Ishitsubute's profile

Ishitsubute's profile
Gender Male
Age U20
Experience 11〜20 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Innerforce Layer ZLC
      Racket

      Innerforce Layer ZLC

      The Innerforce Layer ZLC offers a completely new experience by combining ZLC Carbon technology an...
    2. DIGNICS 64
      Rubber (Front)

      DIGNICS 64

    3. VO>101
      Rubber (Back)

      VO>101

      The new VO > 101 is a very fast and dangerous short pips-out rubber with built-in High Energy Ten...

User review

  • Fastarc G-1

    User review

    The biggest attraction is that it is currently used by countless top athletes such as Masataka Morizono, Ito, Kenta Tazoe, Mitsuho Kimura, etc., and has continued to play an active role and has achieved numerous achievements. I heard that Kasumi Ishikawa also used it in the past, and I felt that it really had that much performance. When used in the foreground, I am very satisfied with the power and control. It felt very stable with the back! Smash depends on swing speed, so your ability is tested. When you rub the drive, it will feel a little slippery, but it will fit. When you bite into it, both speed and spin will come out. Also, although it is a front treatment, it will fit even if you apply it or rub it. It was great that Chiquita made it easy to make changes! It was a very good rubber as I thought it would be easy to block and fit on the stand! I think Nitta Clubber would be the best! I think the advantage of this rubber is that it can achieve both offensive and defensive techniques at a high level. The rubber itself doesn't bounce that much, so the momentum of the racket is better for men who can bounce the racket. However, it is easy to use with any racket. It was easy to block even with a bouncing racket. Also, since the maximum thickness has been released, I feel that the range of layers that can be used has expanded.

    See original review

    2024/03/29
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    10
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • P700

    User review

    Avalox P700 is compatible with table software other than ◎ very good ◎.
    Many rackets weigh more than 90 grams and should be heavy, so it may be heavy for women
    It is for people who want to put out power in a wood racket because it gives power even if you put a lot of rubber on it.
    There is a sense of security when driving with a solid ball that seems to be a wooden racket.
    Also, as I've said many times, it's heavy, so if you don't shake it firmly and return it firmly, you will easily fall behind.
    Also, the grip is round and thick, so if you have small hands, it will be difficult to hold!
    I have small hands so it was difficult to hold.
    In the past, many players of the Chinese national team used it, so the compatibility with the adhesive rubber must be perfect.
    As a recommended rubber
    on the fore side
    Dignics 09C
    Dignics 64
    Tenergy 05
    Tenergy 25
    Tenergy 64
    leopard series
    on the back side
    Dignics 09C
    Dignics 64
    Tenergy 05
    Tenergy 64
    Shoryu
    leopard series
    etc. is recommended.
    Regarding table software, I think that compatibility is generally good.

    See original review

    2022/10/07
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    10
    Control
    10
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) Dignics 09C

    Recommend rubber(Back) VO>101

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • MASAMUNE

    User review

    First of all, let me say that it is probably not suitable for cutters other than Aida and other players who place high in national tournaments.
    I tried it on Rakuza 7.
    We recommend a different rubber.
    The reason is that it bounces too much and I can't control the cut.
    Suitable players are those who like the feel of wood, want the bounce, like the feel of cypress at impact, can't use special materials, like 3-ply plywood, like thick racket, or who like the back surface. Recommended for players who are unique and fight in the front team.
    It is also recommended for large ball players.
    It's such a good racket that I'm even thinking about changing from my current racket.

    See original review

    2024/03/30
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    10
    Control
    10
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) V>15 Extra

    Recommend rubber(Back) Evolution MX-P

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • DNA PLATINUM XH

    User review

    As a frank impression, I could not continue to use it because it was too hard, too hard to fly, and the problem of life.
    It has a hardness of 52.5 degrees, so it is really hard.
    I think that the bite is better than the general same hardness.
    The point I thought was good was that I felt a sense of trust in the upward rotation. The reason is that the ball has a good speed and the ball is played well, and I felt that there was a great confidence in the upward rotation.
    Regarding the downward rotation, I felt the hardness and I couldn't get it to bite well with my skill, so I made a lot of net mistakes.
    In conclusion, this rubber is a rubber for advanced users.

    See original review

    2022/10/16
    Overall
    5/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    5
    Control
    1
    Hardness Hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Innerforce Layer ZLC

    User review

    This is the racket I am currently using.
    Details of the racket I use: Weight → 93 grams Grip → FL
    Basically, I don't like the feel and ball retention of special material rackets.
    I've tried various rackets and this is the only one I was able to use.
    Why are we currently using it?
    It bounces quite a bit and has great ball retention, so it's pretty easy to control.
    As for ball retention, the ball retention is so good that I think it sticks once.
    It gives the impression that the harder you hit the ball, the more it curves into the opponent's court.
    For me, loop drive is quite easy.
    By the way, it is recommended for players who use double-sided back software, but it is especially recommended for those who have a different type of rubber on one side (soft surface, variable surface, grain height, anti, 1 piece).
    The heterogeneous aspect changes considerably.
    It is a racket that is worth trying out once.
    I can't change from this racket for the time being.

    See original review

    2024/03/30
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    10
    Control
    10
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) V>15 Extra

    Recommend rubber(Back) VO>101

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!