NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  so sa （Experience：４〜５ years） Back rubber that has a strong habit

  

  The rotation takes a lot!
  Also affected by flooding
  Therefore, in the case of a turn-up rally, you will not lose first.
  However, it may be painful if I do not do my best to beat the lower rotation.
  I think that a ball will come in a good feeling if you let it bite and strike.
  I think that a good ball does not go so much if it rubs like adhesion.

  See original review Hide original review

  回転がむちゃくちゃかかります！
  ↔︎影響も受けます
  よって、上回転のラリーだとまず打ち負けません。
  ですが、下回転うちはかなり頑張って打たないと苦しいかもしれません。
  食い込ませて打つといい感じに球が入ると思います。
  粘着のように擦るといい球はあんまり行かないと思います。

  2019/04/06

  All	9/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  5

• 

  W （Experience：２〜３ years） Rotation of surprise. And speed.

  

  What I thought about hitting was a very rotating rubber. The amount of rotation is more than tenacity. The ballistic trajectory is high and the ball with growth is hitting. However, I thought it was inferior to tenacity that I must always make a strong impact because it is a little hard.
  q5 seems to be more efficient than this, so it's a shame.

  See original review Hide original review

  打ってみて思ったことはとても回転のかかるラバーだと思いました。回転量はテナジーよりあります。弾道が高く伸びのあるボールが打てます。ですが、少し硬いのでいつも強くインパクトしないといけないのはテナジーに劣るかなと思いました。
  q5はこれを上回る性能らしいのでやばいですね。

  2019/04/04

  All	10/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	10
  Control	10
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use HUGO CALDERANO FOCO OFF+

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  3

• 

  Tikeike （Experience：４〜５ years） Turn the ball!

  

  I think the rotation is great. But I feel relatively hard. It depends on how you hit it. Oh, it's easy to put on the rotation, so it's easy to do the Chikita, and if you put it on the fore, it was easy to do all the techniques, such as serve, drive and tsutsuki. However, it is necessary to get used to it, as it is different from other rubbers because it flies in front of it and stops.

  See original review Hide original review

  回転はえぐいと思う。でも割と硬い感じがする。それは打ち方にもよるけど。まぁ回転はかけやすいのでチキータはやりやすいし、フォアに貼るならサーブ、ドライブ、ツッツキなどあらゆる技術がやりやすかった。しかしツッツキとかストップはめっちゃ前に飛んで他のラバーと違うから慣れが必要。

  2019/04/02

  All	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	7
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use APOLONIA ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Chop （Experience：６〜１０ years） Recommended for cutmans who are above intermediate level

  

  We used 05 for a long time, but changed because control and control of cut and tsutsuki were good here. The lower rotation system is different from 05, so the pitching muscle does not rise much because it is straight low, so it is possible to cut the bully when cutting, rumbling, lower rotation serve. Is the amount of rotation comparable to 05?
  However, I think that 05 is generally better on the attack. The amount of rotation is not lost but the momentum is different. But in comparison with 05, Q4 itself is excellent. As it is a cut-man, it is fit to the racket which is easy to put on it without much bounce, but the drive of the great rotation is hit. Speed is up to that point, but it is enough as a Katman's attack by inviting block mistakes. It is also good to go down inquiries and counters.
  I want to fly when I want to fly, when I do not want to fly it is recommended to cutman because it is suppressed by all means.

  See original review Hide original review

  05を長く使っていましたがこちらのがカットとツッツキの抑えやコントロールが良かったので乗り換えました。下回転系は05と違い真っ直ぐ低く飛び球筋があまり浮き上がらないのでカット、ツッツキ、下回転サーブ時は強気に切りに行けます。その回転量は05に匹敵するかと。
  ただ攻撃に関しては05のが全体的に上かなと思います。回転量は負けてませんが弾みが違います。しかし05と比べればの話であってQ4自体は優秀です。カットマンなのであまり弾まず回転のかけやすいラケットに合わせてますが凄まじい回転のドライブが打てます。スピードはそこまでですがブロックミスを誘えたりでカットマンの攻撃としては充分です。また下がっての引き合いやカウンターもやりやすいのも良いです。
  飛ばしたい時は飛ばせる、飛んでいってほしくない時は抑えられるので是非カットマンにオススメですね。

  2019/03/22

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Def play Senzo

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  Piro （Experience：６〜１０ years） Good for cutman

  

  It was recommended by the staff in the shop and used it for a trial. It was blue fire JP 02 before, but there is a sense that Q4 is more stable with Tsutsuzuki, cut and smash.
  Because the thickness of the sponge is 1.7 mm to reduce the impact because it is a cut man, the drive can be well consulted and there is no dissatisfaction point in particular.
  Also, I practiced for 2 hours each week 4 and it has been about a month and a half now, but the color of the surface is not felt to deteriorate even if it is faint.
  Because the weight of the rubber is light and high quality, it is made in Japan and there is no weight loss even when buying it by mail order, so I switched from Blue Fire with confidence.
  If you want to increase the attack rate, you want to increase the thickness of the sponge to the extent that you can not overwhelm the treatment on the bench.

  See original review Hide original review

  お店のスタッフさんに勧められ、試しに使いました。以前はブルーファイアJP02でしたが、Q4の方がツッツキやカット、スマッシュも安定して入る感覚があります。
  カットマンなので弾みを抑えるべくスポンジの厚みは1.7mmですが、しっかりドライブも引き合いができますし、特に不満点はありません。
  また週4で2時間ずつ練習し、今は1ヶ月半くらい経過しましたが、表面の色は褪せても品質の劣化が感じられません。
  ラバーの重量も軽く、高品質な日本製なので通販で買っても重量のバラつきもなく、安心してブルーファイアから乗り換えました。
  攻撃の比率を上げたくなったら台上処理に無理がない程度にスポンジの厚みを厚くしたいです。

  2019/03/16

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Hadraw Shield

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  8

• 

  Wai Hai （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Even though it has a ridiculous amount of rotation, it is easy to apply

  

  First, as the maker's phrase, it is a rubber with a large amount of rotation.
  I will not take a shrink at all on certain 05 or certain NEO 3 (advanced grade).

  If that alone, other rubbers can be substituted,
  Moreover, it has the advantage of being easy to rotate.

  Even if you lose somewhat, even if you can not secure swing speed,
  I think that it is excellent in performance that does not easily give the initiative to the opponent.
  Naturally, stability is also high from the ease of rotation.
  Also, meat is easy to beat for this type. (Q3 Gave up?

  It is an extremely high level of rubber as a rubber with emphasis on rotation amount
  (There is a certain amount in 05 in the flight distance and strength of the bound)
  Considering from the performance, I think that it is considerably cheap.

  See original review Hide original review

  まず、メーカーの謳い文句通り、回転量が極めて多いラバーです。
  某05や某NEO３（上級グレード）にまったく引けを取りません。

  それだけなら、他のラバーでも代用できるところですが、
  更に回転のかけやすさを備えているのが強みです。

  多少打ち損じたり、スイングスピードを確保できなくてもしっかりかかるため、
  相手に容易に主導権を渡さない性能に優れていると思います。
  当然、回転のかけやすさから、安定性も高いです。
  あと、このタイプの割に、ミートも打ちやすいです。（Q3譲り？）

  回転量重視のラバーとして極めてレベルの高いラバーですね
  （飛距離やバウンドの強さでは某05に分があります）
  性能から考えたら、むしろ相当安いと思います。

  2019/02/19

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use HOUO 5ply plywood (SQUARE TYPE)

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  10

• 

  BOO （Experience：１１〜２０ years） The arc line is high!

  

  Changed from Q3, seeking stability of backhand.

  【Long technology】
  There are many people who are oriented in the foreground, but as for my approach, the ball has gone too high in the fore and the back was just right. (Because there were always many net mistakes)

  【Bench Top】
  I can not go crazy.
  Although the other person is also written how to fly the tsutsuki, it fly linearly.

  Tikita is very easy to do.

  【speed】
  I think that it is later than Q3.

  【rotation】
  It takes more than Q3.

  【Shot feeling】
  Even though it should be hard there, I feel soft why.

  Is the characteristic of this rubber hooked up good and the height of archwire?

  I put Q3 on both sides, but I changed the back only to this rubber seeking stability of the Chiquita and stability of the backdrive.

  See original review Hide original review

  バックハンドの安定性を求めて、Q3から変更。

  【ロング系技術】
  フォア向きという人が多いですが、私の打ち方だとフォアはボールが上がりすぎてしまい、バックは逆にちょうどよかったです。(いつもネットミスが多かったので)

  【台上】
  暴れないです。
  ツッツキの飛び方は他の方も書かれてますが直線的に飛びます。

  チキータが非常にやりやすいです。

  【スピード】
  Q3よりは遅いかなと思います。

  【回転】
  Q3より掛かります。

  【打球感】
  そこそこハードのはずなのに、何故だか柔らかく感じます。

  このラバーの特徴は引っ掛かりの良さと弧線の高さですかね。

  私は両面にQ3貼ってましたが、チキータの安定感とバックドライブの安定感を求めてバックのみこのラバーに変更しました。

  2019/02/16

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

1. < Previous
2. 1
3. 2
4. 3
5. 4
6. 5
7. 6
8. 7
9. 8
10. 9
11. Next >
12. Last »

Related rubber

• 
  Q5
• 
  Q3
• 
  GF PRO
• 
  Q power