O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
- The Arylate Carbon fibers are located closer to the core than with non-layer blades, which leads ...
-
- Rubber (Front)
- TENERGY 05 has a unique feeling using a combination of Spring Sponge technology, High Tension rub...
-
- Rubber (Back)
- • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
-
User review
-
-
-
2025/09/04
I tried out the 2.1mm forehand.
The sheet is a little firm, but the sponge is surprisingly soft, even for a 47.5° club.
This allows for a high grip and easy bite, making it easier to handle than I expected.
The trajectory is somewhat straight, but it also produces a good arc.
I was able to hit underspin and pull drives with ease, and they didn't even feel like they were dropping.
Drive-type techniques in particular tend to have a high spin rate and produce a wild trajectory. It's difficult to control the ball faster than the speed suggests, making it quite tricky.
The sheet also helps prevent balls from dropping even when hit hard.
However, since it's not a rubber with good launch, the speed is only moderate. On the flip side, it also makes it easier to use on the table.
Personally, it was the first rubber I've had a good experience with in a while. I highly recommend giving it a try.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket FAN ZHESDONG CNF
-
-
-
-
2025/08/03
I used the 82GFL.
It's made entirely of seven ply cypress plywood. A well-known example was DARKER's 7P-2A series, but this is one of the few remaining.
Despite the soft feel at impact, the quick launch and lack of flex are similar to those of a harder racket, creating a strange sensation.
In terms of racket performance, it has decent bounce but doesn't seem to generate much spin.
The thickness makes it easy to bounce and block.
It tends to produce lighter balls, and the center of gravity is at the tip to compensate for its power.
The grip is a thin, narrow FL, but you can feel the thickness.
The top ply has some strength issues, so please be careful when replacing the rubber.This racket isn't recommended for everyone, but it's likely to be phased out in the future due to the difficulty of obtaining Kiso cypress.
If you're interested, give it a try.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
-
-
-
-
2025/05/10
I tried it with the F surface thickness.
My first impression was that it didn't feel as hard as I felt it when I touched it, even though it's a 50° rubber.
The rotation, speed, and height of the arc are all the best I've ever used.
It is particularly characterized by the height of the arc and the amount of rotation, and if you don't trust the rubber and swing forward rather than lifting it yourself, you will go over the speed drive.
The loop also has a steep trajectory, and the sinking and acceleration after the bounce are tremendous, so I got the impression that there were many block mistakes on the receiver's side.
The downside is that it is heavy. Even with a thickness of 157X150, it weighs nearly 50G.
Finally, it is one step ahead in terms of price compared to other companies' flagship models, so please give it a try.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
-
2025/04/30
I used 2.0mm on both sides.
The grip of the sheet is quite strong and somewhat insensitive, so underspin hits and table-top receives are much more stable.
Furthermore, it feels much softer than other rubbers of the same hardness range, so it can be used without any problems even with weaker impacts.
On the other hand, its lifespan is so short that even Rosena can't compare.
After 2 hours of practice, the ball marks did not disappear, and white lines, a characteristic of Yasaka, began to appear.
However, this is the best rubber I have ever used, so I plan to continue using it for a while.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER
-
-
-
-
2024/10/06
I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber（Front） Rakza 7
Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 64
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.