NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Sticky Rubber Man (Experience: ６〜１０ years) This is overkill spec-wise

  

  I'm currently using the red max-thickness version on my backhand.
  I used to run Tenergy 80 and decided to make a bold switch, but this turned out to be a completely different rubber rather than an upgrade — it makes more sense to think of it as an evolved version of the 05.

  The sponge is on the firmer side, but the way the ball sinks into it is excellent as expected. That said, the topsheet is very strong (hard), so Tenergy actually grips the ball more, and the feel and sound are more satisfying with Tenergy. Still, just as Tamasu heavily advertises, the arc is high and the spin is really strong — probably because of how strong the topsheet is. I don't feel like I lose out even against topspin. As long as your timing isn't off, whether hitting forward or back, the ball won't catch the net. But if you can't sink the ball into the sponge properly, you get a flat, fast ball with no spin. The "automatic" feel seems to have dropped a bit compared to Tenergy.
  Blocks also come off high, so it's easy to go into counters too.
  It doesn't fly off wildly on light hits, so you can manage okay over the table too.
  Honestly, I didn't have the skill to bring out its full spec on the backhand. I had a better impression of it on the forehand. But since its durability is worth about two rubbers, I'm thinking an FX version for the backhand might work — somewhere around 36 or 37 hardness.

  See original review Hide original review

  裏面に赤特厚で使用中
  以前はテナジー80で思いきって変えましたが、上位互換ではなく全くの別物で05の進化版の方が納得。

  スポンジ硬度が比較的硬めですが、食い込み感は流石。ただ、シートが非常に強い(硬い)のでテナジーの方がよく食い込み、感覚と音は気持ち良いです。しかし、タマスが大々的に言うだけあって、弧線は高いし、回転はよくかかります。シートの強さが作用しているのでしょう。対上回転でも負ける気はしません。前後問わずタイミングを間違えなければネットにはかかりません。が、食い込ませられないと棒玉です(速い)。オートマチック性は落ちた気がします。
  ブロックも上にでるため、カウンター気味も楽です。
  軽打ではぶっ飛ばないため、台上でもなんとかなると思います。
  正直、裏面でスペックを引き出すには実力不足でした。表面での方が好印象です。ですが、ラバー二枚に相当する耐久力なので、裏面用でFXなら…と思います。36か37くらいで。

  2020/06/09

  All	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	5
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use HURRICANE LONG 5

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Homoko (Experience: ４〜５ years) On a different level — strictly for advanced players. Not recommended for beginners or intermediates!!

  

  I borrowed this from a strong player near me and got to try it out.
  My first impression was that it flies far and has a high arc. Overall, it's just on a different level compared to run-of-the-mill rubbers.
  I really felt "this is Butterfly for you." It combines spin and speed so well that it's become a staple rubber at national tournaments.
  That said, one downside is that control is tough even for advanced players.
  Aside from that, I think it's a god-tier rubber that lets you hit high-level shots in every category.
  If they ever release an FX version, maybe even I could use it, lol.
  If a middle schooler is using this, you'd think "oh, this kid's advanced."
  In high school, you'd think "oh, this guy's pretty strong, huh?"
  It feels like a rubber that's still way out of reach for intermediate players and beginners.
  Put another way, if you run into someone using this rubber, you might just think "game over," lol.

  See original review Hide original review

  近所の上級者の人から借りて打たせてもらいました。
  まず思ったこととしては、飛ぶし弧線が高い点です。あと全体的にそこらへんのラバーと比べてレベルが違います。
  流石バタフライだな実感しました。回転とスピードを両立しているので全国大会とかでは常連ラバー化してます。
  ただ、上級者でもコントロールがムズイという難点もあります。
  そこを除いてみるならばすべてにおいてハイレベルなボールも打てる神ラバーだと思います。
  FXとか登場したら僕でも使えるかもしれませんｗ
  中学生がこれ使ってたら[あっ、こいつ上級者だな]って思うと思います。
  高校だと[あっ、こいつなかなか強い奴だな？]と思うでしょう。
  中級者・初心者にはまだまだ遠い存在のラバーって感じです。
  逆に言うとこのラバー使ってる人と当たった=オワタ
  って考えてしまうかもですｗ

  2020/05/30

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  Betchi (Experience: １１〜２０ years)

  

  I normally use German rubbers, so please keep in mind this review is written from that perspective.
  Whenever I've test-hit other rubbers in the Tenergy line, I always came away with the impression that they were too soft, dropped the ball, made it hard to lift the ball, and were weak against backspin. But this rubber felt like it could appeal to just about everyone — even as someone used to German rubbers, I thought "this Tenergy is actually usable" for the first time.
  Of course, since I'm more used to German rubbers, I still get more spin and speed with those, but this one felt usable enough once you get used to it.
  So if you're thinking about switching from a German rubber to a Japanese one, it might be worth trying this rubber as a stepping stone first.

  See original review Hide original review

  普段ドイツラバーを使用しているので、ドイツ製を使用している方向けのレビューです。ご了承下さい。
  他のテナジーシリーズなどを試打した時には、いつも柔らかくて落ちたり、ボールが上がりにくかったり、下回転に対して弱い印象を受けましたが、このラバーは普段ドイツラバーを使っている自分でもテナジーシリーズにしては使えないことないかな？と思うくらいの万人受けしそうなラバーでした。
  もちろん、ドイツ製の方が使い慣れてるので、回転やスピードは出たりしますが、慣れれば使えるんじゃないかと思えるくらいでした。
  なので、ドイツ製から日本製への変更を考えている方はこのラバーを一度経由してからでも良いかもしれません。

  2020/05/20

  All	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	6
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use APOLONIA ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  I LOVE STIGA (Experience: ４〜５ years) It's all-purpose!

  

  I was using this on my backhand, but the feel was so good that I tried it on my forehand too — maybe going 80 on both sides isn't a bad idea... (lol)
  Out of the whole Dignics series, this is the most stable rubber, so mishits drop way down.
  If you want to factor in all-out attacking play, go with the 05, but for all-around use, the 80 is definitely the right choice.
  It's been a while since I found such a versatile rubber. (o^-^o)

  See original review Hide original review

  バック面で使用しましたが、あまりにも打球感が良かったので、フォアで打ちましたが、両面80でイイかも...(笑)
  ディグニクスシリーズで、イチバン安定感のあるラバーなので、打ちミスが断然減りますね。
  攻撃まで考慮するなら05ですが、オールラウンド的に使うなら80で間違いないでしょう。
  久しぶりに万能ラバーに出会いました。(o^－^o)

  2020/04/22

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  7

• 

  Kei Ashina (Experience: １１〜２０ years)

  

  I have this mounted on the reverse side.
  It doesn't really fly with a high arc.
  Blocking is especially easy! I'm surprised I can do topspin rallies this well even on the backhand.

  See original review Hide original review

  裏面に貼ってます
  あまり山並みには飛ばないですね
  ブロックが特にしやすいです！引き合いもバックでここまで出来るのにびっくりしてます

  2020/04/17

  All	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Hiropon@Kanto (Experience: ２〜３ years) Everything is high-balance!!

  

  I used to use Dignics 05, but with my level of skill, if I made too much contact it would overshoot, and there were a lot of times the ball would bounce off before really gripping the rubber and slam straight into the net, which was frustrating.

  Looking at the spec sheet, the Dignics 80 seems to trade some spin from the 05 for more speed.

  And indeed, it does bounce a bit more than the 05.

  That said, because of how the pimples on the topsheet are arranged, it feels a bit softer than the 05.

  Maybe that's why I can control the ball firmly — even though it bounces more than the 05, it's easier to keep shots short and controlled.

  The 05 probably has the edge in maximum spin and potential ceiling, but for my level, overall, the 80 scores higher.

  The feel and flight are close to Tenergy 05, but the arc is a bit lower. Because the arc is lower, the ball reaches the table faster, so it feels considerably faster in practice.

  It's a wonderful rubber that strikes a great balance between ease of use and power.

  See original review Hide original review

  ディグニクス05を以前は使っていましたが、自分の技術では当てすぎるとオーバーになったり、ボールがラバーに噛む前に弾んでしまいネットに突き刺さるシーンが多く悩んでいました。

  ディグ80はスペックシートを見るとディグ05から回転を下げてスピードを上げたようなデータになっています。

  事実、ディグ05より若干弾みます。

  ただ、シートの粒の配置で若干ディグ05より柔らかく感じます。

  そのおかげか、しっかりとボールをコントロールすることができ、ディグ05より弾みはするものの、短くコントロールするのが簡単です。

  最大の回転量や潜在的なポテンシャルはディグ05の方が上かも知れませんが、自分のレベルでトータルで見たら80の方が点数が上です。

  打球感や飛び方はテナジー05に近いですが、若干弧線は低くなります。弧線が低いことで台への到達スピードが速くなり、体感的にはかなりスピードが出ると思います。

  扱い安さと威力のバランスが取れた素晴らしいラバーです。

  2020/04/15

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  9

• 

  popo_890_ (Experience: ２〜３ years) Pro spec

  

  I borrowed a friend's racket to try it out.
  The ball just flies.
  Even with a little bit of power, it naturally lands deep on the table.
  If you really sink the ball into the sponge, you get an insane drive.
  That said, it's hard to handle, and for a casual player like me,
  I just couldn't get the hang of it.

  See original review Hide original review

  友達のラケットを貸してもらい試打。
  ボールが飛んでく。
  少しの力でも台の深いところに自然に入っていきます。
  食い込ませて打てばえぐいドライブが出ます。
  ただし扱いが難しく、僕のような卓球エンジョイ勢には
  使いこなせなかったです。

  2020/03/28

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
7. 7
8. 8
9. 9
10. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  Tenergy 80-FX
• 
  TENERGY 19
• 
  TENERGY 80
• 
  DIGNICS 64