NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Acoustic

  

  I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
  I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
  Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
  The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
  If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
  The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
  Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
  It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
  If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
  Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL86Gを使用しました。
  社会人になってから卓球再開した時、最初にこれを購入しました。

  弾みは5枚合板の中では割とあります。
  板厚も5.5ミリと薄く回転はかなり掛けやすいですが、思ったより少しだけ飛び出しが良いです。
  重厚感のある手への響きの良さと木材にしては破格のスイートスポットの広さ特徴で、唯一無二の長所です。
  これを体感する為だけに購入を考えてもいいレベルだと感じます。

  難点を挙げるとすれば、威力を補うため+グリップ形状により先端重心です。実数値以上の重さを感じます。
  グリップ形状もかなり独特で、ほぼストレートに近い極細フレアグリップに幅がかなり広いエラが出ております。
  人によっては削り以外にもグリップテープ等での調整は必要と思われます。

  価格を許容できるなら一度は使ってみて欲しいラケットですね。

  2024/10/06

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	9
  Control	10
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） Rakza 7

  Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  GLAYZER09C

  

  I used 2.1mm.

  This is my first time using a slightly sticky rubber, so I'm still experimenting with how to hit it.

  My first impression was that it doesn't fly far, it just goes up. It was a completely different experience compared to the standard Glazer, which is linear.

  The sheet is so soft that it doesn't feel very hard, despite having a sponge hardness of 52°.

  A softer sheet would seem to have issues with hitting on the table, but as expected of a slightly sticky rubber, it handles the table and counters perfectly.

  However, although drives do go up, the ball trajectory is clean, the amount of spin is moderate, and it's not very powerful, so it lacks decisive power.

  In any case, it's an easy rubber to use, so I think it's just right for learning about slightly sticky tension.

  To be honest, I probably should have used a racket with a slightly harder inner or outer string.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。

  初の微粘着系なので打ち方等模索しながらの所感となります。

  第一印象は飛距離出ないけど上がる、ですね。通常グレイザーが直線的だった分対比で全くの別物でした。
  スポンジ硬度52°の割にはあまり硬度を感じない位シートが柔らかいです。
  柔らかいシートだと台上等に難がありそうですが、流石は微粘着と言った感じで台上やカウンターは抜群の収まりです。
  特にツッツキやストップは慣れると通常のテンションに戻りたく無くなる位いいですね。
  ただ、ドライブも上りはするものの綺麗な球筋で回転量もほどほど、威力も出ない為決定打に欠けました。

  とにかく入れやすいラバーなので、微粘着テンションを学ぶには丁度いいと思います。
  張るラケットは正直もう少し硬めのインナーかアウターにした方が良かったかもしれません。

  2026/01/25

  Overall	6/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  DIGNICS 80

  

  I tried out the 2.1mm.

  Both the seat and sponge are fairly firm, but some people may find it grips better than the Tenergy 19 or 05.

  Unlike Tenergy, it doesn't fly as far after you grip it with the seat, so it feels a little closer to the German style.

  Its biggest feature is the ball that goes up. I thought the Tenergy 19 also went up, but this one goes even further.

  The amount of spin is also excellent, and the receiver can clearly feel the ball's movement after it hits the court.

  Since there's little difference between the initial and final speeds, the first time you receive it, you'll likely miss the block repeatedly.

  The stiffness is more noticeable when you're backhanded, so the required impact quality is higher.

  On the flip side, you can hit more powerful balls, so if you're confident, I recommend giving it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを試打しました。

  シート・スポンジともに相応に硬めですが、テナジー19や05よりも掴むと感じる人もいるかもしれません。
  テナジーと違いシートで掴んだ後にそこまで勝手に飛ばないので、ややドイツ系に近い感じです。

  打球が強烈に上に行きます。テナジー19も上がる方だと思いましたがそれ以上です。
  飛距離もかなり出ますが、回転を意識すればしっかりと打球が降ります。
  更に回転量も素晴らしく、受け手側だとコートに着いてからの打球のノビを明確に感じられます。
  初速と終速に差が出にくい為か、初めて受けると刺し込まれてブロックミスを連発するレベルです。

  バックだとミート時には刺さるような弾道で鋭い打球が出せますが、ドライブ系だと回転を掛ける前に出る感覚が強いです。
  要求されるインパクトとボールタッチはフォアよりもレベルが高いですね。
  その代わり威力のあるボールがだせるので自信のある方は是非使ってみて下さい。

  2025/11/13

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  REVOLDIA CNF

  

  I tried out the FL84G.

  It's one of Tamas' top-of-the-line rackets. I really felt that its performance was more than adequate for its price.

  It combines the ball holding of a wood racket, the ease of adjusting the strength of the inner racket, and the projection of an outer racket.

  It bounces well, as you'd expect from an outer racket. The trajectory is also slightly lower.

  The feel of the ball is wood-like with a soft touch, but suddenly becomes as hard as you'd expect from a special material with a hard hit.

  Although it feels similar to wood, it's naturally harder than a five-ply racket, and perhaps even softer than an inner ALC racket.

  When hitting hard, it feels as hard as an inner ZLC racket, but it has a strange hardness that barely feels metallic.

  Also, although the racket is 5.7mm thick, the CNF material is quite rigid, so there's almost no sense of it being overpowered by blocks or counters.

  Honestly, if you can afford the price, I think it's worth skipping over a wood racket to this one.
  At first, you may not be able to put enough spin on the ball and may end up making a lot of over-spins, but this is a racket that you can use for a long time, so I highly recommend it.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL87Gを使用しました。打感が良く本ラケとして採用です。

  タマスの中でも最高峰のラケットの一つです。その価格に十二分な性能の高さを実感しました。
  木材を感じる柔らかい打球感、インナーのような強弱の付けやすさ、アウターの強烈な飛び出しの全てを内包しております。

  特にアウターらしい弾みと木材らしさを感じる柔らかな打球感の両立がこのラケットならではの特徴ですね。
  台上やブロックの柔らかな収まりの良さは勿論、強打をしてもALCやZLCのような金属感が無いのでカーボンの打感が苦手でも一度試してみて欲しいです。

  グリップ形状は少し角の丸くなったインナーフォース系です。厚みもそこまで無いので手の小さい方でもしっかり握れます。

  しいて難点を挙げるとすれば球離れがそこそこ早い点位ですが、それでも一般的なアウターよりはかなり持ちます。
  インナーだと持ち過ぎるけどアウターはちょっと･･･といった方にはアウターフォースへ行くよりもこっちの方がいいんじゃないでしょうか。

  現状ベストギアの一つですね。末長く付き合っていけそうな良いラケットです。

  2025/09/28

  Overall	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  Recommend rubber（Back） DIGNICS 80

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  

  I tried out the 2.1mm forehand.

  The sheet is a little firm, but the sponge is surprisingly soft, even for a 47.5° club.

  This allows for a high grip and easy bite, making it easier to handle than I expected.

  The trajectory is somewhat straight, but it also produces a good arc.

  I was able to hit underspin and pull drives with ease, and they didn't even feel like they were dropping.

  Drive-type techniques in particular tend to have a high spin rate and produce a wild trajectory. It's difficult to control the ball faster than the speed suggests, making it quite tricky.

  The sheet also helps prevent balls from dropping even when hit hard.

  However, since it's not a rubber with good launch, the speed is only moderate. On the flip side, it also makes it easier to use on the table.

  Personally, it was the first rubber I've had a good experience with in a while. I highly recommend giving it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。

  硬めのラバーのような台上の収まりと柔らかいラバーの食い込みと安定感が持ち味のラバーです。
  シート自体はかなり硬めですが、スポンジの気泡が大きく柔らかい為、この二面性の両立が成り立っていそうです。
  回転量と癖玉にも光るものがあり、ループ系は曲がる、沈むの強烈な弾道で相手のコートに突き刺さりますね。
  下回転の持ち上げも食い込み易いので比較的楽です。
  スピード系は重いブレ玉がでるので傍から見ている以上に取り難い打球が打てます。

  フォアは現状、弾み過ぎない上に強く掛けられる自分にとってのベストラバーですが、バックだと飛距離の出なさが目立ちますね。
  中間硬度での個人的トップラバーの一つです。是非一度お試しください。

  2025/09/04

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. Next >