's profile

's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. WANOKIWAMI AO OFF
      Racket

      WANOKIWAMI AO OFF

      Wanokiwami - a unique project. Takeshi Wanaka, a Japanese carpenter with the focus on processing ...
    2. Evolution MX-P
      Rubber (Front)

      Evolution MX-P

      This version confers the highest dynamic and thus makes MX-P the fastest rubber of the EVOLUTION ...
    3. TARGET PRO GT-H47
      Rubber (Back)

      TARGET PRO GT-H47

User review

  • Fastarc C-1

    User review

    Around me
    junior high kids who just started
    and can't swing properly yet
    are reaching for hard, advanced-level rubbers like
    Hurricane, 05, G1
    Rasant 47 and so on
    that don't match their level

    out of every 10 balls they hit one good shot
    and the other 9 are
    straight balls or misses, over and over.

    They don't have enough strength
    to sink the ball into rubbers harder than 47 degrees
    a hardness of around 42-45 degrees
    would really be optimal for them.

    If using the gear you want to use matters more
    than actually hitting good shots
    then there's nothing more to say.

    This C-1 is a perfect match for
    players around second-year junior high
    who are steadily building up their skill.

    For players not quite there yet
    maybe Rakza 7 Soft or Raigan
    would be better.

    It's not as soft as people say
    it's really a medium-hardness rubber.

    Serves, drives, and smashes
    are all well balanced
    it's a really good rubber.
    Junior high kids who want to get stronger
    should pick a rubber like this.

    See original review

    2018/07/08
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    9
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Innerforce LAYER ZLF - CS

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • RIGAN

    User review

    It's a much better product than you'd expect from the price.

    High-control rubbers can sometimes be too soft,
    but this one doesn't have that problem — it's a medium-hardness rubber.

    That said, it's practically zero effort to handle.
    You get really great shots out of it.

    For beginner-to-intermediate players who've improved and are looking to take the next step,
    I think this could be an outstanding fit.

    It seems like a great example, almost a model rubber, for breaking the assumption that whatever the top players use — like Hurricane, Tenergy, or G1 — must be the best,
    and for realizing that equipment like this can bring out the most out of your game.

    Compare forcing yourself to use an expensive Tenergy for six months while scratching your head,
    versus replacing a brand-new Rigan every three months,
    and think it over.

    I think you'll feel the advantage both economically and in terms of performance!

    See original review

    2018/07/16
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    7
    Control
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Innerforce ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • GENESIS II S

    User review

    I've been curious about this rubber for a long time.
    I kept waiting to see if someone would post a review,
    but no one ever did,
    so I couldn't wait any longer and bought it myself.

    True to what was said about the old version,
    the topsheet is Chinese-made tacky rubber.
    I figured that to lean it toward tension, it'd only have the faintest bit of tack, like a Spinart,
    but it actually has a bit more than that.
    I'd call it lightly tacky.
    It has that sticky, clingy feel.

    I put it on my forehand.

    Light hits definitely have that tacky feel —
    the bounce is a bit subdued,
    but it's also soft,
    so it's not like the ball doesn't fly at all.

    Drives are really easy to hit.
    Because it's soft, the ball sinks right in
    and gets wrapped up nice and snug.
    High-level players might find it lacking
    in speed and spin,
    but for players who can't get along with harder tacky rubbers —
    beginners and intermediate players —
    it was just the right balance.
    Rather than saying it doesn't fly, I'd describe it as the ball settling in well.
    My overshoot misses went down.

    Thanks to the tackiness, the spin is more than your average rubber,
    though it's not the kind that just rips through with a snap.

    Overall it felt like a well-balanced, easy-to-handle tacky rubber.

    See original review

    2018/09/17
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Hardness Soft
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • 7P-2A

    User review

    It's listed as semi-hard
    going by its actual hardness rating,
    but the feel itself is
    extremely, extremely
    soft.

    It's the exact opposite
    of the sharp, hard "bang" feel
    of special-material blades —
    instead you get an exquisite, moist hinoki-wood kind of feel.
    But its offensive characteristics
    are still firmly those of a proper 7-ply blade,
    which is strange.

    If your forehand drives tend to fly long,
    if your backhand drives won't go in,
    if a 5-ply blade doesn't give you enough power,
    or if you're generally lost when it comes to equipment,

    using this blade
    might just make those worries disappear.

    To gain something
    you're supposed to have to give something up,
    but this blade ignores that principle of equivalent exchange entirely —
    it's an incredibly greedy blade.

    It excels at everything,
    but if I had to pick one thing,
    it would be drives with both hands.

    Highly recommended.

    See original review

    2017/01/19
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) Tenergy 05 FX

    Recommend rubber(Back) Tenergy 05 FX

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • GLAYZER

    User review

    This might work for Dignics users who are looking for a bit more softness than Dignics itself offers.
    It's well made, and the price is approachable too.

    One of the amazing things about the Dignics 05/80/64 lineup
    is that even though they use the same sponge,
    they change how soft the rubber feels
    just by changing the quality of the sheet,
    and I really hope
    we'll see more of the lineup come out based on the same idea.

    One thing to watch out for in the manufacturer's marketing copy
    is probably the phrase
    "a step up from Rozena."

    Glayzer really is too big a step up, or rather, you'll definitely feel how much harder it is - it's different enough that it'll feel tough to handle.

    I'm a player myself, but I also coach kids,
    and I wouldn't recommend Glayzer
    as a step up for kids using Rozena.

    Rozena's appeal comes from the softness of its sheet, and that's what Rozena users like about it, but it seems like Glayzer isn't really an extension of that.

    If a Glayzer 64 comes out,
    I'll try it and make my judgment again then.

    See original review

    2023/04/01
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket HUGO CALDERANO SAL

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3

Top Players

Country

Style