O3's profile
| Gender | Male |
|---|---|
| Age | U30 |
| Experience | ４〜５ years |
-
Use racket, rubber
-
- Racket
-
- Rubber (Front)
- • Tenergy 80 is the ideal balance between spin and speed• Even faster than Tenergy 05 and offerin...
-
- Rubber (Back)
- TENERGY 64 is the fastest attacking rubber of the TENERGY family; the No. 64 being the developmen...
-
User review
-
-
-
2025/02/24
I used the 88g FL. It was a relatively light item, with many weighing over 90g.
Its features are its unique high hitting sound and the feel it gives in your hand.
Although it is a high-pitched sound, it is not a metallic sound like carbon, but a pleasant one like hitting wood.
In terms of performance, it is slightly more bouncy than the 7-ply wood, but I think the balance of flexibility and rotation is good.The FL grip is unique in that it is thinner and gets thicker towards the grip end. Please note that if you grip it deeply, it will feel quite thin and thin.
I have heard that the ST is also quite thicker than the FL, so I recommend that you try gripping it in the store to check the weight.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
Recommend rubber（Front） Rakza 7 Soft
Recommend rubber（Back） Vega Europe
-
-
-
-
2024/10/06
I bought this when I started playing table tennis again after I became a working adult.
I think it's the best of the 5-ply plywood rackets, except for the price.
Thanks to the stringed instrument manufacturing method, the ball goes through to a certain extent even if the core is removed.
The flexibility and ball retention are good, and the soft hitting feeling resonates well in the hand.
If there is one complaint, it is the grip shape.
The jaws are protruding, so if you hold it deeply it will dig into your hand, so it needs to be filed down.
Furthermore, the FL does not have a shape that spreads out at the grip end, and is closer to the thin and narrow ST.
It is easier to change grips, so preferences may vary.
If I have the opportunity, I would like to try the G-REVISION.
Finally, the average weight is a little heavy at 88g, but there are many lightweight ones, so I recommend checking at a specialty store before purchasing.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little soft
-
-
-
-
2025/09/19
I used the FL89G.
The basic blade structure is the same as the Inner Force Layer ZLC.
The differences are the lighter average weight due to the use of slightly lower-density wood, and the thick grip, similar to the Ovtcharov.
The racket itself doesn't have much bounce, but the ZLC allows you to make a difference in ball quality between light and hard hits, which is great.
You can either hit the ball far or not, so you can not only keep it on the table, but also add drop to your drives.
The blade is 5.7mm thick, giving it a slight flex. It's less likely to be overwhelmed by counters or blocks than the Acoustic Inner.
It's prone to dropping or becoming a straight shot if you hit it with your hand or lose your balance, and it's difficult to control when hitting it hard, but
it was such a good racket that I wish I had tried the ZLC sooner.Overall Speed Spin Control Touch Hardness Little hard
Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 80
Recommend rubber（Back） Tenergy 64
-
-
-
-
2025/09/19
I used a 2.1mm rubber. It weighs about 46g after cutting.
Its performance falls exactly between the 05 and 64.
It has an excellent balance of bite, grip, and launch power.
It has the straight trajectory and decently high arc characteristic of Tenergy, plus a sense of speed at impact that the 05 lacks.
Unlike the 64, it can be paired with wood rackets as well as harder carbon rackets, making it a rubber with a fairly wide range of tolerances.
I think it can be used for both forehand and backhand shots, but I liked that it felt better to hold the club than the 64 when used with a backhand shot.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket FRANZISKA Innerforce ZLC
-
-
-
-
2025/09/04
I used a 2.1mm rubber. It weighs 66g before cutting and approximately 44g after cutting, making it quite lightweight.
This rubber is still renowned as one of Tenergy's masterpiece series, and is considered the easiest to use, excluding FX.
The sheet is quite soft even among its hardness range, but it doesn't feel like it's losing any power.
It produces a straight trajectory, but also has good spin.
It doesn't fly too far off the table, and I can even cut it myself with a push shot, so it feels very stable.
The speed of the hit is particularly noteworthy. I can return the ball at high speed with little force. The back hit and back block felt great.
Overall, I felt like the sheet could be a little harder, but considering the weight, I was satisfied with this product.
Overall Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Recomend racket ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION
-
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
Rubber
Producer
Type
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.