Q5

Everyone's rating [Hardness] Little hard
[Performance] Spin and Speed to have excellent
Q5

(Click to zoom the photo)

Averages reviews points

  • Rating: 9.06 / 10
  • 48 reviews
    • Speed:8.75
    • Spin:9.08
    • Control:8.67

    Reviews of Q5. Players who use Rubber evaluate various points such as hardness of the sponge, speed, control, spin, and feel at impact thoroughly.(Page 2)

    • Pimples in

    Specifications

    Price
    6,800 Yen(Include tax 7,480 Yen)
    Producer
    Mizuno
    Product code
    83JRT895

    Reviews by user

    • katsuo000

      (Experience:More than 20 years) Q3 A similar grain shape, the hardest sponge in the series makes a curved drive easier!

      Reviews by user

      51 mm at 2.1 mm.
      It was a rubber that made Q3 harder as the title says.
      ・Loop drive with a low amount of rotation is possible because the seat is caught well! The amount of rotation of the serve is sufficient.
      ・It is hard, but it is easy to get into the seat!
      ・If you hit the speed drive like you play, it will be a heavy drive with a straight trajectory.
      ・Curve drive with the side in mind, making it a heavy and quirky drive!
      ・Tsutsuki and stop are low!
      -It is not easily affected by rotation! Easy counter drive!

      ・I felt that the back ball was a little early, probably because of the graininess in the back. Even if you bite into it, it feels like you are leaving the ball immediately.
      ・It is easy to cut the Tsuttsuki and the stop, but it is difficult to cut. It may have the effect that the heat made the sponge soft.

      I think that it is a unique rubber because if you hit the curve drive with the side in mind, it will be violent, the counter drive will be easy, and the Tsutsuki and the stop will be reasonably low.
      I really liked everything except the smell!
      I would appreciate your reference.

      See original review

      2020/08/28
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      9
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Zhang Jike ZLC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:2〜3 years) Rotation and speed are dangerous

      Reviews by user

      The seat is hard and smells, but the rotation and speed are dangerous!
      Recommended for those who are good at the counter anyway
      I put it on the fore but the back is also very good!
      The drive is clearly scintillating!
      The cut is low and easy to do!

      See original review

      2020/03/02
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      10
      Control
      7
      Hardness Hard

      Racket recommended use SK7 Classic

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:4〜5 years) I like it more than Tenergy

      Reviews by user

      Both rotation and speed are perfect
      The best I've ever used
      I like personally more than Tenergy
      good point
      1. Don't fall.-Don't lose to the opponent's ball.
      が な い There is no mysterious omission

      2, Stability 良 い Good performance rubber for stability
      Often lacks, but this is high stability

      3, Technology on a platform Stopping is really easy
      Perfect Chiquita and Flick


      Bad points
      1, heavy. I thought about sticking on both sides, but it was heavy

      2, Lifetime: Top sheet is good
      I feel a lot of deterioration

      3, Smell The smell (?) Peculiar to rubber is quite severe (laugh)
      位 I was worried about the game for about 2 days after I started using it

      See original review

      2020/02/25
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      10
      Control
      9
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use LIN Gaoyuan ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:6〜10 years) You can also go with the cut man.

      Reviews by user

      Compared to Q4, Q4 is easier to cut, but Q5 is powerful and active in the counterattack scene, and I think that the counterattack surface is definitely better in Q5.
      With the cut drive, the impression that the net rotation of the opponent increased due to the proper rotation.
      However, it is a little difficult to hold down, so I think that it is the rubber after stretching Q4 first. I don't think there is any problem from Q5.

      See original review

      2020/02/23
      All
      9/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      9
      Control
      8
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use WANOKIWAMI MIDORI DEF

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:2〜3 years) It ’s really good

      Reviews by user

      It is really good.
      Rotating burrs are hard and bite though they are hard
      But I fly.
      To Tenergy class.
      Please try using it.

      See original review

      2020/02/19
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      9
      Spin
      10
      Control
      8
      Hardness Hard

      Racket recommended use FORTIUS FT ver.D

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • Expert (10 years blank)

      (Experience:6〜10 years) Definitely a good rubber ...

      Reviews by user

      2.1mm medium pen fore surface used. While comparing with other Q series ...
      As a trend, the aim of post tenergy 05 is to complain (?), The arc trajectory of the auto sense, and even the meet is out of the arc. Even if it ’s pretty close
      Are you worried about the momentum? And softness. The sponge hardness is the same, but definitely feels the softest in the Q series. Regarding momentum, I think Q3 ≧ Q4> Q5. Although I feel that it is easier to do in Nakajin than Q3 due to the arc line ...
      Is it easy to use as a general comment, but did it become immersed? You can do everything without fuss, but you don't feel anything special. Although it is received by everyone, it seems that it has become close to German rubber for some reason aiming for tenergy. In the Q series, it is for players who aim for a stable orientation. However, this may not be so different from other high-end rubbers.

      See original review

      2020/01/29
      All
      7/10
      Speed
      8
      Spin
      8
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little soft

      Racket recommended use MA LIN CARBON

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    • visitor

      (Experience:2〜3 years) Wow nice!

      Reviews by user

      It is a very good rubber!

      It's expensive but worth it!
      Recommended for those who are strong and trained or are good at serial drama! I felt that I used the inner, better than the outer!
      Not recommended for beginners!

      See original review

      2020/01/18
      All
      10/10
      Speed
      10
      Spin
      10
      Control
      10
      Hardness Little hard

      Racket recommended use Zhang Jike ALC

      Was this review helpful to you? Like!
    1. < Previous
    2. 1
    3. 2
    4. 3
    5. 4
    6. 5
    7. 6
    8. Next >
    9. Last »
    Post a review

    Top Players

    Country

    Style

    Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

    Sign up!