O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ４〜５ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
-
- Rubber (Front)
-
- Rubber (Back)
- It is not yet released as of January 2018, but since it is already used by Mizutani and Hamamoto,...
-
User review
-
-
-
2025/11/18
I used the MAX. It weighed 72g before cutting and approximately 51g after cutting.
A true masterpiece of early-generation German rubbers.
The sheet is soft, but the sponge is stiff for a 47.5° shaft, the exact opposite of today's mainstream rubbers.
The prevalence of heavier rubbers is also a characteristic of the older generation.
It has a speedier, slightly straighter trajectory than the Rakza 7, which is from the same generation.
They are similar in that they offer just the right amount of bounce, decent spin, and are fairly easy to grip and increase backspin.
However, it feels more slippery than the Rakza 7. It's particularly difficult to counter topspin, and there are many situations where you'll feel the sheet's limitations.
If you buy it online, you can get it for under ¥5,000 with significant discounts, so it might be worth giving it a try given its good value for money.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
-
-
-
-
2025/11/13
I tried out the 2.1mm.
Both the seat and sponge are fairly firm, but some people may find it grips better than the Tenergy 19 or 05.
Unlike Tenergy, it doesn't fly as far after you grip it with the seat, so it feels a little closer to the German style.
Its biggest feature is the ball that goes up. I thought the Tenergy 19 also went up, but this one goes even further.
The amount of spin is also excellent, and the receiver can clearly feel the ball's movement after it hits the court.
Since there's little difference between the initial and final speeds, the first time you receive it, you'll likely miss the block repeatedly.
The stiffness is more noticeable when you're backhanded, so the required impact quality is higher.
On the flip side, you can hit more powerful balls, so if you're confident, I recommend giving it a try.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little hard
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2025/09/28
I tried out the FL84G.
It's one of Tamas' top-of-the-line rackets. I really felt that its performance was more than adequate for its price.
It combines the ball holding of a wood racket, the ease of adjusting the strength of the inner racket, and the projection of an outer racket.
It bounces well, as you'd expect from an outer racket. The trajectory is also slightly lower.
The feel of the ball is wood-like with a soft touch, but suddenly becomes as hard as you'd expect from a special material with a hard hit.
Although it feels similar to wood, it's naturally harder than a five-ply racket, and perhaps even softer than an inner ALC racket.
When hitting hard, it feels as hard as an inner ZLC racket, but it has a strange hardness that barely feels metallic.
Also, although the racket is 5.7mm thick, the CNF material is quite rigid, so there's almost no sense of it being overpowered by blocks or counters.
Honestly, if you can afford the price, I think it's worth skipping over a wood racket to this one.
At first, you may not be able to put enough spin on the ball and may end up making a lot of over-spins, but this is a racket that you can use for a long time, so I highly recommend it.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5
Recommend rubber（Back） DIGNICS 80
-
-
-
-
2025/09/04
I tried out the 2.1mm forehand.
The sheet is a little firm, but the sponge is surprisingly soft, even for a 47.5° club.
This allows for a high grip and easy bite, making it easier to handle than I expected.
The trajectory is somewhat straight, but it also produces a good arc.
I was able to hit underspin and pull drives with ease, and they didn't even feel like they were dropping.
Drive-type techniques in particular tend to have a high spin rate and produce a wild trajectory. It's difficult to control the ball faster than the speed suggests, making it quite tricky.
The sheet also helps prevent balls from dropping even when hit hard.
However, since it's not a rubber with good launch, the speed is only moderate. On the flip side, it also makes it easier to use on the table.
Personally, it was the first rubber I've had a good experience with in a while. I highly recommend giving it a try.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF
-
-
-
-
2025/08/13
I tried out the FL87G.
It's classified as a flexible inner racket. Personally, I felt it had an exquisite balance of bounce, flex, and feel.
Based on my experience using it, in terms of bounce, it goes as follows: Souten > Acoustic Inner > Inner Force ALC > Inner Force ALCS, and in terms of flex, it goes as follows: ALCS > Souten > Acoustic Inner > ALC.
The feel on impact is high-pitched, typical of carbon, but perhaps because of the large blade, it resonates quite a bit in the hand. I was surprised that it flexed more than the Acoustic Inner.
However, the flex was stronger than I expected, so I ended up hitting a few over-the-top shots on counters, etc.
The larger blade size also creates a nice wide sweet spot.
The grip is almost always an Inner Force type. The thickness is also 5.7mm, so ALCS is quite close.
I was also surprised at how incredibly smooth the finish on the side of the grip was. The extremely meticulous finish is another plus point.
I have never used Harimoto ALC before, so this is just my opinion at this point, but if you are just starting out with inner carbon, I would recommend this for those starting with 7 clubs.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber（Front） RAKZA XX
Recommend rubber（Back） mantra pro H
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.