NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  STIGA enthusiast （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Unlike the Tenergy 80, it has a very hard feel!

  

  I think that it is a good rubber because it takes more than tenergy for speed and spin and the deterioration of the seat is slow.
  It's 80, so you might think it's an advanced version of Tenergy 80, but it's so hard for me personally. I'm using the Razanter R53, but I wonder if it's still stiff and lacks swing speed. It is a difficult rubber unless you are a fairly advanced person. Back is even more difficult, so I guess it's an advanced player. Personally, I felt that Dignics 05 was softer and easier to use. Also, since it is super-bouncy, it is difficult to racket too much.

  See original review Hide original review

  スピード、スピンはテナジー以上にかかるし、シートの劣化が遅いのでいいラバーだと思います。
  80なので、テナジー80の進化版のように思うかもですが、個人的にはこんなに硬いのか‥というくらい硬いです。私はラザンターR53を使ってますが、それでも硬くてスイングスピード足りないのかなと。かなりの上級者でないと難しいラバーです。バックはなおさら難しいので、上級者のフォアかなと。個人的にはディグニクス05のほうが柔らかくて使いやすく感じました。また、超弾むので飛びすぎるラケットは難しいです。

  2020/08/27

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  D-Ace （Experience：６〜１０ years）

  

  I put it on both sides!
  I used to stick it, stick crazy turbo blue on the fore and turbo orange on the back, and thought that it would fly too much if I switched to Dignics 80, but it was just a nice feeling! It's a very easy to handle rubber

  See original review Hide original review

  両面に貼りました！
  以前は粘着、フォアに狂飈ターボブルーとバックにターボオレンジ貼ってて、ディグニクス80に変えたら飛びすぎるかと思ったんですが、丁度いい感じでした！とても扱いやすいラバーだす

  2020/08/04

  All	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Racket recommended use LIN Gaoyuan ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Butterfly followers （Experience：６〜１０ years） Dignix 05 Hard? Lol

  

  * Completely discretionary
  I thought 05 was the best for both tenergy and dignics, so I thought there would be no more. In the first place, I didn't feel that the Tenergy 80 was too soft and I couldn't grab it, but when I tried my friend Dignics 80, it was good in hardness, grip, and feeling. As I said in the headline, I felt that the evolution of Tenergy 05 Hard was more than the evolution of Tenergy 80. So Dignics 80 is used for the fore. I feel a little stiff on the back... It's an arm.

  See original review Hide original review

  ※完全独断です
  テナジーもディグニクスも05が1番好きでこれ以上はないなと思っていました。そもそもテナジー80が柔らかすぎて掴みが悪い気がしてしまうくらい合っていなかったのですが、友人のディグニクス80を試打させてもらったところ硬さ、掴み、感覚どれも良かったです。見出しにもあるようにテナジー80の進化ってよりもテナジー05ハードの進化のように感じました。なのでディグニクス80はフォアに使用しています。バックには少し硬い気がしてしまって…腕ですね笑笑

  2020/07/21

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Muratetsu （Experience：１１〜２０ years）

  

  I put it on the foreground! It is a pendora. I also tried 64!
  I flew 64 but it was too soft, so I tried 80 too! Then the flight distance, rotation and hardness were perfect! Above all it is easy to serve

  See original review Hide original review

  フォアに貼りました！ペンドラです。64も試してみました！
  64は飛ぶけど柔らかすぎたので、80も使ってみました！そしたら飛距離も回転も硬さもピカイチでした！何よりサーブがしやすい

  2020/07/15

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Racket recommended use CARBONADO 190

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  Higa holly tree （Experience：６〜１０ years）

  

  It is easy to apply it like rubber around the rotation. It's especially easy to put on the back, so I thought I would stick it

  See original review Hide original review

  そこら辺の回転重視ラバー並に回転かけやすいです。特にバックがしやすくて、これからも貼ろうと思いました

  2020/07/11

  All	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike T5000

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Left-kun （Experience：４〜５ years） very good! !! !!

  

  It was very good to use! Especially, I can hit a good ball both in front and behind, and it spins so much that my opponent makes a mistake. It was perfect for me.

  See original review Hide original review

  使ってみて、とても良かったです！特に前でも後ろでもちゃんと良いボール打てるし、とても回転がかかって相手もミスしてくれます。自分の中では完璧でした。

  2020/06/28

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Kenta Matsudaira ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Sticky man （Experience：６〜１０ years） This is overspec

  

  On the back with a special red thickness
  Previously I changed it with Tenergy 80, but I am satisfied with the evolved version of 05 because it is not a top compatibility but a completely different one.

  The sponge hardness is comparatively hard, but the feeling of biting is just right. However, since the seat is very strong (hard), tenergy digs in better, and the sensation and sound are pleasant. However, as Tamas has said in a big way, the archwire is high and the rotation takes a lot. The strength of the seat is probably working. I don't feel like losing even with an upward rotation. If you don't make a mistake in the timing before or after, you won't get online. However, it is a stick ball if you can not bite it (fast). I feel that the automatic performance has deteriorated.
  Since the block is also on the top, it is easy to counter.
  It doesn't fly off with a light hit, so I think it will be manageable even on the table.
  To be honest, I didn't have enough ability to get the specs on the back. I like the surface better. However, since it has the durability equivalent to two pieces of rubber, I think it is for the back side and FX. About 36 or 37.

  See original review Hide original review

  裏面に赤特厚で使用中
  以前はテナジー80で思いきって変えましたが、上位互換ではなく全くの別物で05の進化版の方が納得。

  スポンジ硬度が比較的硬めですが、食い込み感は流石。ただ、シートが非常に強い(硬い)のでテナジーの方がよく食い込み、感覚と音は気持ち良いです。しかし、タマスが大々的に言うだけあって、弧線は高いし、回転はよくかかります。シートの強さが作用しているのでしょう。対上回転でも負ける気はしません。前後問わずタイミングを間違えなければネットにはかかりません。が、食い込ませられないと棒玉です(速い)。オートマチック性は落ちた気がします。
  ブロックも上にでるため、カウンター気味も楽です。
  軽打ではぶっ飛ばないため、台上でもなんとかなると思います。
  正直、裏面でスペックを引き出すには実力不足でした。表面での方が好印象です。ですが、ラバー二枚に相当する耐久力なので、裏面用でFXなら…と思います。36か37くらいで。

  2020/06/09

  All	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use HURRICANE LONG 5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  Tenergy 80-FX
• 
  TENERGY 19
• 
  TENERGY 80
• 
  DIGNICS 64