O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
- The Arylate Carbon fibers are located closer to the core than with non-layer blades, which leads ...
-
- Rubber (Front)
-
- Rubber (Back)
-
User review
-
-
-
2026/02/21
I tried out the 2.1mm club. It weighs about 48G after cutting.
Perhaps because I had used the 80 beforehand, it didn't feel as hard as I expected.
With the 80, the ball would fly too far and be too straight, but with the high arc, it feels just right.
The height of the arc and the strength of the seat are particularly exceptional, making thin returns and underspin hits extremely easy.
However, if you miss the ball because your position isn't good enough during the movement, it becomes a very solid ball.
It seems to be more geared towards advanced players who have a solid foundation and can hit the ball perfectly.
My goal is to be able to use this club satisfactorily in the future.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/02/14
I used the MAX. It was 67.8G before cutting and about 47.8G after cutting.
At first touch, the sheet seemed soft, but when I actually hit with it, the ball felt surprisingly hard.
The bounce is quite strong, and the arc is low and linear.
Rather than hitting with the sheet, you can get a good shot by hitting it more directly and making sure the sponge is firmly planted.
It's particularly easy to hit with underspin. I'm only a little concerned about the amount of spin on loops with a lower impact point.
The sheet is a little insensitive, and including the slipperiness, it feels almost like an upgraded version of the G-1.Unlike the R48 and V47.5, this is a balanced rubber that can handle any technique with ease.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2026/01/25
I used the FL88.1G racket. It's extra-thick on both sides, weighing 183.4g.
I gave up on this racket a year ago, but I repurchased it and am giving it another try.
I've finally experienced the performance that lives up to its reputation as a universally popular inner racket.
The bounce isn't too strong, and even when you hit it, it settles in nicely without flying too far.
The feel of the ball is solid, with a woody feel, and while this may vary from racket to racket, light hits felt softer than the Harimoto ALC.
Strong hits produce the satisfying metallic feel that's characteristic of ALC, making it easy to tell whether the hit was good or bad.
The thickness of the racket makes it difficult to block, and the ease of use on the table, typical of inner rackets, makes it less likely to have technical weaknesses.
Overall, it's a well-balanced racket, scoring about 70 points in all performance aspects.
Personally, I'd recommend using this racket as the third racket after a 5- or 7-rack racket. If you're a beginner, you'll probably find the feel to be quite hard.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
Recommend rubber（Back） GLAYZER
-
-
-
-
2026/01/12
I used FL88.8G. It's extra-thick, double-sided, and weighs 184.8G.
This racket features an Inner Force Layer ALC base with a 158x152 face.
The wider face offers several advantages over previous models, including a larger sweet spot, reduced ALC's hard hitting feel, and increased power through centrifugal force.
The grip is also slightly thinner than the previous Inner ALC, making it recommended for players with smaller hands.
The biggest drawback is that the expanded face increases the overall weight, and the weight feels even heavier at the tip of the center of gravity.
This is a problem that can be solved physically, but please be aware that it puts a lot of strain on your wrists when initially switching from a standard size.
In my opinion, the feel of the ball on impact felt harder than with Revoldia CNF. The ALC itself may be a fairly hard material.
It also flexed less than I expected, and I personally appreciate the fact that it doesn't hold the ball too much.
It's easy to vary the strength of your hits, and the club's inherent lack of bounce makes it particularly easy to control on blocks and on the table.I think it's a great choice for younger players who are looking for something more physical.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 80
-
-
-
-
2025/11/29
I used the MAX rubber. It weighed about 71g before cutting and about 47g after cutting.
The sheet has low grains, so it doesn't feel like it has much tension.
The sponge doesn't have large bubbles, so it feels soft and bouncy overall.It seems to be relatively lightweight among German rubbers.
Its distinctive features are that the ball tends to fly up quite high and it penetrates into the ground more easily than its hardness suggests.
It penetrates into the ground easily, but even when you hit it close, it doesn't feel like the ball is dropping, so it's great for any swing style.
However, you need to be careful as it doesn't produce much distance or speed and the ball flies in a high arc and shallowly.
This rubber is a little different from the R48 or V47.5, which have similar hardness.
I recommend pairing it with a slightly harder inner or outer racket.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket LIBERTA SOLID Pro
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.