NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  DIGNICS 05

  

  I tried out the 2.1mm club. It weighs about 48G after cutting.

  Perhaps because I had used the 80 beforehand, it didn't feel as hard as I expected.

  With the 80, the ball would fly too far and be too straight, but with the high arc, it feels just right.

  The height of the arc and the strength of the seat are particularly exceptional, making thin returns and underspin hits extremely easy.

  However, if you miss the ball because your position isn't good enough during the movement, it becomes a very solid ball.

  It seems to be more geared towards advanced players who have a solid foundation and can hit the ball perfectly.

  My goal is to be able to use this club satisfactorily in the future.

  See original review Hide original review

  特厚を使用しました。カット後で約46Gです。

  80だと飛び出し過ぎ＋直線的だった打球が上方向に更に出るようになり、意外と飛距離的には丁度良く収まる印象です。
  弧線の高さとシートの強さが別格で、ドライブ系技術とカウンターの適正がかなり高いです。
  ループ・スピード共に伸びのある打球が出せます。下回転打ちもかなりやり易い部類です。

  反面ミート系は打球方向が上に出る分、そのまま打つと癖がありますね。
  上から下から全部ドライブ出来るような上級者向けと言った感じがかなり伝わってきます・・・。
  台上も割と回転を貰いやすいので技量がもろに出ます。

  使いこなせたら間違いなくトップクラスのラバーですが、結構ピーキーです。

  2026/02/21

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  DNA PLATINUM M

  

  I used the MAX. It was 67.8G before cutting and about 47.8G after cutting.

  At first touch, the sheet seemed soft, but when I actually hit with it, the ball felt surprisingly hard.

  The bounce is quite strong, and the arc is low and linear.

  Rather than hitting with the sheet, you can get a good shot by hitting it more directly and making sure the sponge is firmly planted.

  It's particularly easy to hit with underspin. I'm only a little concerned about the amount of spin on loops with a lower impact point.
  The sheet is a little insensitive, and including the slipperiness, it feels almost like an upgraded version of the G-1.

  Unlike the R48 and V47.5, this is a balanced rubber that can handle any technique with ease.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAXを使用しました。カット前67.8G、カット後約47.8Gです。

  シートが薄いラザンター系の作りですが、それよりも粒自体が太い分ラザンターより回転寄りに感じます。
  シート自体は柔らかめで回転は掛けやすいです。ただ、上限値はそれほど高くなさそうな感じですね。

  弾みが結構強めで弧線も低めの直線系です。
  ドイツ製には珍しくオート感があるので、普段日本製を使用している方にもおすすめし易いと思います。
  ただ、思ったよりも打球が行かないのが少し気になるところです。この辺は硬度を上げたら解決するかもしれません。

  Mは良くも悪くも丁度いいと言った感じなので、やはり本命はHやXHですね。

  2026/02/14

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  DIGNICS 80

  

  I tried out the 2.1mm.

  Both the seat and sponge are fairly firm, but some people may find it grips better than the Tenergy 19 or 05.

  Unlike Tenergy, it doesn't fly as far after you grip it with the seat, so it feels a little closer to the German style.

  Its biggest feature is the ball that goes up. I thought the Tenergy 19 also went up, but this one goes even further.

  The amount of spin is also excellent, and the receiver can clearly feel the ball's movement after it hits the court.

  Since there's little difference between the initial and final speeds, the first time you receive it, you'll likely miss the block repeatedly.

  The stiffness is more noticeable when you're backhanded, so the required impact quality is higher.

  On the flip side, you can hit more powerful balls, so if you're confident, I recommend giving it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを試打しました。

  ディグ系の入門として試打しました。グリップ力はテナジー05以上ですが流石に硬さを感じますね。
  テナジーに比べてドイツらしさを感じる面もあるので個人的には好印象でした。

  打球が上に行きます。事前に使用していたテナジー19も上がる方だと思いましたがそれ以上です。
  飛距離もかなり出ますが回転量も素晴らしく、受け手側だとコートに着いてからの打球のノビを明確に感じられます。
  直線弾道で伸びてくるので、初めて受けると刺し込まれてブロックミスを連発するレベルです。

  バックだとミート時には刺さるような弾道で鋭い打球が出せますが、相応の硬さがあるのでインパクトがないと安定しませんでした。
  その代わり威力のあるボールがだせるので自信のある方は是非使ってみて下さい。

  2025/11/13

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  REVOLDIA CNF

  

  I tried out the FL84G.

  It's one of Tamas' top-of-the-line rackets. I really felt that its performance was more than adequate for its price.

  It combines the ball holding of a wood racket, the ease of adjusting the strength of the inner racket, and the projection of an outer racket.

  It bounces well, as you'd expect from an outer racket. The trajectory is also slightly lower.

  The feel of the ball is wood-like with a soft touch, but suddenly becomes as hard as you'd expect from a special material with a hard hit.

  Although it feels similar to wood, it's naturally harder than a five-ply racket, and perhaps even softer than an inner ALC racket.

  When hitting hard, it feels as hard as an inner ZLC racket, but it has a strange hardness that barely feels metallic.

  Also, although the racket is 5.7mm thick, the CNF material is quite rigid, so there's almost no sense of it being overpowered by blocks or counters.

  Honestly, if you can afford the price, I think it's worth skipping over a wood racket to this one.
  At first, you may not be able to put enough spin on the ball and may end up making a lot of over-spins, but this is a racket that you can use for a long time, so I highly recommend it.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL87Gを使用しました。打感が良く本ラケとして採用です。

  タマスの中でも最高峰のラケットの一つです。その価格に十二分な性能の高さを実感しました。
  木材を感じる柔らかい打球感、インナーのような強弱の付けやすさ、アウターの強烈な飛び出しの全てを内包しております。

  特にアウターらしい弾みと木材らしさを感じる柔らかな打球感の両立がこのラケットならではの特徴ですね。
  台上やブロックの柔らかな収まりの良さは勿論、強打をしてもALCやZLCのような金属感が無いのでカーボンの打感が苦手でも一度試してみて欲しいです。

  グリップ形状は少し角の丸くなったインナーフォース系です。厚みもそこまで無いので手の小さい方でもしっかり握れます。

  しいて難点を挙げるとすれば球離れがそこそこ早い点位ですが、それでも一般的なアウターよりはかなり持ちます。
  インナーだと持ち過ぎるけどアウターはちょっと･･･といった方にはアウターフォースへ行くよりもこっちの方がいいんじゃないでしょうか。

  現状ベストギアの一つですね。末長く付き合っていけそうな良いラケットです。

  2025/09/28

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） DIGNICS 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  

  I tried out the 2.1mm forehand.

  The sheet is a little firm, but the sponge is surprisingly soft, even for a 47.5° club.

  This allows for a high grip and easy bite, making it easier to handle than I expected.

  The trajectory is somewhat straight, but it also produces a good arc.

  I was able to hit underspin and pull drives with ease, and they didn't even feel like they were dropping.

  Drive-type techniques in particular tend to have a high spin rate and produce a wild trajectory. It's difficult to control the ball faster than the speed suggests, making it quite tricky.

  The sheet also helps prevent balls from dropping even when hit hard.

  However, since it's not a rubber with good launch, the speed is only moderate. On the flip side, it also makes it easier to use on the table.

  Personally, it was the first rubber I've had a good experience with in a while. I highly recommend giving it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。平均してカット後50G前後の重めのラバーです。

  硬めのラバーのような台上の収まりと柔らかいラバーの食い込みと安定感が持ち味のラバーです。
  シート自体はかなり硬めですが、スポンジの気泡が大きく柔らかい為、この二面性の両立が成り立っていそうです。
  回転と癖玉にも光るものがあり、ループ系は曲がる、沈むの強烈な弾道で相手のコートに突き刺さります。
  スピード系は重いブレ玉がでるので傍から見ている以上に取り難い打球が打てます。
  下回転打ちは少し癖があります。スピード系で打とうとするとかなり直線弾道になるので苦しい場面もあります。

  とにかく全体的に飛距離の出なさが目立ちますね。
  合わせるラケットはインナーでも弾みが良いもの、もしくはアウターをお勧めします。

  2025/09/04

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. Next >
10. Last »