NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  hi-lite (Experience: １１〜２０ years) Strong rubber smell

  

  It has a rubber smell that's a step above your typical rubber.
  Some people might not be able to stand it.
  I used the 1.9mm on the forehand of a chop blade.
  Chops come out with plenty of spin and stay low. Pushes and serves have good spin too, so there's no shortage in defensive technique.
  On top of that, when attacking, it grips the ball well and lets you hit an arcing topspin drive from close to the table, mid-distance, or way back.
  It's not cheap, but the performance justifies the price, so if you're a chopper who wants solid consistency along with some attacking ability, this is a rubber worth considering.

  See original review Hide original review

  従来のラバーとは一線を画すゴムの香りがします。
  苦手なひとは苦手かもしれません。
  カットラケットのFで1.9mmを使用。
  カットはしっかり切れて、低く入っていきます。ツッツキやサーブも切れ、守備技術に不足はなさそうです。
  また、攻撃時にはしっかり食い込んで弧線のあるドライブを前中後陣どこからでも打てます。
  値段は安くはないものの、それなりの性能ですので、カットマンの方でそれなりに安定し、攻撃もしたいと考えておられるならば、選択肢に入ってもいいラバーです。

  2018/10/11

  All	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use KOJI MATSUSHITA

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  tako 3

  

  I bought the FT ver. D, and since I was going for a full Mizuno setup, I paired it with the Q3 — I wanted to compare them, so I kept both at 1.9mm thickness.
  My blade is 88g, so the total racket weight came to 185g. If I'd gone with max thickness, it would've been too heavy for me to swing.
  Compared to the Q3, it grips the ball well and topspin shots are easy to put on.
  It's not that it's hard to use because it's overly affected by incoming spin, but I was thrown off by how low the trajectory is on pushes.
  Both the Q3 and Q4 are on the harder side, but they don't bounce as much as you'd expect, so blocking and stopping felt easy.
  Even so, it still has enough power that you won't lose an exchange at mid-distance, so I think it's a rubber that can really contribute.
  Right now I'm using Q4 on my forehand and Q3 on my backhand, but since the Q3 needs you to generate the spin yourself, I think using Q4 on both sides would work fine too.
  This might be the perfect rubber for anyone who gave up on the 05 for money reasons and got tired of the G1.

  See original review Hide original review

  FTver.Dを購入し、どうせならミズノ仕様にということでQ3と組合せ、比較したかったので厚さも1.9で統一しました。
  ラケット８８ｇで総重量が185ｇとなったので、トク厚にしてたら私に振れる重さじゃなかったですね。
  Q３と比較してみますと食い込みが良く上回転は掛け易いです。
  回転の影響を受けすぎるという感じの使い難さではないのですが、ツッツキの軌道が低くて戸惑いました。
  Q3・Q4共に硬めのラバーだとは思いますが、意外と弾まないのでブロックやストップはやり易いと思いました。
  そのくせ中陣で打ち負ける事はない威力は出ますので、戦力になるラバーだと思います。
  今のところフォアQ4、バックQ3で使っていますが、Q3が自分から掛けに行かなきゃならないところがあるので、両方ともQ4でも良いかと思われます。
  金銭的に05に挫折し、G1に飽きた方には丁度良いラバーではないでしょうか。

  2018/10/03

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use FORTIUS FT ver.D

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Lee (Experience: ６〜１０ years) Recommended for modern choppers

  

  I used the 1.9mm thickness. Maybe it's the sheet's characteristics, but this rubber is strong against topspin balls in general. The pattern of a sharp chop followed by countering the opponent's lifted loop is quite easy to pull off with it. It also holds up well in topspin rallies from farther back. Overall, its attacking performance is quite high. And despite that high attacking performance, its chopping and pushing are also solid. It cuts well and settles right down onto the table nicely, which is excellent. As for backspin balls, they do come out with a noticeably low trajectory, but as I mentioned, since this rubber makes it easy to counter after making the opponent lift the ball, I actually see that as an advantage. For the forehand, with sharp chops plus attacking that would put dedicated attackers to shame, I think this is a good option for modern choppers to consider.

  See original review Hide original review

  1.9ミリを使用。シートの性質か、とにかく上回転の球に強いですね。切ったカット→相手が持ち上げたループをカウンター攻撃のパターンがかなりやりやすいです。下がっての引き合いも負けません。総じて攻撃面の性能はかなり高いです。さらに攻撃性能の高さの割にカットやツッツキの性能も良好です。キレは良くストンと台の中に落ちてくれる収まりの良さが素晴らしい。ちなみに下回転の球は確かに低く飛び出すような感覚がありますが先述した通り持ち上げさせてからのカウンターがやりやすいラバーなので自分的にはメリットだと感じてます。フォアはブツ切りカット＋攻撃選手顔負けの攻撃が多い現代カットマンには選択肢に入ってくる良いラバーだと思います

  2018/09/28

  All	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Def play Senzo

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Steadily (Experience: ２〜３ years) Outstanding stability across all techniques

  

  I'm an attack-oriented chopper. I have it on my forehand, and it cuts well. Serves have good bite. And specifically for backspin techniques like chopping, the bounce suddenly drops right off. Chops come in at just the right speed with a straight trajectory, driving into the opponent's court really well. And when I switch to attacking, even from mid to far distance from the table, it flies with a satisfying amount of power. The only downside is that it cuts spin on its own so much that it's hard to produce a knuckle ball. Still, if you're a player who's looking to keep developing your skills — especially choppers — definitely give this one a try at least once.

  See original review Hide original review

  攻撃重視カットマンです。フォア側に貼っていますが、切れます。サービスは切れます。そして、カットなど下回転の技術の時だけ、急激に弾まなくなります。カットはちょうど良いスピードで相手のコートに突き刺さるように直線的な弾道で上手く入ってくれます。そして攻撃に転じる時は中後陣からでも気持ち良いぐらいに飛んでくれます。ただ、勝手に切れてしまうので、ナックルは出しにくいです。ただ、技術の進歩が見込める選手なら、是非一回、特にカットマンの人は使ってみてください。

  2018/09/25

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use LIBERTA WILLOW

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  Bob @ S (Experience: １１〜２０ years) High risk, high return

  

  My first impression hitting with Q4 was that the feel on contact is quite hard — maybe close to the feel of a tacky rubber. But unlike a tacky rubber, the ball leaves the sheet fast. Because the ball releases so quickly I assumed it wasn't putting on that much spin, but it actually grabs quite a lot. I'd put it at the top tier among spin tension rubbers. Compared to the previous Q3, it flies to the opponent's court with a slightly higher arc, so despite the hard feel, it's easy to hit with and produces speed too. What I liked best about this rubber was hitting against chops. You can forcefully meet a floating chop and put it away. Since it's on the harder side, I think it pairs well with blades like the Fortius FT or other inner-carbon-type blades.

  See original review Hide original review

  Q4を打っての第一印象は打球感がかなり硬めと思いました、粘着ラバーに近い打球感かも知れません。しかし粘着ラバーと違う点は球離れが速い点です。球離れが良いから回転はそれほどかかっていない思いましたが、相当かかっています。スピンテンション系ではトップクラスだと思います。前作のQ3よりもやや弧線を描いて相手コートに飛ぶので硬めの打球感の割に打ちやすくスピードも出ます。このラバーで最も良かったのはカット打ちです。浮いたカットを強引にミートでもっていけます。何分硬めのラバーですので合わせるラケットとしてはフォルティウスFTやインナー系のラケットが良いと思います。

  2018/09/15

  All	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	7
  Hardness	Hard

  Racket recommended use Forutiusu FT

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Cool Max (Experience: １１〜２０ years) Easy to spin and easy to control

  

  Comparing this to Q3.

  Spin: Q4 > Q3
  Speed: Q4 < Q3
  Bounce: Q4 < Q3
  Control: Q4 > Q3

  I expected it to be close to Tenergy 05 and planned to use it on the forehand, but regardless of good or bad, it's a rubber with a different direction from Tenergy 05.
  Given the stability of its arc and how little it bounces, personally I'd want to use this on the backhand.
  I'd heard that backspin balls come out lower than expected, but I didn't really feel that. Backspin-related shots like pushes and chops both come out low and straight, giving a stable feel. There's also plenty of spin on drives, so it made sense to me why a chopper would want this on their forehand.
  I'd recommend it for the backhand of an intermediate inverted-rubber-on-both-sides looper, or the forehand of a chopper.

  See original review Hide original review

  Q3と比較します。

  回転量：Q4 ＞ Q3
  スピード：Q4 ＜ Q3
  弾み：Q4 ＜ Q3
  コントロール：Q4 ＞ Q3

  テナジー05に近いと想定し、フォア面での使用を想定していましたが、それがいい悪いではなくテナジー05とは違う方向性のラバーです。
  弧線の安定感と弾まなさ加減から、個人的にはバックで使いたいラバーです。
  下回転が思ったより下方向に飛ぶとの情報もありましたが、そんなに感じませんでした。下回転系の技術はツッツキ、カットとも低く直線的に飛んでくれて安定します。ドライブの回転量もかなりあるため、カットマンならフォアに使いたくなるのも納得しました。
  中級者の裏裏ドライブマンのバックに、カットマンのフォアにオススメします。

  2018/09/12

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Freitas ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  Petergius Insane

  

  The spin is amazing
  The speed is amazing too

  Looking forward to the Q7 releasing this December as well.

  See original review Hide original review

  回転もすごい
  スピードもすごい

  今年の12月発売のQ7も楽しみです

  2018/08/30

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 4
4. 5
5. 6
6. 7
7. 8
8. 9
9. 10
10. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  Q5
• 
  Q3
• 
  GF PRO
• 
  Q power