NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  CLIPPER WOOD

  

  I used the 88g FL. It was a relatively light item, with many weighing over 90g.

  Its features are its unique high hitting sound and the feel it gives in your hand.
  Although it is a high-pitched sound, it is not a metallic sound like carbon, but a pleasant one like hitting wood.
  In terms of performance, it is slightly more bouncy than the 7-ply wood, but I think the balance of flexibility and rotation is good.

  The FL grip is unique in that it is thinner and gets thicker towards the grip end. Please note that if you grip it deeply, it will feel quite thin and thin.
  I have heard that the ST is also quite thicker than the FL, so I recommend that you try gripping it in the store to check the weight.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL88Gを使用しました。

  40年以上発売し続けている超ロングセラーラケットです。
  現行品は板厚6.5ミリで7枚合板の中でも弾みは中間位ですが、下手なインナーカーボンラケットより弾みます。
  7枚の中でも掴みがある方ですが、6.0ミリ以下のラケットに比べるとしなりの少なさを感じます。
  カーボン特有の手に響かない感じが苦手で弾みが欲しい方は一度お試しください。かなり手に響きます。
  また、上板の強度にかなり不安があるのでラケットコート推奨です。

  グリップはFLが中心部が細く薄く且つ、グリップエンドに向けて厚みが増していく独特のものになっております。
  握った感覚の確認は勿論、グリップの仕上がりにかなり個体差があるので店頭での確認は必須のラケットです。

  2025/02/24

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） Rakza 7 Soft

  Recommend rubber（Back） Vega Europe

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Fastarc G-1

  

  I used the MAX. It weighed 72g before cutting and approximately 51g after cutting.

  A true masterpiece of early-generation German rubbers.

  The sheet is soft, but the sponge is stiff for a 47.5° shaft, the exact opposite of today's mainstream rubbers.

  The prevalence of heavier rubbers is also a characteristic of the older generation.

  It has a speedier, slightly straighter trajectory than the Rakza 7, which is from the same generation.

  They are similar in that they offer just the right amount of bounce, decent spin, and are fairly easy to grip and increase backspin.

  However, it feels more slippery than the Rakza 7. It's particularly difficult to counter topspin, and there are many situations where you'll feel the sheet's limitations.

  If you buy it online, you can get it for under ¥5,000 with significant discounts, so it might be worth giving it a try given its good value for money.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAXを使用しました。カット前72G、カット後約51Gです。

  本当の初期世代ドイツラバーの代表作です。
  シートは柔らかめですがスポンジが47.5°にしては硬く、今の主流のラバーとは真逆の構成になります。
  重めの個体が多いのも旧世代の特徴ですね。

  同世代のラクザ7よりスピード寄りでやや直線的な弾道が持ち味です。
  程よい弾み、そこそこ掛かる回転、割と噛みやすく下回転は上げやすいちょうどいいラバーな点は似てますね。
  ただ、ラクザ7以上にスリップする感覚があります。特に上回転に対して掛け返しがきつくシートの限界を感じる場面は多いです。

  通販で買うと割引額が大きく大体5000円以下で入手も可能なので、コスパの良さを考えれば使ってみるのもありかもしれません。

  2025/11/18

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  DIGNICS 80

  

  I tried out the 2.1mm.

  Both the seat and sponge are fairly firm, but some people may find it grips better than the Tenergy 19 or 05.

  Unlike Tenergy, it doesn't fly as far after you grip it with the seat, so it feels a little closer to the German style.

  Its biggest feature is the ball that goes up. I thought the Tenergy 19 also went up, but this one goes even further.

  The amount of spin is also excellent, and the receiver can clearly feel the ball's movement after it hits the court.

  Since there's little difference between the initial and final speeds, the first time you receive it, you'll likely miss the block repeatedly.

  The stiffness is more noticeable when you're backhanded, so the required impact quality is higher.

  On the flip side, you can hit more powerful balls, so if you're confident, I recommend giving it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを試打しました。

  シート・スポンジともに相応に硬めですが、テナジー19や05よりも掴むと感じる人もいるかもしれません。
  テナジーと違いシートで掴んだ後にそこまで勝手に飛ばないので、ややドイツ系に近い感じです。

  最大の特徴は上に出る打球ですね。テナジー19も上がる方だと思いましたがそれ以上です。
  更に回転量も素晴らしく、受け手側だとコートに着いてからの打球のノビを明確に感じられます。
  初速と終速に差が出にくい為、初めて受けるとブロックミスを連発するレベルです。

  バックだと硬さをより感じるので要求インパクトの質が上がります。
  その代わり威力のあるボールがだせるので自身のある方は是非使ってみて下さい。

  2025/11/13

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  

  I used the FL85G.

  This is an Inner Fiber racket made with Izanas.

  It has decent bounce, even for an Inner Fiber racket, and the ball flies out better than I expected.

  The feel of the ball resonates well in the hand, almost the same as a five-ply paulownia wood racket.

  Compared to the ZX Gear F, which is in the same category, this racket feels more focused on contact than spin.

  Thanks to its 6.0mm thickness, it doesn't flex too much, providing a high level of stability when contacting and blocking the ball.

  That said, it's not difficult to apply spin, and the exquisite balance is addictive.

  The grip is slightly thicker than Inner Force rackets, but there were some small differences that made it difficult to fit.

  The diagonally cut part at the base of the grip where the thumb rests is shorter than on Butterfly rackets, which tends to result in a slightly deeper grip.

  This can cause the surface to crumble, so I had to sand the grip for the first time. Please keep this in mind.

  If the grip fits your hand, this racket is a better choice than buying an inner carbon one.
  Please come and try it out in store.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL85Gを使用しました。

  イザナスを使用したインナーファイバーラケットです。
  弾みはインナー系の中でもそこそこあり、思ったより球離れと飛距離がいい印象です。
  打球感は手によく響き、桐の5枚合板とほぼ変わらない感覚です。

  同系統のZXギアファイバーに比べ、回転よりミート重視のラケットに感じます。
  板厚が6.0ミリあるおかげでしなり過ぎず、ミートとブロックの安定感が高いです。

  グリップはインナーフォース系より少し太め、同系統のグリップはなさそうな感じです。
  グリップ付け根の斜めにカットされた部分がバタフライやニッタクのラケットに比べて短く、少し違和感があるかもしれません。
  気になる方は大胆にやすり掛けしてグリップを均してしまうのも手ですね。

  手に合えば下手なインナーカーボンを買うよりもいい選択にになるラケットです。
  是非一度店頭で握ってみて下さい。

  2025/11/01

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

• 

  TENERGY 05

  

  I reused the 2.1mm rubber on my forehand. It weighed about 45g after cutting.

  I previously used this rubber with a softer inner rubber, but the ball didn't travel as far as I expected, so I gave up on it.

  This time, I used it again with the outer rubber, and it felt incomparably better than before.

  To hit good shots with the 05, you need to make the ball dig in more than with the 64 or 80.

  Because the sheet is harder, the ball spins high when it reaches the sponge, with a high trajectory, penetrating deep into the opponent's court.

  Perhaps the stronger instantaneous impact to match the outer rubber paid off, or perhaps the harder racket improves the digging, but it's suddenly become much easier to use.

  Another advantage is that it produces high-swinging shots with slightly less force than German-style rubbers. It's no wonder it's called an auto-style rubber.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。カット後で約45Gです。

  シートは結構強め、スポンジは柔らかいですが押し返す力が強いです。
  噛ませると勝手に発射される感覚は元祖オート感と言った感じでしょうか。
  球離れは相応に早めで80や64より瞬間的なインパクトが要求されますが、テナジーの中でもしっかりと掛けた時の回転量は随一です。

  軽量且つオート感を持ったラバーが未だなく、オンリーワンの良さも維持し続けているのも凄まじい点です。
  好き嫌いは別として、このラバーが使えるようになれば一人前といっても過言ではないと思います。
  寿命に関しては割り切って使いましょう。

  2025/10/05

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  0

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. Next >