NO.1 table tennis review site

User review

• 

  Rakza 7

  

  I used the 2.1mm version.

  The sponge is a bit firmer than medium hardness, but the sheet is on the softer side and the ball sinks in easily, so it feels more manageable than its rated hardness would suggest.
  Because the sheet is soft, brushing-type spin techniques are easy to do, but the arc is on the lower side and the depth of the shot tends to be a bit shallow.

  It has a consistent level of ease across every technique, so I think it makes a great benchmark for the 47.5° hardness class.
  If you want a higher arc, Rakza X or Dignics V47.5 are options; if you want speed or a flatter trajectory, V>15 Extra or Rasanter R48 — it's easy to find your next step within the same hardness range.

  It didn't hit me with the same impact as Rakza XX or X Soft, but it's a good rubber for German-tension users looking to move up from the 42.5-45° range.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを使用しました。

  スポンジは中間硬度より少し硬いですが、シートがやや柔らかめで食い込み易く度数以上に扱いやすさを感じます。
  シートが柔らかいので擦る系の回転技術はやりやすいですが、弧線は低めで打球の深さはやや浅めといった感じです。

  どの技術に対しても一定のやり易さがあるので47.5°のベンチマークとしてちょうどいいと思います。
  より高い弧線が欲しいならラクザXやジキハイV47.5、スピードや直線弾道ならV＞15エキストラやラザンターR48等、同硬度帯で次の乗り換え先も見つけやすいです。

  ラクザXX、Xソフト程の衝撃は受けませんでしたが、ドイツユーザーの42.5～45°からの乗り継ぎ先として良いラバーですね。

  2025/06/28

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket Acoustic

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  DNA PLATINUM M

  

  I used the max thickness. Before cutting it was 67.8g, and after cutting to fit, about 47.8g.

  The build has a thin sheet like the Rasanter series, but since the pips themselves are thicker, it feels more spin-oriented than the Rasanter.
  The sheet itself is on the soft side, so it's easy to put spin on. That said, the ceiling doesn't seem all that high.

  The bounce is fairly strong, and the trajectory is a low, flat one.
  It has an "automatic" feel that's unusual for a German-made rubber, so I think it's easy to recommend even to people who normally use Japanese rubbers.
  My one concern is that the ball doesn't travel quite as far as I expected. Bumping up the hardness might solve that.

  The M is fine either way — a "just right" kind of rubber — so I do think the real choice is the H or the XH.

  See original review Hide original review

  MAXを使用しました。カット前67.8G、カット後約47.8Gです。

  シートが薄いラザンター系の作りですが、それよりも粒自体が太い分ラザンターより回転寄りに感じます。
  シート自体は柔らかめで回転は掛けやすいです。ただ、上限値はそれほど高くなさそうな感じですね。

  弾みが結構強めで弧線も低めの直線系です。
  ドライブが低く深く入るので同硬度の他ラバーよりは性能面で少し抜けている感じです。
  更にドイツ製には珍しく日本製のようなオート感があるので、普段テナジー系を使用している方にもおすすめし易いと思います。
  ただ、思ったよりも打球が行かないのが少し気になるところです。この辺は硬度を上げたら解決するかもしれません。

  Mは良くも悪くも丁度いいと言った感じなので、やはり本命はHやXHですね。

  2026/02/14

  Overall	7/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	7
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  DIGNICS 80

  

  I test-hit the 2.1mm.

  I tried it as an entry point into the Dignics lineup. The grip on the ball is better than Tenergy 05, but you can definitely feel the hardness.
  Compared to Tenergy, there's also a certain German character to it, which personally left a good impression on me.

  The ball tends to fly upward. I thought the Tenergy 19 I'd used before also flew high, but this is even more so.
  It gets quite a lot of distance, and the spin is also fantastic - as the receiver, you can clearly feel the ball carry through after it lands on the table.
  It comes in on a flat, driving trajectory, so the first time you face it you'll get jammed and rack up block errors.

  On the backhand, meet shots come out with a piercing, sharp trajectory, but because of its hardness you need real impact or it won't be stable.
  In exchange, you can produce a really powerful ball, so if you're confident in your game, definitely give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  2.1ミリを試打しました。

  ディグ系の入門として試打しました。グリップ力はテナジー05以上ですが流石に硬さを感じますね。
  テナジーに比べてドイツらしさを感じる面もあるので個人的には好印象でした。

  打球が上に行きます。事前に使用していたテナジー19も上がる方だと思いましたがそれ以上です。
  飛距離もかなり出ますが回転量も素晴らしく、受け手側だとコートに着いてからの打球のノビを明確に感じられます。
  直線弾道で伸びてくるので、初めて受けると刺し込まれてブロックミスを連発するレベルです。

  バックだとミート時には刺さるような弾道で鋭い打球が出せますが、相応の硬さがあるのでインパクトがないと安定しませんでした。
  その代わり威力のあるボールがだせるので自信のある方は是非使ってみて下さい。

  2025/11/13

  Overall	8/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Recomend racket REVOLDIA CNF

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  LIBERTA SOLID Pro

  

  I used the FL 85g version. With max thickness rubber on both sides it comes to 176.8g.

  Its selling points are a soft feel and how well the ball comes off the blade — it's a blade that leans a bit toward flat hitting.
  Even among special-material blades, it really resonates in the hand quite a lot. The feel is very close to a 5-ply paulownia wood blade.
  Compared to other makers, the head shape is closer to an egg shape, and it's designed with the balance point near the hand so it's easy to swing through.
  The thickness, at 6.0mm, is also just right for balancing stiffness and flex.

  The grip is a rounded style without sharp edges and is a bit on the thick side. It's not especially wide though.
  It has a different feel from the SK7 or the Innerforce, but aside from where my thumb sits, I could hold it without any discomfort.
  If you grip shallowly, you might need to shave it down a little.

  Personally, it seems to pair better with German-made spin-oriented tension rubbers around 48° than with Japanese rubbers like Rozena.
  This is a good blade you can stick with for a long time, from your first step into special materials up to a fairly high level.
  If you're curious, please give it a try.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL85Gを使用しました。両面特厚で176.8Gです。

  柔らかい打球感と打球の飛び出しの良さが売りで、ややミート寄りのラケットです。
  素材系ラケットの中でもかなり手に響きます。桐の5枚合板にかなり近い打感です。
  面の形状が他社に比べて卵型に近く手元重心で振りぬきやすい設計になってます。
  板厚も6.0mmと剛性としなりのバランスが丁度いい厚みです。

  グリップは角張ってない丸系でやや太めです。幅はそこまで広くありません。
  SK7やインナーフォースとも違った仕上がりですが、親指の部分以外は違和感なく握れましたね。
  浅めに握る人は少し削らないと駄目かもしれません。

  個人的にはロゼナ等の日本系よりもドイツ製48°付近のスピン系テンションの方が相性は良さそうな感じです。
  特殊素材への入門からある程度のレベルまで長く付き合っていけるいいラケットです。
  気になった方は是非お試しください。

  2025/11/01

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	6
  Spin	8
  Control	9
  Touch	10
  Hardness	Soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) ROZENA

  Recommend rubber(Back) ROZENA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  REVOLDIA CNF

  

  I used the FL at 87g. The feel is great, so I've made it my main blade.

  It's one of the top-tier blades even among Tamasu's lineup. I really felt that the performance more than justifies the price.
  It has it all: a soft, wood-like feel, the kind of easy control over power that you get with inner-carbon blades, and the powerful ball release of an outer-carbon blade.

  What really stands out about this blade is the combination of outer-carbon-like bounce with a soft, wood-like feel.
  Of course it has that nice soft, controlled feel for the short game and blocking, and even on hard hits it doesn't have that metallic ALC/ZLC feel, so I'd like even people who don't like carbon to give it a try.

  The grip shape is an Innerforce-style shape with slightly rounded edges. It's not too thick either, so even people with small hands can grip it firmly.
  If I had to point out one downside, it's that the ball release is somewhat quick, but even so it holds the ball much longer than a typical outer-carbon blade.
  If you want something closer to inner-carbon, I'd recommend looking for a lighter individual blade at 85g or under.

  Right now it's one of my best pieces of gear. It's a great blade I feel I can keep using for a long time.

  See original review Hide original review

  FL87Gを使用しました。打感が良く本ラケとして採用です。

  タマスの中でも最高峰のラケットの一つです。その価格に十二分な性能の高さを実感しました。
  木材を感じる柔らかい打球感、インナーのような強弱の付けやすさ、アウターの強烈な飛び出しの全てを内包しております。

  特にアウターらしい弾みと木材らしさを感じる柔らかな打球感の両立がこのラケットならではの特徴ですね。
  台上やブロックの柔らかな収まりの良さは勿論、強打をしてもALCやZLCのような金属感が無いのでカーボンが苦手でも一度試してみて欲しいです。

  グリップ形状は少し角の丸くなったインナーフォース系です。厚みもそこまで無いので手の小さい方でもしっかり握れます。
  しいて難点を挙げるとすれば球離れがそこそこ早い点位ですが、それでも一般的なアウターよりはかなり持ちます。
  インナー寄りにしたい場合は85G以下の軽量個体を探すことをお勧めします。

  現状ベストギアの一つですね。末長く付き合っていけそうな良いラケットです。

  2025/09/28

  Overall	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Touch	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Recommend rubber(Front) DNA PLATINUM XH

  Recommend rubber(Back) DIGNICS 64

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. Next >
10. Last »