NO.1 table tennis review site

Reviews by user

• 

  Deeply （Experience：４〜５ years） Rotation hangs well

  

  Use 2.1 for the cut for the fore. The advantage of this rubber is that the amount of rotation of the loop is high, the trajectory of cuts and tsutsuki is sharp and stable. It matched to the racket that does not play for cutting, but the ball was deeper than when sticking the other tension back rubber. The color of the sponge is purple and cool, but it has a peculiar smell.

  See original review Hide original review

  カット用のフォアに2.1を使用。このラバーの利点は、ループの回転量が高いこと、カットやツッツキの弾道が鋭く安定しやすいことです。カット用の弾まないラケットに合わせたが、他のテンション裏ラバーを貼った時より玉が深かった。スポンジの色が紫とかっこいいが、少々独特な臭いがする。

  2019/01/14

  All	8/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Super defensive

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

• 

  Ultra crunch （Experience：More than ２０ years） Stable rubber with emphasis on rotation

  

  Until now I have used Vega Asia 1.8 mm as a back. This time 1.4mm of Q4 is used as back.
  I tried it with "trying Q4 for those who gave up on continued use by using Q3 with a test video of a certain net".
  Starting test hit, momentum is normal. There was no impression that it fly so much. Hit feeling is consolidated and seat gulping is also a favorite category.
  Comparing Q4 and Vega, I did not feel the difference in speed to that extent, but the rotational performance obviously was higher for Q4.
  Of course we can serve as well as drive. I'm doing it primarily in the backserv but now I can take service ace by downward rotation.
  The impression that the block often stops is a favorable impression and is easier to use than Q3. The ball that hit the ball entered the far end.
  I changed it to the fore and used it, but compared with the Vega tour of the fore, the speed is Vega, but I felt that the rotation rate and stability are higher for Q4.
  It was an impression that I let it fly when I wanted to fly, and when I wanted to suppress it I was holding rubber.
  I think that it is a rubber that can be used for both the fore and back. Neck is a price, Vega is better than Cospa so I'm worried about whether to use Q4 or Vega.

  See original review Hide original review

  今までヴェガアジア1.8mmをバックに使用してました。今回はQ4の1.7mmをバックに使用。
  某ネットの試打動画で「Q3使って継続使用を諦めた人もQ4を試してみて」とのことで試してみました。
  試打開始、弾みは普通。そんなに飛ぶなぁといった印象は無かったです。打感は固めでシートの食い込みもよく好みの部類。
  Q4とヴェガ両者を比較してスピードの差はそこまで感じませんでしたが回転性能はは明らかにQ4の方が上でした。
  ドライブ、チキータはもちろんサーブも安定して切れます。基本バックサーブ主体でやってますが下回転でサービスエースが取れるようになりました。
  ブロックがよく止まるのが好印象でQ3よりも使いやすい印象。打球した球が台の一番奥に入ってくれました。
  フォアに持ち変えて使用しましたが、フォアのヴェガツアーと比較して直線弾道かつスピードはヴェガの方がありますが回転量と安定度はQ4の方が上だと感じました。
  飛ばしたい時に飛ばせて、抑えたい時は抑えてくれるラバーといった印象でした。
  フォア、バック両面に使えるラバーだと思います。ネックは値段ですね、ヴェガの方がコスパは良いのでQ4かヴェガのどちら使うか悩みどころです。

  2018/12/24

  All	8/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use DYNA SEVEN

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  19

• 

  mizutaku （Experience：１１〜２０ years） Backward facing rubber

  

  8 months I put Q3 on the back side, but changed to Q4.
  According to previous reputation, the rotation is more than Q3, the speed drops. The trajectory becomes high, so the drive is very stable.
  In addition, the loop drive against the downward rotation was a series of over-misses at the beginning, finally fell on the table when lightly struck with a sense of shaking before. Unlike Q3, it is good to take a firm turn even at the time of a light hit.
  Tekki technology such as Chiquita, Stop, Stickiness was similar to Q3. I do not know the difference.

  It is easy to back against the back from the chikita and loop because it is strong against the rally of the upper rotation type.
  The shortcoming so far is that blocks are hard to do. Unlike Q3, there is a sense to dig into, so it gets over-missed because it gets overloaded.
  Other than that, no complaints!

  See original review Hide original review

  8ヶ月バック面にQ3を貼っていたのですが、Q４に変更しました。
  前評判通り、Q３より回転がかかり、スピードは落ちます。弾道が高くなるのでドライブは非常に安定します。
  また、下回転に対するループドライブは初めオーバーミスの連発で、前に振る感覚で軽く打つとようやく台に収まりました。Q３と違って軽打時にもしっかりと回転がかかるので良いです。
  チキータ、ストップ、つっつきなどの台上技術はQ3と同様でした。違いは私には分かりません。

  上回転系のラリーに強いのでチキータやループからのバック対バックがしやすいです。
  今のところ欠点は、ブロックがやりにくいところです。Q3と違って食い込む感覚があるため、弾みすぎてオーバーミスしてしまいます。
  それ以外は文句なし！

  2018/12/08

  All	10/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use FORTIUS FT ver.D

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Selfishness

  

  Well I guess I want a bit more speed Rotation or v15 I thought that rotation was pretty good with extra v15 extra, I thought that rotation was a bit pretty easy to control Because I thought that part of the v15 extra was ok with that part

  See original review Hide original review

  うーんもうちょっとスピードが欲しいですね回転とかゎv15エキストラと一緒ぐらいでv15エキストラの方がちょっと回転が勝っていると思いましたコントロールわしやすいのでその部分でわv15エキストラに勝手いると思いました

  2018/11/26

  All	9/10
  Speed	8
  Spin	10
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little soft

  Racket recommended use Zhang Jike ALC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  1

• 

  Lately （Experience：２〜３ years） Rotation is egg

  

  Used thick. First of all it is very easy to handle. The upper revolution will also take a firm turn and fly. You can also invite your opponent's mistakes on a drive with a downward rotation with a loop drive. Speed ​​drive is also easy to handle, so it's easy. I am the fourth from Q3. Because it is emphasis on rotation. I think that it fits for the player who places importance on rotation.

  See original review Hide original review

  厚で使用。まず初めにとても扱いやすいと思います。上回転打ちもしっかり回転がかかって飛んでいきます。下回転のドライブもループドライブで相手のミスを誘うことができます。スピードドライブも扱いやすいので簡単です。自分はQ3より4派ですね。回転重視なので。回転重視の選手には合うと思います。

  2018/11/25

  All	10/10
  Speed	7
  Spin	9
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  2

• 

  Perhaps cut man （Experience：２〜３ years） What's this

  

  Use the thickness of Q4 for the inner force layer ZLC. First of all surprised is the amount of rotation. All drive technologies from loop to speed drive, curve drive to shoot drive are easy to do. Using a racket makes it difficult for the loop to rotate. Because it returns all in a short block whether the other party seems to be difficult to counter the loop. You can fold. And downward rotation does not dramatically bounce. I was surprised when I tripped it. It jumps tremendously linearly. I can cut it up by that amount. Even if it cuts, it does not go over even if it shakes as expected. However, when attacking with a drive from the middle backwards, the arcuate line is high and you enter it securely. Blocks may be hard to do. Match the various player layers such as drive main type fighting in the former middle team, all round type fighting in the middle backward, cut main type, etc. Because it is hard, it is painful that the back is not a player that can shake as much as possible. It is recommended in the fore. Please try it at once.

  See original review Hide original review

  Q4の厚をインナーフォースレイヤーZLCに使用。まず驚いたのが、回転量ですね。ループからスピードドライブ、カーブドライブからシュートドライブまで全てのドライブ技術がやりやすいです。しなるラケットを使うとループの回転がえぐくなります。相手がループをカウンターしにくいらしいのか、全てショートブロックで返すので。畳み掛けることが出来ます。そして、下回転が劇的に弾みません。ツッツキしてみた時にびっくりしました。物凄い直線的に飛びます。その分めちゃくちゃ切れます。それはカットでも同様、思いっきり振ってもオーバーしません深く入ります。しかし中後陣からドライブで攻める時は、弧線が高いのでしっかり入ります。ブロックはやりにくいかもです。前中陣で戦うドライブ主戦型、中後陣で戦うオールラウンド型、カット主戦型、などなど様々な選手層にマッチします。硬いので、バックは思いっきり振れる選手じゃ無いと辛いですね。フォアにおススメです。一度でいいから試してみてください。

  2018/10/20

  All	10/10
  Speed	9
  Spin	10
  Control	8
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Innerforce Layer ZLC

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  6

• 

  rubber （Experience：４〜５ years） It is good for the back side of the meat!

  

  I bought it for the fore ... It was difficult to lift the lower rotation (because the seat was thin) I felt it was hard to handle because the power was not so much and the arc line was also low because of it. However, when you flip it backwards, the stability and speed of the block are great, and the backdrive that tends to be sweet is low and can be struck deeply. Regarding back, it was pretty good as a high-quality ball appears in both the meat system in the front team and the drive system in the middle team. I did not feel much about falling down rotating system, but Tsutsuki, stop is not as strong as sticky but it stops messing up. There are a lot of people thinking to use on the forest because it is 05 series, but the back is quite good. Gore is better if it is a fore.

  See original review Hide original review

  フォア用に購入しました...が下回転を持ち上げにくく（シートが薄いため）その割に威力がそこまでなく弧線も低いため扱いづらいなと最初に感じました。しかし反転してバックで使うとブロックの安定感、スピードが素晴らしく、また甘くなりがちなバックドライブが低く深く打てるようになりました。バックに関しては前陣でのミート系と中陣でのドライブ系両方で質の高い球が出るためかなり良かったです。下回転系が落ちるとかいうことはあまり感じませんでしたがツッツキ、ストップが粘着ほどではないですがめちゃくちゃ止まります。05系ということでフォアで使用を考える人が多いかもですがバックの方が断然いいですね。フォアならＧ１のほうがいいです。

  2018/10/13

  All	9/10
  Speed	10
  Spin	7
  Control	9
  Hardness	Little hard

  Racket recommended use Swat

  Was this review helpful to you? Like! Thank you for your feedback. Sorry, we failed to record your vote. Please try again.

  4

1. « First
2. < Previous
3. 3
4. 4
5. 5
6. 6
7. 7
8. 8
9. 9
10. 10
11. Next >

Related rubber

• 
  Q5
• 
  Q3
• 
  GF PRO
• 
  Q power