O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ４〜５ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
-
- Rubber (Front)
-
- Rubber (Back)
-
User review
-
-
-
2025/06/28
I used the FL90G.
I bought this as my second racket when I first started playing table tennis again, but at the time it was too bouncy and heavy and I couldn't handle it at all so I put it away.
I was surprised at how difficult it was to use the Inner Force Layer ALC that I tried recently, so I pulled it out to compare it.It has the three qualities of being hard, flying, and heavy, but you can also feel the ball holding (flexibility) of the wood.
As expected, the ALC wins in terms of the power of the ball from the middle, but this one was easier to use.
In terms of ball holding of the rackets I have used, I would say Inner Force ALCS >> Clipper >> SK7 >>> Inner Force ALC.The grip is round and not angular compared to the Inner Force series, so it feels a little thin.
If you don't like hard carbon and want distance, please give it a try.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
-
-
-
-
2024/10/06
I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
-
-
-
-
2025/09/28
I tried out the FL84G.
It's one of Tamas' top-of-the-line rackets. I really felt that its performance was more than adequate for its price.
It combines the ball holding of a wood racket, the ease of adjusting the strength of the inner racket, and the projection of an outer racket.
It bounces well, as you'd expect from an outer racket. The trajectory is also slightly lower.
The feel of the ball is wood-like with a soft touch, but suddenly becomes as hard as you'd expect from a special material with a hard hit.
Although it feels similar to wood, it's naturally harder than a five-ply racket, and perhaps even softer than an inner ALC racket.
When hitting hard, it feels as hard as an inner ZLC racket, but it has a strange hardness that barely feels metallic.
Also, although the racket is 5.7mm thick, the CNF material is quite rigid, so there's almost no sense of it being overpowered by blocks or counters.
Honestly, if you can afford the price, I think it's worth skipping over a wood racket to this one.
At first, you may not be able to put enough spin on the ball and may end up making a lot of over-spins, but this is a racket that you can use for a long time, so I highly recommend it.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
Recommend rubber（Back） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
-
-
-
-
2025/08/13
I tried out the FL87G.
It's classified as a flexible inner racket. Personally, I felt it had an exquisite balance of bounce, flex, and feel.
Based on my experience using it, in terms of bounce, it goes as follows: Souten > Acoustic Inner > Inner Force ALC > Inner Force ALCS, and in terms of flex, it goes as follows: ALCS > Souten > Acoustic Inner > ALC.
The feel on impact is high-pitched, typical of carbon, but perhaps because of the large blade, it resonates quite a bit in the hand. I was surprised that it flexed more than the Acoustic Inner.
However, the flex was stronger than I expected, so I ended up hitting a few over-the-top shots on counters, etc.
The larger blade size also creates a nice wide sweet spot.
The grip is almost always an Inner Force type. The thickness is also 5.7mm, so ALCS is quite close.
I was also surprised at how incredibly smooth the finish on the side of the grip was. The extremely meticulous finish is another plus point.
I have never used Harimoto ALC before, so this is just my opinion at this point, but if you are just starting out with inner carbon, I would recommend this for those starting with 7 clubs.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber（Front） RAKZA XX
Recommend rubber（Back） V>11 EXTRA
-
-
-
-
2025/06/15
I used the FL81G product.
It is one of the few inner fiber rackets still in existence.
It feels almost like a five-ply plywood racket, but the sweet spot is wider because of the fiber, and you can feel the force of pushing back after grabbing it compared to wood only.
It flexes well and resonates well in your hand. The hitting feel feels a little cheap compared to an acoustic, but I like the feel.
It is also a product that is recommended for beginners and novices, as it is easy to get lightweight pieces.As for the grip, it is wide on the sides, slightly thin in thickness, and the jaws are also slightly wide.
Also, since the lenses are on both sides and are large, if you grip it and feel something strange, such as your little finger slipping, you should stop using it.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Soft
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.