NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  SK7 Classic

  

  I've used three units — FL at 90g, 93g, and 87g.

  If you want to use this type of blade, I'd recommend picking the heaviest individual unit you can still swing comfortably.
  For a blade with no special materials, the bounce and feel off the blade change quite a bit depending on how dense the wood is.
  The 87g and 93g units in particular differ so much you'd think they were two completely different blades.

  As a blade it checks the thick, fast, and heavy boxes, but surprisingly you can also feel the wood holding onto the ball.
  Since the board is thick, it's less about flex and more about the outer limba layer gripping the ball, I'd say. The ball comes off fairly quickly, but not too quickly — that balance is spot on.
  True to wood, the appeal is in the slight variation in shot quality and the heavy shots it produces. That said, there's no help from any special material, so it all comes down to your own power.
  Lifting backspin really tests your technique, so whether you can swing through there or not is a good way to decide if this blade is right for you.

  Aside from the sound on contact not quite being to my taste, this is a really excellent blade, especially combined with the value for money.
  Compared to Innerforce-type grips, this one is rounded rather than angular, so it feels a little thinner.
  The balance point is also more central to hand-side, so it's easy not to notice the weight as much, which is another plus.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL90Gと93G、87Gの3本を使用しました。

  この手のラケットを使いたい場合、振れる範囲で極力重い個体を選ぶことをお勧めします。
  素材入りでないラケットは木の詰まり具合で弾みと打球感がかなり変わります。
  特に87と93の個体は別の種類のラケットかと思う位、差異がありますね。

  ラケットとしては厚い・飛ぶ・重いの3拍子ですが、以外にも木材の球持ちも感じられます。
  板厚が厚いのでしなりというよりは表面のリンバで掴む感じでしょうか。球離れはそこそこ早めですが、早すぎないのが絶妙ですね。
  木材らしく、球質にブレが出たり、重い球が出るのが魅力です。ただ、素材の補助が一切ないので自分のパワー次第となります。
  下回転を上げる時に技術力を試されるので、そこで振れるかどうかで使用判断をしてもいいかと思います。

  ミート時の打球の響き方があまり好みのタイプではないのを除けば、コスパも相まってかなりの優良ラケットです。
  グリップはインナーフォース系に比べ、角ばってない丸型なので若干細く感じます。
  重心も中央～手元よりなのでそこまで重さを感じにくいのも〇ですね。

  2025/06/28

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7

  Recommend rubber(Back) GLAYZER

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  CLIPPER WOOD

  

  I used the FL at 88g.

  This has been continuously sold for over 40 years, a true long-seller and probably one of the defining 7-ply blades.
  The current version has a 6.5mm thick blade, and compared to power-oriented 7-ply blades, it puts more emphasis on spin and a substantial, weighty feel.
  It also has bounce that's not far behind inner-carbon blades, so it's easy to see why it's sold for so long.

  That said, personally I have some complaints about the grip and blade shape, so I'll note them here.
  First, the top ply is quite thin, so there's a durability issue. Personally I'd consider a racket coating essential.
  Second, compared to other manufacturers' blades, this one's blade is slightly longer, and the grip end is longer too.
  I think that shape is meant to balance the center of gravity, but it feels a bit off during serves and quick direction changes, which is the downside.

  Also, the FL grip has a distinctive shape — thin and narrow at the center, getting thicker toward the grip end.
  Besides checking how it feels in your hand, there's quite a bit of individual variation in how the grip is finished, so checking it in person at a store is a must for this blade.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL88Gを使用しました。

  40年以上発売し続けている超ロングセラー品であり、7枚合板の代表格でしょうか。
  現行品は板厚6.5ミリと、パワー系の7枚合板に比べて回転や重厚な打球感に重きを置いたラケットです。
  弾みもインナー系に負けない位はあるので長く売れている理由も納得です。

  ただ、個人的にはグリップ・ブレード形状に不満点もあるのでその点は記載しておきます。
  まず、上板がかなり薄く強度に難があります。個人的にはラケットコート必須と考えるレベルです。
  次に他メーカー品に比べてブレードの長さが僅かに長く、グリップエンドも長くなってます。
  重心バランスを取ってその形状にしているとは思いますが、サーブと切り返しの時に少し違和感を感じるのがネックですね。

  また、グリップはFLが中心部が細く薄く且つ、グリップエンドに向けて厚みが増していく独特のものになっております。
  握った感覚の確認は勿論、グリップの仕上がりにかなり個体差があるので店頭での確認は必須のラケットです。

  2025/02/24

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7 Soft

  Recommend rubber(Back) Vega Europe

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  I used max thickness. After cutting it down, it came out to about 46g.

  At 80 hardness, the ball flies too much and what used to be a flat, straight trajectory now shoots up even more, but surprisingly the actual distance ends up landing about right. Impression-wise it works out.
  The height of the arc and the strength of the sheet are on another level, and it's very well suited to drive-based technique and countering.
  Both loops and speed drives come out with a shot that really carries. Hitting backspin balls is also on the easier side.

  On the other hand, since flat hits tend to shoot upward, if you hit it the same way you're used to, it has its quirks.
  It really comes across as a rubber for advanced players who can drive everything, whether the ball is high or low....
  The short game also tends to pick up a lot of spin from the opponent, so it really exposes your skill level.

  If you can master it, it's without a doubt a top-class rubber, but it's pretty finicky.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚を使用しました。カット後で約46Gです。

  80だと飛び出し過ぎ＋直線的だった打球が上方向に更に出るようになり、意外と飛距離的には丁度良く収まる印象です。
  弧線の高さとシートの強さが別格で、ドライブ系技術とカウンターの適正がかなり高いです。
  ループ・スピード共に伸びのある打球が出せます。下回転打ちもかなりやり易い部類です。

  反面ミート系は打球方向が上に出る分、そのまま打つと癖がありますね。
  上から下から全部ドライブ出来るような上級者向けと言った感じがかなり伝わってきます・・・。
  台上も割と回転を貰いやすいので技量がもろに出ます。

  使いこなせたら間違いなくトップクラスのラバーですが、結構ピーキーです。

  2026/02/21

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  TENERGY 19

  

  I used 2.1mm thickness. About 45g after cutting to size.

  The sheet is still on the firmer side as usual, but it feels softer than 05.
  What really stands out is how far the ball flies. Because it grips the ball so easily, if you hit it with the same feel as 05 you'll rack up overshoot misses one after another.

  Compared to 05, the ball comes off more automatically with plenty of pace, but the amount of spin is a bit underwhelming.
  I don't think it suits players who want to win through loops or heavy spin.
  If anything, I'd recommend it for players whose main weapon is repeated sharp speed drives without full swings.
  The short game and serves also tend to float up a bit since it's soft, so it takes some getting used to.

  On the backhand, the thin, faint feel off the rubber stands out even more than on the forehand. It comes off more on its own compared to 05 or 80.
  If you just trust the rubber and swing, the ball goes in well enough, but I think opinions on this will be split.

  Overall, I'd say this is a Tenergy that's really tailored for the fast-paced modern game.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット後で約45Gです。

  シートは相変わらず強めですが、05より柔らかい印象です。
  特筆するべきは飛距離の長さですね。食い込み易い分、05と同じ感覚で打つとオーバーミスを連発するくらい飛びます。

  05よりオートで上に出て球威も十分ですが、回転量がちょっとイマイチです。
  ループ系や回転量で勝負したい人には合わないと思われます。
  どちらかと言えば万振りしないシャープなスピードドライブでの連打を主軸にする方にお勧めです。
  台上とサーブも柔らかい分浮きやすいので少し慣れが必要ですね。

  バックだとフォアよりも打球感の薄さが目立ちます。05や80よりも勝手に出る感覚です。
  ラバーに任せて振ればとりあえずは入る感じですが、好き嫌いが分かれそうです。

  総じて見れば、ピッチの早い現代卓球向けにしっかり合わせてきたテナジーと言えます。

  2025/11/07

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	7
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  V>11 EXTRA

  

  I used the 2.1mm thickness. 61g before cutting, about 43g after cutting.

  The look is distinctive — pips that seem to bulge out from a thin topsheet stretched to its tension limit.
  The sponge is a dense type with a reasonable hardness, but the topsheet is quite soft, so it's a rubber that holds the ball well.
  It carries on that classic VICTAS straight-line trajectory, but the ceiling on bounce and spin is modest.
  On top of that, the lifespan is short too, but in terms of weight this rubber is unmatched by anything else.

  It's even lighter than Rozena, which is famous for being a lightweight rubber — at the 157×150 size, dropping below 45g is quite common.
  If you're looking for a lightweight German-style rubber, I'd love for you to give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット前61G、カット後約43Gです。

  薄いシートを限界までテンションかけてるような粒が浮き出た見た目が特徴です。
  スポンジは詰まっている系で相応の硬度ですが、シートがかなり柔らかく球持ちが良いラバーです。
  VICTASらしい直線弾道もしっかり継承しておりますが、弾みと回転上限は控えめです。
  その上寿命も短いですが、重量という点において他の追随を許さないラバーです。

  軽量ラバーとして有名なロゼナ以上に軽く、157×150サイズで45Gを下回ることはザラです。
  ドイツ系で軽量ラバーを探している方には一度試してみて欲しいです。

  2025/07/20

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	6
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. Next >
9. Last »