O3's profile

O3's profile
Gender Male
Age U30
Experience 4〜5 years

User review

  • SO-TEN

    User review

    I tried out the FL87G.

    It's classified as a flexible inner racket. Personally, I felt it had an exquisite balance of bounce, flex, and feel.

    Based on my experience using it, in terms of bounce, it goes as follows: Souten > Acoustic Inner > Inner Force ALC > Inner Force ALCS, and in terms of flex, it goes as follows: ALCS > Souten > Acoustic Inner > ALC.

    The feel on impact is high-pitched, typical of carbon, but perhaps because of the large blade, it resonates quite a bit in the hand. I was surprised that it flexed more than the Acoustic Inner.

    However, the flex was stronger than I expected, so I ended up hitting a few over-the-top shots on counters, etc.

    The larger blade size also creates a nice wide sweet spot.

    The grip is almost always an Inner Force type. The thickness is also 5.7mm, so ALCS is quite close.

    I was also surprised at how incredibly smooth the finish on the side of the grip was. The extremely meticulous finish is another plus point.
    I have never used Harimoto ALC before, so this is just my opinion at this point, but if you are just starting out with inner carbon, I would recommend this for those starting with 7 clubs.

    See original review

    2025/08/13
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Touch
    7
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) RAKZA XX

    Recommend rubber(Back) V>11 EXTRA

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Septear

    User review

    I used the 82GFL.

    It's made entirely of seven ply cypress plywood. A well-known example was DARKER's 7P-2A series, but this is one of the few remaining.

    Despite the soft feel at impact, the quick launch and lack of flex are similar to those of a harder racket, creating a strange sensation.

    In terms of racket performance, it has decent bounce but doesn't seem to generate much spin.

    The thickness makes it easy to bounce and block.

    It tends to produce lighter balls, and the center of gravity is at the tip to compensate for its power.

    The grip is a thin, narrow FL, but you can feel the thickness.
    The top ply has some strength issues, so please be careful when replacing the rubber.

    This racket isn't recommended for everyone, but it's likely to be phased out in the future due to the difficulty of obtaining Kiso cypress.

    If you're interested, give it a try.

    See original review

    2025/08/03
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    5
    Spin
    7
    Control
    9
    Touch
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) Mark V

    Recommend rubber(Back) Mark V

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • ACOUSTIC CARBON INNER G-REVISION

    User review

    I used FL87G.

    This is an inner racket that has increased bounce while keeping the flex and ball holding as close as possible to the Acoustic.
    It's just right for stepping up from the Acoustic, but it feels like the good feel of the shot and the wide sweet spot are slightly compromised.
    This may be an individual difference in the racket due to the light weight of the individual racket.

    The grip is almost the same as the Inner Force, but it is slightly thicker near the base.
    The width of the jaw has also been improved, so you can hold it firmly.

    Personally, I'm satisfied because it's close to the ideal inner racket I was looking for.
    This time, the rubber I applied was quite soft and didn't suit me, so I'll try something around 48° next time.

    See original review

    2025/07/19
    Overall
    8/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    8
    Control
    9
    Touch
    9
    Hardness Little soft

    Recommend rubber(Front) RASANTER R48

    Recommend rubber(Back) V>11 EXTRA

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • SK7 Classic

    User review

    I used the FL90G.

    I bought this as my second racket when I first started playing table tennis again, but at the time it was too bouncy and heavy and I couldn't handle it at all so I put it away.
    I was surprised at how difficult it was to use the Inner Force Layer ALC that I tried recently, so I pulled it out to compare it.

    It has the three qualities of being hard, flying, and heavy, but you can also feel the ball holding (flexibility) of the wood.
    As expected, the ALC wins in terms of the power of the ball from the middle, but this one was easier to use.
    In terms of ball holding of the rackets I have used, I would say Inner Force ALCS >> Clipper >> SK7 >>> Inner Force ALC.

    The grip is round and not angular compared to the Inner Force series, so it feels a little thin.
    If you don't like hard carbon and want distance, please give it a try.

    See original review

    2025/06/28
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    8
    Spin
    7
    Control
    7
    Touch
    6
    Hardness Little hard

    Recommend rubber(Front) GLAYZER

    Recommend rubber(Back) GLAYZER

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  • Rakza 7

    User review

    I used a 2.1mm forehand and backhand.

    This rubber has a slightly softer sheet and is perfectly balanced.

    The ball does not extend as far as the Rakza X, but it is easier to use.

    For better or worse, it is an average 47.5° German rubber, so it may be just right as a benchmark for stepping up.

    See original review

    2025/06/28
    Overall
    7/10
    Speed
    6
    Spin
    8
    Control
    8
    Hardness Little soft

    Recomend racket Acoustic

    Was this review helpful to you? Like!
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4

Top Players

Country

Style

Welcome to the table tennis Navi!

Sign up!