O3's profile

O3's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 6〜10 years
  • Use racket, rubber

    1. Innerforce Layer ALC
      Racket

      Innerforce Layer ALC

      The Arylate Carbon fibers are located closer to the core than with non-layer blades, which leads ...
    2. TENERGY 05
      Rubber (Front)

      TENERGY 05

      TENERGY 05 has a unique feeling using a combination of Spring Sponge technology, High Tension rub...
    3. TENERGY 80
      Rubber (Back)

      TENERGY 80

      • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...

User review

  • RAKZA XX

    User review

    I tried it with the F surface thickness.

    My first impression was that it didn't feel as hard as I felt it when I touched it, even though it's a 50° rubber.

    The rotation, speed, and height of the arc are all the best I've ever used.

    It is particularly characterized by the height of the arc and the amount of rotation, and if you don't trust the rubber and swing forward rather than lifting it yourself, you will go over the speed drive.

    The loop also has a steep trajectory, and the sinking and acceleration after the bounce are tremendous, so I got the impression that there were many block mistakes on the receiver's side.

    The downside is that it is heavy. Even with a thickness of 157X150, it weighs nearly 50G.

    Finally, it is one step ahead in terms of price compared to other companies' flagship models, so please give it a try.

    See original review

    2025/05/10
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    7
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Rakza X Soft

    User review

    I used 2.0mm on both sides.

    The grip of the sheet is quite strong and somewhat insensitive, so underspin hits and table-top receives are much more stable.

    Furthermore, it feels much softer than other rubbers of the same hardness range, so it can be used without any problems even with weaker impacts.

    On the other hand, its lifespan is so short that even Rosena can't compare.
    After 2 hours of practice, the ball marks did not disappear, and white lines, a characteristic of Yasaka, began to appear.
    However, this is the best rubber I have ever used, so I plan to continue using it for a while.

    See original review

    2025/04/30
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    5
    Spin
    8
    Control
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Acoustic

    User review

    I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
    I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
    Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
    The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
    If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
    The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
    Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
    It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
    If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
    Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.

    See original review

    2024/10/06
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    5
    Spin
    9
    Control
    10
    Touch
    10
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) Rakza 7

    Recommend rubber(Back) Tenergy 64

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • JEKYLL&HYDE Z52.5

    User review

    I tried out the MAX. It weighs approximately 52g after cutting.

    The sponge doesn't feel as hard as its hardness rating suggests; the topsheet is on the softer side.

    The ease of ball penetration and the insensitivity of the topsheet are consistent with the previous Jekyll & Hyde series, which is very impressive.

    While the V47.5 had issues with distance and speed, this rubber completely overcomes those problems.

    In particular, the speed is at a level I've never seen before, allowing me to blast the ball deep into my opponent's court.

    Furthermore, it retains the spin power to produce high-trajectory, rapidly dropping balls and low-trajectory, short-dropping loops from a low stance.

    The downsides are the extremely fast ball release and its very short lifespan. It feels like the ball penetrates for just a moment before flying off at incredible speed.

    The racket I paired it with this time was the Revoludia CNF 84G, which is supposed to be a racket with excellent ball control, but this rubber surpasses even that in terms of ball launch.

    Regarding its lifespan, the sheet starts to deteriorate after about a month, which is a minor drawback.

    This is a high-end rubber, different from the Dig 05. I highly recommend you try it.

    See original review

    2026/05/09
    Overall
    10/10
    Speed
    10
    Spin
    10
    Control
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Innerforce Layer ALC

    User review

    I used the FL88.1G racket. It's extra-thick on both sides, weighing 183.4g.

    I gave up on this racket a year ago, but I repurchased it and am giving it another try.

    I've finally experienced the performance that lives up to its reputation as a universally popular inner racket.

    The bounce isn't too strong, and even when you hit it, it settles in nicely without flying too far.

    The feel of the ball is solid, with a woody feel, and while this may vary from racket to racket, light hits felt softer than the Harimoto ALC.

    Strong hits produce the satisfying metallic feel that's characteristic of ALC, making it easy to tell whether the hit was good or bad.

    The thickness of the racket makes it difficult to block, and the ease of use on the table, typical of inner rackets, makes it less likely to have technical weaknesses.

    Overall, it's a well-balanced racket, scoring about 70 points in all performance aspects.

    Personally, I'd recommend using this racket as the third racket after a 5- or 7-rack racket. If you're a beginner, you'll probably find the feel to be quite hard.

    See original review

    2026/01/25
    Overall
    9/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    9
    Control
    9
    Touch
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) JEKYLL&HYDE V47.5

    Recommend rubber(Back) TENERGY 80

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. Last »

Top Players

Country

Style