O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ６〜１０ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
-
- Rubber (Front)
-
- Rubber (Back)
-
User review
-
-
-
2025/05/10
I tried it with the F surface thickness.
My first impression was that it didn't feel as hard as I felt it when I touched it, even though it's a 50° rubber.
The rotation, speed, and height of the arc are all the best I've ever used.
It is particularly characterized by the height of the arc and the amount of rotation, and if you don't trust the rubber and swing forward rather than lifting it yourself, you will go over the speed drive.
The loop also has a steep trajectory, and the sinking and acceleration after the bounce are tremendous, so I got the impression that there were many block mistakes on the receiver's side.
The downside is that it is heavy. Even with a thickness of 157X150, it weighs nearly 50G.
Finally, it is one step ahead in terms of price compared to other companies' flagship models, so please give it a try.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC
-
-
-
-
2025/04/30
I used 2.0mm on both sides.
The grip of the sheet is quite strong and somewhat insensitive, so underspin hits and table-top receives are much more stable.
Furthermore, it feels much softer than other rubbers of the same hardness range, so it can be used without any problems even with weaker impacts.
On the other hand, its lifespan is so short that even Rosena can't compare.
After 2 hours of practice, the ball marks did not disappear, and white lines, a characteristic of Yasaka, began to appear.
However, this is the best rubber I have ever used, so I plan to continue using it for a while.Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER
-
-
-
-
2024/10/06
I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber（Front） Rakza 7
Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 64
-
-
-
-
2026/01/25
I used the FL88.1G racket. It's extra-thick on both sides, weighing 183.4g.
I gave up on this racket a year ago, but I repurchased it and am giving it another try.
I've finally experienced the performance that lives up to its reputation as a universally popular inner racket.
The bounce isn't too strong, and even when you hit it, it settles in nicely without flying too far.
The feel of the ball is solid, with a woody feel, and while this may vary from racket to racket, light hits felt softer than the Harimoto ALC.
Strong hits produce the satisfying metallic feel that's characteristic of ALC, making it easy to tell whether the hit was good or bad.
The thickness of the racket makes it difficult to block, and the ease of use on the table, typical of inner rackets, makes it less likely to have technical weaknesses.
Overall, it's a well-balanced racket, scoring about 70 points in all performance aspects.
Personally, I'd recommend using this racket as the third racket after a 5- or 7-rack racket. If you're a beginner, you'll probably find the feel to be quite hard.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 80
-
-
-
-
2026/01/12
I used FL88.8G. It's extra-thick, double-sided, and weighs 184.8G.
This racket features an Inner Force Layer ALC base with a 158x152 face.
The wider face offers several advantages over previous models, including a larger sweet spot, reduced ALC's hard hitting feel, and increased power through centrifugal force.
The grip is also slightly thinner than the previous Inner ALC, making it recommended for players with smaller hands.
The biggest drawback is that the expanded face increases the overall weight, and the weight feels even heavier at the tip of the center of gravity.
This is a problem that can be solved physically, but please be aware that it puts a lot of strain on your wrists when initially switching from a standard size.
In my opinion, the feel of the ball on impact felt harder than with Revoldia CNF. The ALC itself may be a fairly hard material.
It also flexed less than I expected, and I personally appreciate the fact that it doesn't hold the ball too much.
It's easy to vary the strength of your hits, and the club's inherent lack of bounce makes it particularly easy to control on blocks and on the table.I think it's a great choice for younger players who are looking for something more physical.
Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
Recommend rubber（Back） TENERGY 80
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.