NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  DIGNICS 80

  

  I tried out the 2.1mm.

  Both the seat and sponge are fairly firm, but some people may find it grips better than the Tenergy 19 or 05.

  Unlike Tenergy, it doesn't fly as far after you grip it with the seat, so it feels a little closer to the German style.

  Its biggest feature is the ball that goes up. I thought the Tenergy 19 also went up, but this one goes even further.

  The amount of spin is also excellent, and the receiver can clearly feel the ball's movement after it hits the court.

  Since there's little difference between the initial and final speeds, the first time you receive it, you'll likely miss the block repeatedly.

  The stiffness is more noticeable when you're backhanded, so the required impact quality is higher.

  On the flip side, you can hit more powerful balls, so if you're confident, I recommend giving it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを試打しました。

  シート・スポンジともに相応に硬めですが、テナジー19や05よりも掴むと感じる人もいるかもしれません。
  テナジーと違いシートで掴んだ後にそこまで勝手に飛ばないので、ややドイツ系に近い感じです。

  打球が強烈に上に行きます。テナジー19も上がる方だと思いましたがそれ以上です。
  飛距離もかなり出ますが、回転を意識すればしっかりと打球が降ります。
  更に回転量も素晴らしく、受け手側だとコートに着いてからの打球のノビを明確に感じられます。
  初速と終速に差が出にくい為か、初めて受けると刺し込まれてブロックミスを連発するレベルです。

  バックだとミート時には刺さるような弾道で鋭い打球が出せますが、ドライブ系だと回転を掛ける前に出る感覚が強いです。
  要求されるインパクトとボールタッチはフォアよりもレベルが高いですね。
  その代わり威力のあるボールがだせるので自信のある方は是非使ってみて下さい。

  2025/11/13

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  REVOLDIA CNF

  

  I tried out the FL84G.

  It's one of Tamas' top-of-the-line rackets. I really felt that its performance was more than adequate for its price.

  It combines the ball holding of a wood racket, the ease of adjusting the strength of the inner racket, and the projection of an outer racket.

  It bounces well, as you'd expect from an outer racket. The trajectory is also slightly lower.

  The feel of the ball is wood-like with a soft touch, but suddenly becomes as hard as you'd expect from a special material with a hard hit.

  Although it feels similar to wood, it's naturally harder than a five-ply racket, and perhaps even softer than an inner ALC racket.

  When hitting hard, it feels as hard as an inner ZLC racket, but it has a strange hardness that barely feels metallic.

  Also, although the racket is 5.7mm thick, the CNF material is quite rigid, so there's almost no sense of it being overpowered by blocks or counters.

  Honestly, if you can afford the price, I think it's worth skipping over a wood racket to this one.
  At first, you may not be able to put enough spin on the ball and may end up making a lot of over-spins, but this is a racket that you can use for a long time, so I highly recommend it.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL87Gを使用しました。打感が良く本ラケとして採用です。

  タマスの中でも最高峰のラケットの一つです。その価格に十二分な性能の高さを実感しました。
  木材を感じる柔らかい打球感、インナーのような強弱の付けやすさ、アウターの強烈な飛び出しの全てを内包しております。

  特にアウターらしい弾みと木材らしさを感じる柔らかな打球感の両立がこのラケットならではの特徴ですね。
  台上やブロックの柔らかな収まりの良さは勿論、強打をしてもALCやZLCのような金属感が無いのでカーボンの打感が苦手でも一度試してみて欲しいです。

  グリップ形状は少し角の丸くなったインナーフォース系です。厚みもそこまで無いので手の小さい方でもしっかり握れます。

  しいて難点を挙げるとすれば球離れがそこそこ早い点位ですが、それでも一般的なアウターよりはかなり持ちます。
  インナーだと持ち過ぎるけどアウターはちょっと･･･といった方にはアウターフォースへ行くよりもこっちの方がいいんじゃないでしょうか。

  現状ベストギアの一つですね。末長く付き合っていけそうな良いラケットです。

  2025/09/28

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber（Front） TENERGY 05

  Recommend rubber（Back） DIGNICS 05

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  JEKYLL＆HYDE V47.5

  

  I tried out the 2.1mm forehand.

  The sheet is a little firm, but the sponge is surprisingly soft, even for a 47.5° club.

  This allows for a high grip and easy bite, making it easier to handle than I expected.

  The trajectory is somewhat straight, but it also produces a good arc.

  I was able to hit underspin and pull drives with ease, and they didn't even feel like they were dropping.

  Drive-type techniques in particular tend to have a high spin rate and produce a wild trajectory. It's difficult to control the ball faster than the speed suggests, making it quite tricky.

  The sheet also helps prevent balls from dropping even when hit hard.

  However, since it's not a rubber with good launch, the speed is only moderate. On the flip side, it also makes it easier to use on the table.

  Personally, it was the first rubber I've had a good experience with in a while. I highly recommend giving it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。平均してカット後50G前後の重めのラバーです。

  硬めのラバーのような台上の収まりと柔らかいラバーの食い込みと安定感が持ち味のラバーです。
  シート自体はかなり硬めですが、スポンジの気泡が大きく柔らかい為、この二面性の両立が成り立っていそうです。
  回転と癖玉にも光るものがあり、ループ系は曲がる、沈むの強烈な弾道で相手のコートに突き刺さります。
  スピード系は重いブレ玉がでるので傍から見ている以上に取り難い打球が打てます。
  下回転打ちは少し癖があります。スピード系で打とうとするとかなり直線弾道になるので苦しい場面もあります。

  とにかく全体的に飛距離の出なさが目立ちますね。
  合わせるラケットはインナーでも弾みが良いもの、もしくはアウターをお勧めします。

  2025/09/04

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  RAKZA XX

  

  I tried it with the F surface thickness.

  My first impression was that it didn't feel as hard as I felt it when I touched it, even though it's a 50° rubber.

  The rotation, speed, and height of the arc are all the best I've ever used.

  It is particularly characterized by the height of the arc and the amount of rotation, and if you don't trust the rubber and swing forward rather than lifting it yourself, you will go over the speed drive.

  The loop also has a steep trajectory, and the sinking and acceleration after the bounce are tremendous, so I got the impression that there were many block mistakes on the receiver's side.

  The downside is that it is heavy. Even with a thickness of 157X150, it weighs nearly 50G.

  Finally, it is one step ahead in terms of price compared to other companies' flagship models, so please give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAXを使用しました。カット前73.8G、カット後50.5Gです。

  50°にしては少し柔らかめの打球感が特徴のラバーです。気泡が大きめのスポンジのおかげでしょうか。
  ラクザ系の最新版ということで弧線の高さや回転量は勿論、現代向けのシートの強さがいいですね。
  特にボールの上を捉えるようなカウンターやブロックでも負けない点は素晴らしいです。

  各メーカーのハイエンド系と比べると特筆して飛びぬけた性能はないのですが、とにかくコスパが良いです。
  この性能で5000円前～中盤くらいの価格で入手可能なのは他メーカーには無い利点です。

  新しいドイツ系を試してみたいという方にはお勧めのラバーです。

  2025/05/10

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	8
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket Innerforce Layer ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Rakza X Soft

  

  I used 2.0mm on both sides.

  The grip of the sheet is quite strong and somewhat insensitive, so underspin hits and table-top receives are much more stable.

  Furthermore, it feels much softer than other rubbers of the same hardness range, so it can be used without any problems even with weaker impacts.

  On the other hand, its lifespan is so short that even Rosena can't compare.
  After 2 hours of practice, the ball marks did not disappear, and white lines, a characteristic of Yasaka, began to appear.
  However, this is the best rubber I have ever used, so I plan to continue using it for a while.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAX、2.0ミリを使用しました。

  結構硬めのシートですが、スポンジを柔らかくしたことで扱いやすいラバーに変貌してます。
  硬度が下がっている分、Ｘ特有の噛ませた時の高回転・高弧線の打球を出すためのハードルが低いです。
  いい打球が出た時には打球音も変わるので、ドライブ感覚を養うのにもおすすめです。

  難点はＸ以上に飛び出しが悪い為、ミートの多いバックだと少し苦労するかもしれません。
  個人的にドイツユーザーなら2枚目に必ずお勧めする位には信頼しているラバーです。
  是非一度お試しください。

  2025/04/30

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	5
  Spin	8
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket ZX-GEAR FIBER

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. Next >
10. Last »