether rubber players can use rubber. .

      See original review

      2019/11/11
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Fortius

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Penoten (Experience:2〜3 years)

      Reviews by user

      Personally, it is an impression of rubber that can be enlarged by combining it with a racket. Compared to Tenergy, the momentum is inferior, but it is effective for the control, so if you are wondering whether to buy Tenergy, you may want to stick it once. Although the feel at impact is slightly hard, it feels like a bite, and the feeling is similar to Lazanta r47. It can be done with little force to punch the cut with a drive. However, depending on the racket when you block, it is hard to enter if you hit with the same feeling as the rubber you have used so far. I feel a little jealous in the angle of the tabletop processing. However, if you get used to it, a very deep and sharp ball will enter. If you are a fast-paced person, you can easily use a combination of Q5 on the fore side and Rosena on the back side. If you have a table, you can cover the momentum with VO> 102, which has good momentum. I haven't tried the compatibility with grain height, so I don't know, but I think that it is quite possible to adopt it as a warfare type that adds sway. If the thickness of the cut is affixed, it can be used in a rotating manner. However, I think that it is not necessary to put this on purpose if you do not fight with both cut and attack.

      See original review

      2019/11/09
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use OVTCHAROV No.1

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Cutman forecutting (Experience:6〜10 years)

      Reviews by user

      The feel of the ball feels firm, but it feels like it ’s biting and has a good ball holding. It feels like 80 is a little hard. Previously I used Q4 for cutting, but this was far easier to use for attacks. The counter is particularly easy to do.
      Cuts and Tsuttsuki have a sense of security because Q4 flies low, but Q5 also bites in moderately, so it has a good ball holding, and I think that it is relatively easy to do because it is not a rubber with a feeling of flying as Tenaji. I think that it is a good rubber that can be used all-round regardless of the battle type because it is a rubber that makes Tenergy mild and eliminates the habit of the Q series.

      See original review

      2019/10/17
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Def play Senzo

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • ecoecorarara7

      ecoecorarara7 (Experience:6〜10 years) Overall there is a sense of security in the control

      Reviews by user

      I have never used Q3 or Q4, but when I compare Q5 with Tenge 05 and Kyo Leopard Pro3 Turbo Orange from the perspective of Cutman, it's an intermediate image (halfway?).
      The stability of the cut against strong or weak ball and loop drive is almost the same as Tenergy 05, but I don't think it's far from Kyo Leopard in the sharp part. Regarding the attack, I think the arc line is higher than Tenergy and Leopard, and I think that Leopard and Tenergy are better in terms of rotation and speed.
      However, if you use it at a level where you are not a beginner, you should be able to feel a sense of security overall.

      See original review

      2019/08/27
      All
      8/10
      Speed
      7
      Spin
      7
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use KOJI MATSUSHITA DEFENSIVE

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      Ina (Experience:More than 20 years) easy to handle

      Reviews by user

      The inside is pasted on the back of the middle pen. Although it was a transition from the inside of Rosena, the price was also quite high, so it was as expected that there was Q5 in terms of power, but I felt that Q5 was also superior in control and ease of handling with light hits. When hitting in front, it was more stable to apply it thickly. The counter was particularly easy to do and stable. The price is high, but I will continue to use it.

      See original review

      2019/08/23
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard
      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. 1
    2. 2
    3. 3
    4. 4
    5. 5
    6. 6
    7. 7
    8. 8

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!