Ishitsubute's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U20 |
| Experience | 11〜20 years |
User review
-
-
-
2024/03/30
I used it from 5th grade in elementary school to 2nd grade in high school when the Tenergy series was priced at 6,300 yen including tax, before it became expensive.
At that time, I was weak so I couldn't use hard rubber at all.
What I was looking for in a rubber at that time
I was looking for things like 1) speed, 2) rotation, 3) distance, 4) control, and 5) softness, so I was looking for something that was as soft and powerful as possible, so it was the perfect rubber and I've used it the longest in my life.
The speed is about 1st or 2nd among the rubbers I have used so far.
However, when it reached its current price, I gave up on using it for economic reasons, but it is a rubber that I would like to use again when I can afford it financially.
After that, I had some financial leeway, so I used it for a month.
I felt that it would drop a little when I used it at my level of foreground when driving against downward rotation.
However, it is a good rubber overall that I am worried about continued use.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC
-
-
-
-
2024/03/29
The biggest attraction is that it is currently used by countless top athletes such as Masataka Morizono, Ito, Kenta Tazoe, Mitsuho Kimura, etc., and has continued to play an active role and has achieved numerous achievements. I heard that Kasumi Ishikawa also used it in the past, and I felt that it really had that much performance. When used in the foreground, I am very satisfied with the power and control. It felt very stable with the back! Smash depends on swing speed, so your ability is tested. When you rub the drive, it will feel a little slippery, but it will fit. When you bite into it, both speed and spin will come out. Also, although it is a front treatment, it will fit even if you apply it or rub it. It was great that Chiquita made it easy to make changes! It was a very good rubber as I thought it would be easy to block and fit on the stand! I think Nitta Clubber would be the best! I think the advantage of this rubber is that it can achieve both offensive and defensive techniques at a high level. The rubber itself doesn't bounce that much, so the momentum of the racket is better for men who can bounce the racket. However, it is easy to use with any racket. It was easy to block even with a bouncing racket. Also, since the maximum thickness has been released, I feel that the range of layers that can be used has expanded.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC
-
-
-
-
2024/02/02
It's the best rubber I've ever had in terms of speed, number of knuckles, ease of hitting, etc.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ZLC
-
-
-
-
2022/10/07
Avalox P700 is compatible with table software other than ◎ very good ◎.
Many rackets weigh more than 90 grams and should be heavy, so it may be heavy for women
It is for people who want to put out power in a wood racket because it gives power even if you put a lot of rubber on it.
There is a sense of security when driving with a solid ball that seems to be a wooden racket.
Also, as I've said many times, it's heavy, so if you don't shake it firmly and return it firmly, you will easily fall behind.
Also, the grip is round and thick, so if you have small hands, it will be difficult to hold!
I have small hands so it was difficult to hold.
In the past, many players of the Chinese national team used it, so the compatibility with the adhesive rubber must be perfect.
As a recommended rubber
on the fore side
Dignics 09C
Dignics 64
Tenergy 05
Tenergy 25
Tenergy 64
leopard series
on the back side
Dignics 09C
Dignics 64
Tenergy 05
Tenergy 64
Shoryu
leopard series
etc. is recommended.
Regarding table software, I think that compatibility is generally good.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber(Front) Dignics 09C
Recommend rubber(Back) VO>101
-
-
-
-
2024/03/30
This is the racket I am currently using.
Details of the racket I use: Weight → 93 grams Grip → FL
Basically, I don't like the feel and ball retention of special material rackets.
I've tried various rackets and this is the only one I was able to use.
Why are we currently using it?
It bounces quite a bit and has great ball retention, so it's pretty easy to control.
As for ball retention, the ball retention is so good that I think it sticks once.
It gives the impression that the harder you hit the ball, the more it curves into the opponent's court.
For me, loop drive is quite easy.
By the way, it is recommended for players who use double-sided back software, but it is especially recommended for those who have a different type of rubber on one side (soft surface, variable surface, grain height, anti, 1 piece).
The heterogeneous aspect changes considerably.
It is a racket that is worth trying out once.
I can't change from this racket for the time being.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Hard
Recommend rubber(Front) V>15 Extra
Recommend rubber(Back) VO>101
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.
