O3's profile

O3's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 4〜5 years

User review

  • SK7 Classic

    User review

    I used the FL90G.

    I bought this as my second racket when I first started playing table tennis again, but at the time it was too bouncy and heavy and I couldn't handle it at all so I put it away.
    I was surprised at how difficult it was to use the Inner Force Layer ALC that I tried recently, so I pulled it out to compare it.

    It has the three qualities of being hard, flying, and heavy, but you can also feel the ball holding (flexibility) of the wood.
    As expected, the ALC wins in terms of the power of the ball from the middle, but this one was easier to use.
    In terms of ball holding of the rackets I have used, I would say Inner Force ALCS >> Clipper >> SK7 >>> Inner Force ALC.

    The grip is round and not angular compared to the Inner Force series, so it feels a little thin.
    If you don't like hard carbon and want distance, please give it a try.

    See original review

    2025/06/28
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7

    Recommend rubber(Back) GLAYZER

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Rakza 7

    User review

    I used a 2.1mm forehand and backhand.

    This rubber has a slightly softer sheet and is perfectly balanced.

    The ball does not extend as far as the Rakza X, but it is easier to use.

    For better or worse, it is an average 47.5° German rubber, so it may be just right as a benchmark for stepping up.

    See original review

    2025/06/28
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Acoustic

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Fastarc G-1

    User review

    I used the MAX. It weighed 72g before cutting and approximately 51g after cutting.

    A true masterpiece of early-generation German rubbers.

    The sheet is soft, but the sponge is stiff for a 47.5° shaft, the exact opposite of today's mainstream rubbers.

    The prevalence of heavier rubbers is also a characteristic of the older generation.

    It has a speedier, slightly straighter trajectory than the Rakza 7, which is from the same generation.

    They are similar in that they offer just the right amount of bounce, decent spin, and are fairly easy to grip and increase backspin.

    However, it feels more slippery than the Rakza 7. It's particularly difficult to counter topspin, and there are many situations where you'll feel the sheet's limitations.

    If you buy it online, you can get it for under ¥5,000 with significant discounts, so it might be worth giving it a try given its good value for money.

    See original review

    2025/11/18
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    7
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little soft
    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • TENERGY 19

    User review

    I used a 2.1mm club. After cutting, it weighed about 45g.

    The sheet is still strong, but it feels a little softer than the 05. Conversely, it launches faster.

    What's particularly noteworthy is the long flight distance. If you hit it with the same feel as the 05, it will fly so far that you'll end up hitting over and over the ball repeatedly.

    The ball goes high and has plenty of power, but the spin isn't great. It probably isn't suitable for players who rely on loops or spin.

    It's recommended for players who primarily hit sharp, speedy drives without swinging too hard.

    The softness of the rubber makes it easy to float on the table and on serves, so it takes some getting used to.

    The lack of feel on impact is more noticeable on backhand shots than on forehand shots. It feels like it naturally launches forward more than the 05 or 80.

    If you just let the rubber do the work, it will go in, but people's opinions will vary.

    Overall, it can be said that Tenergy is well-adjusted for the fast pace of modern table tennis.

    See original review

    2025/11/07
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    9
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Rakza X Soft

    User review

    I used 2.0mm on both sides.

    The grip of the sheet is quite strong and somewhat insensitive, so underspin hits and table-top receives are much more stable.

    Furthermore, it feels much softer than other rubbers of the same hardness range, so it can be used without any problems even with weaker impacts.

    On the other hand, its lifespan is so short that even Rosena can't compare.
    After 2 hours of practice, the ball marks did not disappear, and white lines, a characteristic of Yasaka, began to appear.
    However, this is the best rubber I have ever used, so I plan to continue using it for a while.

    See original review

    2025/04/30
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    5
    Spin
    8
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style