NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  katsuo000 （Experience：More than ２０ years） Evolution of Tenergy 05! Or Dignics 05 semi-soft!

  

  It was 48g with a special thickness. Used on the foreground.
  First of all, compared with Tena 80 and Tena 05, the tena 05's gripping force remained unchanged, the speed felt above Tena 80, and the amount of rotation was equal to or greater than Tena 05. The feeling that the block and the counter drive are surprisingly stable and hardly affected by the rotation of the opponent of the characteristics of the dig system is alive and well, and it can be asserted that it is an evolved rubber that corresponds to the plastic rather than the tena system.
  Compared to Dig 05, I felt that the arc was slightly lower and the ball was easy to enter the shallow place of the table, and I felt that the rotation amount of Max was also inferior, but all the technologies were considerably easier to do than Dig 05 and the total balance was I felt better. This is the ease of use and the outstanding performance that you can use even if you are not good at back.
  The life expectancy is obviously longer than that of tena, and it is better to buy Dig 80 than tena.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚で貼って48gでした。フォア面で使用。
  まずテナ80やテナ05と比較するとテナ05のグリップ力そのままに、スピードはテナ80より上に感じ、回転量はテナ05と同等以上でした。ディグ系の特徴の相手の回転に対して影響を受けにくくブロックやカウンタードライブが驚くほど安定する感じは健在で、性能以上にテナ系よりもプラに対応した進化したラバーと断言できます。
  ディグ05と比較すると、やや弧線が低くボールが台の浅いところに入りやすく、Maxの回転量も劣ると感じましたが、全ての技術がディグ05よりも、かなりやりやすくてトータルバランスではこちらの方が上だと感じました。これなら苦手なバックでも使えると感じる使いやすさと抜群の性能です。
  寿命についてもテナ系と比較して明らかに長持ちでコスパ面含め、テナ系買うよりもディグ80を買う方が良いでしょう。

  2019/12/19

  All	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  157

• 

  STIGA mania （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Perfect for Pendra! 05 Soft-like rubber

  

  I used Dig 05, but it was too hard and I couldn't do it. So I decided to dig 80.
  In conclusion, it was a very correct answer.
  You can do anything. The serve is sharp, and even with a weaker impact than the 05, a good ball comes out. For blocks and counters, the ball is fast and can attack the opponent.
  However, the rubber is quite hard, so you will need a good arm. Recommended for those who use one piece of rubber for back and fore like Pendra. Or, it is recommended for those who cannot use 05.
  It might be best to use an inner racket to match. If you wear outerwear, you will need arms to control the bounce.

  See original review Hide original review

  ディグ05を使って、硬すぎて無理でした。なのでディグ80にしてみました。
  結論から言うと、大正解でした。
  なんでもできます。サーブは切れる、05より弱いインパクトでもいい球が出る。ブロック、カウンターは球が速く、相手を差し込めます。
  ただ、とはいってもかなり硬めのラバーになるので、腕は必要です。ペンドラのようにバックもフォアも一枚のラバーで使う方にはオススメです。または、05が使えない方にはオススメです。
  合わせるラケットはインナーとかがいいかも。アウターだと弾みを抑える腕が必要です。

  2024/02/04

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC-CS

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Fuji （Experience：１１〜２０ years）

  

  I pasted it on the fore. I used Fastark G1 before, but I changed it because I wanted a little more speed. Speed is of course, but it takes a lot of spin.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォアに貼りました。前はファスタークG1を貼ってたんですが、もうちょっとスピードが欲しいと思い貼り替えました。スピードは勿論ですが、スピンもかなりかかります。

  2023/07/20

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use FAN ZHESDONG CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Yuu. Cutman （Experience：２〜３ years） more stable than 05

  

  It was a rubber with a slightly less momentum than Dignics 05, and it was easy to feel the ball holding. 05 was for advanced users, but 80 is for intermediate and advanced users.
  The block that sticks has a very good feel at impact and is stable.
  It is stable even from the rear. As Mizutani used it, it was very easy to lob.
  It is a rubber for all-rounders who play with all teams!

  See original review Hide original review

  ディグニクス05よりも弾みが若干抑えられており、球持ちを感じやすいラバーでした。05は上級者向けという感じでしたが、80は中上級者向けといった感じです。
  吸い付くようなブロックは打球感がとても良く、安定もしました。
  後陣からでも安定します。水谷選手が使用してただけありロビングがとてもしやすかったです。
  全陣でプレーするオールラウンダー向けのラバーです！

  2023/06/11

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use LIN Gaoyuan ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  68

• 

  Unknown （Experience：４〜５ years） Balance-oriented rubber

  

  The hardness is about 52.5 degrees according to the German standard, which is higher than that of the Tenergy series, which is 47.5 degrees. When hitting normally or giving a little rotation, the spin took better as the Tenergy series is low hardness, but if you give a good impact when driving, you can give more speed and spin than the Tenergy series. When the impact was properly given, even though it was an 80 balanced rubber, it showed a spin exceeding Tenergy 05, but the difficulty of overall control was higher with Dignix 80. When compared to Tenergy 64, the speed when smashing felt a little behind.
  Since Tenergy is low hardness, it is easy to control and spins well, but it has a relatively low threshold, so if you are not confident in the impact, I think it is better to buy the low hardness Tenergy series than Dignix.

  See original review Hide original review

  경도는 독일 기준 52.5도 정도로 47.5도인 테너지 시리즈와 비교해서 경도가 높습니다. 평범하게 받아치거나 살짝씩 회전을 줄 때에는 테너지 시리즈가 저경도인 만큼 스핀이 더 잘 걸렸으나 드라이브 시 임팩트를 잘 준다면 테너지 시리즈를 넘는 스피드와 스핀을 줄 수 있었습니다. 임팩트를 제대로 주었을 때에는 80 밸런스형 러버임에도 테너지 05를 넘는 스핀을 보여주었으나 전체적인 컨트롤의 난이도 또한 디그닉스 80이 더 높았습니다. 스매싱 시 스피드는 테너지 64랑 비교해보았을 때에는 조금 뒤쳐지는 느낌이 있었습니다.
  테너지는 저경도인 만큼 컨트롤이 쉽고 스핀이 잘 묻는 대신 한계치가 비교적 낮은 느낌이 있기에 만약 임팩트에 자신이 없다면 디그닉스를 사는 것보다 저경도인 테너지 시리즈를 사는 것이 좋다고 생각합니다.

  2023/06/01

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use FRANZISKA Innerforce ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  John Mizutani （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Hit feeling closest to Tenergy 05 + increased power

  

  When transitioning from Tenergy 05 to Dignics, most people choose Dignics 05 or 09C, but unless you are a hard hitter with a strong impact, you will feel uncomfortable with the hardness of the sponge and seat, and you will not be able to experience the goodness of Dignics. . .
  At that time, I happened to use the Dignics 80, which surprised me. . .

  As an image, it feels like Tenergy 05 with increased power, which is the closest to Tenergy 05, and now it is an ace rubber on the fore side.
  It draws an arc neatly, closer to the "automatic feeling" of Tenergy 05 that draws an arc easily,
  Also, Dignics 80 cannot be said to be an evolution of Tenergy 80.

  Privately,
  Dignics 80 is an evolution of Tenergy 05,
  Dignics 05 feels like an evolution of Tenergy 05 Hard.

  For Dignics 05 and 09C, Dignics 80 is definitely recommended for those who want to make net mistakes instead of over mistakes.

  See original review Hide original review

  テナジー05からディグニクスへの移行にあたっては、大概がディグニクス05や09Cを選択するも、インパクトの強いハードヒッターではない限り、スポンジとシートの硬さから違和感を感じて、なかなかディグニクスの良さを体感できない。。。
  そんな時にたまたまディグニクス80を使用したところ、これが驚き。。。

  イメージとしてはテナジー05に最も近い威力増のテナジー05といった感覚で、今やフォア面のエースラバーに。
  きちんと弧線を描き、テナジー05の」簡単に弧線を描く「オートマチック感」により近く、
  またディグニクス80はテナジー80の進化系とも言えない。

  私的には、
  ディグニクス80はテナジー05の進化系、
  ディグニクス05はテナジー05ハードの進化系　といった感覚です。

  ディグニクス05や09Cにて、オーバーミスではなくネットミスが課になる方には、ディグニクス80が断然お勧めです。

  2023/01/30

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  14

• 

  Table tennis is good, isn't it? （Experience：４〜５ years） good rubber

  

  It is a specification on the fore side. (Thickness)
  I thought it was a very wonderful rubber with almost no difficulty.
  Especially the counter was easy to do.
  Also, I personally think that the racket fits well with the inner system.
  Compared to other rubbers, it is still expensive, but I would like to use it next time.
  I think it's good for intermediate to advanced players. For beginners, I thought it was hard and difficult.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア側での仕様です。（厚）
  ほとんど、やりにくいことがなくとても素晴らしいラバーだと思いました。
  特に、カウンターがやりやすかったです。
  また、ラケットはインナー系に個人的にはよく合うと思います。
  他のラバーと比べるとやはり高いですが、次も使いたいと思います。
  中〜上級者ぐらいがいいと思います。初心者には、固くて難しいと思いました。

  2022/12/28

  All	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Tomokazu Harimoto Innerforce ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  13

1. 1
2. 2
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. Next >
7. Last »

Related rubber

• 
  Tenergy 80-FX
• 
  TENERGY 19
• 
  TENERGY 80
• 
  DIGNICS 64