Tenergy 64 FX
| Everyone's rating |
[Hardness] Pretty soft [Performance] Speed and Control to have excellent |
Averages reviews points
- Speed:8.83
- Spin:7.98
- Control:8.35
-
Similar to Tenergy 64, but a softer sponge layer, Tenergy 64-FX is the ultimate attacking rubber for players who prefer a softer feel at impact.
Powered by Spring Sponge Technology and with more distance between the pimples, Tenergy 64 is the fastest of the Tenergy rubbers and offers more flexibility and a softer touch, enabling powerful and precise attacking strokes from mid distance.
Spring Sponge Technology is produced by the unique format of air bubbles within the sponge and the thin pimples of the highly flexible surface, enable dynamic topspin play with heavy rotation.
Within the Tenergy Family of rubbers, all styles of play can benefit from this new technology
Which Tenergy is right for you?!
- Pimples in
Players use Tenergy 64 FX
Reviews by user
-
-
-
2017/04/08
In combination with La Zandt power grip you use them in back
It does not change the normal 64 and up there
Drive will sink
It is recommended in the backAll Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use MA LIN HARD CARBON
-
-
-
I love Table Tennis (Experience:4〜5 years) Stability of attack
-
2017/01/22
Yourself Have you used to back. Tenaji 64 than was stable. Is 2 ball first attack of the back was easy to do. However, it is the fast deterioration.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
Racket recommended use Timo Boll ZLC
-
-
-
Blessing (Experience:6〜10 years)
-
2016/12/17
Not much different from the 64 normal is issue a speed so say the FX series of Tenaji 64 but I feel that made it easier to enter the fore drive. Before that it had been put to the fore the 80FX, it is very easy to use because the rubber is soft. Since there are quite a distance to soft comparatively, you can attack even from the back of the stand.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Racket recommended use Freitas ALC
-
-
-
Tiga (Experience:6〜10 years) Control-oriented speed type
-
2016/08/31
Sponge is quite soft to the speed is high comparatively. So is the speed drive is fairly easy to hit. Myself I thought that one person of the back has been peeled.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Racket recommended use Timo Boll ALC
-
-
-
Kaolin Tenaji Saiyawara
-
2016/06/04
Since most soft in Tena Gee series is of no doubt, but a rubber for the top players of Tenaji itself in the first place stiffer in general of players is about just right in the FX. This looks a bit dropped the rotation a little to increase the speed of unbranded 64. I say that now can also be used in the first Intermediate! Since the beginner does not personally can recommend to use Tenaji is recommended to the back surface of the above Intermediate! I think that soft is to truly fore surface.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
-
-
-
Yutchi @ cut The most flexible in the Tena Gee series
-
2016/05/12
Tena is the most soft in Gee series. Indeed in this hardness was think impossible for fore surface, but there is still Tenaji. It takes a whole bunch rotation You out also speed, any because technology do you will smile just still soft enough to influence Moroni rotation in the block, is the most difficult feeling in Tena Gee series is on the table. It is very recommended to the back surface of the Intermediate!
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Soft
Racket recommended use Joo Saehyuk
-
-
-
nijco (Experience:2〜3 years)
-
2016/02/27
Because in Tena Gee series is the FX easy to handle 64, and I got the impression, such as easy-to-use anyway. Speed is more important than the rotation, but still in the amount of rotation of the more than enough, will sink mess by typing the drive. Since the soft sponge control performance is also high, I think in literate, even for beginners.
All Speed Spin Control Hardness Little soft
-
Related rubber
Rubber
Producer
Type
Racket
Producer
Grip
Review Ranking
-
Get the Amazon gift card at a Review!
20 points are added in the post. You can replace it by Amazon Gift Card worth $5.00 with 1000 points.
