NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Rakza X

  

  I used a 2.1mm rubber on the forehand side.

  This is a hard, heavy, and classic German rubber from a generation ago.

  The sheet is so strong that you can use your own power to bite into it and hit it to get the spin and speed.

  The high arc and spin when the impact is perfect is amazing, and you can clearly feel the quality of the shot.

  Rather than switching from X-soft to this one right away, it might be better to get used to it with the Rakza 7 first.

  I switched directly from X-soft, so I'm having a hard time...

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア面2.1ミリを使用しました。

  硬く重い一世代前の王道ドイツラバーです。
  とにかくシートが強いため、己のパワーで噛ませ、ぶつけて回転とスピードを乗せるマニュアルラバーです。
  インパクトが嚙み合った時の深い弧線と回転は素晴らしく、打球の良し悪しがはっきり感じられます。
  変更当初はシートの硬さに四苦八苦しましたが、使い込む内に良さを感じられるようになってきました。
  基本フォア面にお勧めしますが、バックはよほど振れる方でないと硬さを感じやすいです。

  後、非常にラバーが重いです。
  両面特厚だとラバーだけで100Gは軽く超えてきますので、組み合わせは考えた方がいいかもしれません。

  2025/06/02

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  RAKZA XX

  

  I tried it with the F surface thickness.

  My first impression was that it didn't feel as hard as I felt it when I touched it, even though it's a 50° rubber.

  The rotation, speed, and height of the arc are all the best I've ever used.

  It is particularly characterized by the height of the arc and the amount of rotation, and if you don't trust the rubber and swing forward rather than lifting it yourself, you will go over the speed drive.

  The loop also has a steep trajectory, and the sinking and acceleration after the bounce are tremendous, so I got the impression that there were many block mistakes on the receiver's side.

  The downside is that it is heavy. Even with a thickness of 157X150, it weighs nearly 50G.

  Finally, it is one step ahead in terms of price compared to other companies' flagship models, so please give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  F面2.0で試打しました。

  50°のラバーにしては触った感覚より硬度を感じなかったのが第一印象でした。
  回転・スピード・弧線の高さも全て使用してきた中で過去一です。
  特に持ち上がりの良さが特徴で、擦ってよし、ぶつけてよしの使い方を選ばないラバーです。
  ラクザXとは毛色が違いかなりオート系ですね。勝手にある程度飛び出すのでショート系の技術に苦労するかもしれません。

  今回インナーフォースレイヤーALCSと蒼天、2種類のインナーで試打しましたが、硬めの蒼天の方が合っているように感じます。
  重量も他ドイツラバーに比べて比較的軽量で価格も安いのでぜひ一度お試しください。

  2025/05/10

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket SO-TEN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  Rakza X Soft

  

  I used 2.0mm on both sides.

  The grip of the sheet is quite strong and somewhat insensitive, so underspin hits and table-top receives are much more stable.

  Furthermore, it feels much softer than other rubbers of the same hardness range, so it can be used without any problems even with weaker impacts.

  On the other hand, its lifespan is so short that even Rosena can't compare.
  After 2 hours of practice, the ball marks did not disappear, and white lines, a characteristic of Yasaka, began to appear.
  However, this is the best rubber I have ever used, so I plan to continue using it for a while.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.0ミリを両面で使用しました。

  ラクザX系のシートの為、グリップが強く硬いシートです。
  が、スポンジが柔らかい分インパクトが弱くても食い込み易く、シートの強さと相まって下回転打ち・台上レシーブが格段に安定します。
  Xと同じく掛けた分だけ回転が乗るので、同硬度帯のラバーの中では性能が頭一つ以上抜けています。
  ドイツ系ラバーでステップアップを考えているのであれば、2枚目あたりで一度は必ず使って欲しいラバーです。

  2025/04/30

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  INNERFORCE LAYER ALC.S

  

  I used the FL85G product.

  It's an easy-to-handle carbon racket with a board thickness of 5.5mm and a supple feel.
  I recommend it as an introduction to special materials for those who like the thick grips of the Inner Force series.
  The biggest difference between this and the fiber-only series, which is also cited as an introduction to similar special materials, is that the feel of the ball changes significantly between light and strong hits.

  Personally, I like the fact that the base material is spruce instead of the usual Inner ALC, which shows the manufacturer's attention to detail.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL85G品を試打しました。

  板厚5.5mmでしなりの良さと手に響く感覚が扱いやすいカーボンラケットです。
  ほぼ5枚合板と変わらない感覚で使えると思いますが、中陣から強く打つと途端に金属音が鳴ります。
  インナーフォース系の細い厚肉グリップが個人的にかなり握りやすく好印象です。

  同じような特殊素材入門として挙げられるアウターフォースCAFあたりとの違いは板厚の違いからのしなりの大小にあります。
  こちらの方が球持ちの感覚を養うという点では有利かと思います。
  2本目以降でカーボン系に移行したい方にお勧めです。

  2025/04/14

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	7
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） RAKZA XX

  Recommend rubber（Back） Rakza X

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  RIGAN

  

  Both the sheet and sponge are soft and insensitive.

  I think it's good for cultivating the feeling of hitting with forehand and backhand. Even if you hit it from below, it will lift up.

  Because the sheet is insensitive, you don't need to adjust the angle to receive it.

  On the other hand, the upper limit of rotation and speed is low and the trajectory is linear.

  If you start to feel that you can hit it stably with this rubber, but it often returns, or you can't hit it through, it's time to move on to the next rubber.
  In conclusion, if you are going to use it, the first one seems appropriate.

  See original review Hide original review

  シート・スポンジ共に柔らかく鈍感なのが特徴です。

  フォア・バックで入れ感を養うのにはいいと思います。適当に下から当てても持ち上がります。
  シートが鈍いのでレシーブもしっかりと角度を合わせなくても入ります。
  反面、回転・スピードの上限は低く弾道も直線的になります。
  このラバーで強打が安定してきたけどよく返される、打ち抜けないと感じ始めたら次のラバーへの移行タイミングです。
  結論、使うなら最初の1枚目あたりが妥当と思われます。

  2025/03/26

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	5
  Control	9
  Hardness	Soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. Next >