NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Left-kun （Experience：４〜５ years） very good! !! !!

  

  It was very good to use! Especially, I can hit a good ball both in front and behind, and it spins so much that my opponent makes a mistake. It was perfect for me.

  See original review Hide original review

  使ってみて、とても良かったです！特に前でも後ろでもちゃんと良いボール打てるし、とても回転がかかって相手もミスしてくれます。自分の中では完璧でした。

  2020/06/28

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Sticky man （Experience：６〜１０ years） This is overspec

  

  On the back with a special red thickness
  Previously I changed it with Tenergy 80, but I am satisfied with the evolved version of 05 because it is not a top compatibility but a completely different one.

  The sponge hardness is comparatively hard, but the feeling of biting is just right. However, since the seat is very strong (hard), tenergy digs in better, and the sensation and sound are pleasant. However, as Tamas has said in a big way, the archwire is high and the rotation takes a lot. The strength of the seat is probably working. I don't feel like losing even with an upward rotation. If you don't make a mistake in the timing before or after, you won't get online. However, it is a stick ball if you can not bite it (fast). I feel that the automatic performance has deteriorated.
  Since the block is also on the top, it is easy to counter.
  It doesn't fly off with a light hit, so I think it will be manageable even on the table.
  To be honest, I didn't have enough ability to get the specs on the back. I like the surface better. However, since it has the durability equivalent to two pieces of rubber, I think it is for the back side and FX. About 36 or 37.

  See original review Hide original review

  裏面に赤特厚で使用中
  以前はテナジー80で思いきって変えましたが、上位互換ではなく全くの別物で05の進化版の方が納得。

  スポンジ硬度が比較的硬めですが、食い込み感は流石。ただ、シートが非常に強い(硬い)のでテナジーの方がよく食い込み、感覚と音は気持ち良いです。しかし、タマスが大々的に言うだけあって、弧線は高いし、回転はよくかかります。シートの強さが作用しているのでしょう。対上回転でも負ける気はしません。前後問わずタイミングを間違えなければネットにはかかりません。が、食い込ませられないと棒玉です(速い)。オートマチック性は落ちた気がします。
  ブロックも上にでるため、カウンター気味も楽です。
  軽打ではぶっ飛ばないため、台上でもなんとかなると思います。
  正直、裏面でスペックを引き出すには実力不足でした。表面での方が好印象です。ですが、ラバー二枚に相当する耐久力なので、裏面用でFXなら…と思います。36か37くらいで。

  2020/06/09

  All	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use HURRICANE LONG 5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  sand （Experience：２〜３ years） Rubber for completely advanced players with different levels. Never recommended for middle and beginners !!

  

  I borrowed it from a senior person in the neighborhood and hit it.
  The first thing I thought about was the high flying and arch line. After that, the level is different compared to rubber here and there.
  I really felt like a butterfly. Since it has both rotation and speed, it has become a regular rubber at national competitions.
  However, even advanced users have the drawback of having poor control.
  Except for that, I think it is a god rubber that can hit high-level balls in all.
  I might be able to use it if FX comes out w
  If a junior high school student uses this, I think that he is an advanced person.
  In high school [Oh, this guy is pretty strong? ]I would think.
  It feels like a rubber that is far away from intermediate and beginners.
  Conversely, I hit someone using this rubber = Owata
  I might think w

  See original review Hide original review

  近所の上級者の人から借りて打たせてもらいました。
  まず思ったこととしては、飛ぶし弧線が高い点です。あと全体的にそこらへんのラバーと比べてレベルが違います。
  流石バタフライだな実感しました。回転とスピードを両立しているので全国大会とかでは常連ラバー化してます。
  ただ、上級者でもコントロールがムズイという難点もあります。
  そこを除いてみるならばすべてにおいてハイレベルなボールも打てる神ラバーだと思います。
  FXとか登場したら僕でも使えるかもしれませんｗ
  中学生がこれ使ってたら[あっ、こいつ上級者だな]って思うと思います。
  高校だと[あっ、こいつなかなか強い奴だな？]と思うでしょう。
  中級者・初心者にはまだまだ遠い存在のラバーって感じです。
  逆に言うとこのラバー使ってる人と当たった=オワタ
  って考えてしまうかもですｗ

  2020/05/30

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  Becchi （Experience：１１〜２０ years）

  

  As I usually use German rubber, this is a review for those who are using German rubber. please note that.
  When I tried other tenergy series etc., I always felt that it was soft and fell, the ball was difficult to rise, and it was weak against downward rotation, but this rubber is usually a German rubber I also make it a tenergy series Is it not possible to use it? It was a rubber that seems to be received by everyone as much as I think.
  Of course, the German ones are more accustomed to using it, so the rotation and speed will come out, but I thought that I could use it if I got used to it.
  So, those who are thinking about changing from German to Japanese may be able to go through this rubber once.

  See original review Hide original review

  普段ドイツラバーを使用しているので、ドイツ製を使用している方向けのレビューです。ご了承下さい。
  他のテナジーシリーズなどを試打した時には、いつも柔らかくて落ちたり、ボールが上がりにくかったり、下回転に対して弱い印象を受けましたが、このラバーは普段ドイツラバーを使っている自分でもテナジーシリーズにしては使えないことないかな？と思うくらいの万人受けしそうなラバーでした。
  もちろん、ドイツ製の方が使い慣れてるので、回転やスピードは出たりしますが、慣れれば使えるんじゃないかと思えるくらいでした。
  なので、ドイツ製から日本製への変更を考えている方はこのラバーを一度経由してからでも良いかもしれません。

  2020/05/20

  All	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use APOLONIA ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  I LOVE STIGA （Experience：４〜５ years） All-purpose!

  

  I used it on the back side, but it was too good at hitting, so I hit it in the foreground, but it may be good on both sides 80 (laugh)
  In the Dignics series, it is a rubber with a sense of stability, so mistakes in striking will be greatly reduced.
  If you consider the attack, it is 05, but if you use it all-round, it will be 80.
  I came across a universal rubber after a long time. (o ^ － ^ o)

  See original review Hide original review

  バック面で使用しましたが、あまりにも打球感が良かったので、フォアで打ちましたが、両面80でイイかも...(笑)
  ディグニクスシリーズで、イチバン安定感のあるラバーなので、打ちミスが断然減りますね。
  攻撃まで考慮するなら05ですが、オールラウンド的に使うなら80で間違いないでしょう。
  久しぶりに万能ラバーに出会いました。(o^－^o)

  2020/04/22

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  Kei Ashina （Experience：１１〜２０ years）

  

  I put it on the back
  It doesn't fly in the mountains
  Blocks are especially easy to do! I am surprised that I can make inquiries up to this point

  See original review Hide original review

  裏面に貼ってます
  あまり山並みには飛ばないですね
  ブロックが特にしやすいです！引き合いもバックでここまで出来るのにびっくりしてます

  2020/04/17

  All	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Hiropon @ Kanto （Experience：２〜３ years） All in high balance! !!

  

  I used to use Dignix 05 before, but when I hit it too much with my technique, it was over, and I often worried about the ball bouncing before being bitten by the rubber and piercing the net.

  If you look at the spec sheet for the dig 80, the data is as if you increased the speed by lowering the rotation from dig 05.

  In fact, it's a little more bouncy than Dig 05.

  However, it feels slightly softer than Dig 05 due to the arrangement of the grain on the sheet.

  Thanks to that, I can control the ball firmly, and although it has more momentum than Dig 05, it is short and easy to control.

  The maximum amount of rotation and the potential potential may be higher for Digg 05, but if you look at your total level, 80 is higher.

  The shot feeling and how to fly are close to those of Tenergy 05, but the archwire is slightly lower. The low arch wire speeds up the speed of reaching the platform, and I think that it will be quite speedy.

  It is a wonderful rubber that has a balance of handling and power.

  See original review Hide original review

  ディグニクス05を以前は使っていましたが、自分の技術では当てすぎるとオーバーになったり、ボールがラバーに噛む前に弾んでしまいネットに突き刺さるシーンが多く悩んでいました。

  ディグ80はスペックシートを見るとディグ05から回転を下げてスピードを上げたようなデータになっています。

  事実、ディグ05より若干弾みます。

  ただ、シートの粒の配置で若干ディグ05より柔らかく感じます。

  そのおかげか、しっかりとボールをコントロールすることができ、ディグ05より弾みはするものの、短くコントロールするのが簡単です。

  最大の回転量や潜在的なポテンシャルはディグ05の方が上かも知れませんが、自分のレベルでトータルで見たら80の方が点数が上です。

  打球感や飛び方はテナジー05に近いですが、若干弧線は低くなります。弧線が低いことで台への到達スピードが速くなり、体感的にはかなりスピードが出ると思います。

  扱い安さと威力のバランスが取れた素晴らしいラバーです。

  2020/04/15

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  Tenergy 80-FX
• 
  TENERGY 19
• 
  TENERGY 80
• 
  DIGNICS 64